CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00799760BIVIRUpdated Mar 19, 2012

Evaluation of Efficacity and Safety of Oseltamivir and Zanamivir

A Phase 3 interventional study of oseltamivir + zanamivir and oseltamivir + zanamivir's placebo in Gastric Influenza, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Terminated at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-03-19.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Just Terminated for the end of the pandemia
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
541
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In order to prevent the high mortality due to an hypothetic pandemic caused by a newly emerging influenza A virus, antiviral drugs are seen as essential requirements for control of initial influenza outbreaks.Two antivirals are available for the treatment oseltamivir and zanamivir. Emergence of Oseltamivir resistance has been recently reported. . It appeared opportune to assess the efficacy and safety of biotherapy of neuraminidase inhibitors ,will be investigated by a randomized, placebo controlled, double blind study in France, during the next winter season . This study will be conducted in 300 centres of primary care with 900 adults with a virologically suspected influenza A infection. Individuals will be randomized to 1 of the 3 treatment groups: oseltamivir +zanamivir, or oseltamivir+placebo or placebo +zanamivir.The primary judgment criteria will be the proportion of patients with negative RT PCR negative in nasal secretions at Day 2.

Read the detailed description

In the near future, a pandemic caused by a newly emerging influenza A virus has been predicted by the WHO. In order to prevent the high mortality due to the pandemic, antiviral drugs are seen as essential requirements for control of initial influenza outbreaks.

Zanamivir (GSK) and Oseltamivir (Roche) are stockpiled by the French government in the setting of pre-pandemic plan. In France, Zanamivir and Oseltamivir are both registered for the prophylactic and therapeutic use against influenza A.

Previous studies have shown that neuraminidase inhibitors (oseltamivir and zanamivir, based treatment) are associated with shorter illness duration and resulted in significant decrease of viral load in the nasal secretions.

In Winter season 2007-2008 the presence of oseltamivir-resistant viruses circulating in the community in several European countries is in marked contrast to the previous winter seasons, when oseltamivir resistance was detected in \<1% of circulating strains from . Patients infected by viruses with neuraminidases carrying these mutations, didn't present unusual disease syndromes.

Although zanamivir and oseltamivir are both issued from the same class ,a combination of these two neuraminidase inhibitors could reduce the duration and severity of acute influenza and the incidence of secondary complications, reduce the spread of influenza, and the frequency of neuraminidase inhibitors mutations. An evaluation of the combination of oseltamivir and zanamivir versus zanamivir with placebo versus oseltamivir associated with placebo in the treatment of a virologically suspected influenza in primary care will be investigated in a randomised double blind placebo controlled trial study in France during the winter season 2008-2009.

Primary outcome measure:

Evaluate viral efficacy after 2 days of biotherapy oseltamivir and zanamivir versus zanamivir with placebo versus oseltamivir associated with placebo.

Patients and methods:

Randomised double blind, placebo controlled multicenter trial conducted during the influenza season 2008-2009 Arm 1: oral oseltamivir 75mg twice daily + zanamivir 10 mg inhaled by mouth twice daily during 5 days Arm 2: oral oseltamivir 75mg twice daily+ placebo inhaled by mouth twice daily during 5 days Arm 3: oral placebo twice daily + zanamivir 10 mg inhaled by mouth twice daily during 5 days.

Schedule:

D0: rapid test diagnostic for influenza A urine pregnancy test for women inclusion /randomisation initiation of treatment D2:nasal sample for influenza RNA RTPCR D5:End of treatment D7:medical evaluation (follow up evaluation) D14:nurse call (clinical evaluation)

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastric Influenza

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • influenza A
  • neuraminidase inhibitor
  • oseltamivir
  • zanamivir
  • treatment outcome
  • resistance
  • mutation
  • combination therapy
  • monotherapy
  • pandemic
  • primary care
  • randomized controlled trials
  • antiviral agent
03

In context

Influenza, Human

2,214 studies on the registry are indexed under Influenza, Human; 163 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 541 is above the median of 238 across 1,853 interventional studies indexed under Influenza, Human.

Browse Influenza, Human studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,505 studies on the registry; 1,006 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Influenza season declared
  • Subjects aged>18 years presenting within 36h documented of onset influenza illness
  • Who have fever >38°C
  • who present at least on of the following respiratory symptoms( cough, sore throat, nasal symptoms)
  • and one of the following constitutional symptoms(headache, myalgia, sweats and or chills or fatigue)
  • positive rapid diagnostic test for influenza A
  • who have giving written informed consent prior to enrollment
  • Patient examined before the inclusion
  • able to complete a questionnaire.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Influenza Vaccination in the 12 months prior the beginning of the study
  • Patient unable to use diskhaler of Zanamivir
  • Asthma, Chronic bronchitis,
  • Woman with a positive urine pregnancy test
  • Clearance of creatinine\< 30 ml/min Chronic renal disease
  • History of depression, psychiatric disorders
  • oseltamivir or zanamivir hypersensibility
  • patient treated by oseltamivir or zanamivir or amantadine 14 days before
  • Non member of the social security or CMU
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
541 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    oral oseltamivir 75mg twice daily + zanamivir 10 mg inhaled by mouth twice daily during 5 days

    Drug: oseltamivir + zanamivir

  • Active comparator
    2

    oral oseltamivir 75mg twice daily+ placebo inhaled by mouth twice daily during 5 days

    Drug: oseltamivir + zanamivir's placebo

  • Active comparator
    3

    oral placebo twice daily + zanamivir 10 mg inhaled by mouth twice daily during 5 day

    Drug: oseltamivir's placebo + zanamivir

Interventions

  • Drugoseltamivir + zanamivir

    oral oseltamivir 75mg twice daily + zanamivir 10 mg inhaled by mouth twice daily during 5 days

    Also known as: experimental Arm

  • Drugoseltamivir + zanamivir's placebo

    oral oseltamivir 75mg twice daily+ placebo inhaled by mouth twice daily during 5 day

    Also known as: Active comparator Arm

  • Drugoseltamivir's placebo + zanamivir

    oral placebo twice daily + zanamivir 10 mg inhaled by mouth twice daily during 5 day

    Also known as: active comparator arm

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. RT-PCR for influenza A virus in nasal secretion

    Time frame: 2 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to resolution of influenzal illness Severity of illness

    Time frame: 14 days

  2. Severity of illness

    Time frame: 14 Days

  3. Adverse event (graded on a four -point scale:mild-moderate- severe-life threatening)

    Time frame: 14 days

  4. Compliance to antiviral treatment

    Time frame: 14 days

  5. Number of persons with influenza illness in households contact

    Time frame: 14 days

  6. Evaluation of restricted activity (requirement for additional health car)

    Time frame: 14 days

  7. Frequency of and need for antibiotic treatment of influenza (otitis media, bronchitis, sinusitis, and pneumonia )

    Time frame: 14 days

  8. Frequency of resistance to antiviral drugs

    Time frame: 14 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Centre Investigateur 155
    Deulemont, 59000, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Blanchon T, Mentre F, Charlois-Ou C, Dornic Q, Mosnier A, Bouscambert M, Carrat F, Duval X, Enouf V, Leport C; Bivir Study Group. Factors associated with clinical and virological response in patients treated with oseltamivir or zanamivir for influenza A during the 2008-2009 winter. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013 Feb;19(2):196-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03751.x. Epub 2012 Jan 20. PubMed 22264308 ↗
  • Galimard JE, Chevret S, Curis E, Resche-Rigon M. Heckman imputation models for binary or continuous MNAR outcomes and MAR predictors. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Aug 31;18(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0547-1. PubMed 30170561 ↗
  • Flicoteaux R, Protopopescu C, Tibi A, Blanchon T, Werf SV, Duval X, Mosnier A, Charlois-Ou C, Lina B, Leport C, Chevret S. Factors associated with non-persistence to oral and inhaled antiviral therapies for seasonal influenza: a secondary analysis of a double-blind, multicentre, randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 10;7(7):e014546. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014546. PubMed 28698321 ↗
  • Duval X, van der Werf S, Blanchon T, Mosnier A, Bouscambert-Duchamp M, Tibi A, Enouf V, Charlois-Ou C, Vincent C, Andreoletti L, Tubach F, Lina B, Mentre F, Leport C; Bivir Study Group. Efficacy of oseltamivir-zanamivir combination compared to each monotherapy for seasonal influenza: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2010 Nov 2;7(11):e1000362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000362. Erratum In: PLoS Med. 2010;7(12) doi: 10.1371/annotation/ca448e7c-fbbc-43e9-9981-108c9bfa8bce. PubMed 21072246 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 19, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00799760
Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Collaborators
Hoffmann-La Roche, GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 1, 2008
Start date
Dec 2008
Primary completion
Nov 2009
Completion
Nov 2010
Last update
Mar 19, 2012

Study contacts

Catherine LEPORT, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Nov 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion