CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00948025CHANGEUpdated Dec 1, 2020Results posted

A Comparative Post-marketing Study of Commercially Available Peripheral Nerve Gap Repair Options

An interventional study of Hollow tube nerve conduit, synthetic or biosynthetic and Processed Human Nerve Tissue in Traumatic Nerve Injury, sponsored by Axogen Corporation. Terminated at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-12-01.

Sponsored by Axogen Corporation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
transitioning from 361 HCT/P Tissue to a Biologic (BLA)
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
23
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a comparison of sensory recovery outcomes following the use of AVANCE Nerve Graft or hollow tube conduit for peripheral nerve gap repairs in the hand.

Read the detailed description

The CHANGE study is a post-marketing study designed as a prospective, single-blind, randomized, two phase study comparing clinical outcomes of AVANCE Nerve Graft to hollow tube conduits. The first phase (pilot phase) assesses projected differences expected between two treatment groups. The second phase of the study provides comparison data between the two treatment groups.

AVANCE Nerve Graft is current regulated in the United States as a 361 HCT/P Tissue for transplantation; not a Drug, Biologic, or Medical Device. Hollow tube conduits are currently regulated in the United States as medical devices.

02

Conditions studied

  • Traumatic Nerve Injury

Keywords

  • Peripheral Nerve Repair
  • Conduit
  • AVANCE
  • Neuroma Resection
  • Nerve Gap Repair
  • Digital Nerve Repair
  • Nerve Graft
  • Nerve Allograft
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Axogen Corporation is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Require primary or secondary nerve injury repair with Hollow Nerve Conduit or AVANCE™ in at least 1 digital nerve;
  • Undergo End to End nerve to nerve graft coaptation on both the proximal and distal portion of the nerve gap in the AVANCE™ group or nerve entubulation in the Hollow Nerve Conduit group;
  • Be willing to comply with all aspects of the treatment and evaluation schedule over a 12 Month duration; and
  • Sign and date an IRB-approved written informed consent prior to initiation of any study procedures, including screening procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Nerve gaps of \< 5 mm or > 20 mm;
  • Estimated distance of regeneration of >125 mm (distance from injury site to sensory target)
  • Nerve crush or avulsion injuries;
  • Incomplete nerve transections;
  • Injury requiring replantation of target digit;
  • Contralateral digital injuries corresponding to the target digit;
  • Nerve injuries in the affected limb proximal to the crease of the wrist;
  • End to side nerve repair;
  • Injuries with significant vascular damage which may impair adequate perfusion of the target limb;
  • Subjects who are undergoing treatment with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or other know treatment which affects the growth of neural and/or vascular system;
  • Use of bovine collagen based hollow nerve conduit in a subject with known or suspected bovine sensitivity;
  • Subjects age ≤18 years or ≥70 years;
  • History neuropathy, diabetic or any other known neuropathy;
  • Secondary nerve repair >12 weeks post initial injury;
  • Currently enrolled in another investigational study;
  • Expected use of medications during the study that are known to cause peripheral neuropathy;
  • History or Reynaud's or other disorder known to compromise circulation or sensation in the upper extremity; and
  • Any subject who at the discretion of the Investigator is not suitable for inclusion in the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
23 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Avance Nerve Graft

    Commercially available Avance Nerve Graft for repair of nerve gap

    Other: Processed Human Nerve Tissue

  • Active comparator
    Hollow Tube Conduit

    Commercially available hollow tube conduit for repair of nerve gap.

    Device: Hollow tube nerve conduit, synthetic or biosynthetic

Interventions

  • DeviceHollow tube nerve conduit, synthetic or biosynthetic

    Appropriately size matched hollow tube nerve conduit (Neurotube, NeuroLac, NeuraGen, NeuroMatrix, NeuroFlex)

    Also known as: Neurotube, NeuroLac, NeuraGen, NeuroMatrix, NeuroFlex

  • OtherProcessed Human Nerve Tissue

    Implantation of appropriate length of processed human nerve tissue at time of surgery.

    Also known as: Avance Nerve Graft

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recovery of Static 2-point Discrimination in the Affected Digit

    Mean change in static 2-Point Discrimination between baseline and 12 months

    Time frame: 12 Months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Moving 2-point Discrimination

    Percent Change from Baseline of Moving 2-Point Discriminations at Month 12

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Assessment

    Percent Change from Baseline of Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Assessment at Month 12

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. 12-month DASH Core Module Scores

    Summary of Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores (Core Module) at Month 12 The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) core module questionnaire is a 30-item questionnaire includes 21 physical function items, 6 symptom items, and 3 social/role function items. It is a patient reported questionnaire used to assess physical function and severity of symptoms in patients with musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. Each of the items in the DASH use a 5-point Likert scale to assess the corresponding severity or functional parameter. The outcome measure is scored based on the formula (\[sum of n responses)/ - 30 (minimum score\]/1.2 (range of scores ÷100), where n represents the number of completed items. Computed scores range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. 12-month DASH (Work Module) Scores

    Summary of Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores (Work Module) at Month 12 The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Work Module questionnaire is a 4-item questionnaire used to identify the job-specific difficulties that workers might experience but which may not affect their activities of daily living. It is a patient reported questionnaire used to assess the impact that musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb have on a patient's ability to perform work-related tasks. Each of the items in the DASH Work Module use a 5-point Likert scale to assess the corresponding severity or functional parameter. The outcome measure is scored based on the formula (\[sum of n responses)/ - 4 (minimum score\]/0.16 (range of scores ÷100), where n represents the number of completed items. Computed scores range from 0 (no difficulty) to 100 (most severe difficulty).

    Time frame: 12 month

  5. 12- Month DASH (Sports/Performing Arts Module)

    Summary of Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores (Sports/Performing Arts Module) at month 12 The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Sports/Performing Arts Module questionnaire is a 4-item questionnaire used to identify the specific difficulties that professional athletes/performing artists might experience but which may not affect their activities of daily living. It is a patient reported questionnaire used to assess the impact that musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb have on a patient's ability to perform sports or play a musical instrument. Each of the items in the DASH use a 5-point Likert scale to assess the corresponding severity or functional parameter. The outcome measure is scored based on the formula (\[sum of n responses)/ - 4 (minimum score\]/0.16 (range of scores ÷100), where n represents the number of completed items. Computed scores range from 0 (no difficulty) to 100 (most severe difficulty).

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Pain at 12-months

    Summary of Pain Assessment using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Month 12 The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) For Pain is a patient reported outcomes scale whereby the patient indicates his/her current pain level by making a mark on a continuous horizontal 10 centimeter (100 millimeter) line. The distance from the 0 millimeter to the patient's mark corresponds to the amount of pain the subject is currently experiencing. VAS for Pain data are recorded as the number of millimeters from the left of the line to the patients mark across the range of 0-100 millimeters, with 0 millimeter representing no pain and 100 millimeters representing "the worst pain imaginable".

    Time frame: 12-months

  7. Thermal Discretion at 12-months

    Summary of Thermal Discretion at Month 12 as determined by the Investigator. Thermal discretion was assessed by applying a hot and/or cold object to the patient's affected digit. Thermal discretion was reported as either present ("Yes") or not present ("No").

    Time frame: 12-month

  8. Protective Sensation Present at 12-months

    Summary of Protective Sensation by Month 12 Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament (SWMF) assessment of protective sensation. The gauge of the monofilaments range from 2.83 (normal) to 6.65 (deep pressure sensation only). Protective Sensation Present (SWMF score of 3.61 or better), Protective Sensation Diminished (SWMF score of 4.31-3.84), Protective Sensation Absent (SWMF score of 4.56 or greater).

    Time frame: 12 months

  9. Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months

    Summary of Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months Patients were assessed for functional recovery of sensation on a scale from S0 to S4 with S0 representing absence of sensibility, S1 representing recovery of deep cutaneous pain sensibility, S2 representing the return of some degree of superficial cutaneous pain and tactile sensibility, S3 representing return of superficial cutaneous pain and tactile sensibility, S3+ representing return of sensibility as in S3 and some recovery of 2-point discrimination (a 2-PD score between 7-15mm), and S4 representing complete recovery of normal sensation as assessed by 2-point discrimination (score between 2-6mm).

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Results

Posted Dec 1, 2020
Limitations and caveats
1. Early termination due to planned changes in the regulatory status of the study product from an HC/T product to a licensed biologic (planned). 2. High loss-to-follow-up rate.

Participant flow

Recruitment began on 22 June 2009 and ended on 23 May 2012.

Phase 1 (Pilot Phase)
Participant flow — Phase 1 (Pilot Phase)
MilestoneAvance Nerve GraftHollow Tube Conduit
Started149
Completed56
Not completed93
Withdrew: Adverse event11
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up71
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject11
Phase 2 (Comparative Phase)
Participant flow — Phase 2 (Comparative Phase)
MilestoneAvance Nerve GraftHollow Tube Conduit
Started00
Completed00
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryRecovery of Static 2-point Discrimination in the Affected Digit

Mean change in static 2-Point Discrimination between baseline and 12 months

Time frame:
12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · percent change from baseline
Recovery of Static 2-point Discrimination in the Affected Digit
percent change from baselineAvance Nerve GraftHollow Tube Conduit
Recovery of Static 2-point Discrimination in the Affected Digit-65.6 ± 5.94-31.8 ± 10.90
Statistical analysis
  • Avance Nerve Graft vs Hollow Tube Conduit · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.0433 (1. a priori threshold for statistical significance set at p\<0.05. 2. the p-value was not adjusted for multiple comparisons.)
SecondaryMoving 2-point Discrimination

Percent Change from Baseline of Moving 2-Point Discriminations at Month 12

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · percentage
Moving 2-point Discrimination
percentageAvance Nerve GraftHollow Tube Conduit
Modified Intent to Treat population-62.5 ± 4.78-35.4 ± 13.71
Per protocol population-62.5 ± 4.78-35.4 ± 13.71
SecondarySemmes-Weinstein Monofilament Assessment

Percent Change from Baseline of Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Assessment at Month 12

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · percentage
Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Assessment
percentageAvance Nerve GraftHollow Tube Conduit
modified intent to treat-46.1 ± 4.07-21.1 ± 6.66
per protocol-46.1 ± 4.07-21.1 ± 6.66
Secondary12-month DASH Core Module Scores

Summary of Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores (Core Module) at Month 12 The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) core module questionnaire is a 30-item questionnaire includes 21 physical function items, 6 symptom items, and 3 social/role function items. It is a patient reported questionnaire used to assess physical function and severity of symptoms in patients with musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. Each of the items in the DASH use a 5-point Likert scale to assess the corresponding severity or functional parameter. The outcome measure is scored based on the formula (\[sum of n responses)/ - 30 (minimum score\]/1.2 (range of scores ÷100), where n represents the number of completed items. Computed scores range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
12-month DASH Core Module Scores
score on a scaleAvance Nerve GraftHollow Tube Conduit
modified intent to treat4.66 ± 2.907.77 ± 2.58
per protocol4.66 ± 2.907.77 ± 2.58
Secondary12-month DASH (Work Module) Scores

Summary of Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores (Work Module) at Month 12 The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Work Module questionnaire is a 4-item questionnaire used to identify the job-specific difficulties that workers might experience but which may not affect their activities of daily living. It is a patient reported questionnaire used to assess the impact that musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb have on a patient's ability to perform work-related tasks. Each of the items in the DASH Work Module use a 5-point Likert scale to assess the corresponding severity or functional parameter. The outcome measure is scored based on the formula (\[sum of n responses)/ - 4 (minimum score\]/0.16 (range of scores ÷100), where n represents the number of completed items. Computed scores range from 0 (no difficulty) to 100 (most severe difficulty).

Time frame:
12 month
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
12-month DASH (Work Module) Scores
score on a scaleAvance Nerve GraftHollow Tube Conduit
modified intent to treat0.00 ± 0.005.22 ± 4.09
per protocol0.00 ± 0.005.22 ± 4.09
Secondary12- Month DASH (Sports/Performing Arts Module)

Summary of Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores (Sports/Performing Arts Module) at month 12 The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Sports/Performing Arts Module questionnaire is a 4-item questionnaire used to identify the specific difficulties that professional athletes/performing artists might experience but which may not affect their activities of daily living. It is a patient reported questionnaire used to assess the impact that musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb have on a patient's ability to perform sports or play a musical instrument. Each of the items in the DASH use a 5-point Likert scale to assess the corresponding severity or functional parameter. The outcome measure is scored based on the formula (\[sum of n responses)/ - 4 (minimum score\]/0.16 (range of scores ÷100), where n represents the number of completed items. Computed scores range from 0 (no difficulty) to 100 (most severe difficulty).

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
12- Month DASH (Sports/Performing Arts Module)
score on a scaleAvance Nerve GraftHollow Tube Conduit
modified intent-to-treat8.33 ± 8.3318.77 ± 9.56
per protocol8.33 ± 8.3318.77 ± 9.56
SecondaryPain at 12-months

Summary of Pain Assessment using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Month 12 The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) For Pain is a patient reported outcomes scale whereby the patient indicates his/her current pain level by making a mark on a continuous horizontal 10 centimeter (100 millimeter) line. The distance from the 0 millimeter to the patient's mark corresponds to the amount of pain the subject is currently experiencing. VAS for Pain data are recorded as the number of millimeters from the left of the line to the patients mark across the range of 0-100 millimeters, with 0 millimeter representing no pain and 100 millimeters representing "the worst pain imaginable".

Time frame:
12-months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pain at 12-months
units on a scaleAvance Nerve GraftHollow Tube Conduit
modified intent to treat0.54 ± 0.280.92 ± 0.41
per protocol0.54 ± 0.280.92 ± 0.41
SecondaryThermal Discretion at 12-months

Summary of Thermal Discretion at Month 12 as determined by the Investigator. Thermal discretion was assessed by applying a hot and/or cold object to the patient's affected digit. Thermal discretion was reported as either present ("Yes") or not present ("No").

Time frame:
12-month
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Thermal Discretion at 12-months
ParticipantsAvance Nerve GraftHollow Tube Conduit
Modified Intent to Treat — Yes (Thermal Discretion)67
Modified Intent to Treat — No (Thermal Discretion)00
Per Protocol — Yes (Thermal Discretion)67
Per Protocol — No (Thermal Discretion)00
SecondaryProtective Sensation Present at 12-months

Summary of Protective Sensation by Month 12 Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament (SWMF) assessment of protective sensation. The gauge of the monofilaments range from 2.83 (normal) to 6.65 (deep pressure sensation only). Protective Sensation Present (SWMF score of 3.61 or better), Protective Sensation Diminished (SWMF score of 4.31-3.84), Protective Sensation Absent (SWMF score of 4.56 or greater).

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Protective Sensation Present at 12-months
ParticipantsAvance Nerve GraftHollow Tube Conduit
modified intent to treat — Protective Sensation Present54
modified intent to treat — Protective Sensation Diminished13
modified intent to treat — Protective Sensation Absent02
per protocol — Protective Sensation Present54
per protocol — Protective Sensation Diminished13
per protocol — Protective Sensation Absent02
SecondaryFunctional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months

Summary of Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months Patients were assessed for functional recovery of sensation on a scale from S0 to S4 with S0 representing absence of sensibility, S1 representing recovery of deep cutaneous pain sensibility, S2 representing the return of some degree of superficial cutaneous pain and tactile sensibility, S3 representing return of superficial cutaneous pain and tactile sensibility, S3+ representing return of sensibility as in S3 and some recovery of 2-point discrimination (a 2-PD score between 7-15mm), and S4 representing complete recovery of normal sensation as assessed by 2-point discrimination (score between 2-6mm).

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months
ParticipantsAvance Nerve GraftHollow Tube Conduit
modified intent to treat — S102
modified intent to treat — S200
modified intent to treat — S320
modified intent to treat — S3+10
modified intent to treat — S435
per protocol — S102
per protocol — S200
per protocol — S320
per protocol — S3+10
per protocol — S435

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse Events were collected from the time of randomization through 1 year.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Avance Nerve Graft0/14 (0%)1/14 (7.1%)0/14 (0%)
Hollow Tube Conduit0/9 (0%)1/9 (11.1%)1/9 (11.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventAvance Nerve GraftHollow Tube Conduit
OsteomyleitisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/141/9
InfectionInfections and infestations1/140/9
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAvance Nerve GraftHollow Tube Conduit
Occasional PainNervous system disorders0/141/9

Baseline characteristics

All participants who were randomized and received one of the study treatments (Safety Population).

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Avance Nerve GraftHollow Tube ConduitTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years14923
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Avance Nerve GraftHollow Tube ConduitTotal
Mean45 (21 to 63)39 (20 to 53)41 (20 to 63)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Avance Nerve GraftHollow Tube ConduitTotal
Female235
Male12618
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Avance Nerve GraftHollow Tube ConduitTotal
United States14923
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Georgia Hand, Shoulder and Elbow
    Atlanta, Georgia 30309, United States
  • Indiana Hand Center
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46260, United States
  • University of Kentucky
    Lexington, Kentucky 40536, United States
  • Curtis National Hand Center
    Baltimore, Maryland 21218, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD will not be released to other researchers.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 1, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00948025
Lead sponsor
Axogen Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 29, 2009
Start date
Jun 2009
Primary completion
Dec 2014
Completion
Dec 2014
Results posted
Dec 1, 2020
Last update
Dec 1, 2020

Study contacts

Erick W DeVinney
study director · Axogen Corporation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Nov 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion