ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00961714OsseoFixUpdated Apr 28, 2022Results posted

OsseoFix™ Spinal Fracture Reduction System in Treating Spinal Compression Fracture

An interventional study of OsseoFix Spinal Fracture Reduction System in Vertebral Compression Fractures, sponsored by Alphatec Spine, Inc.. Terminated at 11 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 105 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-28.

Sponsored by Alphatec Spine, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Withdrew study
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
50 Years to 105 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The OsseoFix Spinal Fracture Reduction System facilitates the treatment of spinal fractures by providing internal fixation and stabilization using a titanium implant in conjunction with OsseoFix+™ polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement.

The purpose of the study is to provide reasonable assurance on safety and effectiveness of the OsseoFix Spinal Fracture Reduction System for market release approval in the US.

This investigational device is intended to restore biomechanical integrity to a vertebral body that has suffered a painful compression fracture in the thoracic or lumbar spine between levels T6 and L5.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, multi-center clinical study designed to evaluate safety and effectiveness of the OsseoFix Spinal Fracture Reduction System used with PMMA bone cement relative to the clinical expectations for treatment of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). The study will be conducted at up to 15 investigational centers in the United States in 115 (up to 125) subjects with one or two vertebral compression fractures between levels T6 and L5 implanted with the investigational device(s).

Baseline screening will be completed to determine eligible subjects. VCFs will be confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or by a CT / bone scan. These diagnostic tests will be utilized to confirm that there are no retropulsed bone fragments. Subjects who meet all inclusion criteria and do not have any exclusion criteria will be scheduled to receive the OsseoFix Spinal Fracture Reduction System.

Subjects that are enrolled will be implanted with the OsseoFix Spinal Fracture Reduction System through a postero-lateral approach to the anterior vertebral body using instruments specifically designed for this procedure.

Radiographs will be taken at each follow-up visit, including baseline and post-operatively. Subject's perception of pain will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Functional outcomes will be measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Short Form- 36 (SF-36) questionnaires as well as their neurologic status. The VAS, ODI, SF-36 and neurologic status will be measured at baseline, 4-week, 3-month, 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits. Overall patient-satisfaction will be evaluated at all post-implant scheduled follow-up visits. Adverse event will be the recorded in all scheduled and non-scheduled visits.

The endpoint analysis will be performed and submitted when all implanted subjects have completed their 12-months follow-up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vertebral Compression Fractures

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • VCF
03

In context

Fractures, Compression

50 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Compression; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 15 is below the median of 73 across 32 interventional studies indexed under Fractures, Compression.

Browse Fractures, Compression studies →

Lead sponsor

Alphatec Spine, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 105 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 5o years of age.
  • Legal US citizen with ability to read and write.
  • Acute painful fracture (≤2 months) between T6 to L5 as evidenced by plain radiography, CT / Bone scan, and/or magnetic resonance imaging.
  • Subject is...

    • Non-Standard Treatment:

      • Inability to tolerate prolonged conservative care due to intractable pain (VAS 70/100) with maximum tolerated medication for at least 2 weeks, but less than 6 weeks; OR
      • Inability to tolerate prolonged immobilization due to other comorbid conditions aggravated by immobility for at least 2 weeks, but less than 6 weeks; OR
      • Intolerance of or adverse reaction to available pain medications for at least 2 weeks, but less than 6 weeks; OR
      • Hospitalization secondary to pain for at least 2 weeks, but less than 6 weeks.
    • Standard Treatment:

      • Has undergone at least 6 weeks of conservative care.
  • Have a self assessment VAS score ≥ 50 mm at the Baseline visit.
  • Have 30% or greater disability score on ODI at the Baseline visit.
  • Anterior wedge deformity with no less than 5% and no more than 75% loss of anterior cortical height as compared to the posterior cortical height of the same vertebral body.
  • Bone mineral density (BMD) T-score of -1.5 or less, as determined by a DEXA scan.
  • Intact posterior cortical vertebral body wall.
  • Type A compression fractures according to AO classification of spinal vertebral fractures.
  • If a transpedicular approach is utilized the pedicle diameter must be equal to or greater than 6.5 mm; however, if an extrapedicular approach is utilized there is not a minimum pedicle width requirement.
  • Subject is willing and able to provide and agrees to release medical information for purposes of this study (HIPAA authorization) and to return for scheduled follow-up evaluations.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant vertebral collapse defined as more than 75% of original vertebral height or less than 5% or a burst or pedicle fracture with posterior cortical wall disruption.
  • Presence of healed fracture at the intended treatment level(s) based on a CT / bone scan or MRI.
  • Compression fractures requiring treatment at 3 or more levels.
  • Spinal/Foraminal canal compromised.
  • Significant deformity/instability indicated by:

    • Segmental kyphosis > 30 degrees, or
    • translation > 4 mm.
  • VAS back pain score of \< 50 mm.
  • ODI score of \< 30%.
  • Have a documented active systemic or local infection, such as AIDS, hepatitis, with a WBC greater than 11.5 and a temperature greater than 101.5°F.
  • Spinal surgery in the thoracic and/or lumbar region within the past year
  • Previous kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty at involved level or level above or below treated level.
  • Spinal arthrodesis within 2 adjacent levels of fracture.
  • Non-ambulatory prior to fracture.
  • Greater than Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at level of fracture.
  • Scoliosis > 10 degrees.
  • > 40.
  • Severe cardiopulmonary deficiencies.
  • Pregnant.
  • Type I or II diabetes without controlled level.
  • Achondrogenesis disorders.
  • Active , hemangiomas at the operative level(s), or multiple myeloma.
  • No generally accepted medical to spinal surgery and/or general anesthesia, such as coagulopathy with a threshold for at 1.5 or less, and count 100,000.
  • A less than the study duration or undergoing palliative care.
  • Trauma injuries aside from vertebral compression fracture(s).
  • Injuries that violate the posterior vertebral cortex and/or posterior column.
  • Active litigation.
  • Currently on workman's compensation.
  • disorders.
  • Non-spine pain that requires daily Opioids.
  • Systemic long-term use - greater than 6 months.
  • Active multiple sclerosis or neurologic deficit caudal to fracture.
  • Currently an alcohol, solvent, or drug abuser.
  • Psychiatric or cognitive impairment that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the subject's ability to comply with the study requirements.
  • History of allergies to any of the device components including but not limited to commercially pure titanium, titanium alloy, polymethylmethacrylate or Zirconium Oxide (ZrO2)
  • Incarcerated.
  • Are currently participating in another study.
  • Having had another device implanted in the thoracic and/or lumbar area that would interfere with the surgical approach, study device, or follow-up evaluations.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
15 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    OsseoFix

    Osseofix is an titanium expandable device similar to a vascular stent that is placed in the fractured vertebral body to provide a structure in which bone cement (polymethylmethacrylate) is inserted. It is intended to be used in the thoracolumbar spine between levels T6 through L5.

    Device: OsseoFix Spinal Fracture Reduction System

Interventions

  • DeviceOsseoFix Spinal Fracture Reduction System

    All enrolled into the study will be receiving the OsseoFix if meet inclusion / exclusion criteria.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Back Pain Improvement at 12 Months

    Back pain improvement is defined as a reduction in VAS score of ≥ 20mm at 12 months from baseline

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Percentage of Participants With Functional Disability Improvement at 12 Months

    Functional disability improvement is defined as a reduction in ODI score by ≥ 15 points at 12 months from baseline.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Absence of Device Related Subsequent Interventions or Re-treatment at the Study Treated Levels

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Pain at 12 Months as Presented by VAS, When Compared to Baseline

    Pain measurements determined by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on a 100mm scale with, 0=no pain at all, to 100=worse possible pain.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Functional Disability Change at 12months From Baseline as Determined by ODI

    Improvement in functional disability as determined by ODI on a scale of 0-50, with 0=no disability at all to 50=complete disability

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Any Cement Extravasation Before Discharge

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Results

Posted Apr 4, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOsseoFix
Started15
Completed13
Not completed2

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Back Pain Improvement at 12 Months

Back pain improvement is defined as a reduction in VAS score of ≥ 20mm at 12 months from baseline

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of available participants
Percentage of Participants With Back Pain Improvement at 12 Months
Percentage of available participantsOsseoFix
Percentage of Participants With Back Pain Improvement at 12 Months85
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Functional Disability Improvement at 12 Months

Functional disability improvement is defined as a reduction in ODI score by ≥ 15 points at 12 months from baseline.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of available participants
Percentage of Participants With Functional Disability Improvement at 12 Months
Percentage of available participantsOsseoFix
Percentage of Participants With Functional Disability Improvement at 12 Months84.6
PrimaryAbsence of Device Related Subsequent Interventions or Re-treatment at the Study Treated Levels
Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Absence of Device Related Subsequent Interventions or Re-treatment at the Study Treated Levels
Percentage of participantsOsseoFix
Absence of Device Related Subsequent Interventions or Re-treatment at the Study Treated Levels84.6
SecondaryChange in Pain at 12 Months as Presented by VAS, When Compared to Baseline

Pain measurements determined by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on a 100mm scale with, 0=no pain at all, to 100=worse possible pain.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Pain at 12 Months as Presented by VAS, When Compared to Baseline
units on a scaleOsseoFix
Change in Pain at 12 Months as Presented by VAS, When Compared to Baseline-50.7 ± 27.2
SecondaryFunctional Disability Change at 12months From Baseline as Determined by ODI

Improvement in functional disability as determined by ODI on a scale of 0-50, with 0=no disability at all to 50=complete disability

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Functional Disability Change at 12months From Baseline as Determined by ODI
units on a scaleOsseoFix
Functional Disability Change at 12months From Baseline as Determined by ODI-39.9 ± 16.8
SecondaryAny Cement Extravasation Before Discharge
Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Any Cement Extravasation Before Discharge
participantsOsseoFix
Any Cement Extravasation Before Discharge1

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
OsseoFix—3/15 (20%)2/15 (13.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventOsseoFix
Obstructive HydrocephalusNervous system disorders1/15
PyelonephritisRenal and urinary disorders1/15
WeaknessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/15
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent other events
EventOsseoFix
PainNervous system disorders2/15
Rib FractureMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/15
Cardiac ArrestCardiac disorders1/15
Compression FractureMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/15
Elbow AbrasionMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/15
FallGeneral disorders1/15
Left Trochanter BursitisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/15
NauseaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/15
SacroiliitisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/15
Thoracis AbscessCardiac disorders1/15

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)OsseoFix
Mean80.5 ± 8.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)OsseoFix
Female11
Male4
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)OsseoFix
United States15
BMI
BMI(lb/in^2)OsseoFix
Mean23.7 ± 4.6
08

Study locations

11 sites
  • Scripps
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
  • Boulder Neurosurgery Associates
    Boulder, Colorado 80304, United States
  • South Denver Neurosurgery
    Littleton, Colorado 80122, United States
  • Lyerly Neurosurgery
    Jacksonville, Florida 32207, United States
  • Southwestern Orthopedic Center
    Savannah, Georgia 31405, United States
  • SIU Phyysicians and Surgeons Division of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation
    Springfield, Illinois 62702, United States
  • Jewish Hospital for Advanced Medicine
    Louisville, Kentucky 40202, United States
  • Clinical Radiology of Oklahoma
    Edmond, Oklahoma 73034, United States
  • NeuroSpine Institute, LLC
    Eugene, Oregon 97401, United States
  • Orthopaedic Associates of the Greater Lehigh Valley Easton Hospital
    Easton, Pennsylvania 18045, United States
  • Neurospine Solutions, PC
    Bristol, Tennessee 37620, United States
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Aug 2009, a primary completion of Dec 2012 and a completion of Jul 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Apr 2022, 9 years 4 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 17, 2009
First posted
Aug 19, 2009
Start
Aug 2009
Primary completionActual
Dec 2012
CompletionActual
Jul 2013
Results first posted
Apr 4, 2022
Last update
Apr 28, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 28, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00961714
Lead sponsor
Alphatec Spine, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 19, 2009
Start date
Aug 2009
Primary completion
Dec 2012
Completion
Jul 2013
Results posted
Apr 4, 2022
Last update
Apr 28, 2022

Study contacts

James Yue, MD
principal investigator · Yale University
Daniel Bennett, MD
principal investigator · Integrative Treatment Centers

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion