CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00699348CARISMAUpdated Apr 6, 2016Results posted

A Study of Monthly Intravenous C.E.R.A. (Mircera) in Hemodialysis Participants With Chronic Renal Anemia

A Phase 3 interventional study of Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (C.E.R.A.) in Anemia, sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche. Completed at 60 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-04-06.

Sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
351
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This single arm study will assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of once-monthly administration of intravenous methoxy polyethylene glycolepoetin beta (Mircera) for the maintenance of hemoglobin levels in hemodialysis participants with chronic renal anemia. Participants currently receiving intravenous epoetin alfa or beta or darbepoetin alfa will receive intravenous Mircera at a starting dose of 120, 200 or 360 micrograms/month (based on the erythropoietin stimulating agent [ESA] dose administered on week -1). Subsequent doses will be adjusted to maintain hemoglobin levels within the target range of 10 to12 gram per deciliter (g/dL). The anticipated time on study treatment is 1-2 years, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anemia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Anemia

1,733 studies on the registry are indexed under Anemia; 246 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 351 is above the median of 94 across 1,291 interventional studies indexed under Anemia.

Browse Anemia studies →

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche is the lead sponsor of 2,061 studies on the registry; 85 are open to participants now.

Of its 319 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 239 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Chronic renal anemia;
  • Continuous intravenous maintenance erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) treatment during previous month;
  • Regular long term hemodialysis therapy with the same mode of dialysis for >=3 months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Transfusion of red blood cells during previous 2 months;
  • Significant acute or chronic bleeding, such as overt gastrointestinal bleeding;
  • Active malignant disease (except non-melanoma skin cancer).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
351 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    C.E.R.A.

    Drug: Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (C.E.R.A.)

Interventions

  • DrugMethoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (C.E.R.A.)

    Intravenous methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (C.E.R.A.) at starting dose of 120, 200, or 360 micrograms every 4 weeks for 24 weeks.

    Also known as: Mircera

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Maintaining Mean Hemoglobin Concentration Within Plus or Minus (+/-) 1 Gram Per Deciliter (g/dL) of Reference and Within the Target Range

    Percentage of participants maintaining the mean hemoglobin concentration within +/- 1.0 g/dL of their reference hemoglobin value and within the target range of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL during the efficacy evaluation period (EEP) was assessed. The reference hemoglobin value was defined on the basis of the 5 assessments recorded during the stability verification period (SVP) at Weeks -4, -3, -2, -1 and 0. The mean hemoglobin concentration for each individual participant during the EEP (Week 17 to Week 24) was estimated as a time adjusted average.

    Time frame: Week 17 up to Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Hemoglobin Concentration Between Reference SVP and EEP

    The mean change of the time adjusted average of hemoglobin from reference value obtained during the SVP (Week -4 up to Week 0) and the value during EEP (Week 17 up to Week 24) was assessed.

    Time frame: Week -4 up to Week 0 and Week 17 up to Week 24

  2. Percentage of Participants Maintaining Hemoglobin Concentration Within the Target Range

    Percentage of participants maintaining hemoglobin concentration within the target range of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL during EEP (Week 17 to Week 24) was assessed.

    Time frame: Week 17 up to Week 24

  3. Median Time Spent by Participants With Hemoglobin Concentration in the Target Range During the EEP

    Median time spent by participants with hemoglobin concentration within the target range of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL during the EEP (Week 17 to Week 24) was assessed.

    Time frame: Week 17 up to Week 24

  4. Percentage of Participants Requiring Any Dose Adjustment

    Percentage of participants requiring any adjustment in the dose of study drug during the dose titration period (DTP: Week 1 to Week 16) and EEP (Week 17 to Week 24) was reported.

    Time frame: Week 1 up to Week 16 and Week 17 up to Week 24

  5. Number of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion During the Study

    Number of participant who underwent red blood cell transfusion during the study was reported.

    Time frame: Week -4 up to Week 52

07

Results

Posted Apr 6, 2016

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneC.E.R.A.
Started351
Completed261
Not completed90
Withdrew: Death6
Withdrew: Adverse event15
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject11
Withdrew: Protocol violation10
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy8
Withdrew: Failure to return1
Withdrew: Blood transfusion24
Withdrew: Renal transplantation10
Withdrew: Other5

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Maintaining Mean Hemoglobin Concentration Within Plus or Minus (+/-) 1 Gram Per Deciliter (g/dL) of Reference and Within the Target Range

Percentage of participants maintaining the mean hemoglobin concentration within +/- 1.0 g/dL of their reference hemoglobin value and within the target range of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL during the efficacy evaluation period (EEP) was assessed. The reference hemoglobin value was defined on the basis of the 5 assessments recorded during the stability verification period (SVP) at Weeks -4, -3, -2, -1 and 0. The mean hemoglobin concentration for each individual participant during the EEP (Week 17 to Week 24) was estimated as a time adjusted average.

Time frame:
Week 17 up to Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Mean Hemoglobin Concentration Within Plus or Minus (+/-) 1 Gram Per Deciliter (g/dL) of Reference and Within the Target Range
percentage of participantsC.E.R.A.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Mean Hemoglobin Concentration Within Plus or Minus (+/-) 1 Gram Per Deciliter (g/dL) of Reference and Within the Target Range60.00 (52.10 to 67.54)
SecondaryChange in Hemoglobin Concentration Between Reference SVP and EEP

The mean change of the time adjusted average of hemoglobin from reference value obtained during the SVP (Week -4 up to Week 0) and the value during EEP (Week 17 up to Week 24) was assessed.

Time frame:
Week -4 up to Week 0 and Week 17 up to Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · g/dL
Change in Hemoglobin Concentration Between Reference SVP and EEP
g/dLC.E.R.A.
Change in Hemoglobin Concentration Between Reference SVP and EEP-0.10 ± 0.98
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Maintaining Hemoglobin Concentration Within the Target Range

Percentage of participants maintaining hemoglobin concentration within the target range of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL during EEP (Week 17 to Week 24) was assessed.

Time frame:
Week 17 up to Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Hemoglobin Concentration Within the Target Range
percentage of participantsC.E.R.A.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Hemoglobin Concentration Within the Target Range73.94 (66.54 to 80.45)
SecondaryMedian Time Spent by Participants With Hemoglobin Concentration in the Target Range During the EEP

Median time spent by participants with hemoglobin concentration within the target range of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL during the EEP (Week 17 to Week 24) was assessed.

Time frame:
Week 17 up to Week 24
Reported as:
Median · days
Median Time Spent by Participants With Hemoglobin Concentration in the Target Range During the EEP
daysC.E.R.A.
Median Time Spent by Participants With Hemoglobin Concentration in the Target Range During the EEP44.0 (0.0 to 56.0)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Requiring Any Dose Adjustment

Percentage of participants requiring any adjustment in the dose of study drug during the dose titration period (DTP: Week 1 to Week 16) and EEP (Week 17 to Week 24) was reported.

Time frame:
Week 1 up to Week 16 and Week 17 up to Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Requiring Any Dose Adjustment
percentage of participantsC.E.R.A.
DTP70.3
EEP50.9
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion During the Study

Number of participant who underwent red blood cell transfusion during the study was reported.

Time frame:
Week -4 up to Week 52
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion During the Study
participantsC.E.R.A.
Number of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion During the Study38

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 52 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
C.E.R.A.—98/351 (27.9%)23/351 (6.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 84
Most frequent serious events
EventC.E.R.A.
Arteriovenous fistula thrombosisInjury, poisoning and procedural complications9/351
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders7/351
Transient ischaemic attackNervous system disorders4/351
Acute pulmonary oedemaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/351
Peripheral ischaemiaVascular disorders4/351
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders3/351
PyrexiaGeneral disorders3/351
PneumoniaInfections and infestations3/351
Vascular access complicationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications3/351
Haemoglobin decreasedInvestigations3/351
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventC.E.R.A.
HypertensionVascular disorders23/351

Baseline characteristics

The safety population included all participants who were treated with at least 1 dose of C.E.R.A. and had a safety follow-up, whether withdrawn prematurely or not.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)C.E.R.A.
Mean65.7 ± 13.32
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)C.E.R.A.
Female149
Male202
08

Study locations

60 sites
  • Acireale, 95024, Italy
  • Ancona, 60121, Italy
  • Anzio, 00042, Italy
  • Arenzano, 16011, Italy
  • Ascoli Piceno, 63100, Italy
  • Avellino, 83100, Italy
  • Benevento, 82100, Italy
  • Bollate, 20021, Italy
  • Borgomanero, 28021, Italy
  • Brescia, 25123, Italy
  • Brindisi, 72100, Italy
  • Cagliari, 09100, Italy
  • Castellammare, 80053, Italy
  • Catania, 95124, Italy
  • Catania, 95126, Italy
  • Cernusco Sul Naviglio, 20063, Italy
  • Chieri, 10023, Italy
  • Chieti, 66013, Italy
  • Civitavecchia, 00053, Italy
  • Cosenza, 87100, Italy
  • Ferrara, 44100, Italy
  • Firenze, 50011, Italy
  • Firenze, 50100, Italy
  • Foggia, 71100, Italy
  • Genova, 16132, Italy
  • La Spezia, 19124, Italy
  • Lecco, 23900, Italy
  • Legnano, 20025, Italy
  • Lodi, 26900, Italy
  • Lucera, 71036, Italy
  • Mantova, 46100, Italy
  • Matera, 75100, Italy
  • Milano, 20142, Italy
  • Milazzo, 98057, Italy
  • Montevarchi, 52025, Italy
  • Napoli, 80131, Italy
  • Napoli, 80137, Italy
  • Nocera Inferiore, 84014, Italy
  • Novara, 28100, Italy
  • Nuoro, 08100, Italy
  • Ostia Lido, 00121, Italy
  • Palermo, 90127, Italy
  • Pavia, 27100, Italy
  • Perugia, 06126, Italy
  • Piacenza, 29100, Italy
  • Pisa, 56100, Italy
  • Ravenna, 48100, Italy
  • Reggio Emilia, 42100, Italy
  • Roma, 00133, Italy
  • Roma, 00149, Italy
  • Roma, 00161, Italy
  • Roma, 00189, Italy
  • San Daniele Del Friuli, 33038, Italy
  • San Miniato, 56028, Italy
  • Sassari, 07100, Italy
  • Taranto, 74100, Italy
  • Torino, 10126, Italy
  • Udine, 33100, Italy
  • Verona, 37126, Italy
  • Vicenza, 36100, Italy
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Locatelli F, Choukroun G, Truman M, Wiggenhauser A, Fliser D. Once-Monthly Continuous Erythropoietin Receptor Activator (C.E.R.A.) in Patients with Hemodialysis-Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease: Pooled Data from Phase III Trials. Adv Ther. 2016 Apr;33(4):610-25. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0309-6. Epub 2016 Mar 10. PubMed 26965694 ↗
  • Locatelli F, Mandolfo S, Menegato Adorati M, Villa G, Tarchini R, Pizzarelli F, Conte F, Guastoni C, Ricciardi B, Crotta A. Efficacy and safety of once-monthly continuous erythropoietin receptor activator in patients with chronic renal anemia. J Nephrol. 2013 Nov-Dec;26(6):1114-21. doi: 10.5301/jn.5000251. Epub 2013 Sep 13. PubMed 24052462 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 6, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00699348
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 18, 2008
Start date
Jul 2008
Primary completion
Jul 2010
Completion
Jul 2010
Results posted
Apr 6, 2016
Last update
Apr 6, 2016

Study contacts

Clinical Trials
study director · Hoffmann-La Roche
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion