CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00934947BURN HELPUpdated Nov 17, 2017Results posted

Burn Healing and Analgesia With Propranolol

A Phase 2 interventional study of Propranolol and Placebo in Burns and Pain, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 59 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-17.

Sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 59 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the ability of propranolol to decrease pain and improve recovery in burn patients with a common genotype.

02

Conditions studied

  • Burns
  • Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Burns
  • Pain
03

In context

Burns

719 studies on the registry are indexed under Burns; 145 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 45 is above the median of 40 across 524 interventional studies indexed under Burns.

Browse Burns studies →

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill is the lead sponsor of 1,340 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 155 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 59 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Thermal burn
  • Greater than or equal to 18 years of age
  • Less than 60 years of age
  • Able to speak and read English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intubated
  • Clinically unstable
  • Other substantial comorbid injury (e.g. long bone fracture)
  • Heart block greater than first degree (EKG)
  • History of coronary artery disease
  • History of congestive heart failure
  • Asthma (within past 10 years, induced by a beta-blocker, or receiving current treatment)
  • Pregnant
  • Prisoner
  • Psychotic, suicidal, or homicidal
  • Diabetic
  • Hepatic failure (acute or chronic)
  • Renal failure (acute or chronic)
  • History of hyperthyroidism unless taking synthroid or other thyroid hormone replacement
  • Exceeds daily acceptable chronic opioid use prior to burn
  • Interacting medication
  • Received propranolol within the last 6 months
  • Multiple severe allergic reactions
  • On daily methylphenidate or similar stimulant medication
  • Unwilling to use medically acceptable birth control (if childbearing potential)
  • Breastfeeding
  • Severe peripheral vascular disease or vasospastic disorder
  • Bradycardia that in the opinion of the investigator would constitute too great a risk when considered in the context of the patient's medical comorbidities and health history
  • Other criteria that in investigator's opinion makes participant poor candidate for the trial
  • Cancer (except basal cell cancer)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Sugar pill

    Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Propranolol, Propanolol ER

    Drug: Propranolol · Drug: Propanolol

Interventions

  • DrugPropranolol

    40 mg

    Also known as: Inderal, Innopran

  • DrugPlacebo

    sugar pill

    Also known as: Sugar pill

  • DrugPropanolol

    120 mg twice per day

    Also known as: Inderal, Innopran

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Pain Trajectory Slopes

    Overall pain trajectory slopes by treatment group, where linear mixed modeling was used to combine pain measurements (waking, worst, and least pain) assessed on primary outcome days into an overall pain score. Pain was assessed using a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS). A lower score on the NRS indicated less pain and a higher score was indicative of worse pain.

    Time frame: Study days 5, 7, 10, 13, 17 and 19

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sleep Quality

    Medical Outcomes Survey Sleep Quality Subscale. This is a 0-10 numeric rating scale in which patients rate their sleep quality. 0 represents poor sleep quality whereas 10 represents a restful night of sleep.

    Time frame: 6 weeks after injury timepoint was chosen for this analysis

  2. Itch Symptoms

    Average itch intensity measured with a 0-10 numeric rating scale, 6 weeks was used as main outcome timepoint for itch symptom burden. 0 represents no itch symptoms and 10 represents the most severe itch symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 6 after injury was chosen as the main timepoint of interest

  3. Anxiety Symptoms

    Anxiety severity via the State Trait Personality Inventory (STPI), range 10-40, 40 represents high anxiety.

    Time frame: 6 weeks after injury was chosen as the main timepoint of interest

07

Results

Posted Oct 29, 2012

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSugar PillPropranolol, Propanolol ER
Started2322
Completed2320
Not completed02
Withdrew: Adverse event02

Outcome measures

PrimaryOverall Pain Trajectory Slopes

Overall pain trajectory slopes by treatment group, where linear mixed modeling was used to combine pain measurements (waking, worst, and least pain) assessed on primary outcome days into an overall pain score. Pain was assessed using a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS). A lower score on the NRS indicated less pain and a higher score was indicative of worse pain.

Time frame:
Study days 5, 7, 10, 13, 17 and 19
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Numeric Rating Scale Score Change/Day
Overall Pain Trajectory Slopes
Numeric Rating Scale Score Change/DaySugar PillPropranolol, Propanolol ER
Overall Pain Trajectory Slopes-0.22 (-0.25 to -0.19)-0.16 (-0.19 to -0.13)
SecondarySleep Quality

Medical Outcomes Survey Sleep Quality Subscale. This is a 0-10 numeric rating scale in which patients rate their sleep quality. 0 represents poor sleep quality whereas 10 represents a restful night of sleep.

Time frame:
6 weeks after injury timepoint was chosen for this analysis
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Sleep Quality
units on a scalePropranololPlacebo
Sleep Quality6.75 ± 2.497.46 ± 2.02
Statistical analysis
  • Propranolol vs Placebo · t-test, 2 sided · p = .36
SecondaryItch Symptoms

Average itch intensity measured with a 0-10 numeric rating scale, 6 weeks was used as main outcome timepoint for itch symptom burden. 0 represents no itch symptoms and 10 represents the most severe itch symptoms.

Time frame:
Week 6 after injury was chosen as the main timepoint of interest
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Itch Symptoms
units on a scalePropranololPlacebo
Itch Symptoms1.91 ± 1.812.61 ± 2.89
Statistical analysis
  • Propranolol vs Placebo · t-test, 2 sided · p = .32
SecondaryAnxiety Symptoms

Anxiety severity via the State Trait Personality Inventory (STPI), range 10-40, 40 represents high anxiety.

Time frame:
6 weeks after injury was chosen as the main timepoint of interest
Reported as:
Mean · units on scale
Anxiety Symptoms
units on scalePropranololPlacebo
Anxiety Symptoms15.27 ± 4.6214.23 ± 3.87
Statistical analysis
  • Propranolol vs Placebo · t-test, 2 sided · p = .48

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sugar Pill—1/23 (4.3%)6/23 (26.1%)
Propranolol, Propanolol ER—0/22 (0%)8/22 (36.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventSugar PillPropranolol, Propanolol ER
ThrombisisBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/230/22
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSugar PillPropranolol, Propanolol ER
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders6/238/22

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Sugar PillPropranolol, Propanolol ERTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years232245
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Sugar PillPropranolol, Propanolol ERTotal
Mean32 ± 1131 ± 932 ± 10
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Sugar PillPropranolol, Propanolol ERTotal
Female4711
Male191534
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Sugar PillPropranolol, Propanolol ERTotal
United States232245
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Washington Hospital Center
    Washington, D.C., District of Columbia 20011, United States
  • North Carolina Jaycee Burn Center
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514, United States
  • Wake Forest University Baptist
    Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587, United States
  • Crozer Chester Medical Center
    Upland, Pennsylvania 19102, United States
09

References and documents

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 17, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00934947
Lead sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 8, 2009
Start date
Jul 2009
Primary completion
Feb 2011
Completion
Jun 2011
Results posted
Oct 29, 2012
Last update
Nov 17, 2017

Study contacts

Samuel McLean, MD, MPh
principal investigator · University of North Carolina, Department of Anesthesiology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion