ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00886015Updated May 19, 2017Results posted

Modified Instrumentation for Surgery to Correct Trichiasis

An interventional study of TT Clamp and Standard BLTR Technique in Trachoma, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-19.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,927
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Trachoma, an ocular infection caused by C. trachomatis, is the second leading infectious cause of blindness worldwide. Years of repeated infection with C. trachomatis cause the eyelid to scar and contract and ultimately to rotate inward such that the eyelashes rub against the eyeball and abrade the cornea (trichiasis). The World Health Organization (WHO) has endorsed a multi-faceted strategy to combat trachoma which includes surgery to repair lids distorted by trachoma (trichiasis) in imminent danger of vision loss. Current evidence suggests that long-term success rates of trichiasis surgery are less than optimal due to variation in surgical technique. Previous research by this study team has demonstrated that shorter incisions have a higher rate of trichiasis recurrence. In addition, observations by this team's oculoplastic surgeon have led to the hypothesis that granuloma formation and lid contour abnormalities may result from current surgical practices. The objective of this study is to compare outcomes of trichiasis surgeries performed with the newly developed trachomatous trichiasis (TT) clamp versus surgeries following standard technique (bilamellar tarsal rotation procedure or BLTR).

Read the detailed description

Field observations in 2005 by this study's PI and oculoplastic surgeon revealed some significant departures from current trichiasis surgery procedure (bilamellar tarsal rotation procedure or BTRP), as described in the WHO manual, "Trichiasis Surgery for Trachoma-the Bilamellar Tarsal Rotation Procedure". These procedural departures were felt to contribute to adverse outcomes, including trichiasis recurrence, granuloma formation and lid contour abnormalities. This study team developed a new surgical tool, the TT clamp, to help improve surgical outcomes following BLTR.

A randomized, single-masked clinical trial will be implemented in the Mtwara region in Tanzania. Study participants will be randomized on a 1:1 basis to surgery with the TT clamp or to surgery with standard BLTR equipment. All surgeries will take place at surgical centers in Mtwara and Lindi over an 8-month period.

Baseline assessment for severity of trichiasis and other predictors of surgical failure will be carried out prior to surgery. Follow-up is planned at 2 weeks (for suture removal), 6 weeks, 12 months, and 24 months post-surgery. At each follow-up visit participants will be assessed for evidence of unfavorable outcomes, including trichiasis recurrence, granuloma formation, and lid contour abnormalities. All outcomes will be assessed clinically by a trained observer who is masked to intervention status.

02

Conditions studied

  • Trachoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Trachoma
  • trichiasis
  • bilamellar tarsal rotation procedure
03

In context

Trachoma

39 studies on the registry are indexed under Trachoma; 3 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,927 is above the median of 1,300 across 31 interventional studies indexed under Trachoma.

Browse Trachoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,815 studies on the registry; 315 are open to participants now.

Of its 208 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 144 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Presence of upper lid trichiasis: defined by at least one eyelash touching the globe of the eye or evidence of epilation
  • No previous report of trichiasis surgery in at least one eye with trichiasis:

    • eyes with prior surgery are already at high risk due to the prior surgery, and their inclusion may decrease our ability to clearly evaluate our primary outcome
    • if unilateral surgery has been performed previously, only the eye without prior history of surgery will be in the study, even if both eyes require surgery
  • Age 18 or older (in order to provide consent as an adult): the vast majority of trichiasis patients are aged 18 or older
  • At time of enrollment, subjects must state their intention to remain in the area for two years to facilitate study follow-up

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absence of upper lid trichiasis
  • Prior trichiasis surgery on both eyes
  • Age 18 or younger
  • Subjects who are transiently in the area
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,927 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TT Clamp

    The TT clamp will be used in trichiasis surgery.

    Device: TT Clamp

  • Active comparator
    Standard BLTR Technique

    Standard BLTR technique will be used in trichiasis surgery.

    Procedure: Standard BLTR Technique

Interventions

  • DeviceTT Clamp

    trichiasis surgery performed with TT clamp

  • ProcedureStandard BLTR Technique

    bilamellar tarsal rotation procedure in trichiasis surgery

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Eyelids With Presence of Recurrent Trichiasis

    Trichiasis: 1 or more eyelashes touching globe in primary position

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Number of Eyelids With Pyogenic Granuloma

    A pyogenic granuloma was defined as a sessile growth of 2 mm or more in diameter on the tarsal conjunctiva.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Number of Eyelids Experiencing an Unfavorable Outcome

    At least 1 unfavorable outcome, including mild, moderate, or severe trichiasis; granuloma; or mild, moderate, or severe eyelid contour abnormality

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Number of Eyelids With Normal or Mild Eyelid Contour Abnormalities vs Moderate or Severe Eyelid Contour Abnormalities

    Eyelid contour abnormalities (ECA) were graded by photographs of the eyes. In the primary outcome measure, normal eyes and mild eyelid contour abnormalities are considered together, and moderate or severe eyelid contour abnormalities are considered together. ECA severity is defined as follows: Mild: Vertical deviation from the natural contour \< 1 mm in height (less than half the pupil height in daylight) and affecting \< 1/3 of horizontal eyelid length; Moderate: Vertical deviation from the natural contour 1-2 mm in height (about the pupil height in daylight) or affecting 1/3-2/3 of horizontal eyelid length; Severe: Vertical deviation from the natural contour \> 2 mm in height (more than the pupil height in daylight) or a defect \> 2/3 of the horizontal eyelid length

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Eyelids With Mild, Moderate, Severe, or no Eyelid Contour Abnormality

    Eyelid contour abnormalities (ECA) were graded by photographs of the eyes. ECA severity is defined as follows: Mild: Vertical deviation from the natural contour \< 1 mm in height (less than half the pupil height in daylight) and affecting \< 1/3 of horizontal eyelid length; Moderate: Vertical deviation from the natural contour 1-2 mm in height (about the pupil height in daylight) or affecting 1/3-2/3 of horizontal eyelid length; Severe: Vertical deviation from the natural contour \> 2 mm in height (more than the pupil height in daylight) or a defect \> 2/3 of the horizontal eyelid length

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Number of Eyelids With Normal, Mild, Moderate, or Severe Trachomatous Trichiasis

    Trichiasis is generally defined as 1 or more eyelashes touching globe in primary position. Classifications of trichiasis severity are as follows: Mild: 1-4 Eyelashes touching globe, no epilation OR 1-10 Eyelashes epilated, no eyelashes touching globe; Moderate: 5-9 Eyelashes touching globe, no epilation OR 1-4 Eyelashes touching globe and 1-10 eyelashes epilated; Severe: 5-9 Eyelashes touching globe and 1-10 eyelashes epilated OR 10 Eyelashes touching globe, regardless of epilation status OR 11-20 Eyelashes epilated, regardless of eyelashes touching globe OR Entire eyelid epilated, regardless of eyelashes touching globe

    Time frame: 2 Years

07

Results

Posted May 19, 2017

Participant flow

Community-level eye screenings were conducted to identify all trichiasis cases in the community. Patients were scheduled for surgery. On the day of surgery they were invited to join the study if they were eligible.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStandard InstrumentationTT Clamp
Started16741671
Completed16741669
Not completed02
Withdrew: Death02

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Eyelids With Presence of Recurrent Trichiasis

Trichiasis: 1 or more eyelashes touching globe in primary position

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Number · eyelids
Number of Eyelids With Presence of Recurrent Trichiasis
eyelidsTT ClampStandard BLTR Technique
Normal9481062
TT Recurrence721612
Statistical analysis
  • TT Clamp vs Standard BLTR Technique · Odds ratio (or): 1.36 · 95% CI 0.96 to 1.93
PrimaryNumber of Eyelids With Pyogenic Granuloma

A pyogenic granuloma was defined as a sessile growth of 2 mm or more in diameter on the tarsal conjunctiva.

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Number · eyelids
Number of Eyelids With Pyogenic Granuloma
eyelidsTT ClampStandard BLTR Technique
Granuloma281375
Normal13881299
Statistical analysis
  • TT Clamp vs Standard BLTR Technique · Odds ratio (or): 0.67 · 95% CI 0.46 to 0.98
PrimaryNumber of Eyelids Experiencing an Unfavorable Outcome

At least 1 unfavorable outcome, including mild, moderate, or severe trichiasis; granuloma; or mild, moderate, or severe eyelid contour abnormality

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Number · eyelids
Number of Eyelids Experiencing an Unfavorable Outcome
eyelidsTT ClampStandard BLTR Technique
Any unfavorable outcome10171055
Normal652619
Statistical analysis
  • TT Clamp vs Standard BLTR Technique · Odds ratio (or): 0.88 · 95% CI 0.66 to 1.18
PrimaryNumber of Eyelids With Normal or Mild Eyelid Contour Abnormalities vs Moderate or Severe Eyelid Contour Abnormalities

Eyelid contour abnormalities (ECA) were graded by photographs of the eyes. In the primary outcome measure, normal eyes and mild eyelid contour abnormalities are considered together, and moderate or severe eyelid contour abnormalities are considered together. ECA severity is defined as follows: Mild: Vertical deviation from the natural contour \< 1 mm in height (less than half the pupil height in daylight) and affecting \< 1/3 of horizontal eyelid length; Moderate: Vertical deviation from the natural contour 1-2 mm in height (about the pupil height in daylight) or affecting 1/3-2/3 of horizontal eyelid length; Severe: Vertical deviation from the natural contour \> 2 mm in height (more than the pupil height in daylight) or a defect \> 2/3 of the horizontal eyelid length

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Number · eyelids
Number of Eyelids With Normal or Mild Eyelid Contour Abnormalities vs Moderate or Severe Eyelid Contour Abnormalities
eyelidsTT ClampStandard BLTR Technique
No/Mild ECA15491500
Moderate/Severe ECA120174
Statistical analysis
  • TT Clamp vs Standard BLTR Technique · Odds ratio (or): 0.65 · 95% CI 0.44 to 0.98
SecondaryNumber of Eyelids With Mild, Moderate, Severe, or no Eyelid Contour Abnormality

Eyelid contour abnormalities (ECA) were graded by photographs of the eyes. ECA severity is defined as follows: Mild: Vertical deviation from the natural contour \< 1 mm in height (less than half the pupil height in daylight) and affecting \< 1/3 of horizontal eyelid length; Moderate: Vertical deviation from the natural contour 1-2 mm in height (about the pupil height in daylight) or affecting 1/3-2/3 of horizontal eyelid length; Severe: Vertical deviation from the natural contour \> 2 mm in height (more than the pupil height in daylight) or a defect \> 2/3 of the horizontal eyelid length

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Number · eyelids
Number of Eyelids With Mild, Moderate, Severe, or no Eyelid Contour Abnormality
eyelidsTT ClampStandard BLTR Technique
Normal13971278
Mild ECA152222
Moderate ECA89131
Severe ECA3143
Statistical analysis
  • TT Clamp vs Standard BLTR Technique · Odds ratio (or): 0.64 · 95% CI 0.42 to 0.97
  • TT Clamp vs Standard BLTR Technique · Odds ratio (or): 0.63 · 95% CI 0.39 to 1.01
  • TT Clamp vs Standard BLTR Technique · Odds ratio (or): 0.62 · 95% CI 0.35 to 1.10
SecondaryNumber of Eyelids With Normal, Mild, Moderate, or Severe Trachomatous Trichiasis

Trichiasis is generally defined as 1 or more eyelashes touching globe in primary position. Classifications of trichiasis severity are as follows: Mild: 1-4 Eyelashes touching globe, no epilation OR 1-10 Eyelashes epilated, no eyelashes touching globe; Moderate: 5-9 Eyelashes touching globe, no epilation OR 1-4 Eyelashes touching globe and 1-10 eyelashes epilated; Severe: 5-9 Eyelashes touching globe and 1-10 eyelashes epilated OR 10 Eyelashes touching globe, regardless of epilation status OR 11-20 Eyelashes epilated, regardless of eyelashes touching globe OR Entire eyelid epilated, regardless of eyelashes touching globe

Time frame:
2 Years
Reported as:
Number · eyelids
Number of Eyelids With Normal, Mild, Moderate, or Severe Trachomatous Trichiasis
eyelidsTT ClampStandard BLTR Technique
Normal9481062
Mild TT Recurrence476417
Moderate TT Recurrence12186
Severe TT Recurrence120100
Statistical analysis
  • TT Clamp vs Standard BLTR Technique · Odds ratio (or): 1.22 · 95% CI 0.97 to 1.53

Adverse events

Collected over through 2 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Standard Instrumentation—0/960 (0%)15/960 (1.6%)
TT Clamp—0/957 (0%)12/957 (1.3%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventStandard InstrumentationTT Clamp
necrosisEye disorders4/9608/957
postoperative bleedingEye disorders5/9604/957
Excess intraoperative bleedingEye disorders4/9600/957
Division of Eyelid MarginEye disorders2/9600/957

Baseline characteristics

1927 participants were originally enrolled. 10 participants did not undergo surgery for the following reasons: refused surgery (5), ineligible because of lower eyelid trichiasis only (4), or surgery was delayed and patient did not attend (1). The final total number of participants was 1917.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Standard InstrumentationTT ClampTotal
Mean55.6 ± 13.154.9 ± 13.555.2 ± 13.3
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(participants)Standard InstrumentationTT ClampTotal
Female7227051427
Male238252490
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Standard InstrumentationTT ClampTotal
Tanzania9609571917
Trichiasis
Trichiasis(eyelids)Standard InstrumentationTT ClampTotal
mild347303650
moderate453423876
severe8749451819
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Johns Hopkins University
    Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Gower EW, Munoz B, Rajak S, Habtamu E, West SK, Merbs SL, Harding JC, Alemayehu W, Callahan EK, Emerson PM, Gebre T, Burton MJ. Pre-operative trichiatic eyelash pattern predicts post-operative trachomatous trichiasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Oct 7;13(10):e0007637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007637. eCollection 2019 Oct. PubMed 31589610 ↗
  • Gower EW, West SK, Harding JC, Cassard SD, Munoz BE, Othman MS, Kello AB, Merbs SL. Trachomatous trichiasis clamp vs standard bilamellar tarsal rotation instrumentation for trichiasis surgery: results of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar;131(3):294-301. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.910. PubMed 23494035 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified data will be provided to investigators through application to the data committee at Johns Hopkins University.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of May 2009, a primary completion of Jan 2012 and a completion of Jun 2012. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in May 2017, 5 years 4 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 21, 2009
First posted
Apr 22, 2009
Start
May 2009
Primary completionActual
Jan 2012
CompletionActual
Jun 2012
Results first posted
May 19, 2017
Last update
May 19, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 19, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00886015
Collaborators
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Responsible party
Emily Gower (Associate Professor of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 22, 2009
Start date
May 2009
Primary completion
Jan 2012
Completion
Jun 2012
Results posted
May 19, 2017
Last update
May 19, 2017

Study contacts

Emily Gower, PhD
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion