CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00929838DM-TBSIUpdated Jul 12, 2024Results posted

Telephone Delivered Behavioral Skills Intervention for Blacks With T2DM

An interventional study of Diabetes Knowledge/Information and Motivation/Behavioral Skills in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetes Mellitus, Adult-Onset and Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Insulin-Dependent, sponsored by State University of New York at Buffalo. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-12.

Sponsored by State University of New York at Buffalo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
256
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Blacks or African Americans have greater risk of and are more likely to die from type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Major barriers to effective diabetes care for Blacks include poor diabetes knowledge, self-management skills, empowerment, and perceived control. Few prior studies have tested interventions to address these barriers in combination, especially among Blacks who have the greatest burden of diabetes related complications. This study provides a unique opportunity to address this gap in the literature by testing the efficacy of separate and combined telephone-delivered, diabetes knowledge and motivation/behavioral skills training intervention in high risk Blacks with poorly controlled T2DM. The findings of this study, if successful, will provide new information on how to improve quality of care for diabetes in ethnic minorities and reduce the disproportionate burden of diabetes complications and deaths in this population.

Read the detailed description

Blacks (African Americans) with Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) have higher prevalence of diabetes, poorer metabolic control, and greater risk for complications and death compared to Whites. Poor outcomes in Blacks with T2DM can be attributed to patient, provider, and health systems level factors. Provider and health system factors account for \<10% of variance in major diabetes outcomes. Key differences appear to be at the patient level. Of the patient level factors, consistent differences between Blacks and Whites with T2DM have been found in diabetes knowledge, self-management skills, empowerment, and perceived control. A variety of interventions to improve diabetes self-management have been tested including: 1) knowledge interventions; 2) lifestyle interventions; 3) skills training interventions; and 4) patient activation and empowerment interventions. Most of these interventions have been tested individually, but rarely have they been tested in combination, especially among Blacks who have the greatest burden of diabetes related complications. This study provides a unique opportunity to address this gap in the literature. Using a 2x2 factorial design, this study will test the efficacy of separate and combined telephone-delivered, diabetes knowledge/information and motivation/behavioral skills training intervention in high risk Blacks with poorly controlled T2DM (HbA1c ≥9%). The primary objective is to test the separate and combined efficacy of a telephone-delivered diabetes knowledge/information intervention and motivation/behavioral skills training intervention in improving HbA1c levels in Blacks with T2DM using a 2x2 factorial design. The secondary objectives are: 1) To determine whether patients randomized to the telephone-delivered diabetes knowledge/information intervention, the motivation/behavioral skills training intervention or the combined intervention will have greater improvement in physical activity, diet, medication adherence, and self-monitoring of blood glucose at 12 months of follow-up compared to usual care; and 2) To determine the cost-effectiveness of each telephone intervention separately, and then in combination. The primary outcome is HbA1c level at 12 months of follow-up. The secondary outcomes are cost-effectiveness of each telephone intervention separately, and then in combination, and change in physical activity, diet, medication adherence, and self-monitoring of blood glucose over 12 months of follow-up. The long-term goal of the project is to achieve improvement in diabetes-related outcomes in this patient population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Adult-Onset
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Insulin-Dependent
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Noninsulin Dependent
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type II

Keywords

  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Adult-Onset
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Insulin-Dependent
  • African Americans
  • Blacks
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Controlled Clinical Trial
  • Behavioral Research
  • Behavioral Medicine
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,318 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 256 is above the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

State University of New York at Buffalo is the lead sponsor of 287 studies on the registry; 65 are open to participants now.

Of its 19 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 15 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

    1. Age ≥18 years
    1. Clinical diagnosis of T2DM and HbA1c ≥9% at the screening visit
    1. Self-identified as Black or African American
    1. Subject must be taking at least one oral medication for diabetes, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia and must be willing to use the MEMS cap and bottle for 12 months
    1. Subjects must be able to communicate in English
    1. Subjects must have access to a telephone (landline or cell phone) for the 12 week intervention period

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    1. Mental confusion on interview suggesting significant dementia
    1. Participation in other diabetes clinical trials
    1. Alcohol or drug abuse/dependency
    1. Active psychosis or acute mental disorder
    1. Life expectancy \<6 months
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
256 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Diabetes Knowledge/Information Arm

    Subjects randomized to the diabetes knowledge/information arm will complete 12 diabetes education modules over a 12-week period. The educational materials were developed based on guidelines for diabetes education by the American Diabetes Association. The content is based on the principles of the Adult Learning Theory. The information is designed to be relevant, person centered, and presented in a non-threatening manner. The modules are designed to be delivered via telephone in 10-15 minutes, so that the maximum contact time per telephone call including introduction and closing would not exceed 30 minutes.

    Behavioral: Diabetes Knowledge/Information

  • Experimental
    Motivation/Behavioral Skills Arm

    The motivation/behavioral skills intervention consists of patient activation (list of 5 questions to ask their provider at every visit and training on how to ask the questions), patient empowerment (diabetes responsibility contracts, personal goals, and flow charts for patients to record lab results/medications and training on how to use the empowerment tools), and behavioral skills training delivered via telephone lasting 30 minutes every week for 12 weeks. The behavioral skills training will be focused on 4 behaviors - physical activity, diet, medication adherence, and glucose self-monitoring. Guided by subjects' current problem areas and preferences, subjects will be asked to choose 1 of 4 behaviors to focus on every 3 weeks (4 behaviors over 12 weeks).

    Behavioral: Motivation/Behavioral Skills

  • Experimental
    Combined Intervention Arm

    The combined intervention group will receive weekly telephone-delivered diabetes knowledge/information, patient activation (list of 5 questions to ask their provider at every visit and training on how to ask the questions), patient empowerment (diabetes responsibility contracts, personal goals, and flow charts for patients to record lab results/medications and training on how to use the empowerment tools), and behavioral skills training delivered via telephone. The behavioral skills training will be focused on 4 behaviors and guided by subjects' current problem areas and preferences, subjects will be asked to choose 1 of 4 behaviors to focus on every 3 weeks. The combined intervention group telephone sessions will last for 30 minutes.

    Behavioral: Combined Intervention

  • Sham comparator
    Usual Care Arm

    The usual care group will receive weekly telephone-delivered general health education lasting 30 minutes for 12 weeks to control for attention. Patients in the usual care group will continue to receive any usual diabetes education provided by the clinic staff; however, they will not receive targeted diabetes knowledge/information, activation, empowerment, or behavioral skills training.

    Behavioral: Usual Care

Interventions

  • BehavioralDiabetes Knowledge/Information

    This group will receive telephone-delivered diabetes knowledge/information lasting 30 minutes for 12 weeks.

  • BehavioralMotivation/Behavioral Skills

    This intervention consists of patient activation, patient empowerment, and behavioral skills training delivered via telephone lasting 30 minutes every week for 12 weeks.

  • BehavioralCombined Intervention

    This group will receive all components of the diabetes knowledge/information and the motivation/behavioral skills interventions via telephone lasting 30 minutes every week for 12 weeks.

  • BehavioralUsual Care

    This group will receive telephone-delivered general health education lasting 30 minutes for 12 weeks to control for attention and content.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at 12 Months Post Randomization

    Time frame: 12-months post randomization

07

Results

Posted Apr 10, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDiabetes Knowledge/Information ArmMotivation/Behavioral Skills ArmCombined Intervention ArmUsual Care Arm
Started63656364
Completed53565355
Not completed109109

Outcome measures

PrimaryHemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at 12 Months Post Randomization
Time frame:
12-months post randomization
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at 12 Months Post Randomization
percentage of glycosylated hemoglobinDiabetes Knowledge/Information ArmMotivation/Behavioral Skills ArmCombined Intervention ArmUsual Care Arm
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at 12 Months Post Randomization9.3 ± 1.89.2 ± 2.19.2 ± 1.99.5 ± 2.5

Adverse events

Collected over 12 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Diabetes Knowledge/Information Arm0/63 (0%)0/63 (0%)0/63 (0%)
Motivation/Behavioral Skills Arm0/65 (0%)0/65 (0%)0/65 (0%)
Combined Intervention Arm0/63 (0%)0/63 (0%)0/63 (0%)
Usual Care Arm0/64 (0%)0/64 (0%)0/64 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Diabetes Knowledge/Information ArmMotivation/Behavioral Skills ArmCombined Intervention ArmUsual Care ArmTotal
<=18 years00000
Between 18 and 65 years48514852199
>=65 years1514151256
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Diabetes Knowledge/Information ArmMotivation/Behavioral Skills ArmCombined Intervention ArmUsual Care ArmTotal
Female28253031114
Male35403333141
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Diabetes Knowledge/Information ArmMotivation/Behavioral Skills ArmCombined Intervention ArmUsual Care ArmTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native00000
Asian00000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00000
Black or African American63656364255
White00000
More than one race00000
Unknown or Not Reported00000
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Egede LE, Strom JL, Durkalski VL, Mauldin PD, Moran WP. Rationale and design: telephone-delivered behavioral skills interventions for Blacks with Type 2 diabetes. Trials. 2010 Mar 29;11:35. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-35. PubMed 20350322 ↗
  • Egede LE, Williams JS, Voronca DC, Gebregziabher M, Lynch CP. Telephone-Delivered Behavioral Skills Intervention for African American Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jul;32(7):775-782. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4023-0. Epub 2017 Mar 23. PubMed 28337686 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Feb 20, 2009

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 12, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00929838
Lead sponsor
State University of New York at Buffalo
Collaborators
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Responsible party
Leonard Ehianu Egede (Professor & Chair, Department of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 30, 2009
Start date
Aug 2008
Primary completion
Jun 2016
Completion
Jun 2016
Results posted
Apr 10, 2019
Last update
Jul 12, 2024

Study contacts

Leonard E Egede, MD, MS
principal investigator · Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion