CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00849056Updated Jan 9, 2017Results posted

Safety and Efficacy of Albiglutide in Type 2 Diabetes

A Phase 3 interventional study of albiglutide and placebo in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Completed at 331 sites in 6 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-01-09.

Sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
310
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, tolerability and efficacy of albiglutide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Keywords

  • diabetes
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,926 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 310 is above the median of 80 across 8,368 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

GlaxoSmithKline is the lead sponsor of 3,562 studies on the registry; 117 are open to participants now.

Of its 258 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 232 (90%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • type 2 diabetes
  • BMI 20-45kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • NYHA Class II to IV heart failure
  • females who are pregnant, lactating, or less than 6 weeks post-partum
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
310 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    placebo + pioglitazone (with or without metformin)

    Placebo albiglutide weekly injection + pioglitazone (with or without metformin)

    Drug: placebo

  • Experimental
    albiglutide + pioglitazone (with or without metformin)

    albiglutide weekly injection + pioglitazone (with or without meformin)

    Biological: albiglutide

Interventions

  • Biologicalalbiglutide

    albiglutide weekly subcutaneous injection

  • Drugplacebo

    placebo weekly subcutaneous injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline (BL) in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 52

    HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The BL HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from BL was calculated as the value at Week 52 minus the value at BL. Based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA): change = treatment + BL HbA1c + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing post-BL HbA1c values; the last non-missing post-BL on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. HbA1c values obtained after hyperglycemic rescue were treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values. One Intent-to-Treat (ITT) participant (par.) had all post-BL HbA1c measurements occur after hyperglycemic rescue. This par. is included in the ITT Population counts but did not contribute to this analysis.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 104 and 156

    HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. This analysis used observed HbA1c values, excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed.

    Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 104 and 156

  2. Time to Hyperglycemia Rescue

    Participants who experienced persistent hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) could have qualified for hyperglycemia rescue. The conditions for hyperglycemia rescue were as follows: FPG \>=280 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) between \>=Week 2 and \<Week 4; FPG \>=250 mg/dL between \>=Week 4 and \<Week 12; HbA1c \>=8.5% and a \<=0.5% reduction from Baseline between \>=Week 12 and \<Week 24; HbA1c \>=8.5% between \>=Week 24 and \<Week 48; HbA1c \>=8.0% between \>= Week 48 and \<Week 156. Participants could have been rescued at any time on or after Week 2. Time to hyperglycemia rescue is defined as the time between the date of the first dose of study medication and the date of hyperglycemia rescue plus 1 day, or the time between the date of the first dose of study medication and the date of the last visit during the active treatment period plus 1 day for participants not requiring rescue. This time was divided by 7 to express the result in weeks.

    Time frame: From the start of study medication until the end of the treatment (up to Week 156)

  3. Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52

    The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline FPG values. FPG values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with pre-rescue values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

  4. Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 156

    The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline FPG minus the Baseline FPG.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 156

  5. Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52

    The number of participants who achieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of \<6.5%, \<6.5%, and \<7.0% at Week 52) were assessed.

    Time frame: Week 52

  6. Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156

    The number of participants who achieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of \<6.5%, \<6.5%, and \<7.0% at Week 156) were assessed.

    Time frame: Week 156

  7. Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 52

    The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with prerescue values. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

  8. Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 156

    The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 156

07

Results

Posted Jul 1, 2014

Participant flow

Treatment Period (TP) (156 Weeks)
Participant flow — Treatment Period (TP) (156 Weeks)
MilestonePlacebo + Pioglitazone With or Without MetforminAlbiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin
Started151150
Completed88100
Not completed6350
Withdrew: Adverse event1311
Withdrew: Protocol violation36
Withdrew: Noncompliance33
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up75
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject3118
Withdrew: Physician decision33
Withdrew: Termination of study/site by gsk14
Withdrew: Calcitonin out of range10
Withdrew: Pregnancy10
Follow-up Period (FUP) (8 Weeks)
Participant flow — Follow-up Period (FUP) (8 Weeks)
MilestonePlacebo + Pioglitazone With or Without MetforminAlbiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin
Started149149
Completed122124
Not completed2725
Withdrew: Adverse event13
Withdrew: Noncompliance01
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up149
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject97
Withdrew: Physician decision11
Withdrew: Termination of study/site by gsk14
Withdrew: Early termination10

Outcome measures

SecondaryChange From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 104 and 156

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. This analysis used observed HbA1c values, excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed.

Time frame:
Baseline and Weeks 104 and 156
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of HbA1c in the blood
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 104 and 156
Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodPlacebo + Pioglitazone With or Without MetforminAlbiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin
Week 104, n= 29, 72-0.72 ± 0.845-0.92 ± 1.038
Week 156, n=26, 54-0.50 ± 0.805-0.87 ± 0.926
PrimaryChange From Baseline (BL) in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 52

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The BL HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from BL was calculated as the value at Week 52 minus the value at BL. Based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA): change = treatment + BL HbA1c + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing post-BL HbA1c values; the last non-missing post-BL on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. HbA1c values obtained after hyperglycemic rescue were treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values. One Intent-to-Treat (ITT) participant (par.) had all post-BL HbA1c measurements occur after hyperglycemic rescue. This par. is included in the ITT Population counts but did not contribute to this analysis.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Percentage of HbA1c in the blood
Change From Baseline (BL) in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 52
Percentage of HbA1c in the bloodPlacebo + Pioglitazone With or Without MetforminAlbiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin
Change From Baseline (BL) in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 52-0.05 ± 0.071-0.81 ± 0.071
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin vs Albiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (net): -0.75 · 95% CI -0.95 to -0.56
SecondaryTime to Hyperglycemia Rescue

Participants who experienced persistent hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) could have qualified for hyperglycemia rescue. The conditions for hyperglycemia rescue were as follows: FPG \>=280 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) between \>=Week 2 and \<Week 4; FPG \>=250 mg/dL between \>=Week 4 and \<Week 12; HbA1c \>=8.5% and a \<=0.5% reduction from Baseline between \>=Week 12 and \<Week 24; HbA1c \>=8.5% between \>=Week 24 and \<Week 48; HbA1c \>=8.0% between \>= Week 48 and \<Week 156. Participants could have been rescued at any time on or after Week 2. Time to hyperglycemia rescue is defined as the time between the date of the first dose of study medication and the date of hyperglycemia rescue plus 1 day, or the time between the date of the first dose of study medication and the date of the last visit during the active treatment period plus 1 day for participants not requiring rescue. This time was divided by 7 to express the result in weeks.

Time frame:
From the start of study medication until the end of the treatment (up to Week 156)
Reported as:
Median · Weeks
Time to Hyperglycemia Rescue
WeeksPlacebo + Pioglitazone With or Without MetforminAlbiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin
Time to Hyperglycemia Rescue52.86 ± 0.674NA ± 0.812
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52

The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline FPG values. FPG values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with pre-rescue values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52
Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without MetforminAlbiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 520.35 ± 0.197-1.28 ± 0.197
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 156

The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline FPG minus the Baseline FPG.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 156
Reported as:
Mean · Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 156
Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without MetforminAlbiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 1560.03 ± 1.950-1.26 ± 1.476
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52

The number of participants who achieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of \<6.5%, \<6.5%, and \<7.0% at Week 52) were assessed.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52
ParticipantsPlacebo + Pioglitazone With or Without MetforminAlbiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin
HbA1c <6.5%837
HbA1c <7%2266
HbA1c <7.5%4496
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156

The number of participants who achieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of \<6.5%, \<6.5%, and \<7.0% at Week 156) were assessed.

Time frame:
Week 156
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156
ParticipantsPlacebo + Pioglitazone With or Without MetforminAlbiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin
HbA1c <6.5%720
HbA1c <7%1232
HbA1c <7.5%1744
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 52

The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with prerescue values. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Kilograms
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 52
KilogramsPlacebo + Pioglitazone With or Without MetforminAlbiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 520.45 ± 0.3480.28 ± 0.348
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 156

The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 156
Reported as:
Mean · Kilograms
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 156
KilogramsPlacebo + Pioglitazone With or Without MetforminAlbiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 1561.50 ± 6.939-0.16 ± 6.284

Adverse events

Collected over On-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs, defined as those events that had a start date on or after the first day of study medication and within 56 days after the end of study medication (up to Week 156), are reported.. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin—28/151 (18.5%)117/151 (77.5%)
Albiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin—15/150 (10%)126/150 (84%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 43
Most frequent serious events
EventPlacebo + Pioglitazone With or Without MetforminAlbiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin
Chest painGeneral disorders3/1510/150
Coronary artery diseaseCardiac disorders2/1512/150
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/1512/150
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/1512/150
CellulitisInfections and infestations2/1511/150
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/1510/150
Cholecystitis acuteHepatobiliary disorders2/1510/150
Deep vein thrombosisVascular disorders2/1510/150
Angina unstableCardiac disorders0/1511/150
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders0/1511/150
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 73
Most frequent other events
EventPlacebo + Pioglitazone With or Without MetforminAlbiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin
HypoglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders13/15125/150
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations24/15124/150
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders16/15122/150
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations22/15112/150
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders18/15118/150
HeadacheNervous system disorders18/15113/150
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations9/15117/150
HypertensionVascular disorders15/15117/150
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders16/15115/150
SinusitisInfections and infestations9/15115/150

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without MetforminAlbiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without MetforminTotal
Mean54.9 ± 9.4055.2 ± 9.9855.0 ± 9.67
Gender
Gender(Participants)Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without MetforminAlbiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without MetforminTotal
Female6358121
Male8892180
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without MetforminAlbiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without MetforminTotal
African American/African Heritage201939
American Indian or Alaskan Native151833
Asian - Central/South Asian Heritage123
Asian - East Asian Heritage235
Asian - Japanese Heritage112
Asian - South East Asian Heritage202
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander213
White - Arabic/North African Heritage224
White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage106104210
08

Study locations

331 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Alabaster, Alabama 35007, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Birmingham, Alabama 35205, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Birmingham, Alabama 35235, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Birmingham, Alabama 35242, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Dothan, Alabama 36301, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hueytown, Alabama 35023, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Mobile, Alabama 36617, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35406, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Chandler, Arizona 85224, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Gilbert, Arizona 85295, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Green Valley, Arizona 85614, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Phoenix, Arizona 85023, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Phoenix, Arizona 85028, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Phoenix, Arizona 85032, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Phoenix, Arizona 85051, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Tucson, Arizona 85745, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Bull Shoals, Arkansas 72619, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Harrisburg, Arkansas 72432, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hot Springs, Arkansas 71913, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Jonesboro, Arkansas 72401, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Searcy, Arkansas 72143, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Buena Park, California 90620, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Carmichael, California 95608, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Chula Vista, California 91910, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Foothill Ranch, California 92610, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Fountain Valley, California 92708, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Fresno, California 93720, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Fullerton, California 92835, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Huntington Beach, California 92646, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Huntington Beach, California 92648, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Indio, California 92201, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Irvine, California 92618, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Lakewood, California 90712, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Long Beach, California 90806, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Los Alamitos, California 90720, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Los Angeles, California 90017, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Los Angeles, California 90022, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Los Angeles, California 90025, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Mission Viejo, California 92691, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Northridge, California 91325, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Palm Desert, California 92260, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Palm Springs, California 92262, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Pasadena, California 91105, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Poway, California 92064, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Riverside, California 92506, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Sacramento, California 95821, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Sacramento, California 95825, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    San Diego, California 92117, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    San Diego, California 92120, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Satna Monica, California 90404, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Tarzana, California 91356, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Torrance, California 90503, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Tustin, California 92780, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Victorville, California 92395, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Walnut Creek, California 94598, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    West Hills, California 91307, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Arvada, Colorado 80005, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Denver, Colorado 80209, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    New Britain, Connecticut 06050, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Trumbull, Connecticut 06611, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Waterbury, Connecticut 06708, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Middletown, Delaware 19709, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Clearwater, Florida 33756, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Clearwater, Florida 33765, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Cocoa, Florida 32927, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Cutler Bay, Florida 33189, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Deerfield Beach, Florida 33442, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Delray Beach, Florida 33445, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Edgewater, Florida 32132, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Gainesville, Florida 32605, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hallandale Beach, Florida 33009, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hialeah, Florida 33012, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hialeah, Florida 33013, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hollywood, Florida 33023, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Jacksonville, Florida 32205, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Lauderdale Lakes, Florida 33319, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Marianna, Florida 32446, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Miami, Florida 33135, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Miami, Florida 33156, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    North Miami, Florida 33161, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Ocala, Florida 34471, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Orlando, Florida 32822, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Ormond Beach, Florida 32174, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Oviedo, Florida 32765, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Panama City, Florida 32401, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Pembroke Pines, Florida 33026, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Pembroke Pines, Florida 33027, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Plantation, Florida 33317, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Ponte Verda, Florida 32081, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    St. Cloud, Florida 34769, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Tampa, Florida 33603, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30308, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30309, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30312, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30328, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30338, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30342, United States

Showing the first 100 of 331 sites across 6 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Home PD, Ahren B, Reusch JEB, Rendell M, Weissman PN, Cirkel DT, Miller D, Ambery P, Carr MC, Nauck MA. Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Sep;131:49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jun 15. PubMed 28683300 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 9, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00849056
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 23, 2009
Start date
Jan 2009
Primary completion
Nov 2011
Completion
Jan 2013
Results posted
Jul 1, 2014
Last update
Jan 9, 2017

Study contacts

GSK Clinical Trials
study director · GlaxoSmithKline

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion