A Phase 4 interventional study of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and SILS in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, sponsored by G. Hatzikosta General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Greece. Open to participants aged 28 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-03-31.
Sponsored by G. Hatzikosta General Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
The attempt to further reduce the operative trauma in laparoscopic cholecystectomy led in new techniques, as Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) and Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS). These new techniques are considered as painless procedures, but there are not any publications to study a possible different pain score in new techniques versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In this randomized controlled study the researchers have investigated the pain scores, the incidence of nausea and vomiting and analgesics request after the procedure.
344 studies on the registry are indexed under Abdominal Pain; 53 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 70 across 256 interventional studies indexed under Abdominal Pain.
Browse Abdominal Pain studies →G. Hatzikosta General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Four ports classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Procedure: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Procedure: SILS
Four ports classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
SILS cholecystectomy, except the invisible scar, has significantly less abdominal and shoulder pain scores
The record gives a start of Sep 2008, a primary completion of Dec 2008 and a completion of Dec 2008. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
G. Hatzikosta General Hospital