CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00857233Updated Aug 29, 2012Results posted

Safety and Tolerability of Memantine in Moderate to Severe Alzheimer's Disease

A Phase 3 interventional study of Memantine in Alzheimer's Disease, sponsored by H. Lundbeck A/S. Terminated at 33 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-08-29.

Sponsored by H. Lundbeck A/S · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Please see explanation in the Detailed Description field.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
297
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of the study was to examine the safety and tolerability of memantine in outpatients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's Disease.

Read the detailed description

Memantine is a moderate affinity, uncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist. Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated that memantine can decrease the neuronal toxicity associated with excessive glutamate release and calcium overload in neurons. Results from clinical trials in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's Disease (AD) have demonstrated memantine's efficacy and safety by showing positive treatment effects on cognitive, global and functional decline.

The purpose of this 24-week open-label extension study was to collect additional long-term safety and tolerability data on memantine in patients who completed the lead-in double-blind placebo-controlled Study 10158.

In agreement with Health Canada the study was prematurely terminated due to recruitment difficulties in the lead-in Study 10158. Patients ongoing in the study when the decision to terminate was taken were allowed to complete it.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alzheimer's Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's Disease
03

In context

Alzheimer Disease

3,675 studies on the registry are indexed under Alzheimer Disease; 869 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 297 is above the median of 70 across 2,805 interventional studies indexed under Alzheimer Disease.

Browse Alzheimer Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

H. Lundbeck A/S is the lead sponsor of 218 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Of its 33 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 10 (30%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Ambulatory outpatients with moderate to severe dementia of the Alzheimer's type who have completed the 24-week Study 10158 and who have a knowledgeable and reliable caregiver who will accompany the patient to all clinic visits during the course of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diseases/medication which judged by the investigator could interfere with the assessments of safety, tolerability or efficacy.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
297 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Memantine

    Drug: Memantine

Interventions

  • DrugMemantine

    20 mg oral tablets once daily

    Also known as: Ebixa®

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)

    Overview of AEs

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

  2. Percentage of Patients Who Withdrew Due to Intolerance to Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Long-term Efficacy of Memantine on Behavioural Symptoms Using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) - 12 Items Version Total Score.

    Change from Baseline in the NPI total score. Analysed by descriptive methods only. NPI is a validated scale that assesses behavioural disturbances in patients with dementia. The 12 item version consists of 10 behavioural and 2 neurovegetative areas. It provides both a total score as well as scores for a number of sub-scales. The frequency, severity and caregiver distress for each domain are measured. The NPI is based upon responses obtained from the caregiver. The total score is from 0 to 144. A higher score reflects more frequency and severity of the disturbances.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

  2. Long-term Efficacy of Memantine on Cognition Using the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) Total Score.

    Change from Baseline in the SIB total score. Analysed by descriptive methods only. SIB is a validated scale used to assess cognitive function in patients with moderate to severe dementia. Items are single words or one-step commands combined with gestures. Nine domains are assessed, and the total score is between 0 and 100. A lower total score reflects the loss of cognitive function.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

  3. Long-term Efficacy of Memantine on Global Condition Using the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change-Plus Version (CIBIC-plus).

    CIBIC-plus. Improvement evaluated with reference to Baseline. Analysed by descriptive methods only. CIBIC-plus is a global rating that is derived through an independent, comprehensive interview with the patient and caregiver by a rater who is barred from knowledge of all other psychometric test scores conducted as part of this protocol as well as from reported safety data. The rating is made on a 7-point scale ranging from "1 = marked improvement" to "7 = marked worsening". A score of "4" indicates no change.

    Time frame: Week 24

  4. Long-term Efficacy of Memantine on Functioning Using the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL) 19-item Version Total Score

    Change from Baseline on the ADCS-ADL 19-item version total score. Analysed by descriptive methods only. ADCS-ADL- 19 items version for moderate to severe AD will measure patient's functioning. This battery of ADL questions is used here to measure the functional capabilities of patients with dementia. The inventory is done by interviewing a person in close contact with the patient and covers the most usual and consistent performance of the patient over the preceding 4 weeks. Total score is from 0 to 54. The higher score, the lower impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

07

Results

Posted Aug 29, 2012
Limitations and caveats
Long recruitment, premature termination.

Participant flow

This was an interventional, multi-centre, open-label, fixed-dose extension study to Study 10158. The Baseline visit in Study 10252 was scheduled to occur at the same time as the Week 24 Visit in Study 10158.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMemantine
Started297
Completed242
Not completed55
Withdrew: Adverse event24
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy1
Withdrew: Non-compliance1
Withdrew: Withdrawal of consent9
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up4
Withdrew: Nursing home placement14
Withdrew: Other reasons2

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)

Overview of AEs

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 24
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)
participantsMemantine
Patients with AEs191
Patients with serious AEs (SAEs)27
Patients with AEs Leading to Withdrawal24
Patients with Baseline Events1
SecondaryLong-term Efficacy of Memantine on Behavioural Symptoms Using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) - 12 Items Version Total Score.

Change from Baseline in the NPI total score. Analysed by descriptive methods only. NPI is a validated scale that assesses behavioural disturbances in patients with dementia. The 12 item version consists of 10 behavioural and 2 neurovegetative areas. It provides both a total score as well as scores for a number of sub-scales. The frequency, severity and caregiver distress for each domain are measured. The NPI is based upon responses obtained from the caregiver. The total score is from 0 to 144. A higher score reflects more frequency and severity of the disturbances.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Long-term Efficacy of Memantine on Behavioural Symptoms Using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) - 12 Items Version Total Score.
Scores on a scaleMemantine
Long-term Efficacy of Memantine on Behavioural Symptoms Using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) - 12 Items Version Total Score.2.11 ± 16.12
SecondaryLong-term Efficacy of Memantine on Cognition Using the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) Total Score.

Change from Baseline in the SIB total score. Analysed by descriptive methods only. SIB is a validated scale used to assess cognitive function in patients with moderate to severe dementia. Items are single words or one-step commands combined with gestures. Nine domains are assessed, and the total score is between 0 and 100. A lower total score reflects the loss of cognitive function.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Long-term Efficacy of Memantine on Cognition Using the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) Total Score.
Scores on a scaleMemantine
Long-term Efficacy of Memantine on Cognition Using the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) Total Score.-5.60 ± 9.81
SecondaryLong-term Efficacy of Memantine on Global Condition Using the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change-Plus Version (CIBIC-plus).

CIBIC-plus. Improvement evaluated with reference to Baseline. Analysed by descriptive methods only. CIBIC-plus is a global rating that is derived through an independent, comprehensive interview with the patient and caregiver by a rater who is barred from knowledge of all other psychometric test scores conducted as part of this protocol as well as from reported safety data. The rating is made on a 7-point scale ranging from "1 = marked improvement" to "7 = marked worsening". A score of "4" indicates no change.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Long-term Efficacy of Memantine on Global Condition Using the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change-Plus Version (CIBIC-plus).
Scores on a scaleMemantine
Long-term Efficacy of Memantine on Global Condition Using the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change-Plus Version (CIBIC-plus).4.75 ± 1.14
SecondaryLong-term Efficacy of Memantine on Functioning Using the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL) 19-item Version Total Score

Change from Baseline on the ADCS-ADL 19-item version total score. Analysed by descriptive methods only. ADCS-ADL- 19 items version for moderate to severe AD will measure patient's functioning. This battery of ADL questions is used here to measure the functional capabilities of patients with dementia. The inventory is done by interviewing a person in close contact with the patient and covers the most usual and consistent performance of the patient over the preceding 4 weeks. Total score is from 0 to 54. The higher score, the lower impairment.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Long-term Efficacy of Memantine on Functioning Using the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL) 19-item Version Total Score
Scores on a scaleMemantine
Long-term Efficacy of Memantine on Functioning Using the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL) 19-item Version Total Score-4.16 ± 6.45
PrimaryPercentage of Patients Who Withdrew Due to Intolerance to Treatment
Time frame:
Baseline to Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Who Withdrew Due to Intolerance to Treatment
percentage of participantsMemantine
Percentage of Patients Who Withdrew Due to Intolerance to Treatment8.1

Adverse events

Collected over 24 weeks plus 30 days safety follow-up period. Non-serious events are listed at a 3% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Memantine—27/297 (9.1%)85/297 (28.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 29
Most frequent serious events
EventMemantine
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications5/297
Social stay hospitalisationSocial circumstances3/297
Hip fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/297
Dementia Alzheimer's typeNervous system disorders2/297
DizzinessNervous system disorders2/297
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/297
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders1/297
BradycardiaCardiac disorders1/297
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders1/297
Supraventricular tachycardiaCardiac disorders1/297
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventMemantine
AgitationPsychiatric disorders18/297
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications15/297
DizzinessNervous system disorders15/297
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders12/297
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders10/297
HeadacheNervous system disorders10/297
Confusional statePsychiatric disorders10/297
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders9/297
Gait disturbanceGeneral disorders9/297

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Memantine
Mean75 ± 7.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Memantine
Female172
Male125
NPI: Baseline Total Score
NPI: Baseline Total Score(Scores on a scale)Memantine
Mean22.32 ± 15.41
SIB: Baseline Total Score
SIB: Baseline Total Score(Scores on a Scale)Memantine
Mean79.99 ± 16.36
CIBIC-plus: Baseline Severity Score
CIBIC-plus: Baseline Severity Score(Scores on a scale)Memantine
Mean4.52 ± 0.85
ADCS-ADL - 19 items: Baseline Total Score
ADCS-ADL - 19 items: Baseline Total Score(Scores on a scale)Memantine
Mean33.43 ± 10.06
08

Study locations

33 sites
  • CA019
    Edmonton, Alberta T5G 0B7, Canada
  • CA033
    Kelowna, British Columbia V1W 4V5, Canada
  • CA043
    Kelowna, British Columbia V1Y 3G8, Canada
  • CA042
    Penticton, British Columbia V2A 5C8, Canada
  • CA034
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3M 0X9, Canada
  • CA022
    St. John, New Brunswick, Canada
  • CA045
    Pictou, Nova Scotia B0K 1H0, Canada
  • CA032
    Burlington, Ontario L7M 4Y1, Canada
  • CA029
    Orangeville, Ontario L9W 2E1, Canada
  • CA004
    Ottawa, Ontario K1N 5C8, Canada
  • CA038
    Peterborough, Ontario K9H 2P4, Canada
  • CA009
    Toronto, Ontario M3B 2W7, Canada
  • CA005
    Beauport, Quebec G1J 2G3, Canada
  • CA023
    Greenfield Park, Quebec J4V 2J2, Canada
  • CA013
    Montreal, Quebec H1T 2M4, Canada
  • CA012
    Sherbrooke, Quebec J1J 3H5, Canada
  • CA030
    Vanier, Quebec G1M 2R9, Canada
  • CA017
    Verdun, Quebec H4H 1R3, Canada
  • CA015
    Regina, Saskatchewan S4T 1A5, Canada
  • CA040
    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0W8, Canada
  • CA044
    Chatham, N7L 1B7, Canada
  • CA007
    Kentville, B4N 4K9, Canada
  • CA046
    Kentville, B4N 4K9, Canada
  • CA001
    Kingston, K7L 2V7, Canada
  • CA003
    London, N6A 4V2, Canada
  • CA002
    London, N6C5J1, Canada
  • CA016
    Moncton, E1C 4B7, Canada
  • CA024
    Montreal, H2X 3J4, Canada
  • CA014
    Montreal, H3T 1E2, Canada
  • CA011
    Montreal, H4H 1R3, Canada
  • CA031
    Sherbrooke, J1J 2B8, Canada
  • CA006
    Toronto, M6M 3Z5, Canada
  • CA037
    Windsor, N8X 5A6, Canada
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 29, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00857233
Lead sponsor
H. Lundbeck A/S
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 6, 2009
Start date
Jun 2004
Primary completion
Jul 2010
Completion
Oct 2010
Results posted
Aug 29, 2012
Last update
Aug 29, 2012

Study contacts

Email contact via H. Lundbeck A/S
study director · LundbeckClinicalTrials@lundbeck.com

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion