ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00806455Updated Nov 19, 2013

Exercise-Induced Bronchospasm in Cystic Fibrosis

An observational study in Cystic Fibrosis and Bronchospasm, sponsored by Ohio State University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-11-19.

Sponsored by Ohio State University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
14
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Exercise is an important clinical feature in cystic fibrosis. Better exercise capacity has been associated with better patient outcomes and quality of life. Exercise-induced bronchospasm is a condition, often associated with asthma, which may make exercise difficult. The role that exercise-induced bronchospasm has in people with cystic fibrosis is unknown. This study is designed to determine how often exercise-induced bronchospasm occurs in cystic fibrosis.

Read the detailed description

We anticipate that Visit 1 will take approximately three hours. This will include obtaining informed consent, completing baseline demographic and quality of life questionnaires, brief physical exam, measuring exhaled nitric oxide level, skin allergy testing, obtaining blood and sputum samples, and performing pulmonary function testing before and after bronchodilators.

Visit 2 will take approximately two and one-half hours. This will include performing Eucapnic Voluntary Hyperventilation, measuring exhaled nitric oxide levels, and obtaining blood and sputum samples.

Visit 3 will take approximately two and one-half hours. This will include performing Cardiopulmonary exercise testing followed by serial spirometry, measuring exhaled nitric oxide levels, and obtaining blood and sputum samples.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cystic Fibrosis
  • Bronchospasm

Keywords

  • to determine how often exercise-induced bronchospasm
  • occurs in cystic fibrosis
  • Exercise-induced bronchospasm in cystic fibrosis
03

In context

Cystic Fibrosis

1,619 studies on the registry are indexed under Cystic Fibrosis; 199 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 14 is below the median of 85 across 503 observational studies indexed under Cystic Fibrosis.

Browse Cystic Fibrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Ohio State University is the lead sponsor of 663 studies on the registry; 148 are open to participants now.

Of its 67 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 49 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Forty patients with cystic fibrosis and mild lung disease (defined by FEV1≥ 70% predicted), age 12 years and older, are our target enrollments.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Males and females with confirmed diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis:

    • 2 positive sweat chloride tests (or)
    • genetic testing
  2. Age 12 years and older
  3. Baseline ≥70% predicted
  4. Clinically stable over past 28 days:

    • no change in chronic respiratory symptoms
    • no need for antibiotics other then chronic maintenance therapies
    • no need for oral
    • no increased use of bronchodilators
  5. Visit 1 FEV1 within 10% of baseline

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis (ABPA)
  2. Chronic airway colonization with Burkholderia cepacia (defined as 2 or more prior positive sputum or BAL cultures)
  3. Pregnancy
  4. Chronic oral use
  5. Febrile illness within two weeks of Visit 1
  6. Unable to provide consent (patients under age of 18 will require both parental consent AND patient assent)
  7. Current cigarette smoking, cessation of smoking within 6 weeks of Visit 1, or more than 10 pack-years of prior smoking
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
14 participants (actual)
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To determine the prevalence of exercise-induced bronchospasm in a cohort of adolescent and adult patients with cystic fibrosis

    Time frame: end of study

Secondary outcomes

  1. To determine the prevalence of exercise-induced bronchospasm in those CF patients with evidence of allergic inflammation versus those without allergic inflammation.

    Time frame: end of study

  2. To determine the difference in exhaled nitric oxide and other surrogate markers of inflammation, as well as self-reported quality-of-life and symptom scores in CF patients with and without exercise-induced bronchospasm.

    Time frame: end of study

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The Ohio State University
    Columbus, Ohio 43201, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kirkby SE, Hayes D Jr, Parsons JP, Wisely CE, Kopp B, McCoy KS, Mastronarde JG. Eucapnic Voluntary Hyperventilation to Detect Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction in Cystic Fibrosis. Lung. 2015 Oct;193(5):733-8. doi: 10.1007/s00408-015-9745-3. Epub 2015 Jun 3. PubMed 26036953 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jul 2008, a primary completion of Aug 2013 and a completion of Aug 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 9, 2008
First posted
Dec 10, 2008
Start
Jul 2008
Primary completionActual
Aug 2013
CompletionActual
Aug 2013
Last update
Nov 19, 2013
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 19, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00806455
Responsible party
John Mastronarde, MD (John Mastronard M.D., Ohio State University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 10, 2008
Start date
Jul 2008
Primary completion
Aug 2013
Completion
Aug 2013
Last update
Nov 19, 2013

Study contacts

John G. Mastronarde, MD
principal investigator · Ohio State University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion