CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00889499Updated Mar 24, 2011

Modulation of Central Hypersensitivity in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain by Intravenous Tropisetron

A Phase 2 interventional study of Tropisetron 2 mg and Tropisetron 5mg in Pain and Chronic Disease, sponsored by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-03-24.

Sponsored by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic pain is associated with hypersensitivity of the central nervous system. The drug under investigation (tropisetron) has been shown in animal studies to attenuate central hypersensitivity. It has therefore the potential to be effective in chronic pain. We compare two doses of tropisetron with placebo in patients with chronic pain. We measure pain intensity and parameters that assess central hypersensitivity.

Read the detailed description

Background

Prolonged afferent nociceptive input induces an increase in the excitability of central sensory neurons. The hyperexcitable neurons amplify the nociceptive signal, thereby producing an exaggerated pain response. This state of central hypersensitivity very likely contributes to pain and disability in patients, even in the presence of limited tissue damage.

The 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT-3) receptor is involved in spinal nociceptive transmission. After experimentally induced inflammation, the selective 5-HT-3 receptor antagonist ondansetron inhibited the electrically evoked responses of dorsal horn neurones, but had no effect on these responses in the absence of inflammation. Importantly, the origin of this pathway is a spino-brainstem-spinal loop that includes areas of the brain involved in emotional and affective responses to pain. This suggests that the 5-HT-3 receptors have no significant role under normal conditions, but are activated by peripheral inflammation and contribute to spinal cord hyperexcitability. Their activity could be driven by anxiety and fear.

Spinal cord hyperexcitability elicited by trauma, inflammation or surgery is influenced by descending facilitatory and inhibitory pathways. The periaqueductal grey and endogenous opioid peptides play a central role in the inhibition of spinal cord neuronal responses. Release of enkephalin at supraspinal and spinal levels is evoked by noxious stimulation. Further inhibitory modulation is exerted by serotonergic and noradrenergic systems. These mechanisms may underlie a possible role of psychological disturbances in the spinal cord processing of nociceptive and non-nociceptive stimuli.

While central hypersensitivity mechanisms have been extensively investigated in the animal, data in patients are sparse. In patients, direct measurements at spinal cord or brain neurons can not be made. Therefore, it is impossible to provide direct evidence for neuronal hyperexcitability. However, hypersensitivity can be investigated indirectly by quantitative sensory tests. Typically, hypersensitivity is detected when sensory stimulation evokes pain at stimulus intensities that do not induce pain in normal subjects (lower pain threshold) or when a standardised painful stimulus evokes stronger pain in patients than in normal subjects. Other methods to explore the sensory system are available, but a detailed description is beyond the scope of this section. Whenever pain hypersensitivity is observed after sensory stimulation of healthy areas, its cause must be a hyperexcitability of the central nervous system. Indeed, there is no evidence that peripheral mechanisms could account for a higher pain sensitivity at healthy tissues.

Using the sensory tests, central hyperexcitability has been detected in different chronic musculoskeletal pain syndromes, such as neck pain after whiplash injury, fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis and temporomandibular disorders. Objective electrophysiological evidence for spinal cord hypersensitivity has recently been provided for patients with neck pain after whiplash injury and in fibromyalgia patients.

Few attempts have been made to modulate central hypersensitivity in patients. Infiltration of the local anaesthetic into the painful and tender muscles of patients with chronic neck pain did not reduce either neck pain nor pain thresholds. This indicated that the source of pain was not located in the infiltrated muscles and central hypersensitivity was not maintained by a nociceptive input arising from these muscles, at least in the patient population investigated. Selective 5-HT-3 receptor antagonists have proven effective in patients with fibromyalgia. Because fibromyalgia is associated with central hypersensitivity, one can postulate an activation of the spinal 5-HT-3 system as one of the mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of this pain syndrome. The facilitatory pathway mediated by this receptor involves parts of the brain associated with emotional and affective responses to pain. An effect of selective 5-HT-3 receptor antagonists on other musculoskeletal pain syndromes associated with central hypersensitivity, such as whiplash or osteoarthritis, can not be ruled out. In a recent placebo-controlled study, a single intravenous injection of the selective 5-HT-3 receptor antagonist Ondansetron produced pain relief in patients with neuropathic pain.

Objective

The project will address the following main hypotheses. A. Reduction in pain and central hypersensitivity is accomplished by administration of the 5-HT-3 antagonist tropisetron.

B. The analgesic effect of Tropisetron is predicted in individual patients by the electrophysiological measurements that assess central hypersensitivity.

Methods

Pain intensity is assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS). The following measures of central hypersensitivity will be employed: pain detection and pain tolerance threshold to electrical stimulation, heat and cold stimulation, spinal nociceptive reflexes, assessment of reflex receptive fields and temporal summation.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Musculoskeletal Pain

493 studies on the registry are indexed under Musculoskeletal Pain; 113 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 69 across 346 interventional studies indexed under Musculoskeletal Pain.

Browse Musculoskeletal Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern is the lead sponsor of 724 studies on the registry; 177 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Chronic musculoskeletal pain
  • Pain duration at least 6 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Breast feeding
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Crossover study

    Crossover study

    Drug: Tropisetron 2 mg

  • Placebo comparator
    2

    Crossover Study

    Drug: Tropisetron 5mg

  • Placebo comparator
    3

    Crossover Study

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugTropisetron 2 mg

    Antagonist of the 5HT3 receptor.

  • DrugTropisetron 5mg

    Antagonist of the 5HT3 receptor.

  • DrugPlacebo

    NHCL 0,9%

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity (VAS score)

    Time frame: 2 h

Secondary outcomes

  1. Measures of central hypersensitivity

    Time frame: 2 h

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dep. of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital
    Bern, 3010, Switzerland
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 24, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00889499
Lead sponsor
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
First posted
Apr 29, 2009
Start date
Mar 2009
Primary completion
Apr 2010
Completion
Apr 2010
Last update
Mar 24, 2011

Study contacts

Michele Curatolo, Prof
study director · Inselspital, Bern University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion