CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00886145Updated Apr 28, 2016Results posted

Effect of Vibration Therapy on Bone in Persons With Sub-acute Spinal Cord Injury

An interventional study of Vibration: Right Leg and No Vibration: Left Leg. in Spinal Cord Injuries, sponsored by William A. Bauman, M.D.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-04-28.

Sponsored by William A. Bauman, M.D. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research study is to determine the effect of mechanical vibrations on bones of persons with spinal cord injury.

Read the detailed description

One of the major complications in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) is marked bone loss because it greatly predisposes to skeletal fractures, even after minimal trauma. The use of low magnitude mechanical stimulation has been shown to be both safe and effective in improving bone mass and strength in animal studies. This modality has also been shown a beneficial effect in children with disability and in postmenopausal women. The investigators are interested in obtaining data to determine the possible benefits that mechanical intervention with vibratory stimulation may have on bone in individuals with subacute SCI (e.g., >1 month after injury but \<1 year). Changes in bone density and mass of the leg and arm will be determined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); bone architecture of the distal leg and distal arm will be determined by peripheral quantitative computed tomography; circulating metabolic markers of bone will also be performed.

OBJECTIVES

In persons with subacute spinal cord injury:

  1. To determine differences in bone mineral mass and parameters of bone structural integrity of the stimulated tibia versus the unstimulated tibia.
  2. To determine changes in the metabolic markers of bone resorption and formation in persons with subacute spinal cord injury.
02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Cord Injuries

Keywords

  • Spinal Cord Injuries
  • Mechanical Stimulation
  • Vibration Plate
03

In context

Spinal Cord Injuries

1,948 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 505 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1 is below the median of 24 across 1,566 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries.

Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with William A. Bauman, M.D. as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Males;
  2. Age 18-65;
  3. Non-ambulatory SCI, with ASIA level A or B (ASIA A or B at the time of enrollment);
  4. Neurological level of injury C3-T10;
  5. Duration of injury >1 month after injury but \<1 year; and 6.25(OH)D levels 30ng/ml (patients with values \<30ng/ml will be supplemented with vitamin D to normalize values prior to study participation).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Osteoporosis or low bone mass as determined by medical history or DXA at the baseline visit;
  2. Pressure ulcer that may be exacerbated by the experimental procedure;
  3. Fracture of the lower extremity within the past 5 years;
  4. Active heterotopic ossification (HO);
  5. History of metabolic bone disease;
  6. Knee replacement(s);
  7. Metal hardware in the lower extremities;
  8. Bisphosphonate administration;
  9. Severe underlying chronic illness (cardiac, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, etc.);
  10. Renal disease (creatinine clearance \< 40 mL/min);
  11. 25(OH)D levels \<30ng/ml;
  12. Endocrine disorders known to be associated with osteoporosis (hyperthyroidism, hypercortisolism, and/or hypogonadism);
  13. Alcoholism;
  14. Seizure disorders;
  15. History of kidney stones; and
  16. Compliance 85% for every month up to the 4-month time-point
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1 participant (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Vibration and No Vibration

    Vibration: Right Leg and No Vibration: Left Leg.

    Device: Vibration: Right Leg and No Vibration: Left Leg.

Interventions

  • DeviceVibration: Right Leg and No Vibration: Left Leg.

    Vibration- right leg: The subjects will undergo a mechanical vibration intervention (Juvent Vibrating plate) in the seated position, with a load of 50lbs will be added to the right leg by using an extra wide strap equipped with bungee cords, 5 sessions a week, and each session lasting 20 minutes for a total of 6 month. No Vibration-left leg: At each vibration training session, the left leg will serve as a control with a load of 50lbs added to the left leg using an extra wide strap equipped with bungee cords, 5 sessions a week, and each session lasting 20 minutes for a total of 6 month.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Change From Baseline in Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD) at 6-Months

    Volumetric Bone Mineral Density of the Right and Left Distal Tibia as Determined by Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography

    Time frame: The Percent Change in vBMD from Baseline to 6 months after Mechanical Stimulation Vibration Therapy

07

Results

Posted Apr 28, 2016
Limitations and caveats
Subject recruitment was untenable due to the physiological and psychological healing necessary during the sub-acute phase of spinal cord injury.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneVibration: Right Leg and No Vibration: Left Leg
Started1
Completed1
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercent Change From Baseline in Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD) at 6-Months

Volumetric Bone Mineral Density of the Right and Left Distal Tibia as Determined by Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography

Time frame:
The Percent Change in vBMD from Baseline to 6 months after Mechanical Stimulation Vibration Therapy
Reported as:
Number · Percent Change
Percent Change From Baseline in Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD) at 6-Months
Percent ChangeVibration- Right LegNo Vibration- Left Leg
Percent Change From Baseline in Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (vBMD) at 6-Months-11-5.7

Adverse events

Collected over 1.5 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Vibration- Right Leg:—1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)
No Vibration-left Leg:—1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventVibration- Right Leg:No Vibration-left Leg:
Autonomic DysreflexiaNervous system disorders1/11/1

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Vibration- Right Leg and No Vibration-left Leg
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years1
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Vibration- Right Leg and No Vibration-left Leg
Female0
Male1
08

Study locations

1 site
  • VA Medical Center, Bronx
    Bronx, New York 10468, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 28, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00886145
Lead sponsor
William A. Bauman, M.D.
Collaborators
Kessler Foundation
Responsible party
William A. Bauman, M.D. (Director, James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 22, 2009
Start date
Jun 2009
Primary completion
May 2012
Completion
Dec 2012
Results posted
Apr 28, 2016
Last update
Apr 28, 2016

Study contacts

William Bauman, MD
principal investigator · VA Medical Center, Bronx

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion