CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00770952Updated Jul 5, 2010

Efficacy of Pioglitazone and Glimepiride Combination Therapy in Treating Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

A Phase 3 interventional study of Pioglitazone and Glimepiride and Glimepiride in Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by Takeda. Completed at 17 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-07-05.

Sponsored by Takeda · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
91
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of pioglitazone, once daily (QD), and glimepiride combination therapy compared to glimepiride monotherapy in subjects with Type 2 Diabetes.

Read the detailed description

Tight glycemic control is mandatory for the prevention and treatment of vascular complications in patients suffering from diabetes mellitus. After onset of Type 2 Diabetes, patients are usually treated with diet along with or without different combinations of oral drugs. One first-line drug class are sulfonylurea drugs that are preferably provided to patients who are not obese. The mode of action of sulfonylurea drugs is to increase beta-cell secretion, but it could be shown that they lead to deterioration of the beta-cell secretion product over time, resulting in increased proinsulin secretion. Since proinsulin is an independent cardiovascular risk factor, recent publications have demonstrated an increased risk for cardiovascular events in patients treated with sulfonylurea drugs as compared to other treatment methods.

Combination therapy of sulfonylurea drugs with glitazones has been shown to counterbalance the effect of deteriorated beta-cell secretion and to improve insulin sensitivity and the levels of proinsulin, C-peptide and other laboratory surrogate markers for cardiovascular risk. Proving that the treatment of diabetic patients with higher doses of beta cytotropic agents can be avoided and beta-cell function can be preserved by using pioglitazone in combination with low dose sulfonylurea drugs, it will be possible to optimize the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes who are not controlled efficiently by sulfonylurea drugs monotherapy.

In this study patients will be enrolled who are inefficiently treated with a Glimepiride monotherapy. Patients will be either randomized to a combinational therapy of Pioglitazone and Glimepiride or Glimepiride monotherapy. If possible, study medication will be up-titrated to maximal dosage levels in both treatment arms to observe maximal and comparable treatment effects. Stable effects on beta-cell function will be observed after 24 weeks of treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

  • Glucose Metabolism Disorder
  • Dysmetabolic Syndrome
  • Type II Diabetes
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Lipoatrophic
  • Dyslipidemia
  • Drug Therapy
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 91 is above the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

Takeda is the lead sponsor of 1,002 studies on the registry; 92 are open to participants now.

Of its 173 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 149 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Type 2 Diabetes according to the American Diabetes Association Criteria.
  • Treatment with Glimepiride monotherapy (1-3 mg per day) 3 months before entering the study.
  • Glycosylated hemoglobin greater than 6.5%, but less than 8.5% and/ or fasting plasma glucose greater than 7 mmol/l within the last 4 weeks.
  • Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must agree to use adequate contraception, and can neither be pregnant nor lactating from Screening throughout the duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Type 1 Diabetes mellitus.
  • History of hypersensitivity to the study drugs or to drugs with similar chemical structures.
  • Progressive fatal disease.
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse during the last 5 years.
  • More than one unexplained episode of severe hypoglycemia within 6 months prior to entering the study.
  • A history of significant cardiovascular (New York Heart Association stage I - IV), respiratory, gastrointestinal, hepatic (alanine aminotransferase greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of the normal reference range), renal (serum creatinine greater than 1.8 mg/dl; glomerular filtration rate less than 40 ml/min as estimated by the Cockroft-Gault formula), neurological, psychiatric and/or hematological disease, history of macular edema.
  • Blood donation within the last 30 days.
  • Is required to take or intends to continue taking any disallowed medication, any prescription medication, herbal treatment or over-the counter medication that may interfere with evaluation of the study medication, including:

    • CYP2C9 inductors
    • CYP2C9 inhibitors
    • rifampicin
    • fluconazole
    • drugs used for treating type 2 diabetes (insulin, insulin analogous compounds and oral antidiabetic drugs)
  • Pretreatment with thiazolidinediones within the last 12 months.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
91 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pioglitazone 30 mg to 45 mg QD + Glimepiride 2 mg to 4 mg QD

    Drug: Pioglitazone and Glimepiride

  • Active comparator
    Glimepiride 4 mg to 6 mg QD

    Drug: Glimepiride

Interventions

  • DrugPioglitazone and Glimepiride

    Pioglitazone 30 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and Glimepiride 2 mg, tablets, orally once daily for two weeks; increased to: Pioglitazone 30 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and Glimepiride 4 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for two weeks; increased to: Pioglitazone 45 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and Glimepiride 4 mg, orally, once daily for up to 20 weeks.

    Also known as: ACTOS®

  • DrugGlimepiride

    Pioglitazone placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily and Glimepiride 4 mg, tablets, orally once daily for two weeks; increased to: Pioglitazone placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily and Glimepiride 5 mg, tablets, orally once daily for two weeks; increased to: Pioglitazone placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily and Glimepiride 6 mg, tablets, orally once daily for up to 20 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in Homeostatic Model Assessment - Beta cell.

    Time frame: Week: 24 or Final Visit beyond week 12.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin.

    Time frame: Week: 24 or Final Visit beyond week 12.

  2. Change from Baseline in oral glucose tolerance testing.

    Time frame: Week: 24 or Final Visit beyond week 12.

  3. Change from Baseline in Insulin.

    Time frame: Week: 24 or Final Visit beyond week 12.

  4. Change from Baseline in Proinsulin.

    Time frame: Week: 24 or Final Visit beyond week 12.

  5. Change from Baseline in C-peptide.

    Time frame: Week: 24 or Final Visit beyond week 12.

  6. Change from Baseline in High sensitivity C-Reactive Protein.

    Time frame: Week: 24 or Final Visit beyond week 12.

  7. Change from Baseline in Adiponectin.

    Time frame: Week: 24 or Final Visit beyond week 12.

  8. Change from Baseline in Homeostatic Model Assessment - Sensitivity.

    Time frame: Week: 24 or Final Visit beyond week 12.

  9. Change from Baseline in Triglycerides

    Time frame: Week: 24 or Final Visit beyond week 12.

  10. Change from Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol

    Time frame: Week: 24 or Final Visit beyond week 12.

  11. Change from Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol

    Time frame: Week: 24 or Final Visit beyond week 12.

  12. Change from Baseline in Total Cholesterol

    Time frame: Week: 24 or Final Visit beyond week 12.

07

Study locations

17 sites
  • Villingen-Schwenningen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
  • Aschaffenburg, Bayern, Germany
  • Ingolstadt, Bayern, Germany
  • Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany
  • Frielendorf, Hessen, Germany
  • Rotenburg, Hessen, Germany
  • Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany
  • Dortmund, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
  • Siegen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
  • Kallstadt, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
  • Mainz, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
  • Mayen, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
  • Neuwied, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
  • Rhaunen, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
  • Friedrichsthal, Saarland, Germany
  • Meißen, Sachsen, Germany
  • Berlin, Germany
08

References and documents

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 5, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00770952
Lead sponsor
Takeda
First posted
Oct 10, 2008
Start date
Dec 2006
Primary completion
Dec 2008
Completion
Dec 2008
Last update
Jul 5, 2010

Study contacts

Medical Adviser Clinical Research
study director · Takeda Pharma Gmbh, Aachen (Germany)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion