ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00876733Updated Jan 16, 2015Results posted

Non-Interventional Observational Study With Viramune Plus Antiretroviral in HIV Infected Patients

An observational study in HIV Infections, sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim. Completed at 66 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-01-16.

Sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
605
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This observational study is supposed to assess (under conditions of clinical practice in daily routine) whether treatment with Viramune (nevirapine) in combination with ARV, e.g. Combivir (Zidovudine and Lamivudine), Kivexa (Abacavir and Lamivudine) or Truvada (tenofovir and emtricitabine) will durably suppress viral load below the limit of detection or will maintain suppression of viral replication (HIV-RNA below limit of detection) achieved under previous anti-retroviral combination therapy after switch to combination treatment of Viramune (nevirapine) and ARV, e.g. Combivir (Zidovudine and Lamivudine), Kivexa (Abacavir and Lamivudine) or Truvada (tenofovir and emtricitabine).

02

Conditions studied

  • HIV Infections

Browse trials for

03

In context

HIV Infections

4,340 studies on the registry are indexed under HIV Infections; 240 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 605 is above the median of 200 across 731 observational studies indexed under HIV Infections.

Browse HIV Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Boehringer Ingelheim is the lead sponsor of 2,297 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.

Of its 166 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 121 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

patients

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • male and female
  • 18 years or older
  • written informed consent
  • The inclusion criteria for treatment with Viramune plus other antiretroviral combination drugs are to be based on the current information for healthcare professionals / SmPC

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Pregnant patients
  • The exclusion criteria for the treatment of Viramune plus other antiretroviral combination drugs are to be based on the current SmPC
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
605 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • HIV treatment
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AE) and All Serious AEs

    Number of participants with Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AE) and All Serious AEs

    Time frame: 36 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in the Viral Load After 12 Months From Baseline.

    The change in the log10 viral load from baseline after 12 months was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a negative change represents a decrease in viral load.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

  2. Changes in the Viral Load After 36 Months From Baseline.

    The change in the log10 viral load from baseline after 36 months was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a negative change represents a decrease in viral load.

    Time frame: Baseline and 36 months

  3. Changes in the Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4+) Cell Count After 12 Months From Baseline.

    The change in the CD4+ cell count from baseline after 12 months was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase in CD4+ cell count.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

  4. Changes in the CD4+ Cell Count After 36 Months From Baseline.

    The change in the CD4+ cell count from baseline after 36 months was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase in CD4+ cell count.

    Time frame: Baseline and 36 months

  5. Changes in the Laboratory Data (Total Cholesterol) After 12 Months From Baseline

    The changes in the laboratory data (Total Cholesterol) from baseline after 12 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

  6. Changes in the Laboratory Data (HDL Cholesterol) After 12 Months From Baseline

    The changes in the laboratory data ( High density protein (HDL) Cholesterol) from baseline after 12 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

  7. Changes in the Laboratory Data (LDL Cholesterol) After 12 Months From Baseline

    The changes in the laboratory data ( Low density protein (LDL) Cholesterol) from baseline after 12 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

  8. Changes in the Laboratory Data (Triglycerides) After 12 Months From Baseline

    The changes in the laboratory data (Triglycerides) from baseline after 12 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

  9. Changes in the Laboratory Data (Blood Glucose) After 12 Months From Baseline

    The changes in the laboratory data (Blood Glucose) from baseline after 12 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

  10. Changes in the Laboratory Data (ALT) After 12 Months From Baseline

    The changes in the laboratory data (Alanine transaminase (ALT)) from baseline after 12 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

  11. Changes in the Laboratory Data (AST) After 12 Months From Baseline

    The changes in the laboratory data (Aspartate transminase (AST)) from baseline after 12 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

  12. Changes in the Laboratory Data (Gamma GT) After 12 Months From Baseline

    The changes in the laboratory data (Gamma glutamyl transferase (Gamma GT)) from baseline after 12 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

  13. Changes in the Laboratory Data (Creatinine) After 12 Months From Baseline

    The changes in the laboratory data (Creatinine) from baseline after 12 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

  14. Changes in the Laboratory Data (Haemoglobin) After 12 Months From Baseline

    The changes in the laboratory data (Haemoglobin) from baseline after 12 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

  15. Changes in the Laboratory Data (Total Cholesterol) After 36 Months From Baseline

    The changes in the laboratory data (Total Cholesterol) from baseline after 36 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

    Time frame: Baseline and 36 months

  16. Changes in the Laboratory Data (HDL Cholesterol) After 36 Months From Baseline

    The changes in the laboratory data ( High density protein (HDL) Cholesterol) from baseline after 36 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

    Time frame: Baseline and 36 months

  17. Changes in the Laboratory Data (LDL Cholesterol) After 36 Months From Baseline

    The changes in the laboratory data ( Low density protein (LDL) Cholesterol) from baseline after 36 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

    Time frame: Baseline and 36 months

  18. Changes in the Laboratory Data (Triglycerides) After 36 Months From Baseline

    The changes in the laboratory data (Triglycerides) from baseline after 36 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

    Time frame: Baseline and 36 months

  19. Changes in the Laboratory Data (Blood Glucose) After 36 Months From Baseline

    The changes in the laboratory data (Blood Glucose) from baseline after 36 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

    Time frame: Baseline and 36 months

  20. Changes in the Laboratory Data (ALT) After 36 Months From Baseline

    The changes in the laboratory data (Alanine transaminase (ALT)) from baseline after 36 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

    Time frame: Baseline and 36 months

  21. Changes in the Laboratory Data (AST) After 36 Months From Baseline

    The changes in the laboratory data (Aspartate transminase (AST)) from baseline after 36 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

    Time frame: Baseline and 36 months

  22. Changes in the Laboratory Data (Gamma GT) After 36 Months From Baseline

    The changes in the laboratory data (Gamma glutamyl transferase (Gamma GT)) from baseline after 36 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

    Time frame: Baseline and 36 months

  23. Changes in the Laboratory Data (Creatinine) After 36 Months From Baseline

    The changes in the laboratory data (Creatinine) from baseline after 36 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

    Time frame: Baseline and 36 months

  24. Changes in the Laboratory Data (Haemoglobin) After 36 Months From Baseline

    The changes in the laboratory data (Haemoglobin) from baseline after 36 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

    Time frame: Baseline and 36 months

07

Results

Posted Jan 16, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Started2882039321
Completed1971616314
Not completed9142307
Withdrew: Adverse event3420103
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy179101
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up261032
Withdrew: Data not available14371

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AE) and All Serious AEs

Number of participants with Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AE) and All Serious AEs

Time frame:
36 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AE) and All Serious AEs
participantsTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Patients with any AE1681105110
Patients with serious AEs171250
SecondaryChanges in the Viral Load After 12 Months From Baseline.

The change in the log10 viral load from baseline after 12 months was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a negative change represents a decrease in viral load.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · Log10 copies/ml
Changes in the Viral Load After 12 Months From Baseline.
Log10 copies/mlTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Viral Load After 12 Months From Baseline.-3.3 ± 1.3-0.1 ± 0.8-1.9 ± 1.7—
SecondaryChanges in the Viral Load After 36 Months From Baseline.

The change in the log10 viral load from baseline after 36 months was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a negative change represents a decrease in viral load.

Time frame:
Baseline and 36 months
Reported as:
Mean · Log10 copies/ml
Changes in the Viral Load After 36 Months From Baseline.
Log10 copies/mlTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Viral Load After 36 Months From Baseline.-3.4 ± 1.4-0.2 ± 1.1-2.1 ± 1.8—
SecondaryChanges in the Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4+) Cell Count After 12 Months From Baseline.

The change in the CD4+ cell count from baseline after 12 months was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase in CD4+ cell count.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · cells/mm^3
Changes in the Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4+) Cell Count After 12 Months From Baseline.
cells/mm^3Treatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4+) Cell Count After 12 Months From Baseline.188.7 ± 165.054.6 ± 145.382.8 ± 269.5128.0 ± 223.4
SecondaryChanges in the CD4+ Cell Count After 36 Months From Baseline.

The change in the CD4+ cell count from baseline after 36 months was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase in CD4+ cell count.

Time frame:
Baseline and 36 months
Reported as:
Mean · cells/mm^3
Changes in the CD4+ Cell Count After 36 Months From Baseline.
cells/mm^3Treatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the CD4+ Cell Count After 36 Months From Baseline.223.7 ± 200.42.8 ± 221.3116.0 ± 317.763.5 ± 152.0
SecondaryChanges in the Laboratory Data (Total Cholesterol) After 12 Months From Baseline

The changes in the laboratory data (Total Cholesterol) from baseline after 12 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Total Cholesterol) After 12 Months From Baseline
mg/dLTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Total Cholesterol) After 12 Months From Baseline25.2 ± 36.2-3.0 ± 43.215.8 ± 32.816.4 ± 9.7
SecondaryChanges in the Laboratory Data (HDL Cholesterol) After 12 Months From Baseline

The changes in the laboratory data ( High density protein (HDL) Cholesterol) from baseline after 12 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Changes in the Laboratory Data (HDL Cholesterol) After 12 Months From Baseline
mg/dLTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Laboratory Data (HDL Cholesterol) After 12 Months From Baseline12.7 ± 14.34.2 ± 15.010.9 ± 14.9-13.2 ± 29.1
SecondaryChanges in the Laboratory Data (LDL Cholesterol) After 12 Months From Baseline

The changes in the laboratory data ( Low density protein (LDL) Cholesterol) from baseline after 12 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Changes in the Laboratory Data (LDL Cholesterol) After 12 Months From Baseline
mg/dLTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Laboratory Data (LDL Cholesterol) After 12 Months From Baseline12.1 ± 29.62.4 ± 35.714.4 ± 30.513.6 ± 10.1
SecondaryChanges in the Laboratory Data (Triglycerides) After 12 Months From Baseline

The changes in the laboratory data (Triglycerides) from baseline after 12 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Triglycerides) After 12 Months From Baseline
mg/dLTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Triglycerides) After 12 Months From Baseline7.9 ± 106.7-61.6 ± 180.2-24.0 ± 78.916.3 ± 47.2
SecondaryChanges in the Laboratory Data (Blood Glucose) After 12 Months From Baseline

The changes in the laboratory data (Blood Glucose) from baseline after 12 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Blood Glucose) After 12 Months From Baseline
mg/dLTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Blood Glucose) After 12 Months From Baseline0.2 ± 20.6-3.6 ± 16.90.3 ± 24.9-8.4 ± 9.2
SecondaryChanges in the Laboratory Data (ALT) After 12 Months From Baseline

The changes in the laboratory data (Alanine transaminase (ALT)) from baseline after 12 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · U/L
Changes in the Laboratory Data (ALT) After 12 Months From Baseline
U/LTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Laboratory Data (ALT) After 12 Months From Baseline5.6 ± 20.510.2 ± 28.87.0 ± 28.49.7 ± 33.0
SecondaryChanges in the Laboratory Data (AST) After 12 Months From Baseline

The changes in the laboratory data (Aspartate transminase (AST)) from baseline after 12 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · U/L
Changes in the Laboratory Data (AST) After 12 Months From Baseline
U/LTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Laboratory Data (AST) After 12 Months From Baseline1.7 ± 19.14.4 ± 24.73.0 ± 20.98.3 ± 32.4
SecondaryChanges in the Laboratory Data (Gamma GT) After 12 Months From Baseline

The changes in the laboratory data (Gamma glutamyl transferase (Gamma GT)) from baseline after 12 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · U/L
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Gamma GT) After 12 Months From Baseline
U/LTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Gamma GT) After 12 Months From Baseline32.9 ± 72.425.4 ± 57.723.7 ± 62.39.1 ± 42.6
SecondaryChanges in the Laboratory Data (Creatinine) After 12 Months From Baseline

The changes in the laboratory data (Creatinine) from baseline after 12 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Creatinine) After 12 Months From Baseline
mg/dLTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Creatinine) After 12 Months From Baseline0.0 ± 0.10.0 ± 0.10.0 ± 0.10.0 ± 0.2
SecondaryChanges in the Laboratory Data (Haemoglobin) After 12 Months From Baseline

The changes in the laboratory data (Haemoglobin) from baseline after 12 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 12 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · g/dL
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Haemoglobin) After 12 Months From Baseline
g/dLTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Haemoglobin) After 12 Months From Baseline0.6 ± 1.10.3 ± 1.20.3 ± 0.90.5 ± 1.1
SecondaryChanges in the Laboratory Data (Total Cholesterol) After 36 Months From Baseline

The changes in the laboratory data (Total Cholesterol) from baseline after 36 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

Time frame:
Baseline and 36 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Total Cholesterol) After 36 Months From Baseline
mg/dLTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Total Cholesterol) After 36 Months From Baseline24.1 ± 39.02.0 ± 44.424.2 ± 42.441.1 ± 12.9
SecondaryChanges in the Laboratory Data (HDL Cholesterol) After 36 Months From Baseline

The changes in the laboratory data ( High density protein (HDL) Cholesterol) from baseline after 36 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

Time frame:
Baseline and 36 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Changes in the Laboratory Data (HDL Cholesterol) After 36 Months From Baseline
mg/dLTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Laboratory Data (HDL Cholesterol) After 36 Months From Baseline11.0 ± 21.44.4 ± 20.711.1 ± 11.9-19.6 ± 38.7
SecondaryChanges in the Laboratory Data (LDL Cholesterol) After 36 Months From Baseline

The changes in the laboratory data ( Low density protein (LDL) Cholesterol) from baseline after 36 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

Time frame:
Baseline and 36 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Changes in the Laboratory Data (LDL Cholesterol) After 36 Months From Baseline
mg/dLTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Laboratory Data (LDL Cholesterol) After 36 Months From Baseline12.4 ± 25.815.8 ± 38.123.8 ± 44.722.7 ± 27.9
SecondaryChanges in the Laboratory Data (Triglycerides) After 36 Months From Baseline

The changes in the laboratory data (Triglycerides) from baseline after 36 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

Time frame:
Baseline and 36 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Triglycerides) After 36 Months From Baseline
mg/dLTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Triglycerides) After 36 Months From Baseline-3.4 ± 91.3-73.7 ± 252.6-17.2 ± 98.034.2
SecondaryChanges in the Laboratory Data (Blood Glucose) After 36 Months From Baseline

The changes in the laboratory data (Blood Glucose) from baseline after 36 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

Time frame:
Baseline and 36 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Blood Glucose) After 36 Months From Baseline
mg/dLTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Blood Glucose) After 36 Months From Baseline1.6 ± 27.20.0 ± 19.90.7 ± 36.4-7.2
SecondaryChanges in the Laboratory Data (ALT) After 36 Months From Baseline

The changes in the laboratory data (Alanine transaminase (ALT)) from baseline after 36 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

Time frame:
Baseline and 36 months
Reported as:
Mean · U/L
Changes in the Laboratory Data (ALT) After 36 Months From Baseline
U/LTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Laboratory Data (ALT) After 36 Months From Baseline16.2 ± 107.14.0 ± 33.711.8 ± 27.75.2 ± 26.1
SecondaryChanges in the Laboratory Data (AST) After 36 Months From Baseline

The changes in the laboratory data (Aspartate transminase (AST)) from baseline after 36 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

Time frame:
Baseline and 36 months
Reported as:
Mean · U/L
Changes in the Laboratory Data (AST) After 36 Months From Baseline
U/LTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Laboratory Data (AST) After 36 Months From Baseline7.3 ± 75.30.1 ± 24.65.5 ± 27.1-2.7 ± 19.6
SecondaryChanges in the Laboratory Data (Gamma GT) After 36 Months From Baseline

The changes in the laboratory data (Gamma glutamyl transferase (Gamma GT)) from baseline after 36 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

Time frame:
Baseline and 36 months
Reported as:
Mean · U/L
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Gamma GT) After 36 Months From Baseline
U/LTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Gamma GT) After 36 Months From Baseline52.3 ± 102.545.0 ± 112.650.3 ± 50.312.9 ± 48.1
SecondaryChanges in the Laboratory Data (Creatinine) After 36 Months From Baseline

The changes in the laboratory data (Creatinine) from baseline after 36 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

Time frame:
Baseline and 36 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Creatinine) After 36 Months From Baseline
mg/dLTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Creatinine) After 36 Months From Baseline0.0 ± 0.20.0 ± 0.10.0 ± 0.10.0 ± 0.1
SecondaryChanges in the Laboratory Data (Haemoglobin) After 36 Months From Baseline

The changes in the laboratory data (Haemoglobin) from baseline after 36 months were calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the value after 36 months. Therefore, a positive change represents an increase, a negative change represents a decrease in the data.

Time frame:
Baseline and 36 months
Reported as:
Mean · g/dL
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Haemoglobin) After 36 Months From Baseline
g/dLTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
Changes in the Laboratory Data (Haemoglobin) After 36 Months From Baseline0.7 ± 0.90.2 ± 1.20.5 ± 1.4-0.1 ± 1.6

Adverse events

Collected over 36 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment-naive Patients—17/288 (5.9%)51/288 (17.7%)
Pretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mL—12/203 (5.9%)33/203 (16.3%)
Pretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mL—5/93 (5.4%)22/93 (23.7%)
Patients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented—0/21 (0%)3/21 (14.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 52
Most frequent serious events
EventTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
DepressionPsychiatric disorders0/2880/2032/930/21
Acute hepatitis CInfections and infestations1/2880/2031/930/21
BronchopneumoniaInfections and infestations0/2880/2031/930/21
Herpes zosterInfections and infestations1/2880/2031/930/21
Meningoencephalitis herpeticInfections and infestations0/2880/2031/930/21
Joint dislocationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/2880/2031/930/21
ConvulsionNervous system disorders0/2880/2031/930/21
Anxiety disorderPsychiatric disorders0/2880/2031/930/21
Bursa removalSurgical and medical procedures0/2880/2031/930/21
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders2/2881/2030/930/21
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTreatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not Documented
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations30/28813/20315/931/21
BronchitisInfections and infestations14/28821/2039/931/21
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders16/28814/2037/932/21
HypertensionVascular disorders8/2886/2032/932/21
Transaminase increasedInvestigations16/2883/2032/930/21
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations15/2883/2033/930/21

Baseline characteristics

Treated set (TS): This patient set includes all HIV-1 infected patients who were dispensed Viramune® and were documented to have taken at least one dose of Viramune®and of a antiretroviral combination partner.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Treatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not DocumentedTotal
Mean40.2 ± 9.943.8 ± 9.640.9 ± 9.443.6 ± 7.841.6 ± 9.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Treatment-naive PatientsPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load ≤ 50 Copies/mLPretreated Patients, Baseline Viral Load > 50 Copies/mLPatients With Baseline Viral Load Not DocumentedTotal
Female32296067
Male2561748721538
08

Study locations

66 sites
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 14
    Aachen, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 12
    Berlin, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 13
    Berlin, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 15
    Berlin, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 19
    Berlin, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 21
    Berlin, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 23
    Berlin, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 24
    Berlin, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 28
    Berlin, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 30
    Berlin, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 31
    Berlin, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 34
    Berlin, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 38
    Berlin, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 41
    Berlin, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 54
    Berlin, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 60
    Berlin, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 63
    Berlin, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 8
    Berlin, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 58
    Bochum, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 50
    Chemnitz, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 53
    Cologne, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 61
    Cologne, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 48
    Dortmund, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 27
    Duisburg, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 49
    Düsseldorf, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 62
    Düsseldorf, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 9
    Düsseldorf, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 32
    Frankfurt, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 59
    Frankfurt, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 65
    Frankfurt, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 57
    Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 56
    Fürth, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 29
    Giessen, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 33
    Hamburg, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 42
    Hamburg, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 47
    Hamburg, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 51
    Hamburg, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 40
    Hanover, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 43
    Hanover, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 46
    Hanover, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 6
    Karlsruhe, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 25
    Koblenz, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 37
    Krefeld, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 11
    Leipzig, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 52
    Mainz, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 18
    München, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 20
    München, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 22
    München, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 26
    München, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 35
    München, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 5
    München, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 16
    Münster, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 17
    Münster, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 39
    Münster, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 55
    Münster, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 10
    Neuss, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 36
    Oldenburg, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 64
    Osnabrück, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 7
    Pforzheim, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 66
    Potsdam, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 1
    Stuttgart, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 3
    Stuttgart, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 4
    Stuttgart, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 45
    Troisdorf, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 2
    Wiesbaden, Germany
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 44
    Wuppertal, Germany
09

References and documents

Related links

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Mar 2009, a primary completion of Dec 2013 and a completion of Dec 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jan 2015, 1 year 1 month after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 20, 2009
First posted
Apr 7, 2009
Start
Mar 2009
Primary completionActual
Dec 2013
CompletionActual
Dec 2013
Results first posted
Jan 16, 2015
Last update
Jan 16, 2015
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 16, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00876733
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 7, 2009
Start date
Mar 2009
Primary completion
Dec 2013
Completion
Dec 2013
Results posted
Jan 16, 2015
Last update
Jan 16, 2015

Study contacts

Boehringer Ingelheim
study chair · Boehringer Ingelheim
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion