CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00885131Updated Dec 9, 2019

Effect of Reward on Learning in Motor Cortex

An observational study in Healthy, sponsored by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-09.

Sponsored by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
64
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) uses a strong magnetic field and radio waves to take pictures of the brain. Some MRI studies suggest that this technique reveals brain differences in patients with a nervous system illness when compared to adults without a nervous system illness.

Objectives:

  • To study functional changes in the brain that may be observed in people without any nervous system illness.
  • To learn more about which areas of the brain are necessary to perform certain tasks, especially learning simple motor sequences and processing rewards.

Eligibility:

  • Healthy volunteers between the ages of 18 and 50 who are right-handed and are native English speakers, and who have no medical conditions that would prevent them from undergoing magnetic imaging.
  • Volunteers must not have a history of neurological or psychiatric illnesses.
  • Female volunteers must not be pregnant.

Design:

  • Volunteers will be asked to undergo different types of magnetic imaging, including functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), and/or transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), while participating in either a slot machine simulation or a key sequence learning task.
  • Volunteers will participate in one of four possible experiments:
  • Experiment 1: MRS/TMS and slot machine (3 visits, 3.5 hours in total).
  • Experiment 2: MRS/TMS and key sequence (3 visits, 3.5 hours in total).
  • Experiment 3: fMRI and slot machine (2 visits, 3 hours in total).
  • Experiment 4: fMRI and key sequence (1 visit, 2 hours in total).
  • Experiment types:
  • Slot machine: A computer game like a slot machine, where the user presses a button to start the game and watches as the three barrels of the machine spin into place.
  • Key sequence: Pressing a series of buttons in response to visual cues.
  • Volunteers will also be asked to give a small blood sample for genetic testing.
  • Volunteers will be paid a small amount of money (approximately $50 $80) during the experiments in compensation for their participation in the study.
Read the detailed description

Objective: The role of mesencephalic dopamine neurons in reward processing has been established in primates using electrophysiological techniques and in humans using functional neuroimaging. They have rich projections to both the prefrontal and motor cortices where they synapse on interneurons and cortical pyramidal cells, producing primarily inhibition. Though their function is not fully understood, these projections clearly play an important role in motivation and learning. We recently developed a paradigm to detect reward-related signals in the primary motor cortex, using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and demonstrated increased inhibition in primary motor cortex under conditions of increased reward expectancy. These results suggest that motor learning, which depends critically on the motor cortex, may be influenced by reward, which may take the form of simple performance feedback in humans. This kind of feedback also allows subjects to predict the outcome of actions. Thus, our present objective is to investigate the influence of reward/feedback/prediction on the activity of primary motor cortex during motor learning and in particular during instances of increased reward expectancy. Further, we will examine the role of a brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) single nucleotide polymorphism on motor learning.

Study Population: The population that we will study will be healthy volunteers between the ages of 18-50, without any significant medical history or contraindication to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

Design: All experiments will employ within- or between-subjects fMRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) to measure changes in activations of different cortical areas in response to motor learning and reward.

Outcome Measures: The outcome measures will be (a) graded changes in blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) in response to motor learning and reward and (b) variations in GABA concentration in response to motor learning and reward, and c) variations in response time in the behavioral performance of a learning task.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy

Keywords

  • Reward Processing
  • Motor Cortex
  • HV
  • Healthy Volunteer
03

In context

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) is the lead sponsor of 592 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.

Of its 18 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (44%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-50.
  • Right handed.

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Significant neurological or psychiatric history
  • Habitual consumption of more than two drinks a day, marijuana more than once a week or any other illicit drug use within the last three months
  • Use of medication affecting the DA system, such as phenothiazine antihistamines (promethazine), antiemetics or decongestants within the last month
  • Significant abnormality on neurological examination
  • Metal in the cranial cavity or eye, pacemaker, implanted pumps or stimulators
  • Subjects who participate in any one experiment in this protocol may not participate in another experiment in this protocol.
05

Study design

Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The outcome measures will be (a) graded changes in blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) in response to motor learning and reward and (b) variations in GABA concentration in response to motor learning and reward.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The secondary outcome measures will be variations in response time in the behavioral performance of a learning task.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
    Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Arancio O, Chao MV. Neurotrophins, synaptic plasticity and dementia. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007 Jun;17(3):325-30. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2007.03.013. Epub 2007 Apr 6. PubMed 17419049 ↗
  • Ashe J, Lungu OV, Basford AT, Lu X. Cortical control of motor sequences. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006 Apr;16(2):213-21. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.03.008. Epub 2006 Mar 24. PubMed 16563734 ↗
  • Avanzi M, Uber E, Bonfa F. Pathological gambling in two patients on dopamine replacement therapy for Parkinson's disease. Neurol Sci. 2004 Jun;25(2):98-101. doi: 10.1007/s10072-004-0238-z. PubMed 15221629 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 9, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00885131
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Collaborators
United States Department of Defense, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC), Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine (CNRM)
First posted
Apr 21, 2009
Start date
Apr 15, 2009
Completion
Jan 22, 2013
Last update
Dec 9, 2019

Study contacts

Eric M Wassermann, M.D.
principal investigator · National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion