ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00708461HealthWorksUpdated Nov 1, 2019Results posted

Environmental Intervention for Weight Gain Prevention

An interventional study of weight gain prevention in Obesity, sponsored by University of Minnesota. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-11-01.

Sponsored by University of Minnesota · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,747
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary aim of this research is to evaluate the efficacy of a multicomponent worksite-based, environmental intervention in reducing weight increase and obesity over time in working adults.

Read the detailed description

This study is a randomized trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-component worksite intervention with strong environmental components to prevent weight gain. Six worksites will be randomized to either an intervention or a no-treatment control group. The intervention will be comprised of 1) changing the availability, portion sizes, and prices of foods and beverages sold to employees in their worksites in ways that encourage healthier food choices; 2) increasing the availability of physical activity opportunities at the worksite by implementing walking programs and increasing stairwell access and attractiveness; 3) placing scales in the work environment to encourage body weight monitoring and to enable workers to set goals for their weight; and 4) to provide educational materials to all employees to make them aware of the environmental intervention and of behavioral practices likely to be effective in preventing weight gain. The intervention will be implemented for a 2-year period in each intervention site. Effectiveness will be evaluated by assessing body weight, eating behavior and physical activity in a cohort of employees in both control and intervention sites at baseline and again 2 years later. Weight trends in these populations will also be compared to data from national and state-level annual surveys of weight in representative population samples. Data will be collected on the effects of specific intervention components via aggregate measures of food choice and physical activity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • obesity
  • obesity prevention
  • worksite
  • environment
  • intervention
03

In context

Obesity

6,570 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 1,718 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,747 is above the median of 77 across 5,084 interventional studies indexed under Obesity.

Browse Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Minnesota is the lead sponsor of 1,210 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 133 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 92 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • age 18 or older
  • generally in good health
  • part- or full-time employee in one of the participating worksites

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • work on site \<50% of the time
  • work second or third shift
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,747 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Worksite Environmental Intervention

    Changes to healthy food availability, physical activity opportunities and promotion, body weight scale access, and media enhancements to target weight gain prevention

    Behavioral: weight gain prevention

  • No intervention
    No-contact control

    No-treatment control condition. Worksites were offered program materials upon completion of programs at intervention sites.

Interventions

  • Behavioralweight gain prevention

    1. Changes in the food environment that increase the availability of healthy foods and beverages, reduce food and beverage portion sizes, reduce prices on healthy food items, and increase prices on less healthy food items. 2. Changes in the activity environment that increase cues and incentives for walking at work and at home, using stairs, and to increase exposure of employees to information about active recreational opportunities at work and at home. 3. Changes to the environment to increase cues and incentives for regular weight monitoring by providing scales at convenient locations. 4. Changes in the informational environment that increase frequency of exposure of the employee population to accurate information about healthy food and activity choices.

    Also known as: worksite intervention, obesity prevention

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)

    Assessed in kilograms per meter squared.

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 months

07

Results

Posted Jul 18, 2013
Limitations and caveats
The recruitment goal of 6 sites represents only 3% of those initially contacted for participation, or 16% of eligible and interested sites. The design limits power due to the small sample size at the group level.

Participant flow

Participants were recruited at worksites between January 2006 and April 2007. Human resources departments provided worksite contact information for all eligible employees; these email addresses and phone numbers were used for recruitment contact purposes.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneWorksite Environmental InterventionNo-contact Control
Started752995
Completed611795
Not completed141200
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1811
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject89
Withdrew: Left workforce115180

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Body Mass Index (BMI)

Assessed in kilograms per meter squared.

Time frame:
Baseline to 24 months
Reported as:
Least squares mean · kilograms per meter squared
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)
kilograms per meter squaredWorksite Environmental InterventionNo-contact Control
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)0.315 ± 0.089590.190 ± 0.07987
Statistical analysis
  • Worksite Environmental Intervention vs No-contact Control · ANCOVA · p = 0.36 (Adjusted for age, educational attainment, race/ethnicity, and smoking status as individual, fixed-effect covariates. 95% confidence intervals and p-values derived from t-statistics with 4 degrees of freedom, reflecting the group-randomized design.) · Mean difference (net): 0.125 · 95% CI -0.21 to 0.46Adjusted for age, educational attainment, race/ethnicity, and smoking status as individual, fixed-effect covariates.

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were tracked for the duration of the study (2 years at each site).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Worksite Environmental Intervention—0/752 (0%)0/752 (0%)
No-contact Control—0/995 (0%)0/995 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Worksite Environmental InterventionNo-contact ControlTotal
<=18 years173249
Between 18 and 65 years7299541683
>=65 years6915
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Worksite Environmental InterventionNo-contact ControlTotal
Mean42.7 ± 10.843.1 ± 10.642.9 ± 10.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Worksite Environmental InterventionNo-contact ControlTotal
Female4786081086
Male274387661
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Worksite Environmental InterventionNo-contact ControlTotal
United States7529951747
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • VanWormer JJ, Linde JA, Harnack LJ, Stovitz SD, Jeffery RW. Weight change and workplace absenteeism in the HealthWorks study. Obes Facts. 2012;5(5):745-52. doi: 10.1159/000345119. Epub 2012 Oct 24. PubMed 23108493 ↗
  • Linde JA, Nygaard KE, MacLehose RF, Mitchell NR, Harnack LJ, Cousins JM, Graham DJ, Jeffery RW. HealthWorks: results of a multi-component group-randomized worksite environmental intervention trial for weight gain prevention. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Feb 16;9:14. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-14. PubMed 22340088 ↗
  • VanWormer JJ, Linde JA, Harnack LJ, Stovitz SD, Jeffery RW. Is baseline physical activity a determinant of participation in worksite walking clubs? Data from the HealthWorks Trial. J Phys Act Health. 2012 Aug;9(6):849-56. doi: 10.1123/jpah.9.6.849. Epub 2011 Jul 29. PubMed 21952267 ↗
  • VanWormer JJ, Linde JA, Harnack LJ, Stovitz SD, Jeffery RW. Self-weighing frequency is associated with weight gain prevention over 2 years among working adults. Int J Behav Med. 2012 Sep;19(3):351-8. doi: 10.1007/s12529-011-9178-1. PubMed 21732212 ↗
  • Graham DJ, Linde JA, Cousins JM, Jeffery RW. Environmental modifications and 2-year measured and self-reported stair-use: a worksite randomized trial. J Prim Prev. 2013 Dec;34(6):413-22. doi: 10.1007/s10935-013-0323-2. PubMed 23979097 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2006, a primary completion of Mar 2009 and a completion of Mar 2010. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jul 2013, 4 years 4 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 27, 2008
First posted
Jul 2, 2008
Start
Jan 2006
Primary completionActual
Mar 2009
CompletionActual
Mar 2010
Results first posted
Jul 18, 2013
Last update
Nov 1, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 1, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00708461
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 2, 2008
Start date
Jan 2006
Primary completion
Mar 2009
Completion
Mar 2010
Results posted
Jul 18, 2013
Last update
Nov 1, 2019

Study contacts

Robert W Jeffery, PhD
principal investigator · University of Minnesota, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion