CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00945243Updated Nov 6, 2017Results posted

Clinical Outcomes Study Evaluating the Zero-P PEEK

An interventional study of Zero-P in Cervical Disc Disease, sponsored by Synthes USA HQ, Inc.. Terminated at 14 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-06.

Sponsored by Synthes USA HQ, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
This study was terminated early due to lower than expected enrollment rates.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
11
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multi-center, prospective, outcomes study. In this study, the Zero-P PEEK implant will be used in patients undergoing ACDF for treatment of SCDD at a single level between C3 and C7. The cohort will be followed over time to twenty-four (24) months after surgery. Up to fifteen (15) sites will participate in this study. This is not a controlled study.

Read the detailed description

This was a post-market study

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Disc Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • SCDD
03

In context

Spinal Diseases

267 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Diseases; 54 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 11 is below the median of 52 across 166 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Diseases.

Browse Spinal Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Synthes USA HQ, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) in only one vertebral level between C3-C7 requiring:

    1. Neck or arm (radicular) pain and/or
    2. Functional/neurological deficit confirmed by imaging (CT, MRI, X-Ray) of at least one of the following:

    i. herniated nucleus pulposus

    ii. spondylosis (defined by presence of osteophytes)

    iii. loss of disc height

  2. NDI score greater than or equal to 15/50 (30%) (considered moderate disability);
  3. Skeletally mature adult between the ages of 18-70 years at the time of surgery;
  4. Has completed at least six (6) weeks of conservative therapy;
  5. Psychosocially, mentally and physically able to fully comply with this protocol including adhering to scheduled visits, treatment plan, completing forms, and other study procedures;
  6. Personally signed and dated informed consent document prior to any study-related procedures indicating that the patient has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. More than one vertebral level to be fused;
  2. Posterior instrumentation necessary at same level;
  3. Has had previous surgery at the index level;
  4. Has a fused level adjacent to the index level;
  5. Active systemic or local infection;
  6. Known or documented history of communicable disease, including AIDS or HIV;
  7. Active hepatitis (receiving medical treatment within two years);
  8. Active rheumatoid arthritis, non-controlled diabetes mellitus, or any other medical condition(s) that would represent a significant increase in surgical risk or interfere with normal healing;
  9. Immunologically suppressed, or has received systemic steroids, excluding nasal steroids, at any dose daily for > 1 month within last 12 months;
  10. Known history of Paget's disease, osteomalacia, or any other metabolic bone disease;
  11. Osteopenia or Osteoporosis: A screening questionnaire for osteoporosis, SCORE (Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation), will be used to screen patients who require a DEXA bone mineral density measurement. If DEXA is required, exclusion will be defined as a DEXA bone density measured T score ≤ -1.0.
  12. Previous known allergy to the materials contained in the device, such as polyetheretherketone (PEEK) or titanium alloy (TAN);
  13. Morbid obesity defined as a body mass index > 40 kg/m2 or weight more than 100 pounds over ideal body weight;
  14. Active malignancy. A patient with a history of any invasive malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer), unless treated with curative intent and there has been no clinical signs or symptoms of the malignancy for more than 5 years;
  15. Current or recent history (within last 2 years) of substance abuse (e.g., recreational drugs, narcotics, or alcohol);
  16. Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during study period;
  17. Involved in study of another investigational product that may affect outcome;
  18. History of psychosocial disorders that could prevent accurate completion of self reporting assessment scales;
  19. Patients who are incarcerated.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
11 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Treatment

    Treatment of cervical DDD with the Zero-P device

    Device: Zero-P

Interventions

  • DeviceZero-P

    The Zero-P PEEK is a stand-alone device intended for use in cervical interbody fusion. The device consists of a plate and a spacer with four rigid screws to provide similar stability to a traditional cervical plate and interbody spacer. It is intended for use in skeletally mature patients with symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) with accompanying radicular symptoms, at one level from C3 to C7.

    Also known as: Zero-P PEEK Spacer

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessment of Neck Disability Index Scores

    Percentage of subjects who experienced a maintenance or improvement according to measures of pain and/or function.

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Improvement in the Neck and Arm Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS)

    Percentage of subjects who experienced a maintenance of improvement in VAS neck pain intensity, neck pain frequency, arm pain intensity, and/or arm pain frequency.

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. Implant Related Complications

    Percentage of subjects who had an implant related complication

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Results

Posted Jan 13, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTreatment
Started11
Completed8
Not completed3
Withdrew: Study terminated: subjects dispositioned3

Outcome measures

PrimaryAssessment of Neck Disability Index Scores

Percentage of subjects who experienced a maintenance or improvement according to measures of pain and/or function.

Time frame:
24 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Assessment of Neck Disability Index Scores
percentage of subjectsTreatment
Assessment of Neck Disability Index Scores87.5
SecondaryImprovement in the Neck and Arm Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS)

Percentage of subjects who experienced a maintenance of improvement in VAS neck pain intensity, neck pain frequency, arm pain intensity, and/or arm pain frequency.

Time frame:
24 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Improvement in the Neck and Arm Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS)
percentage of subjectsTreatment
Improvement in the Neck and Arm Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS)75.0
SecondaryImplant Related Complications

Percentage of subjects who had an implant related complication

Time frame:
24 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Implant Related Complications
percentage of subjectsTreatment
Implant Related Complications0

Adverse events

Collected over From enrollment out to 24 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment—0/11 (0%)3/11 (27.3%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTreatment
Pain and/or WeaknessNervous system disorders3/11
SeizureNervous system disorders1/11
Cold SymptomsImmune system disorders1/11
Adjacent Level SurgerySurgical and medical procedures1/11

Baseline characteristics

Number of subjects enrolled and treated per protocol

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Treatment
Mean47.8 ± 11.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Treatment
Female7
Male4
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Treatment
United States11
08

Study locations

14 sites
  • Neurospine, South East Alabama Medical Center
    Dothan, Alabama 36301, United States
  • Barrow Neurosurgical Institute
    Phoenix, Arizona 85013, United States
  • Newport Orthopaedics, Hoag Hospital
    Newport Beach, California 92660, United States
  • Lyerly Neurosurgery Group
    Jacksonville, Florida 32207, United States
  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • Indiana Spine Center
    Lafayette, Indiana 46041, United States
  • The Boston Spine Group
    Newton, Massachusetts 02458, United States
  • Washington University School of Medicine
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • Sierra Neurosurgery Group
    Reno, Nevada 89502, United States
  • Reno Orthopaedic Clinic
    Reno, Nevada 89503, United States
  • VSAS Orthopaedics
    Allentown, Pennsylvania 18103, United States
  • Charleston Neurosurgical Associates
    Charleston, South Carolina 29414, United States
  • Neurosurgery Northwest
    Tacoma, Washington 98405, United States
  • Milwaukee Spinal Specialists
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53211, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 6, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00945243
Lead sponsor
Synthes USA HQ, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 24, 2009
Start date
Jul 1, 2009
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2011
Completion
Dec 1, 2011
Results posted
Jan 13, 2017
Last update
Nov 6, 2017

Study contacts

Mark Lotito
study director · DePuy Synthes Assoc. Director Clinical Research

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion