ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00775931Updated Jul 31, 2019Results posted

Allogeneic Transplantation For Severe Osteopetrosis

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of umbilical cord blood transplantation and Campath-1H in Severe Osteopetrosis, sponsored by Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 1 Day to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-31.

Sponsored by Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
7
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
1 Day to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research is to explore what we believe may be a safer and more effective means of performing stem cell transplantation in patients with Osteopetrosis, using chemotherapy and radiation designed to bring about engraftment and lessen transplant mortality. Prior multi-institutional data in past studies found that approximately 30% of Osteopetrosis patients do not engraft. Therefore, in this study, we utilize a reduced intensity design of pre-transplant drugs to try to make transplants safer for this disease, as well as to provide a second infusion of stem cells in patients with matched related or unrelated donors.

Read the detailed description

This revised transplant protocol will test the following: 1) the ability to achieve engraftment with the reduced intensity protocol and a second infusion of stem cells on day 42, 2) the mortality associated with transplant by day 100, 3) patient outcomes, based on differential imaging and biologic evaluations prior to transplantation and at designated points after transplantation (day 100, 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years). Additional biologic studies will include microarray analysis, and evaluation of blood parameters and genes that may be important in the disease process. In older patients, studies to evaluation osteoclast differentiation and function will also be offered.

02

Conditions studied

  • Severe Osteopetrosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • osteopetrosis
03

In context

Osteopetrosis

22 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteopetrosis; 4 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 7 is below the median of 15 across 17 interventional studies indexed under Osteopetrosis.

Browse Osteopetrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota is the lead sponsor of 286 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Of its 39 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 28 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Day to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients eligible for transplantation under this protocol will be \< or = 45 years of age, and will be diagnosed with severe osteopetrosis. This will be defined as having the following manifestations of the disease.

    1. Bones that are uniformly markedly dense based on skeletal survey
    2. No history that would suggest autosomal dominant inheritance
    3. Evidence of hematologic changes that are attributed to the underlying disease, including
  • the need for ongoing transfusions, OR
  • the presence of progressive anemia or thrombocytopenia, OR
  • a white blood cell differential with a predominance of immature forms and evidence of extramedullary hematopoiesis, OR
  • persistence of serious infectious complications that are thought to be due to the abnormal architecture of the bone that are resistant to surgical and medical interventions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients >45 years of age
  • Evidence of hepatic failure
  • Pulmonary dysfunction sufficient to significantly increase the risk of transplant.
  • Renal dysfunction with (GFR) \<30% of predicted.
  • Cardiac compromise sufficient to substantially increase the risk of transplantation
  • Severe, stable neurologic impairment.
  • (HIV) positivity.
  • Pregnant or lactating females
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
7 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    marrow graft transplant conditioning

    Pre-transplant conditioning using Campath-1H, Busulfan, Fludarabine monophosphate, and total lymphoid irradiation followed by unrelated or matched related donor marrow graft transplantation (both peripheral blood and marrow) and a second CD34 cell infusion on Day 42.

    Drug: Campath-1H · Radiation: Total Lymphoid Irradiation · Drug: Busulfan · Drug: Fludarabine monophosphate · Procedure: marrow graft transplantation

  • Active comparator
    cord blood transplant conditioning

    Pre-transplant conditioning using Campath-1H, Busulfan and Cyclophosphamide followed by unrelated umbilical cord blood transplantation and a second smaller portion cord blood graft infusion on Day 42.

    Procedure: umbilical cord blood transplantation · Drug: Campath-1H · Drug: Cyclophosphamide · Drug: Busulfan

Interventions

  • Procedureumbilical cord blood transplantation

    Umbilical cord blood will be collected, processed and shipped according to existing protocols. 2 cord blood units will be utilized if available. The choice of units will be based on the HLA typing standards of the University of Minnesota Blood and Marrow Program. If 2 units are not available, a single unit may be used. If a single unit is used, the unit should provide at least 10 x 107 nucleated cells/kg recipient body weight.

    Also known as: UCBT

  • Campath-1H will be administered 0.3 mg/kg subcutaneously per day for three days starting on Day -21 through Day -19.

    Also known as: Alemtuzumab

  • RadiationTotal Lymphoid Irradiation

    Dose 500 cGy via anteroposterior (AP) and posteroanterior(PA) fields (250 cGy AP and 250 cGy PA).

    Also known as: TLI

  • Cyclophosphamide (50 mg/kg/dose) will be given IV on day -4, -3, -2 and -1 over 2 hours. The total dose to be given over 4 days is 200 mg/kg for cord blood grafts-receiving patients only.

    Also known as: Cytoxan

  • patients\<12 kg: 1.1 mg/kg/dose IV every 6 hours for 8 doses total; patients \>12 kg: 0.8 mg/kg/dose IV every 6 hours for 8 doses. on Day -8 to -7 for donor grafts-receiving patients, and on Day -9 to -6 for cord blood grafts-receiving patients.

    Also known as: Busulfex

  • Fludarabine (35 mg/m2 daily for 5 days, 175 mg/m2 total) will be administered IV over 30 minutes on days -6, -5, -4, -3, and -2 for donor grafts-receiving patients only.

    Also known as: Fludara

  • Proceduremarrow graft transplantation

    Related donor marrow will be collected, processed and shipped according to existing protocols of the National Marrow Donor Program or other URD registry, with the goal of achieving a cell dose of ≥ 6.0 x 108 nucleated cells/kg. The proportion of cells that are CD34+ will be determined prior to the administration of the graft. This will allow a portion of the graft (2 x 106 CD34+ cells) to be frozen for a subsequent infusion on day +42.

    Also known as: HSCT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients Who Achieved Donor Cell Engraftment

    Time frame: Day 100

Secondary outcomes

  1. Transplant Related Mortality at 100 Days

    Time frame: day 100

  2. Transplant Related Toxicity

    Time frame: Day 100 post transplant

  3. Incidence of Grade II - IV Acute Graft-versus-host Disease

    Time frame: by Day 100 after transplant

07

Results

Posted Jul 31, 2019
Limitations and caveats
Because the disease being treated on this study is rare, our intent was to only report these outcomes in context with other protocols. At some point in the future if we have enough patients we will analyze the data.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMarrow Graft Transplant ConditioningCord Blood Transplant Conditioning
Started61
Completed61
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Patients Who Achieved Donor Cell Engraftment
Time frame:
Day 100
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients Who Achieved Donor Cell Engraftment
ParticipantsMarrow Graft Transplant ConditioningCord Blood Transplant Conditioning
Number of Patients Who Achieved Donor Cell Engraftment50
SecondaryTransplant Related Mortality at 100 Days
Time frame:
day 100
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Transplant Related Mortality at 100 Days
ParticipantsMarrow Graft Transplant ConditioningCord Blood Transplant Conditioning
Transplant Related Mortality at 100 Days00
SecondaryTransplant Related Toxicity
Time frame:
Day 100 post transplant
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Transplant Related Toxicity
ParticipantsMarrow Graft Transplant ConditioningCord Blood Transplant Conditioning
Transplant Related Toxicity31
SecondaryIncidence of Grade II - IV Acute Graft-versus-host Disease
Time frame:
by Day 100 after transplant
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Grade II - IV Acute Graft-versus-host Disease
ParticipantsMarrow Graft Transplant ConditioningCord Blood Transplant Conditioning
Incidence of Grade II - IV Acute Graft-versus-host Disease20

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Marrow Graft Transplant Conditioning—3/6 (50%)6/6 (100%)
Cord Blood Transplant Conditioning—0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventMarrow Graft Transplant ConditioningCord Blood Transplant Conditioning
Multi-Organ FailureGeneral disorders1/60/1
MyocarditisCardiac disorders1/60/1
Acute Graft versus Host DiseaseGeneral disorders1/60/1
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 45
Most frequent other events
EventMarrow Graft Transplant ConditioningCord Blood Transplant Conditioning
Acute SinusitisInfections and infestations0/61/1
AtelectasisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/61/1
Bacterial Infection, RespiratoryInfections and infestations1/61/1
Bacterial Infection, FecesInfections and infestations1/61/1
Blood Clot in Bladder WallBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/61/1
Fungal Infection, RespiratoryInfections and infestations3/61/1
Fungal Infection, FecesInfections and infestations0/61/1
Requires Hemodialysis, NOSRenal and urinary disorders1/61/1
Hyperechogenic Renomegaly with AscitesRenal and urinary disorders0/61/1
Requires Intubation, NOSRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders5/61/1

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Marrow Graft Transplant ConditioningCord Blood Transplant ConditioningTotal
<=18 years404
Between 18 and 65 years213
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Marrow Graft Transplant ConditioningCord Blood Transplant ConditioningTotal
Female202
Male415
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of MInnesota, Fairview
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Aug 2008, a primary completion of Jun 2013 and a completion of Jun 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jul 2019, 6 years 1 month after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 16, 2008
First posted
Oct 20, 2008
Start
Aug 2008
Primary completionActual
Jun 2013
CompletionActual
Jun 2013
Results first posted
Jul 31, 2019
Last update
Jul 31, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 31, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00775931
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 20, 2008
Start date
Aug 2008
Primary completion
Jun 2013
Completion
Jun 2013
Results posted
Jul 31, 2019
Last update
Jul 31, 2019

Study contacts

Paul Orchard, MD
principal investigator · Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Cyclophosphamide · Fludarabine phosphate

Start the discussion