CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00918567Updated Oct 20, 2020Results posted

Impact of Strattera and Behavior Therapy on the Home and School Functioning of Children With ADHD

A Phase 4 interventional study of atomoxetine and Behavior Modification Therapy in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, sponsored by State University of New York at Buffalo. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-20.

Sponsored by State University of New York at Buffalo · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Multiple studies have found Atomoxetine (Strattera) to be efficacious but there is only one published study specifically designed to evaluate its efficacy in school settings. In this 7 week placebo-controlled study, Atomoxetine (ATX) at mean dose of 1.3 mg/kg, significantly reduced teacher rated ADHD symptoms (Weiss et al., 2005). However, children are typically referred for treatment because of "real life" problems in functioning, not symptoms (Pelham, Fabiano, \& Massetti, 2005). While ATX has been found to produce functional improvements at home, the Weiss study found limited results in this area at school.

Furthermore, almost no research has examined the effects of combining ATX and behavior therapy (BT). In the MTA, adding BT to stimulants improved teacher ratings of hyperactivity/impulsivity and increased the number of subjects reaching optimal response (Swanson et al., 2001). Therefore, it is possible that the addition of BT to ATX may improve functional performance in the classroom. The effects of combined therapy may be even larger for ATX as monotherapy with nonstimulants produces smaller effect sizes than with stimulants.

Objective: The primary objective was to evaluate the effects of ATX alone and in combination with BT on the school functioning of 56 children ages 6-12 with ADHD. Outcomes were assessed using traditional symptoms measures as well as functional measures of academic and behavioral improvements in the classroom.

Read the detailed description

The objectives were evaluated in an 8 week open label trial of where half of the participants were randomly assigned to receive (ATX+BT) while the rest received only ATX. An open label design was employed as the efficacy of ATX for ADHD symptoms has been established and to ensure that all patients received at least one active treatment. Parents in the ATX+BT group attended an eight week parenting course using the Community Oriented Parent Education (COPE) program (Cunningham, Bremner, \& Secord, 1998) while the child participated in an eight week social skills course. Teachers implemented a Daily Report Card (DRC) to track classroom behaviors. In the BT group, the child's DRC performance was communicated daily to parents and tied to consequences at home and school. In the ATX group, parents were not provided with the DRCs. The ATX dosing protocol was as follows: .5mg/kg per day on days 1-3, .8mg/kg/day days 4-7, 1.2mg/kg days 8+. After 3 weeks, subjects were eligible to increase to 1.8mg/kg/day. ATX was dosed once in the morning but could be dosed BID to address tolerability. The mean final dose was 1.4mg/kg/day.

To be enrolled, children must have had an IQ > 75, not failed a trial of ATX, met DSM criteria for ADHD but not other psychiatric comorbidities except ODD/CD and be in good physical health. Children already taking ADHD medication were enrolled only if the average symptom score on the ADHD subscale of the Disruptive Behaviors Disorders (DBD) scale was >2 (moderate impairment). ADHD was confirmed by parent report on the DISC and the DBD, which rates all DSM 3R and IV symptoms of ODD, CD and ODD on a 0-3 likert scale. Subjects were also required to evidence ADHD symptoms in the classroom as rated on the IOWA Conners. Psychiatric comorbidities were assessed using the DISC.

Measures of treatment response included:

  1. Parents and teacher ratings on the IOWA Conners: 10 item Likert ratings to measure children's inattention-overactive-impulsive and oppositional-defiant behavior (Milich, Loney, \& Landau, 1982)
  2. Parent and teacher ratings on the Impairment Rating Scale (IRS): 8 items using visual-analogue scales to measure children's functional impairment in peer relationships, adult-child relationships, academic performance, classroom behavior, and self esteem (Fabiano et al., 2006).
  3. Parent and teacher side effect ratings using a structured list of common side effects seen with ATX modeled after the Pittsburgh Side Effects Rating Scale (Pelham, 1993).
  4. Direct observations of subjects to measure rule violations and on/off task behavior using a modified version of the COCADD system (Atkins, Pelham \& Licht, 1988) in which trained observers watched children in their classroom for 30 minutes, recording each rule violation and off-task behavior.
  5. Parent and teacher rating on the Social Skills Rating Scale (SSRS): a measure of teachers' and parents perceptions of children's social and academic skills and of their overall problem behaviors (Gresham \& Elliott, 1990).
02

Conditions studied

  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Keywords

  • ADHD
  • Atomoxetine
  • Behavior Therapy
03

In context

Hyperkinesis

729 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperkinesis; 25 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 56 is below the median of 80 across 583 interventional studies indexed under Hyperkinesis.

Browse Hyperkinesis studies →

Lead sponsor

State University of New York at Buffalo is the lead sponsor of 287 studies on the registry; 65 are open to participants now.

Of its 19 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 15 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. meet DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for ADHD-combined type;
  2. estimated IQ of 75 or higher;
  3. agree to comply with the randomly assigned treatment condition;
  4. enrolled in full time school at first grade level or higher; AND
  5. have a primary teacher available to complete ratings for the entire study duration.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. current or past history of seizures (not including benign febrile seizures) or other neurological disorders;
  2. physical conditions that preclude administration of Strattera or other medical illness that might confound study results or increase the safety risk to subjects exposed to study treatments (i.e. marked cardiac conduction delay, etc.);
  3. prior failed trial of Strattera defined as 3 weeks or more on a daily dose of Strattera of at least .8mg/kg or a documented inability to tolerate at least .8mg/kg/day;
  4. serious forms of psychopathology other than ADHD, such autism, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or any other psychopathology requiring urgent treatment with psychotropic medication; OR
  5. children for whom discontinuation of their current psychotropic medication would represent a serious risk to themselves or others.

The presence of Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD), Conduct Disorder (CD) or learning disabilities will not result in exclusion from the study as they are commonly occurring comorbidities that have not been found to moderate response to ADHD treatments (Jensen et al., 2001). Enrollment in special education services will also not be an exclusionary criteria as work by this research group has found that such services do not affect response to ADHD treatments (Niemic, Fabiano, Pelham, \& Fuller, 2002).

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
56 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Combined therapy

    atomoxetine plus behavior therapy

    Drug: atomoxetine · Behavioral: Behavior Modification Therapy

  • Active comparator
    Drug therapy

    atomoxetine alone

    Drug: atomoxetine

Interventions

  • Drugatomoxetine

    open label treatment dosed up to 1.8mg/kg/day

    Also known as: Drug Therapy

  • BehavioralBehavior Modification Therapy

    8 week behavioral modification course with school consultation, parenting groups using COPE and child social skills group

    Also known as: Behavior Therapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rule Violations During Direct Classroom Observation at Endpoint (Week 8)

    Observations were conducted using the Student Behavior Teacher Response Observation Code. After learning the classroom rules, observers watched children in their classrooms for 30 minutes during an academic activity and recorded each time the subject violated a classroom rule. Total classroom rule violations were used as the primary outcome measures for the study.

    Time frame: Endpoint (Week 8)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Impairment Rating Scale (Parent Completed) at Endpoint

    The IRS is a 8 item measure that uses visual-analogue scales to evaluate the child's problem level and need for treatment in developmentally important areas, such as peer relationships, adult-child relationships, academic performance, and classroom behavior 51. The scale is scored from 0 (no problem) to 6 (extreme problem). The scale has excellent test-retest and inter-rater reliability and well supported validity 51, 52.

    Time frame: Endpoint (Week 8)

  2. Impairment Rating Scale (Teachers) at Endpoint

    The IRS is a 6 item measure that uses visual-analogue scales to evaluate the child's problem level and need for treatment in developmentally important areas, such as peer relationships, adult-child relationships, academic performance, and classroom behavior. The scale is scored from 0 (no problem) to 6 (extreme problem). The scale has excellent test-retest and inter-rater reliability and well supported validity.

    Time frame: Endpoint (Week 8)

  3. Pittsburgh Side Effects Rating Scale (PSERS)(Parent Completed) at Endpoint:

    The PSERS measures adverse events commonly associated with stimulant medication and has been used in multiple studies of ADHD. For this study, the PSERS was modified to also assess adverse emotional events potentially associated with ATX, including suicidal statements. The resulting scale consisted of 14 items (an additional sleep item for parents) rated from 0 ("none") to 3 ("severe"). An overall side effects score was computed by averaging across all ratings and used in analyses.

    Time frame: Endpoint (Week 8)

  4. Pittsburgh Side Effects Rating Scale (PSERS)(Teacher Rated):

    The PSERS measures adverse events commonly associated with stimulant medication and has been used in multiple studies of ADHD. For this study, the PSERS was modified to also assess adverse emotional events potentially associated with ATX, including suicidal statements. The resulting scale consisted of 13 items (for teachers) rated from 0 ("none") to 3 ("severe"). An overall side effects score was computed by averaging across all ratings and used in analyses.

    Time frame: at weeks 8 (Endpoint)

  5. Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale ODD Subscale (DBD- Parent Completed) at Endpoint

    The DBD consists of 8 items that are the DSM-IV symptoms of Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD). Items on the DBD were rated by parents and teachers using Likert scales that ranged from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("very much"). The factor structure, reliability and validity of the DBD have been supported in multiple studies.

    Time frame: Endpoint (Week 8)

  6. Disruptive Behavior Disorder Rating Scale ODD Subscale(DBD- Teacher Completed) at Endpoint

    The DBD consists of 8 items that are the DSM-IV symptoms of Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD). Items on the DBD were rated by parents and teachers using Likert scales that ranged from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("very much"). The factor structure, reliability and validity of the DBD have been supported in multiple studies.

    Time frame: Endpoint (Week 8)

  7. Social Skills Rating Scale Problem Behavior Subscale(SSRS Parent) at Endpoint

    completed by parents to measure children's problem behaviors (PB). Items are rated from 0 ("not at all") to 2 ("very often"). The scale has 55 items. The score reported below is the sum total of the items on the scale and then averaged for the whole group. Therefore, the range can be between 0 and 110. A higher score indicates a better outcome.

    Time frame: Endpoint (Week 8)

  8. Social Skills Rating Scale Problem Behavior Subscale(SSRS Teachers) at Endpoint

    The SSRS was completed by teachers to measure children's problem behaviors (PB). Items are rated from 0 ("not at all") to 2 ("very often"). The scale has 55 items. The score reported below is the sum total of the items on the scale and then averaged for the whole group. Therefore, the range can be between 0 and 110. A higher score indicates a better outcome.

    Time frame: Endpoint (Week 8)

  9. ADHD Subscale of the DBD (Parent Completed) at Endpoint

    The DBD consists of 18 items that are the DSM-IV symptoms of ADHD. Items on the DBD were rated by parents and teachers using Likert scales that ranged from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("very much"). The factor structure, reliability and validity of the DBD have been supported in multiple studies.

    Time frame: Endpoint (Week 8)

  10. ADHD Subscale of the DBD (Teacher Completed) at Endpoint

    The ADHD subscale of the DBD consists of 18 items that are the DSM-IV symptoms of ADHD. Items on the DBD were rated by parents and teachers using Likert scales that ranged from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("very much"). The factor structure, reliability and validity of the DBD have been supported in multiple studies.

    Time frame: Endpoint (Week 8)

07

Results

Posted Apr 7, 2020
Limitations and caveats
The primary limitation of this study was the lack of a control condition, thereby limiting our ability to detect the causality of observed improvements. Study may not have had sufficient subjects to detect group differences on secondary measures.

Participant flow

Subjects were recruited from schools, pediatric offices and the local community through radio and print advertisement. Subjects were recruited between Jan of 2007 and the spring of 2008.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCombined TherapyDrug Therapy
Started2927
Completed2425
Not completed52
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy31
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject11
Withdrew: Adverse event10

Outcome measures

PrimaryRule Violations During Direct Classroom Observation at Endpoint (Week 8)

Observations were conducted using the Student Behavior Teacher Response Observation Code. After learning the classroom rules, observers watched children in their classrooms for 30 minutes during an academic activity and recorded each time the subject violated a classroom rule. Total classroom rule violations were used as the primary outcome measures for the study.

Time frame:
Endpoint (Week 8)
Reported as:
Mean · number occurences per 30 mins
Rule Violations During Direct Classroom Observation at Endpoint (Week 8)
number occurences per 30 minsCombined TherapyDrug Therapy
Rule Violations During Direct Classroom Observation at Endpoint (Week 8)6.15 ± 1.374.93 ± 1.36
Statistical analysis
  • Combined Therapy vs Drug Therapy · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <.05 (Also tested marginal effects defined as p \< .10.) · Mean difference (final values): -1.22Tukey-Kramer adjustments for post-hoc differences of least squares comparisons
SecondaryImpairment Rating Scale (Parent Completed) at Endpoint

The IRS is a 8 item measure that uses visual-analogue scales to evaluate the child's problem level and need for treatment in developmentally important areas, such as peer relationships, adult-child relationships, academic performance, and classroom behavior 51. The scale is scored from 0 (no problem) to 6 (extreme problem). The scale has excellent test-retest and inter-rater reliability and well supported validity 51, 52.

Time frame:
Endpoint (Week 8)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Impairment Rating Scale (Parent Completed) at Endpoint
units on a scaleCombined TherapyDrug Therapy
Impairment Rating Scale (Parent Completed) at Endpoint2.66 ± .372.84 ± .36
Statistical analysis
  • Combined Therapy vs Drug Therapy · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <.05 (Also examined marginal effects, defined as p\<.10) · Mean difference (final values): 0.18
SecondaryImpairment Rating Scale (Teachers) at Endpoint

The IRS is a 6 item measure that uses visual-analogue scales to evaluate the child's problem level and need for treatment in developmentally important areas, such as peer relationships, adult-child relationships, academic performance, and classroom behavior. The scale is scored from 0 (no problem) to 6 (extreme problem). The scale has excellent test-retest and inter-rater reliability and well supported validity.

Time frame:
Endpoint (Week 8)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Impairment Rating Scale (Teachers) at Endpoint
units on a scaleCombined TherapyDrug Therapy
Impairment Rating Scale (Teachers) at Endpoint2.02 ± 0.422.29 ± 0.43
Statistical analysis
  • Combined Therapy vs Drug Therapy · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <.05 (Also tested marginal effects defined as p\<.10) · Mean difference (final values): 0.27
SecondaryPittsburgh Side Effects Rating Scale (PSERS)(Parent Completed) at Endpoint:

The PSERS measures adverse events commonly associated with stimulant medication and has been used in multiple studies of ADHD. For this study, the PSERS was modified to also assess adverse emotional events potentially associated with ATX, including suicidal statements. The resulting scale consisted of 14 items (an additional sleep item for parents) rated from 0 ("none") to 3 ("severe"). An overall side effects score was computed by averaging across all ratings and used in analyses.

Time frame:
Endpoint (Week 8)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pittsburgh Side Effects Rating Scale (PSERS)(Parent Completed) at Endpoint:
units on a scaleCombined TherapyDrug Therapy
Pittsburgh Side Effects Rating Scale (PSERS)(Parent Completed) at Endpoint:.38 ± .06.34 ± .06
Statistical analysis
  • Combined Therapy vs Drug Therapy · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <.05 (Also estimated marginal effects defined as p\<.10) · Mean difference (final values): -0.05
SecondaryPittsburgh Side Effects Rating Scale (PSERS)(Teacher Rated):

The PSERS measures adverse events commonly associated with stimulant medication and has been used in multiple studies of ADHD. For this study, the PSERS was modified to also assess adverse emotional events potentially associated with ATX, including suicidal statements. The resulting scale consisted of 13 items (for teachers) rated from 0 ("none") to 3 ("severe"). An overall side effects score was computed by averaging across all ratings and used in analyses.

Time frame:
at weeks 8 (Endpoint)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pittsburgh Side Effects Rating Scale (PSERS)(Teacher Rated):
units on a scaleCombined TherapyDrug Therapy
Pittsburgh Side Effects Rating Scale (PSERS)(Teacher Rated):.23 ± .05.21 ± .05
Statistical analysis
  • Combined Therapy vs Drug Therapy · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <.05 (also tested marginal effects defined as p\<.10) · Mean difference (final values): -0.02
SecondaryDisruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale ODD Subscale (DBD- Parent Completed) at Endpoint

The DBD consists of 8 items that are the DSM-IV symptoms of Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD). Items on the DBD were rated by parents and teachers using Likert scales that ranged from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("very much"). The factor structure, reliability and validity of the DBD have been supported in multiple studies.

Time frame:
Endpoint (Week 8)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale ODD Subscale (DBD- Parent Completed) at Endpoint
units on a scaleCombined TherapyDrug Therapy
Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale ODD Subscale (DBD- Parent Completed) at Endpoint.90 ± .131.12 ± .13
Statistical analysis
  • Combined Therapy vs Drug Therapy · Mixed Models Analysis · p = >.05 (Also tested marginal effects defined as p\<.10) · Mean difference (final values): 0.22
SecondaryDisruptive Behavior Disorder Rating Scale ODD Subscale(DBD- Teacher Completed) at Endpoint

The DBD consists of 8 items that are the DSM-IV symptoms of Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD). Items on the DBD were rated by parents and teachers using Likert scales that ranged from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("very much"). The factor structure, reliability and validity of the DBD have been supported in multiple studies.

Time frame:
Endpoint (Week 8)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Disruptive Behavior Disorder Rating Scale ODD Subscale(DBD- Teacher Completed) at Endpoint
units on a scaleCombined TherapyDrug Therapy
Disruptive Behavior Disorder Rating Scale ODD Subscale(DBD- Teacher Completed) at Endpoint.54 ± .15.71 ± .14
Statistical analysis
  • Combined Therapy vs Drug Therapy · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <.05 (Also tested marginal effects (p\<.10)) · Mean difference (final values): 0.17
SecondarySocial Skills Rating Scale Problem Behavior Subscale(SSRS Parent) at Endpoint

completed by parents to measure children's problem behaviors (PB). Items are rated from 0 ("not at all") to 2 ("very often"). The scale has 55 items. The score reported below is the sum total of the items on the scale and then averaged for the whole group. Therefore, the range can be between 0 and 110. A higher score indicates a better outcome.

Time frame:
Endpoint (Week 8)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Social Skills Rating Scale Problem Behavior Subscale(SSRS Parent) at Endpoint
units on a scaleCombined TherapyDrug Therapy
Social Skills Rating Scale Problem Behavior Subscale(SSRS Parent) at Endpoint16.48 ± 1.2119.53 ± 1.19
Statistical analysis
  • Combined Therapy vs Drug Therapy · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.05 (Also tested marginal effects (p\<.10)) · Mean difference (final values): 3.05
SecondarySocial Skills Rating Scale Problem Behavior Subscale(SSRS Teachers) at Endpoint

The SSRS was completed by teachers to measure children's problem behaviors (PB). Items are rated from 0 ("not at all") to 2 ("very often"). The scale has 55 items. The score reported below is the sum total of the items on the scale and then averaged for the whole group. Therefore, the range can be between 0 and 110. A higher score indicates a better outcome.

Time frame:
Endpoint (Week 8)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Social Skills Rating Scale Problem Behavior Subscale(SSRS Teachers) at Endpoint
units on a scaleCombined TherapyDrug Therapy
Social Skills Rating Scale Problem Behavior Subscale(SSRS Teachers) at Endpoint13.88 ± 1.2513.96 ± 1.29
Statistical analysis
  • Combined Therapy vs Drug Therapy · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <.05 (Also tested marginal effects (p\<.10)) · Mean difference (final values): 0.08
SecondaryADHD Subscale of the DBD (Parent Completed) at Endpoint

The DBD consists of 18 items that are the DSM-IV symptoms of ADHD. Items on the DBD were rated by parents and teachers using Likert scales that ranged from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("very much"). The factor structure, reliability and validity of the DBD have been supported in multiple studies.

Time frame:
Endpoint (Week 8)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
ADHD Subscale of the DBD (Parent Completed) at Endpoint
units on a scaleCombined TherapyDrug Therapy
ADHD Subscale of the DBD (Parent Completed) at Endpoint1.07 ± 0.111.47 ± 0.11
Statistical analysis
  • Combined Therapy vs Drug Therapy · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <.05 (Also tested marginal effect (p\<.10)) · Mean difference (final values): 0.40
SecondaryADHD Subscale of the DBD (Teacher Completed) at Endpoint

The ADHD subscale of the DBD consists of 18 items that are the DSM-IV symptoms of ADHD. Items on the DBD were rated by parents and teachers using Likert scales that ranged from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("very much"). The factor structure, reliability and validity of the DBD have been supported in multiple studies.

Time frame:
Endpoint (Week 8)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
ADHD Subscale of the DBD (Teacher Completed) at Endpoint
units on a scaleCombined TherapyDrug Therapy
ADHD Subscale of the DBD (Teacher Completed) at Endpoint1.01 ± 0.131.13 ± 0.13
Statistical analysis
  • Combined Therapy vs Drug Therapy · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <.05 (Also tested marginal effects (p\<.10)) · Mean difference (final values): 0.12

Adverse events

Collected over The Pittsburgh Side Effect Rating Scale (PSERS) measures adverse events commonly associated with ADHD medication rated from 0 ("none") to 3 ("severe"). Both teachers and parents completed it at weeks 1, 3 and 8.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Combined Therapy—0/29 (0%)25/29 (86.2%)
Drug Therapy—0/27 (0%)24/27 (88.9%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent other events
EventCombined TherapyDrug Therapy
motor ticsNervous system disorders4/294/7
crabby/irritablePsychiatric disorders14/2911/27
dulled/tired lookingPsychiatric disorders13/2910/27
anxietyPsychiatric disorders10/2912/27
picking at skinPsychiatric disorders9/2910/27
stomachachesGastrointestinal disorders8/294/27
depressed mood/crying episodesPsychiatric disorders8/295/27
appetite lossMetabolism and nutrition disorders7/292/27
headachesNervous system disorders5/293/27
withdrawn from othersPsychiatric disorders5/293/27

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Combined TherapyDrug TherapyTotal
<=18 years292756
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Combined TherapyDrug TherapyTotal
Mean8.3 ± 1.68.9 ± 1.58.59 ± 1.581
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Combined TherapyDrug TherapyTotal
Female242145
Male5611
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Combined TherapyDrug TherapyTotal
United States292756
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Cennter for Children and Families
    Buffalo, New York 14214, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Waxmonsky JG, Waschbusch DA, Pelham WE, Draganac-Cardona L, Rotella B, Ryan L. Effects of atomoxetine with and without behavior therapy on the school and home functioning of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Nov;71(11):1535-51. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05496pur. Epub 2010 Jun 29. PubMed 20673557 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 20, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00918567
Lead sponsor
State University of New York at Buffalo
Collaborators
Eli Lilly and Company
Responsible party
James Waxmonsky (Principal Investigator, State University of New York at Buffalo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 11, 2009
Start date
Jan 2007
Primary completion
May 2008
Completion
Sep 2008
Results posted
Apr 7, 2020
Last update
Oct 20, 2020

Study contacts

James G Waxmonsky
principal investigator · SUNY Buffalo
Daniel A Waschbusch
principal investigator · SUNY Buffalo

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion