CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00782873Updated Oct 31, 2008

Balanced Propofol Sedation During Upper Endoscopy in Morbidly Obese Patients

An observational study in Obesity, sponsored by Research Associates of New York, LLP. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2008-10-31.

Sponsored by Research Associates of New York, LLP · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
65
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of propofol-based, gastroenterologist-administered sedation in severely obese patients (BMI≥35) undergoing upper endoscopy.

The investigators aim to test the hypothesis that it is safe to use balanced-propofol, gastroenterologist-administered sedation in obese patients.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of propofol-based, gastroenterologist-administered sedation in severely obese patients (BMI≥35) undergoing upper endoscopy. We will use changes in pulmonary and hemodynamic parameters as the primary safety measure in this study. We will compare these results in 30 non-obese patients and in 30 obese patients.

The term balanced propofol sedation refers to using a low dose of propofol in combination with small amounts of an opioid and midazolam.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • propofol
  • sedation
  • safety
  • obesity
03

In context

Obesity

6,296 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 1,692 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 65 is below the median of 135 across 1,283 observational studies indexed under Obesity.

Browse Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

Research Associates of New York, LLP is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The research subjects will be selected from a private practice.

Inclusion criteria

  • Undergoing an endoscopic esophagostroduodenoscopy (EGD)
  • Capable of providing written informed consent and willing and able to comply with all procedures of the study
  • Adults between the ages of 18 and 85 inclusive (and of legal age to consent)
  • ASA score of I, II, or III

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe acute illness that is not resolved or stabilized prior to enrollment. Study entry will be based on the investigator's judgment
  • Need for sleep or narcotic analgesic medication on a continuous basis during the proceeding 6 months
  • Pregnancy
  • A history of drug addiction or alcohol abuse within the past 12 months. Alcohol can be consumed in moderation. The consumption of alcohol should be within the routine pattern for the individual before the study.
  • A history of seizure disorder.
  • Allergy to propofol, soy beans, or eggs.
  • Prior history of difficult intubation.
  • Prior history of severe complications during conscious sedation. Study entry will be based on the investigator's judgment.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
65 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • obese subjects

    BMI \> 35

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. A change in mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 20% or more from baseline

    Time frame: during upper endoscopy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Episodes of bradycardia - pulse less than 50

    Time frame: during upper endoscopy

  2. ECG changes consistent with myocardial ischemia

    Time frame: during upper endoscopy

  3. Decrease in respiratory rate - change of 20% or more from baseline

    Time frame: during upper endoscopy

  4. Assess the dose of propofol, midazolam, and fentanyl necessary to achieve adequate sedation during upper endoscopy and compare the dose requirements of the obese and non-obese patient cohorts.

    Time frame: after all patients completed

  5. Compare the level of sedation between the obese and non-obese cohorts

    Time frame: after all patients completed

  6. compare patient satisfaction with endoscopic sedation in obese and non-obese cohorts

    Time frame: after all patients completed

  7. Compare time to sedation in the obese and non-obese cohorts

    Time frame: after all patients completed

  8. Oxygen desaturation

    Time frame: during upper endoscopy

  9. Apneic episodes

    Time frame: during upper endoscopy

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Research Associates of New York
    New York, New York 10075, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 31, 2008, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00782873
Lead sponsor
Research Associates of New York, LLP
First posted
Oct 31, 2008
Start date
Mar 2008
Primary completion
Aug 2008
Completion
Sep 2008
Last update
Oct 31, 2008

Study contacts

Lawrence B Cohen, MD
principal investigator · Research Associates of New York

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion