ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00743080Updated Nov 3, 2010

Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)Comparing GYNAECARE MORCELLEX Versus ROTOCUT GI Tissue Morcellators

A Phase 4 interventional study of Laparoscopic myomectomy and supracervical hysterectomy with GYNECARE MORCELLEX and Laparoscopic myomectomy and supracervical hysterectomy with ROTOCUT G1 in Uterine Myomas, sponsored by University Magna Graecia. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-11-03.

Sponsored by University Magna Graecia · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

To date, laparoscopic approach may apply to several gynecologic diseases. Among the recent advances in laparoscopy an important role was assumed by the methods of tissue extraction. In particular electronic power morcellators have become instruments of large use in surgical practice.

The tissue morcellator is an endoscopic instrument indicated for cutting, coring and extracting tissue in operative laparoscopy, and it has a pivotal role during specific gynaecologic procedures as well as myomectomy and hysterectomy. The main advantages offered by electronic morcellator consist in reduction of operative time and of risk in hernia formation, this last due to the absence of fascia's tearing or stretching.

Recently, a new generation of tissue morcellator has been commercialized. In particular, GYNECARE MORCELLEX (Ethicon-Johnson \& Johnson Gateway, US) and ROTOCUT G1 (Karl Storz, Culver City, CA, US) are two tissue morcellators currently available. These instruments seem to offer advantages over the previous models in terms of precision, speed and durability. The most useful of this features seems to be the higher speed, in particular it has been calculated that they morcellate tissues approximately four times faster than those of the previous generation. The high speed that characterizes this new morcellator potentially results in reduced operative time with consequent benefits in other surgical outcomes such as postoperative pain and recovery time.

Even if both morcellator seems to be high-quality instruments, no study was designed until now to compare these two tools in a prospective fashion.

Read the detailed description

Patients with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas will be assessed for eligibility and will be enrolled in the present protocol-study.

At entry, in each woman age, parity, body mass index (BMI), menopausal, socioeconomic and work status, symptoms related to the gynecologic disease, previous major surgical laparotomies, and associated medical condition will be assessed.

All eligible patients will be randomized in single blocks using a central computer generating randomization lists (University of Catanzaro). The subjects will be assigned to one of four subgroups of surgical treatment, i.e. group A1 myomectomies performed using GYNECARE MORCELLEX, group A2 supracervical hysterectomies performed using GYNECARE MORCELLEX, group B1 myomectomies performed using ROTOCUT G1 and group B2 supracervical hysterectomies performed using ROTOCUT G1.

Before surgery, for each patient gynaecological and rectal examination, Papanicolau smear test, ultrasonographic and hysteroscopic assessment with endometrial biopsy will be performed.

For each surgical intervention the following parameters will be recorded: duration of surgical procedures, intra-operative blood loss, amount of blood transfusion, intra-operative complications, number of laparotomic conversion, postoperative pain, post-operative complications, hospital stay, and time to return to full activity and/or work.

Data will be analyzed using the intention-to-treat principle and a P value of 0.05 or less will be considered significant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Uterine Myomas

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • laparoscopy
  • myomectomy
  • myomas
  • morcellator
  • supracervical hysterectomy
  • surgery
  • symptomatic uterine myomas
03

In context

Myoma

61 studies on the registry are indexed under Myoma; 10 are open to participants now.

Browse Myoma studies →

Lead sponsor

University Magna Graecia is the lead sponsor of 75 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Symptomatic uterine leiomyomas with main diameter over 5 cm

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major medical conditions
  • Endocrinologic diseases
  • Current or past, acute or chronic psychiatric disorders
  • Premenstrual syndrome
  • Use of drugs influencing cognition, vigilance and/or mood within six months of the study enrolment
  • Hypoechoic or calcified leiomyomas at ultrasound
  • Associated lesions in the uterus and adnexa at ultrasound
  • Pattern of hyperplasia with cytologic atypia in the endometrial
  • Abnormal Papanicolau smear test
  • Positive urine pregnancy test result
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    Laparoscopic myomectomy and supracervical hysterectomy using GYNECARE MORCELLEX

    Procedure: Laparoscopic myomectomy and supracervical hysterectomy with GYNECARE MORCELLEX

  • Active comparator
    2

    Laparoscopic myomectomy and supracervical hysterectomy using ROTOCUT G1

    Procedure: Laparoscopic myomectomy and supracervical hysterectomy with ROTOCUT G1

Interventions

  • ProcedureLaparoscopic myomectomy and supracervical hysterectomy with GYNECARE MORCELLEX

    Laparoscopic myomectomy with GYNECARE MORCELLEX: Laparoscopic approach. Longitudinal incision close to the midline of myoma. Identification of cleavage plane. Enucleation of myoma. Suturing myometrial. Removal of myoma with a automatic morcellator (GYNECARE MORCELLEX). Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy using GYNECARE MORCELLEX: Laparoscopic approach. Use of bipolar diathermy and scissor starting with the round ligament and then the utero-ovarian ligament, otherwise the infundibulopelvic ligament in case of removal of adnexa. Identification, desiccation with polar diathermy, and transection of the uterine vessels. Repetition of the procedure on the contra-lateral side. Opening of vagina just below uterine vessels using an unipolar needle. Removal of uterus by means of GYNECARE MORCELLEX. Abdominal cavity irrigation.

  • ProcedureLaparoscopic myomectomy and supracervical hysterectomy with ROTOCUT G1

    Laparoscopic myomectomy with ROTOCUT G1: Laparoscopic approach. Longitudinal incision close to the midline of myoma. Identification of cleavage plane. Enucleation of myoma. Suturing myometrial. Removal of myoma with a automatic morcellator (ROTOCUT G1). Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy using ROTOCUT G1: Laparoscopic approach. Use of bipolar diathermy and scissor starting with the round ligament and then the utero-ovarian ligament, otherwise the infundibulopelvic ligament in case of removal of adnexa. Identification, desiccation with polar diathermy, and transection of the uterine vessels. Repetition of the procedure on the contra-lateral side. Opening of vagina just below uterine vessels using an unipolar needle. Removal of uterus by means of ROTOCUT G1. Abdominal cavity irrigation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Morcellament time

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total operative time

  2. Feasibility [subjective score of difficulty]

  3. Blood loss

  4. Post-operative complications

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Postoperative pain

  6. Hospital stay

  7. Time to return to full activity and/or work

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Magna Graecia
    Catanzaro, 88100, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zullo F, Falbo A, Iuliano A, Oppedisano R, Sacchinelli A, Annunziata G, Venturella R, Materazzo C, Tolino A, Palomba S. Randomized controlled study comparing the Gynecare Morcellex and Rotocut G1 tissue morcellators. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):192-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.11.009. PubMed 20226407 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2008 and a completion of Jan 2010. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 26, 2008
First posted
Aug 28, 2008
Start
Jan 2008
Completion
Jan 2010
Last update
Nov 3, 2010
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 3, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00743080
Lead sponsor
University Magna Graecia
Collaborators
Johnson & Johnson
First posted
Aug 28, 2008
Start date
Jan 2008
Completion
Jan 2010
Last update
Nov 3, 2010

Study contacts

Fulvio Zullo, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, - Viale Europa Loc. Germaneto 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion