CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00869440Updated Jan 8, 2019Results posted

Dose-Finding Safety Study Evaluating Remimazolam (CNS 7056) in Patients Undergoing Diagnostic Upper GI Endoscopy

A Phase 2 interventional study of CNS 7056 and Midazolam in Procedural Sedation and Endoscopy, sponsored by Paion UK Ltd.. Completed at 7 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-08.

Sponsored by Paion UK Ltd. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of CNS 7056 as a procedural sedative at three dose levels compared to midazolam during a diagnostic upper GI endoscopy.

Read the detailed description

This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, dose-finding study assessing the safety and efficacy of three dose levels of CNS 7056 compared with midazolam in patients undergoing diagnostic upper GI endoscopy.

Patients who met all study entry criteria and completed screening procedures were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups: CNS 7056 0.10 mg/kg,0.15 mg/kg, or 0.20 mg/kg; or midazolam 0.075 mg/kg. Patients received their assigned treatment administered as a single intravenous injection by a syringe driver over 1 minute. The endoscopy started when a Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) score of ≤3 has been reached, but no earlier than 90 seconds after Time 0 (the start of study drug injection). Rescue with sedative medication (midazolam 1-2 mg) was be permitted at the discretion of the administering physician.

Efficacy assessments consisted of the MOAA/S scores, Aldrete scores, and drowsiness measures using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Cognitive function was assessed by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised™ (HVLT-R™) and memory for the procedure by the Brice Questionnaire.

Safety assessments included adverse events, physical examinations, vital signs, ECGs, pulse oximetry measurements, clinical laboratory tests, and pain on injection using a VAS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Procedural Sedation
  • Endoscopy

Keywords

  • CNS 7056
  • Procedural Sedation
  • Sedation
  • Endoscopy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Paion UK Ltd. is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (56%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female patients, aged 18 to 65 years inclusive, scheduled to undergo diagnostic upper GI endoscopy.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) Score I or II.
  • Weight range 60 to 120 kg inclusive.
  • Body mass index (BMI) 18 to \< 30 kg/m2.
  • Patients with no clinically significant abnormalities in 12 lead ECG recorded at Screening.
  • Female with a negative serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) pregnancy test result at Screening and negative urine hCG pregnancy test result on Day 1 before the endoscopy procedure.
  • Patients with negative drugs of abuse serum result at Screening and negative drugs of abuse urine result on Day 1 before the endoscopy procedure.
  • Patient has a negative serum ethanol test result at Screening and a negative ethanol saliva test result on Day 1 before the endoscopy procedure.
  • Patient voluntarily signs and dates an informed consent form (ICF) that is approved by an investigational review board (IRB) prior to the conduct of any study procedure.
  • Patient is willing and able to comply with study requirements and return for a Follow up Visit (Visit 3 ± 1 day) after the endoscopy procedure.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a suspected upper GI bleed an conditions predisposing to hemorrhage at the discretion of the investigator.
  • Has a known sensitivity to benzodiazepines, flumazenil, or anesthetic agents, or a medical condition such that these agents are contraindicated.
  • Patients with evidence of uncontrolled renal, hepatic, central nervous system, respiratory, cardiovascular, or metabolic dysfunction, in the opinion of the investigator or medical monitor.
  • Patients taking an agent that inhibits cytochrome P450 subtype 3A4 (CYP3A4) or patients who have taken such an agent within 14 days prior to study start or within the duration of 7 half lives of the drug, whichever is longer.
  • Patients in receipt of any investigational drug within 30 days or less than 7 half lives (whichever is longer) before the start of the study, or scheduled to receive one during the study period.
  • Chronic use of benzodiazepines for any indication (eg, insomnia, anxiety, spasticity).
  • Has known or suspected history of alcoholism or drug abuse or misuse within 2 years of Screening or evidence of tolerance or physical dependence before dosing with study drug.
  • Patients with clinically significant findings at Screening that, in the investigator's opinion, should exclude them from the study.
  • Patients with a history of laboratory results that show the presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs Ag), hepatitis C antibody (HCV Ab), or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
  • Patients with an inability to communicate well in English with the investigator.
  • Lactating female patients.
  • Patients in whom management of airway is judged to be difficult due to:

    • obesity (weight > 120 kg, or BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2),
    • thyro mental distance ≤ 4 cm ("short neck"), or
    • Mallampati score of 4 (Appendix IV).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1: Remimazolam (CNS 7056) 0.10 mg/kg

    Remimazolam (CNS 7056) 0.10 mg/kg iv

    Drug: CNS 7056

  • Experimental
    2: Remimazolam (CNS 7056) 0.15 mg/kg

    Remimazolam (CNS 7056) 0.15 mg/kg iv

    Drug: CNS 7056

  • Experimental
    3: Remimazolam (CNS 7056) 0.20 mg/kg

    Remimazolam (CNS 7056) 0.20 mg/kg iv

    Drug: CNS 7056

  • Experimental
    4: Midazolam 0.075 mg/kg

    Midazolam 0.075 mg/kg iv

    Drug: Midazolam

Interventions

  • DrugCNS 7056

    Administered as a single intravenous injection by a syringe driver over 1 minute

    Also known as: remimazolam

  • DrugMidazolam

    Administered as a single intravenous injection by a syringe driver over 1 minute

    Also known as: Versed

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Success Rates of the Procedure

    Success of the procedure is a composite endpoint consisting of: MOAA/S scores ≤4 on three consecutive measurements after administration of study drug AND completion of the endoscopy procedure AND no requirement for rescue sedative medication AND no requirement for manual or mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: From start of study drug injection to patient discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Fully Alert

    Time to first of 3 consecutive Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scores of 5 following study drug administration in patients who underwent the endoscopy procedure

    Time frame: From study drug administration until fully alert criteria are reached

  2. Time to Ready for Discharge

    Time to first of 3 consecutive Aldrete scores ≥9 after the end endoscopy procedure

    Time frame: From the end of the endoscopy procedure up to 120 minutes or until 3 consecutive Aldrete scores of ≥9 are reached, whichever occurs first

07

Results

Posted Jan 8, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
Milestone1: CNS 7056 0.10 mg/kg2: CNS 7056 0.15 mg/kg3: CNS 7056 0.20 mg/kg4: Midazolam 0.075 mg/kg
Started25252525
Completed23242525
Not completed2100
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1000
Withdrew: Physician decision1100

Outcome measures

PrimarySuccess Rates of the Procedure

Success of the procedure is a composite endpoint consisting of: MOAA/S scores ≤4 on three consecutive measurements after administration of study drug AND completion of the endoscopy procedure AND no requirement for rescue sedative medication AND no requirement for manual or mechanical ventilation

Time frame:
From start of study drug injection to patient discharge
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Success Rates of the Procedure
Participants1: CNS 7056 0.10 mg/kg2: CNS 7056 0.15 mg/kg3: CNS 7056 0.20 mg/kg4: Midazolam 0.075 mg/kg
Success Rates of the Procedure8141611
SecondaryTime to Fully Alert

Time to first of 3 consecutive Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scores of 5 following study drug administration in patients who underwent the endoscopy procedure

Time frame:
From study drug administration until fully alert criteria are reached
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Time to Fully Alert
minutes1: CNS 7056 0.10 mg/kg2: CNS 7056 0.15 mg/kg3: CNS 7056 0.20 mg/kg4: Midazolam 0.075 mg/kg
Time to Fully Alert11 ± 10.0413.4 ± 6.5112.1 ± 5.2617.2 ± 16.71
SecondaryTime to Ready for Discharge

Time to first of 3 consecutive Aldrete scores ≥9 after the end endoscopy procedure

Time frame:
From the end of the endoscopy procedure up to 120 minutes or until 3 consecutive Aldrete scores of ≥9 are reached, whichever occurs first
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Time to Ready for Discharge
minutes1: CNS 7056 0.10 mg/kg2: CNS 7056 0.15 mg/kg3: CNS 7056 0.20 mg/kg4: Midazolam 0.075 mg/kg
Time to Ready for Discharge14 ± 9.9612.8 ± 5.9611.8 ± 4.9617.2 ± 12.81

Adverse events

Collected over Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected from Time 0 on Day 1 to the Follow-up Visit on Day 4, and were followed until resolution (with or without sequelae) up to a maximum of 30 days after Time 0.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
1: CNS 7056 0.10 mg/kg0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)6/25 (24%)
2: CNS 7056 0.15 mg/kg0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)8/25 (32%)
3: CNS 7056 0.20 mg/kg0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)9/25 (36%)
4: Midazolam 0.075 mg/kg0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)10/25 (40%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
Event1: CNS 7056 0.10 mg/kg2: CNS 7056 0.15 mg/kg3: CNS 7056 0.20 mg/kg4: Midazolam 0.075 mg/kg
Oxygen saturation decreasedInvestigations4/255/256/255/25
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders0/250/252/250/25
DizzinessNervous system disorders0/250/250/252/25
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/252/252/252/25
Pharyngeolaryngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/251/250/252/25

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)1: CNS 7056 0.10 mg/kg2: CNS 7056 0.15 mg/kg3: CNS 7056 0.20 mg/kg4: Midazolam 0.075 mg/kgTotal
Mean37.7 ± 13.3338.8 ± 14.0843.2 ± 13.9544.6 ± 13.6441.1 ± 13.86
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)1: CNS 7056 0.10 mg/kg2: CNS 7056 0.15 mg/kg3: CNS 7056 0.20 mg/kg4: Midazolam 0.075 mg/kgTotal
Female1313161254
Male121291346
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)1: CNS 7056 0.10 mg/kg2: CNS 7056 0.15 mg/kg3: CNS 7056 0.20 mg/kg4: Midazolam 0.075 mg/kgTotal
United States25252525100
Height
Height(cm)1: CNS 7056 0.10 mg/kg2: CNS 7056 0.15 mg/kg3: CNS 7056 0.20 mg/kg4: Midazolam 0.075 mg/kgTotal
Mean169.33 ± 9.603168.42 ± 10.283168.97 ± 7.432171.55 ± 9.650169.57 ± 9.241
Weight
Weight(kg)1: CNS 7056 0.10 mg/kg2: CNS 7056 0.15 mg/kg3: CNS 7056 0.20 mg/kg4: Midazolam 0.075 mg/kgTotal
Mean73.22 ± 10.58375.17 ± 10.86975.13 ± 11.02775.45 ± 10.09974.74 ± 10.526
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(Kg/m2)1: CNS 7056 0.10 mg/kg2: CNS 7056 0.15 mg/kg3: CNS 7056 0.20 mg/kg4: Midazolam 0.075 mg/kgTotal
Mean25.47 ± 2.09126.43 ± 2.15826.24 ± 2.72525.59 ± 2.26225.93 ± 2.324
08

Study locations

7 sites
  • Helen Keller Hospital
    Sheffield, Alabama 35660, United States
  • HOPE Research Institute
    Phoenix, Arizona 85050, United States
  • Advanced Clinical Research Institute
    Anaheim, California 92801, United States
  • Miami Research Associates
    South Miami, Florida 33143, United States
  • Stony Brook University Medical Center
    Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States
  • Wake Research Associates
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27612, United States
  • Charlottesville Medical Research
    Charlottesville, Virginia 22911, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Borkett KM, Riff DS, Schwartz HI, Winkle PJ, Pambianco DJ, Lees JP, Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi K. A Phase IIa, randomized, double-blind study of remimazolam (CNS 7056) versus midazolam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2015 Apr;120(4):771-80. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000548. PubMed 25502841 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 8, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00869440
Lead sponsor
Paion UK Ltd.
Collaborators
Premier Research Group plc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 26, 2009
Start date
Mar 2009
Primary completion
Sep 2009
Completion
Sep 2009
Results posted
Jan 8, 2019
Last update
Jan 8, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion