CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00855803Updated Mar 16, 2022Results posted

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Vertebroplasty in Treating Patients With Localized Spinal Metastasis

A Phase 2 interventional study of radiation in Metastatic Cancer, Pain and Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific, sponsored by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-16.

Sponsored by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
35
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

RATIONALE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy may be able to send x-rays directly to the tumor and cause less damage to normal tissue. Vertebroplasty may help prevent fractures and spinal cord compression caused by spinal metastasis. Giving stereotactic body radiation therapy together with vertebroplasty may help lessen pain and improve quality of life of patients with spinal metastasis.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well giving stereotactic body radiation therapy together with vertebroplasty works in treating patients with localized spinal metastasis.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • To determine the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy in reducing pain at 3 months in patients with localized spinal metastasis.

Secondary

  • To determine the duration of pain response at the treated site(s) scored as the time of maximal pain relief to an increase of 2 points on the Visual Analogue Scoring System.
  • To determine the functional preservation of improvement as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory.
  • To prospectively assess quality of life using the FACT-G and EQ-5D questionnaires.
  • To determine the long-term stability of the treated vertebral bone (e.g., fracture, sclerotic change, vertebral body height, or malalignment) as measured by MRI, CT scan, and plain radiographs.

OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups according to prior radiotherapy to the planned treatment site(s).

  • Group 1 (prior radiotherapy): Patients undergo 5 fractions of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) over 30-90 minutes each.
  • Group 2 (no prior radiotherapy): Patients undergo 1 fraction of SBRT over 30-90 minutes.

Within 1 month after the initiation of SBRT, patients in both groups undergo percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Patients complete pain and quality-of-life questionnaires at baseline and periodically during study. Patients also undergo MRI and CT scan at baseline, at 1, 3, and 6 months, and then every 6 months for 3 years to assess changes in vertebral bone strength and stability.

After completion of study therapy, patients are followed at 2 weeks, at 1, 3, and 6 months, and then every 6 months for 3 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Metastatic Cancer
  • Pain
  • Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • spinal cord metastases
  • unspecified adult solid tumor, protocol specific
  • pain
03

In context

Neoplasm Metastasis

3,514 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis; 883 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 35 is below the median of 54 across 2,765 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis.

Browse Neoplasm Metastasis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 990 studies on the registry; 201 are open to participants now.

Of its 135 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 100 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility:

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion:

  • Patients must have localized spine metastasis (a solitary spine metastasis; two contiguous levels, or up to three separate single vertebral levels are permitted)
  • Patients must have a VAS of ≥4 at any of the planned treatment sites
  • Patient with epidural, spinal nerve, and/or cord compression on MRI may be included
  • Histologic confirmation of cancer is required by biopsy, prior surgery, or re-biopsy
  • Narcotic pain prescription and usage information must be available and documented
  • Patients must sign study specific consent
  • Above the age of 18
  • For women of childbearing age a negative pregnancy test is required
  • Patients considered for the retreatment arm, must not of had prior radiation to the proposed spinal site within a 3 month interval prior to treatment
  • Zubrod score of 0-2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion:

  • Patients who have been non-ambulatory for more than 7 days
  • Patients with compression fractures
  • Spine instability requiring fixation
  • Patients with paraspinal extension
  • Patients with bony fragments
  • Planned systemic treatment within one week after treatment.
  • Absence of pathological diagnosis of cancer
  • Chemotherapy within one week of treatment
  • Patients with Multiple Myeloma, Lymphoma, or Plasmacytoma
  • Patient suffered from unstable angina and/or congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization within the last 6 months
  • Patient had a transmural myocardial infarction within the last 6 months
  • Patient has an acute bacterial or fungal infection requiring intravenous antibiotics at the time of registration
  • Patient has hepatic insufficiency resulting in clinical jaundice and/or coagulation defects
  • PT is not within normal limits or planned and feasible to be corrected to normal limits prior to vertebroplasy
  • PTT is not within normal limits or planned and feasible to be corrected to normal limits prior to vertebroplasy
  • Platelet count is \< 50,000
  • History of significant psychiatric illness

Note: Vertebroplasty may not be possible for certain patients due to tumor location or safety. In such cases, patients will omit the vertebroplasty but receive all other protocol care and follow-up Visual Analog Scoring

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
35 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Radiation followed by Vertebroplasty

    Intervention: This study is one arm. All patients will undergo radiotherapy followed by vertebroplasty. Patients who had prior radiotherapy will undergo 5 fractions of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) over 30-90 minutes each. Patients has no prior radiotherapy will undergo 1 fraction of SBRT over 30-90 minutes. The full patient population will then undergo vertebroplasty\*. \*Vertebroplasty may not be possible for certain patients due to tumor location or safety. In such cases, patients will omit the vertebroplasty but receive all other protocol care and follow-up.

    Radiation: radiation

Interventions

  • Radiationradiation

    Given in 1 or 5 fractions

    Also known as: stereotactic body radiation therapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Response as Measured by VAS at 3 Months

    Pain reduction as measured by Visual Analogue Scoring System (VAS) at 3 months Patient pain was recorded on a 10-point scale (0: no pain, 10: most severe pain). At baseline patients were required to have a pain score of 4 or higher associated with spine metastases. Pain response was recorded again during follow-up visits to determine the pain response: A pain score of 0 represents a complete response A decrease in the pain score by at least 2 points represents a partial response VAS scores were used to determine the number of patients with a partial pain response, with a complete pain response, and without a pain response

    Time frame: 3 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Response

    Duration of pain response as measured by VAS at 1 month Patient pain was recorded on a 10-point scale (0: no pain, 10: most severe pain). At baseline patients were required to have a pain score of 4 or higher associated with spine metastases. Pain response was recorded again during follow-up visits to determine the pain response: A pain score of 0 represents a complete response A decrease in the pain score by at least 2 points represents a partial response VAS scores were used to determine the number of patients with a partial pain response, with a complete pain response, and without a pain response

    Time frame: 1 month

  2. Overall Survival

    Overall survival measured from the date of accession to the date of death. Median times will be reported.

    Time frame: 5 year

  3. Daily Function

    Time to functional decline as measure by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at baseline. BPI has two sections that are scored- pain severity and pain interference. For each of these a numeric scale from 0-10 is used, with 0 being the worst pain and 10 being the worst pain.

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Quality of Life Questionnaire Responses

    Number of participants who filled out the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- General (FACT-G) and the European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaires at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Results

Posted Mar 16, 2022

Participant flow

3 withdrew before starting treatment, 1 had clinical decline prior to treatment and was removed, 1 was removed prior to treatment for local progression, and 1 was removed due to a pre-existing compression fracture prior to treatment, These 6 patients did start the study but were assessed for other outcomes.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTotal Population
Started35
Completed21
Not completed14
Withdrew: Death2
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up2
Withdrew: Technical inability to undergo procedure2
Withdrew: Not evaluable at 3 month timepoint2
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject3
Withdrew: Physician decision3

Outcome measures

PrimaryPain Response as Measured by VAS at 3 Months

Pain reduction as measured by Visual Analogue Scoring System (VAS) at 3 months Patient pain was recorded on a 10-point scale (0: no pain, 10: most severe pain). At baseline patients were required to have a pain score of 4 or higher associated with spine metastases. Pain response was recorded again during follow-up visits to determine the pain response: A pain score of 0 represents a complete response A decrease in the pain score by at least 2 points represents a partial response VAS scores were used to determine the number of patients with a partial pain response, with a complete pain response, and without a pain response

Time frame:
3 month
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Pain Response as Measured by VAS at 3 Months
ParticipantsTotal Population
Patients with a partial pain response at 3 months8
Patients with a complete pain response at 3 months12
Patients without a pain response1
SecondaryPain Response

Duration of pain response as measured by VAS at 1 month Patient pain was recorded on a 10-point scale (0: no pain, 10: most severe pain). At baseline patients were required to have a pain score of 4 or higher associated with spine metastases. Pain response was recorded again during follow-up visits to determine the pain response: A pain score of 0 represents a complete response A decrease in the pain score by at least 2 points represents a partial response VAS scores were used to determine the number of patients with a partial pain response, with a complete pain response, and without a pain response

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Pain Response
ParticipantsTotal Population
Patients with a complete pain response10
Patients with a partial pain response10
Patients with no pain response5
SecondaryOverall Survival

Overall survival measured from the date of accession to the date of death. Median times will be reported.

Time frame:
5 year
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival
monthsTotal Population
Overall Survival9 (0 to 63.4)
SecondaryDaily Function

Time to functional decline as measure by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at baseline. BPI has two sections that are scored- pain severity and pain interference. For each of these a numeric scale from 0-10 is used, with 0 being the worst pain and 10 being the worst pain.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Daily Function
score on a scaleTotal Population
Pain Severity5.8 ± 1.8
Pain Interference6.0 ± 2.2
SecondaryQuality of Life Questionnaire Responses

Number of participants who filled out the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- General (FACT-G) and the European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaires at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · participant responses
Quality of Life Questionnaire Responses
participant responsesTotal Population
Number of responses at baseline35
Number of responses at 1 month29
Number of responses at 3 months21
Number of responses at 6 months16
Number of responses at 12 months7

Adverse events

Collected over 5 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Total Population2/29 (6.9%)1/29 (3.4%)3/29 (10.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventTotal Population
Acute myelopathyNervous system disorders1/29
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTotal Population
EsophagitisGastrointestinal disorders1/29
Acute hematomaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/29
Urinary retentionRenal and urinary disorders1/29
Metastatic renal cell carcinomaRenal and urinary disorders1/29
Spinal canal stenosisNervous system disorders1/29
LaminectomySurgical and medical procedures1/29

Baseline characteristics

35 patients enrolled to the study, 29 patients started protocol treatment and had study specific measures completed.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Total Population
Median60 (40 to 77)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Total Population
Female16
Male19
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Total Population
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American7
White27
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Primary Site
Primary Site(participants)Total Population
Lung10
Breast4
Prostate4
Kidney4
Melanoma3
Colorectal2
Oropharyngeal1
Thyroid1
Spine Location
Spine Location(participants)Total Population
Cervical4
Thoracic12
Lumbar13
Number of vertebrae treated
Number of vertebrae treated(participants)Total Population
123
26
Preexisting endplate fracture
Preexisting endplate fracture(participants)Total Population
Yes5
No24
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center - Dallas
    Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 26, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 16, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00855803
Lead sponsor
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Responsible party
Robert Timmerman (Professor, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 4, 2009
Start date
Feb 2009
Primary completion
Jan 20, 2021
Completion
Jan 20, 2021
Results posted
Mar 16, 2022
Last update
Mar 16, 2022

Study contacts

Robert D. Timmerman, MD
principal investigator · Simmons Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion