CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT00863837Updated Mar 18, 2009

Prevention of Esophageal Variceal Rebleeding

A Phase 4 interventional study of terlipressin (vasoconstrictor) and pantoloc (proton pump inhibitor) in Esophageal Variceal Rebleeding, sponsored by National Science Council, Taiwan. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-03-18.

Sponsored by National Science Council, Taiwan · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2009), so the status shown — last known as Enrolling by invitation — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed that the combination of endoscopic therapy with vasoconstrictor is better than either vasoconstrictor or endoscopic therapy alone in achieving the successful hemostatsis of acute variceal bleeding. The rationale of using vasoconstrictor is to enhance the efficacy of hemostasis by endoscopic therapy. Nowadays, endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) has replaced endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) as the endoscopic treatment of choice in the arresting of acute esophageal variceal hemorrhage. EVL alone can achieve hemotasis up to 97% even in cases of active variceal hemorrhage. However, early rebleeding due to ligation-induced ulcer may be encountered. It appears that prevention of esophageal ulcers and bleeding by a proton pump inhibitor may be more logical than using a vasoconstrictor after cessation of bleeding by EVL.

Thus, the investigators designed a controlled trial to compare the initial hemostasis, early rebleeding rate in cirrhotic patients presenting with acute variceal bleeding receiving either emergency EVL plus vasoconstrictor infusion or losec infusion for 5 days.

Read the detailed description

Methods of treatment:

Group 1: Somatostatin 250μg slow bolus IV infusion followed by 250μg per hour (6mg/ 24 hours) or Terlipressin 2mg bolus was instituted on enrollment followed by 1mg per 6 hours for 5 days. The use of either somatostatin or glypressin was at the discretion of doctors in charge. Group 2: Pantoloc 20 mg intravenously per day was instituted on enrollment and continued for 5 days.

Definition of initial hemostasis:

Initial hemostasis was defined as achieving a 24h bleeding-free period within the first 48h after treatment together with stable vital signs based on Baveno consensus criteria.

Very early rebleeding was defined as: UGI bleeding occurred after initial hemostasis and within 5 days after enrollment. UGI bleeding was proven to be from esophageal varices.

Treatment failure is defined as failure to control acute bleeding episodes or very early rebleeding.

02

Conditions studied

  • Esophageal Variceal Rebleeding

Keywords

  • Acute variceal bleeding
  • banding ligation
  • vasoconstrictor
  • proton pump inhibitor
03

In context

Lead sponsor

National Science Council, Taiwan is the lead sponsor of 18 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. The etiology of portal hypertension is cirrhosis.
  2. Age ranges between 18-80 y/o.
  3. Patients presenting with acute esophageal variceal bleeding proven by emergency endoscopy within 12 hours. (Acute esophageal variceal bleeding was defined as:

    • when blood was directly seen by endoscopy to issue from an esophageal varix (active bleeding) OR
    • when patients presented with red color signs on their esophageal varices with blood in esophagus or stomach and no other potential site of bleeding identified (inactive bleeding).
  4. EVL is performed after confirmation of acute esophageal variceal bleeding. Enrollment time: Immediately after EVL is completed and variceal bleeding is arrested.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. association with severe systemic illness, such as sepsis, COPD, uremia
  2. association with gastric variceal bleeding
  3. failure in the control of bleeding by emergency EVL
  4. moribund patients, died within 12 hours of enrollment
  5. Uncooperative
  6. Ever received EIS, EVL within one month prior to index bleeding
  7. Child-Pugh's scores > 10
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Arm A

    add pantoloc to reduce ulcer bleeding after banding ligation

    Drug: pantoloc (proton pump inhibitor)

  • Placebo comparator
    Arm B: ligation + terlipressin 1mg q6h

    Arm B, intervention: ligation + terlipressin 1mg q6h

    Drug: terlipressin (vasoconstrictor)

Interventions

  • Drugterlipressin (vasoconstrictor)

    Ligation plus terlipressin 1mg q6h

    Also known as: vasoconstrictor

  • Drugpantoloc (proton pump inhibitor)

    Pantoloc infusion (1 vial q.d.); Using pantoloc to reduce rebleed after EVL

    Also known as: proton pump inhibitor

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. very early rebleeding

    Time frame: 5 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. mortality, complications

    Time frame: 42 days

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 18, 2009, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00863837
Lead sponsor
National Science Council, Taiwan
First posted
Mar 18, 2009
Start date
Dec 2006
Primary completion
Nov 2009 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2009 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 18, 2009

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion