CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00947219Updated Jan 31, 2013Results posted

Treatment of Androgenic Alopecia in Males

An interventional study of HairMax LaserComb and Control device in Androgenetic Alopecia, Hair Loss and Male Pattern Baldness, sponsored by Lexington International, LLC. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to male participants aged 25 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-01-31.

Sponsored by Lexington International, LLC · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
79
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the change in terminal hair count at 16 and 26 weeks compared to baseline measurements.

Read the detailed description

This is randomized, double-blind, control device clinical study across 3 sites, evaluating changes in terminal hair-count in the evaluation zone having evidence of androgenetic alopecia (miniaturized hair).

The trial will involve approximately 75 male subjects who have been diagnosed with androgenetic alopecia, who are between 25 and 60 years of age, have Fitzpatrick Skin Types I-IV, with classifications of Norwood-Hamilton IIa to V, have active hair loss within the last 12 months.

Subjects will use the device on three non-consecutive days a week as directed per device for 26 weeks treatment duration.

Safety analysis will be assessed based on the reports of adverse events during study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Androgenetic Alopecia
  • Hair Loss
  • Male Pattern Baldness

Keywords

  • Androgenetic Alopecia
  • Hair Loss
  • Male Pattern Baldness
03

In context

Alopecia

609 studies on the registry are indexed under Alopecia; 131 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 79 is above the median of 45 across 513 interventional studies indexed under Alopecia.

Browse Alopecia studies →

Lead sponsor

Lexington International, LLC is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of androgenetic alopecia
  • Fitzpatrick Skin Types I-IV
  • Norwood-Hamilton IIa to V
  • Active hair loss within last 12 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Photosensitivity to laser light
  • Malignancy in the target area
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
79 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    HairMax LaserComb 2009, 12 Beam

    Low Level Laser Medical Device 2009 with 12 laser beams

    Device: HairMax LaserComb

  • Active comparator
    HairMax LaserComb 2009 9 Beam

    Low Level Laser Mecial Device 2009 with 9 laser beams

    Device: HairMax LaserComb

  • Active comparator
    Control device

    The control device appears identical to the active device, but utilizes 9 LED lights instead of laser lights. The randomized devices are blinded to the study investigator and distributed in a blinded manner to the participants.

    Device: Control device

Interventions

  • DeviceHairMax LaserComb

    Device application 3 times week (non-consecutive days), for 26 weeks

  • DeviceControl device

    Device is used 3 times a week on non-consecutive days

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in Terminal Hair Count at 16 and 26 Weeks Compared to Baseline in Men Diagnosed With Androgenetic Alopecia

    The primary analysis of effectiveness was an analysis of covariance, which separately modeled terminal hair count at Week 16 and Week 26 as a function of treatment group (HairMax LaserComb 2009 9 Beam vs.control), study center, age (as a continuous variable), and Fitzpatrick Skin Type classification (as a categorical variable with four levels). The active group was compared to the control device using least squares means with a two-sided test at the 5% level of significance.

    Time frame: baseline, 16 and 26 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jan 31, 2013

Participant flow

Male subjects who have been diagnosed with androgenetic alopicia, who are between 25 and 60 years of age, have Fitzpatrick Skin Types i-IV and Norwood Hamilton Classifications of IIa to IV and have active hair loss with the last 12 months

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneHairMax LaserComb 2009, 12 BeamHairMax LaserComb 2009 9 BeamControl Device
Started282526
Completed222122
Not completed644

Outcome measures

PrimaryChanges in Terminal Hair Count at 16 and 26 Weeks Compared to Baseline in Men Diagnosed With Androgenetic Alopecia

The primary analysis of effectiveness was an analysis of covariance, which separately modeled terminal hair count at Week 16 and Week 26 as a function of treatment group (HairMax LaserComb 2009 9 Beam vs.control), study center, age (as a continuous variable), and Fitzpatrick Skin Type classification (as a categorical variable with four levels). The active group was compared to the control device using least squares means with a two-sided test at the 5% level of significance.

Time frame:
baseline, 16 and 26 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · hairs per cm^2
Changes in Terminal Hair Count at 16 and 26 Weeks Compared to Baseline in Men Diagnosed With Androgenetic Alopecia
hairs per cm^2HairMax LaserComb 2009, 12 BeamHairMax LaserComb 2009 9 BeamControl Device
Change at 16 weeks23.5 ± 17.6720.4 ± 14.524.4 ± 8.38
Change at 26 weeks25.7 ± 16.9220.9 ± 14.089.4 ± 12.94

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 4% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
HairMax LaserComb 2009, 12 Beam—0/28 (0%)0/28 (0%)
HairMax LaserComb 2009 9 Beam—0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)
Control Device—0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)HairMax LaserComb 2009, 12 BeamHairMax LaserComb 2009 9 BeamControl DeviceTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years28252679
>=65 years0000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)HairMax LaserComb 2009, 12 BeamHairMax LaserComb 2009 9 BeamControl DeviceTotal
Female0000
Male28252679
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Abe Marcadis, M.D.
    West Palm Beach, Florida 33409, United States
  • David Goldberg, M.D.
    Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, United States
  • Zoe Draelos, M.D.
    High Point, North Carolina 27262, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Leavitt M, Charles G, Heyman E, Michaels D. HairMax LaserComb laser phototherapy device in the treatment of male androgenetic alopecia: A randomized, double-blind, sham device-controlled, multicentre trial. Clin Drug Investig. 2009;29(5):283-92. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200929050-00001. PubMed 19366270 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 31, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00947219
Lead sponsor
Lexington International, LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 28, 2009
Start date
Jul 2009
Primary completion
Aug 2010
Completion
Aug 2010
Results posted
Jan 31, 2013
Last update
Jan 31, 2013

Study contacts

Zoe Draelos, MD
principal investigator · High Point, NC
David Goldberg, M.D.
principal investigator · Skin & Laser
Abe Marcadis, M.D.
principal investigator · Palm Beach Research

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion