CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00955266Updated May 22, 2017Results posted

A Trial of Intravenous Calcium and Myocardial Diastolic Dysfunction During Separation From Cardiopulmonary Bypass

A Phase 4 interventional study of Calcium Chloride and Placebo in Diastolic Dysfunction, sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-22.

Sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was terminated
Inadequate recruitment
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
8
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Successful heart surgery requires the resumption of a strong beating heart prior to separation from the heart and lung machine. There are different ways to do this. At this hospital, the surgical team usually gives calcium to people when they come off of the heart and lung machine because some doctors believe that calcium can "jump start" the heart. Not every hospital does this.

Some people think that calcium may have a side effect of making the heart more stiff. Stiff hearts do not beat as well or receive as much blood to tissues as non-stiff hearts. If calcium makes the heart stiff, then doctors may have to use other medicines to support the heart in the operating room and the intensive care unit. This may ultimately lead to poorer outcomes including a longer stay in the intensive care unit and in the hospital.

This study is being performed to find out if calcium has the side effect of making the heart more stiff. This study compares calcium to placebo. The placebo looks exactly like the calcium, but it contains no calcium. During this study patients may receive placebo instead of calcium. Neither the doctor nor the study team will know which drug the subject will receive.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diastolic Dysfunction

Keywords

  • Separation
  • Cardiopulmonary bypass
  • Calcium chloride
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Brigham and Women's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,236 studies on the registry; 224 are open to participants now.

Of its 116 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 64 (55%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women greater than 18 years of age
  • Undergoing primary elective valve surgery at Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Consented for Transesophogeal Echocardiography (TEE) as part of routine intra-operative care and monitoring

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients not consented for TEE as part of routine intra-operative care
  • Any absolute contraindication to TEE
  • Ionized calcium level \< 0.80 mmol/L near separation from CPB
  • Myocardial infarction (MI) or acute coronary syndromes \< 3 months prior to surgery due to the presence of pre-operative diastolic dysfunction in infarcted or ischemic myocardium
  • Ejection fraction (EF) \< 35%
  • Atrial fibrillation / flutter the absence of an A wave on mitral inflow Doppler
  • Heart rate (HR) > 100 during 2 data point collections due to E / A wave superimposition
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
8 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Calcium Chloride

    Calcium chloride, 10mg/kg

    Drug: Calcium Chloride

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Normal saline

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugCalcium Chloride

    Calcium chloride 10mg/kg in 50cc NS delivered over 5 minutes

  • DrugPlacebo

    Normal saline, 50cc delivered over 5 minutes

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diastolic Dysfunction

    E/ A ratio on TEE. This ratio of peak velocity flow in early diastole (the E wave) to peak velocity flow in late diastole caused by atrial contraction (the A wave) is reflective of degree of diastolic dysfunction.

    Time frame: 64 enrolled patients or 9 months following start of protocol, whichever comes first

Secondary outcomes

  1. Return to Cardiopulmonary Bypass Secondary to Hemodynamic Instability

    Return to Cardiopulmonary bypass Yes/ No

    Time frame: 64 enrolled patients or 9 months following start of protocol, whichever comes first

  2. Need for Inotropic or Vasopressor Support Upon Leaving the OR

    Use of inotropes or vasopressors in the Operating Room.

    Time frame: 64 enrolled patients or 9 months following start of protocol, whichever comes first

  3. Length of Hospital Stay (Days)

    Hospital length of stay in days.

    Time frame: 64 enrolled patients or 9 months following start of protocol, whichever comes first

  4. Length of ICU Stay (Days)

    Intensive Care Unit length of stay in days.

    Time frame: 64 enrolled patients or 9 months following start of protocol, whichever comes first

07

Results

Posted May 22, 2017
Limitations and caveats
Data storage location sustained significant water intrusion and mold contamination in June 2016. Environmental contractor has advised contents of location need to be destroyed. As a result, data is not available for results reporting.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCalcium CholoridePlacebo
Started44
Completed44
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryDiastolic Dysfunction

E/ A ratio on TEE. This ratio of peak velocity flow in early diastole (the E wave) to peak velocity flow in late diastole caused by atrial contraction (the A wave) is reflective of degree of diastolic dysfunction.

Time frame:
64 enrolled patients or 9 months following start of protocol, whichever comes first
Diastolic Dysfunction
MeasureCalcium CholoridePlacebo
Diastolic Dysfunction00
SecondaryReturn to Cardiopulmonary Bypass Secondary to Hemodynamic Instability

Return to Cardiopulmonary bypass Yes/ No

Time frame:
64 enrolled patients or 9 months following start of protocol, whichever comes first
Return to Cardiopulmonary Bypass Secondary to Hemodynamic Instability
MeasureCalcium CholoridePlacebo
Return to Cardiopulmonary Bypass Secondary to Hemodynamic Instability00
SecondaryNeed for Inotropic or Vasopressor Support Upon Leaving the OR

Use of inotropes or vasopressors in the Operating Room.

Time frame:
64 enrolled patients or 9 months following start of protocol, whichever comes first
Need for Inotropic or Vasopressor Support Upon Leaving the OR
MeasureCalcium CholoridePlacebo
Need for Inotropic or Vasopressor Support Upon Leaving the OR00
SecondaryLength of Hospital Stay (Days)

Hospital length of stay in days.

Time frame:
64 enrolled patients or 9 months following start of protocol, whichever comes first
Length of Hospital Stay (Days)
MeasureCalcium CholoridePlacebo
Length of Hospital Stay (Days)00
SecondaryLength of ICU Stay (Days)

Intensive Care Unit length of stay in days.

Time frame:
64 enrolled patients or 9 months following start of protocol, whichever comes first
Length of ICU Stay (Days)
MeasureCalcium CholoridePlacebo
Length of ICU Stay (Days)00

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Calcium Choloride—0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)
Placebo—0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Calcium CholoridePlaceboTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years448
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Calcium CholoridePlaceboTotal
Female112
Male336
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Brigham and Womens Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 22, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00955266
Lead sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Responsible party
Michael Nurok, MD, PhD (Cardiac Anesthesiologist, Brigham and Women's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 10, 2009
Start date
Jul 2009
Primary completion
Feb 2010
Completion
Feb 2010
Results posted
May 22, 2017
Last update
May 22, 2017

Study contacts

Michael Nurok, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Brigham and Women's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion