ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00883493QUALITYUpdated Jul 11, 2012Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of Quetiapine Versus Quetiapine Plus Lithium in Bipolar Depression

A Phase 3 interventional study of Quetiapine fumarate XR and Lithium carbonate in Acute Bipolar Depression, sponsored by AstraZeneca. Completed at 24 sites in 9 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-07-11.

Sponsored by AstraZeneca · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
421
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of quetiapine fumarate monotherapy with quetiapine fumarate in combination with lithium in the treatment of a major depressive episode in patients with bipolar disorder.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Bipolar Depression

Keywords

  • Acute bipolar depression
  • Lithium carbonate
  • quetiapine fumarate
  • MADRS
03

In context

Lead sponsor

AstraZeneca is the lead sponsor of 3,492 studies on the registry; 266 are open to participants now.

Of its 368 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 176 (48%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Outpatients that meet the diagnostic criteria for bipolar disorder I and bipolar disorder II with the most recent episode depressed
  • The total score of the scale that's used for the evaluation of depression (HAM-D) should be ≥20
  • The total score of the scale that' used for the evaluation of mania (YMRS) should be ≤12

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a current DSM-IV-TR Axis I disorder other than bipolar disorder within 6 months of enrollment. Patients who pose a current serious suicidal or homicidal risk
  • Use of drugs that induce or inhibit the hepatic metabolizing enzymes within 14 days before randomisation
  • Patients who are unable to discontinue all psychoactive medications, including antidepressants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers at least 7 days prior to randomisation and consistent with the pharmacokinetics of the drug
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
421 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Quetiapin fumarate XR

    Quetiapine XR (extended release) will be administered once daily at bedtime in oral tablet form, Day 1: 50 mg, Day 2: 100 mg, Day 3: 200 mg, Day 4 onwards: 300 mg.

    Drug: Quetiapine fumarate XR

  • Experimental
    Quetiapin fumarate XR+Lithium carbonate

    Quetiapine XR will be administered like monotherapy arm. Lithium will be administered twice daily from Day 1 to Day 56.

    Drug: Quetiapine fumarate XR · Drug: Lithium carbonate

Interventions

  • Quetiapine XR (extended release) will be administered once daily at bedtime in oral tablet form, Day 1: 50 mg, Day 2: 100 mg, Day 3: 200 mg, Day 4 onwards: 300 mg.

    Also known as: SEROQUEL XR

  • Twice daily from Day 1 to Day 56. From Day 1 to Day 7, the total daily dose of lithium could be increased gradually within the dose range 300 mg/day to 1800 mg/day. From Day 8 to Day 56, the total daily dose could be adjusted from 600 to 1800 mg/day

    Also known as: LITHURIL Tb in TURKEY, LITOCARB in PERU

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score.

    The change of MADRS Total Score from baseline to the end of treatment was calculated by subtracting the MADRS Total Score assessed at week 8 from the baseline one (Baseline - 8 weeks). The MADRS is a 10-item scale that evaluates the core symptoms and cognitive features of clinical depression. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS Total score ranges from 0 (min) to 60 (max). Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Response Rate for MADRS.

    Response rate defined as the percentage of patients with a ≥50% reduction from baseline in the MADRS total score to the final assessment at week 8. The MADRS is a 10-item scale that evaluates the core symptoms and cognitive features of clinical depression. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS Total score ranges from 0 (min) to 60 (max). Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: baseline, week 8

  2. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) Total Score.

    The mean change of HAM-D Total Score from baseline to the end of treatment was calculated by subtracting the HAM-D Total Score assessed at week 8 from the baseline one (Baseline - week 8). HAM-D is a multiple choice questionnaire used to rate the severity of a patient's major depression. It consists of 17 different items with possible scores from 0 to 4 or 0 to 2 or 0 to 6 depending on the items. Sum the total of all seventeen items gives the HAM-D Total Score, which may range from 0 (min) to 53 (max). The higher the score, the more severe the depression.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 Weeks

  3. Change in Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) Total Score

    The mean change in HAM-A total score from baseline to final assessment was calculated by subtracting the HAM-A Total score assessed at week 8 from the total score assessed at the baseline (baseline - week 8). The HAM-A is a 14-item scale that assesses anxiety symptoms of anxiety such as "anxious mood", "tension" or "fears". Each item is scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0=not present to 4=severe. Sum the scores from all 14 parameters gives the HAM-A Total Score which may range from 0 (min) to 56 (max).

    Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks

  4. Change in the Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Score.

    The reported mean change in the CGI-S score was calculated as baseline - week 8. CGI-S is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment. A patient is assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating 1, normal, not at all ill; 2, borderline mentally ill; 3, mildly ill; 4, moderately ill; 5, markedly ill; 6, severely ill; or 7, extremely ill.

    Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks

  5. Change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total Score.

    The YMRS is a rating scale to assess manic symptoms. The scale has 11 items and is based upon patient's subjective report of his or hers clinical condition over the previous 48 hours. The mean change in YMRS Total score reported was calculated as baseline - week 8. The YMRS total score ranges from 0 to 60 where higher scores indicate more severe mania, thus, a negative change (or decrease) from baseline indicates a reduction (or improvement) in manic symptoms. Total score ≤12 indicates remission (13-19=minimal symptoms; 20-25=mild mania, 26-37=moderate mania, 38-60=severe mania).

    Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks

  6. Change in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)Total Score.

    The mean change in PSQI score from baseline to final assessment at week 8 was calculated as baseline - week 8. PSQI evaluates 7 areas of quality and pattern of sleep: sleep quality, duration getting to sleep, sleep duration, sleep adequacy, sleep disturbance, use of sleeping pill, and somnolence). Each area is rated on a scale from 0 (better) to 3 (worse) with a total score ranging from 0 to 21. Reduction in total scores are associated with better sleep quality.

    Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks

  7. Change in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Total Score.

    The mean change in (Q-LES-Q-Short Form) Total Score from baseline to week 8 was calculated by subtracting the 8 week value from baseline value (baseline - week 8). The Q-LES-Q-SF is a patient self assessment questionnaire consisting of 16 self-rated questions (1 being very poor - 5 very good); the first 14 will be incorporated into a total score. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks

  8. Change in the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score.

    The mean change in the SDS Total score from baseline to week 8 (baseline- week 8). Sheehan Disability Scale is a 5 item scale, with a visual analog scale evaluating work/school work, social life and family life ranging from 0 to a maximum score of 30. Each one of the 3 domains is rated from 0-10 (no impairment to most severe impairment) with evaluation of not at all (0), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), marked (7-9) and extreme (10) disability. A total score will be calculated. A score of 30 indicates most severe impairment.

    Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks

  9. Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ) Scores.

    The 14-item TAQ questionnaire evaluates the patient's overall level of satisfaction with the study medication, the effectiveness, side effects and convenience of the medication. Effectiveness, side effects, convenience and global satisfaction is rated on a scale of 0 being the worst and 100 being very effective, no side effects or very convenient or very satisfied. Overall satisfaction is rated over a score of 5 and 5 being the best overall satisfaction.

    Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jun 29, 2012

Participant flow

First Subject in (FSI): 22 Apr 2009, Last Subject Last Visit (LSLV): 01 Mar 2011, in 9 countries, 29 Psychiatry centres, 421 randomised participants

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneQuetiapine XRQuatiapine XR + Lithium
Started212209
Intention to treat analysis population204195
Per protocol analysis population162155
Completed166159
Not completed4650
Withdrew: Adverse event1112
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy43
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up76
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1120
Withdrew: Eligibility criteria not fullfilled66
Withdrew: Study specific disc. criteria20
Withdrew: Other53

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score.

The change of MADRS Total Score from baseline to the end of treatment was calculated by subtracting the MADRS Total Score assessed at week 8 from the baseline one (Baseline - 8 weeks). The MADRS is a 10-item scale that evaluates the core symptoms and cognitive features of clinical depression. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS Total score ranges from 0 (min) to 60 (max). Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline, 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score.
scores on a scaleQuetiapine XRQuatiapine XR + Lithium
Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score.23.7 ± 8.424.3 ± 7.9
SecondaryResponse Rate for MADRS.

Response rate defined as the percentage of patients with a ≥50% reduction from baseline in the MADRS total score to the final assessment at week 8. The MADRS is a 10-item scale that evaluates the core symptoms and cognitive features of clinical depression. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS Total score ranges from 0 (min) to 60 (max). Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.

Time frame:
baseline, week 8
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Response Rate for MADRS.
percentage of participantsQuetiapine XRQuatiapine XR + Lithium
Response Rate for MADRS.93.2 ± 5,092.9 ± 4,3
SecondaryHamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) Total Score.

The mean change of HAM-D Total Score from baseline to the end of treatment was calculated by subtracting the HAM-D Total Score assessed at week 8 from the baseline one (Baseline - week 8). HAM-D is a multiple choice questionnaire used to rate the severity of a patient's major depression. It consists of 17 different items with possible scores from 0 to 4 or 0 to 2 or 0 to 6 depending on the items. Sum the total of all seventeen items gives the HAM-D Total Score, which may range from 0 (min) to 53 (max). The higher the score, the more severe the depression.

Time frame:
Baseline, 8 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) Total Score.
scores on a scaleQuetiapine XRQuatiapine XR + Lithium
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) Total Score.20.5 ± 7.021.0 ± 6.1
SecondaryChange in Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) Total Score

The mean change in HAM-A total score from baseline to final assessment was calculated by subtracting the HAM-A Total score assessed at week 8 from the total score assessed at the baseline (baseline - week 8). The HAM-A is a 14-item scale that assesses anxiety symptoms of anxiety such as "anxious mood", "tension" or "fears". Each item is scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0=not present to 4=severe. Sum the scores from all 14 parameters gives the HAM-A Total Score which may range from 0 (min) to 56 (max).

Time frame:
baseline, 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) Total Score
scores on a scaleQuetiapine XRQuatiapine XR + Lithium
Change in Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) Total Score17.5 ± 8.217.7 ± 8.2
SecondaryChange in the Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Score.

The reported mean change in the CGI-S score was calculated as baseline - week 8. CGI-S is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment. A patient is assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating 1, normal, not at all ill; 2, borderline mentally ill; 3, mildly ill; 4, moderately ill; 5, markedly ill; 6, severely ill; or 7, extremely ill.

Time frame:
baseline, 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in the Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Score.
scores on a scaleQuetiapine XRQuatiapine XR + Lithium
Change in the Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Score.3.1 ± 1.43.3 ± 1.2
SecondaryChange in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total Score.

The YMRS is a rating scale to assess manic symptoms. The scale has 11 items and is based upon patient's subjective report of his or hers clinical condition over the previous 48 hours. The mean change in YMRS Total score reported was calculated as baseline - week 8. The YMRS total score ranges from 0 to 60 where higher scores indicate more severe mania, thus, a negative change (or decrease) from baseline indicates a reduction (or improvement) in manic symptoms. Total score ≤12 indicates remission (13-19=minimal symptoms; 20-25=mild mania, 26-37=moderate mania, 38-60=severe mania).

Time frame:
baseline, 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total Score.
scores on a scaleQuetiapine XRQuatiapine XR + Lithium
Change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total Score.2.3 ± 1.82.2 ± 1.7
SecondaryChange in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)Total Score.

The mean change in PSQI score from baseline to final assessment at week 8 was calculated as baseline - week 8. PSQI evaluates 7 areas of quality and pattern of sleep: sleep quality, duration getting to sleep, sleep duration, sleep adequacy, sleep disturbance, use of sleeping pill, and somnolence). Each area is rated on a scale from 0 (better) to 3 (worse) with a total score ranging from 0 to 21. Reduction in total scores are associated with better sleep quality.

Time frame:
Baseline, 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Change in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)Total Score.
Scores on a scaleQuetiapine XRQuatiapine XR + Lithium
Change in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)Total Score.3.7 ± -205.0 ± -16
SecondaryChange in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Total Score.

The mean change in (Q-LES-Q-Short Form) Total Score from baseline to week 8 was calculated by subtracting the 8 week value from baseline value (baseline - week 8). The Q-LES-Q-SF is a patient self assessment questionnaire consisting of 16 self-rated questions (1 being very poor - 5 very good); the first 14 will be incorporated into a total score. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

Time frame:
baseline, 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Total Score.
scores on a scaleQuetiapine XRQuatiapine XR + Lithium
Change in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Total Score.-17.9 ± 12.0-18.8 ± 13.4
SecondaryChange in the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score.

The mean change in the SDS Total score from baseline to week 8 (baseline- week 8). Sheehan Disability Scale is a 5 item scale, with a visual analog scale evaluating work/school work, social life and family life ranging from 0 to a maximum score of 30. Each one of the 3 domains is rated from 0-10 (no impairment to most severe impairment) with evaluation of not at all (0), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), marked (7-9) and extreme (10) disability. A total score will be calculated. A score of 30 indicates most severe impairment.

Time frame:
baseline, 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change in the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score.
scores on a scaleQuetiapine XRQuatiapine XR + Lithium
Change in the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score.14.4 ± -314.3 ± -16
SecondaryTreatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ) Scores.

The 14-item TAQ questionnaire evaluates the patient's overall level of satisfaction with the study medication, the effectiveness, side effects and convenience of the medication. Effectiveness, side effects, convenience and global satisfaction is rated on a scale of 0 being the worst and 100 being very effective, no side effects or very convenient or very satisfied. Overall satisfaction is rated over a score of 5 and 5 being the best overall satisfaction.

Time frame:
baseline, 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ) Scores.
Scores on a scaleQuetiapine XRQuatiapine XR + Lithium
Effectivenes, baseline42.7 ± 20.236.7 ± 23.7
Effectivenes, week 868.7 ± 24.966.7 ± 21.8
Side effects, baseline41.7 ± 25.944.4 ± 24.9
Side effects, week 858.2 ± 26.750.4 ± 17.0
Convenience, baseline53.8 ± 21.552.8 ± 21.8
Convenience, week 873.6 ± 17.172.9 ± 17.2
Global satisfaction, baseline37.4 ± 26.135.0 ± 27.7
Global satisfaction, week 869.4 ± 19.470.7 ± 18.9

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 4% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Quetiapine XR—5/212 (2.4%)147/212 (69.3%)
Quatiapine XR + Lithium—5/209 (2.4%)149/209 (71.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventQuetiapine XRQuatiapine XR + Lithium
Hospitalization due to suicide riskPsychiatric disorders0/2121/209
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders1/2121/209
HypothyroidismEndocrine disorders0/2121/209
ConfusionNervous system disorders0/2121/209
BurnInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/2121/209
PeritonitisInfections and infestations1/2120/209
AppendicitisGastrointestinal disorders1/2120/209
SomnolanceNervous system disorders1/2120/209
Exacerbation of symptomsNervous system disorders1/2120/209
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent other events
EventQuetiapine XRQuatiapine XR + Lithium
Dry mouthNervous system disorders50/21247/209
SomnolanceNervous system disorders46/21249/209
DizzinessNervous system disorders16/21232/209
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders14/21229/209
TremorNervous system disorders11/21228/209
HeadacheNervous system disorders28/21225/209
AnxietyNervous system disorders21/21214/209
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders20/21217/209
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders14/21213/209
Increased appetiteNervous system disorders13/2125/209

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(Years)Quetiapine XRQuatiapine XR + LithiumTotal
Mean40.6 ± 10.839.9 ± 12.140.3 ± 11.4
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(years)Quetiapine XRQuatiapine XR + LithiumTotal
Median40 (19 to 64)40 (18 to 65)40 (18 to 65)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Quetiapine XRQuatiapine XR + LithiumTotal
Female147138285
Male5757114
Body weight
Body weight(Kilograms)Quetiapine XRQuatiapine XR + LithiumTotal
Mean72.8 ± 16.372.3 ± 15.472.5 ± 15.8
08

Study locations

24 sites
  • Research Site
    La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Research Site
    Godoy Cruz, Mendoza Province, Argentina
  • Research Site
    Mendoza, Mendoza Province, Argentina
  • Research Site
    Caba, Argentina
  • Research Site
    Aparecida de Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil
  • Research Site
    Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Research Site
    São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Research Site
    Santiago, Chile, Chile
  • Research Site
    Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
  • Research Site
    Bogota D.c, Cundinamarca, Colombia
  • Research Site
    Guatemala City, Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala
  • Research Site
    Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
  • Research Site
    San Luis Potosí City, San Luis Potosí, Mexico
  • Research Site
    Durango, Mexico
  • Research Site
    Monterrey, Mexico
  • Research Site
    Lima, Lima Province, Peru
  • Research Site
    Ankara, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
  • Research Site
    Elâzığ, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
  • Research Site
    Istanbul, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
  • Research Site
    Izmir, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
  • Research Site
    Kocaeli, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
  • Research Site
    Malatya, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
  • Research Site
    Manisa, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
  • Research Site
    Caracas, Venezuela
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 11, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00883493
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 17, 2009
Start date
Apr 2009
Primary completion
Mar 2011
Completion
Mar 2011
Results posted
Jun 29, 2012
Last update
Jul 11, 2012

Study contacts

Simavi Vahip, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · Ege University Faculty of Medicine Psychiatry Department İzmir

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion