An interventional study of Positron Emission Tomography in Cervical Cancer, sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-01-20.
Sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
Rationale: Diagnostic procedures, such as positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), may help determine response to standard cancer therapy in patients with cervical cancer
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the change in cervical tumor heterogenity as measured by FDG-PET/CT imaging.
1,881 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; 567 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 100 across 1,377 interventional studies indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms.
Browse Uterine Cervical Neoplasms studies →Washington University School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 1,765 studies on the registry; 271 are open to participants now.
Of its 324 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 212 (65%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Procedure: Positron Emission Tomography
FDG PET/CT imaging is performed at baseline, after 2 and 4 weeks of radiation therapy and approximately 3 months after chemoradiation is completed
The overall goal of this pilot study is to evaluate the change in cervical tumor FDG heterogeneity and SUVmax during chemoradiation.
Time frame: FDG PET/CT imaging is performed at: Baseline, 2 & 4 weeks of therapy, and 3 months after completing therapy
To correlate changed in FDG heterogeneity and SUVmax with response to therapy.
Time frame: 5 years
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Washington University School of Medicine