CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00698204Updated Jun 5, 2014Results posted

Cox-2 Inhibition in Radiation-induced Oral Mucositis

A Phase 2 interventional study of celecoxib and placebo in Oral Mucositis, sponsored by UConn Health. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-06-05.

Sponsored by UConn Health · Phase 2, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
43
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Oral mucositis refers to ulcerative lesions of the oral mucosa that occur due to radiation therapy given for treatment of head and neck cancer. These lesions are painful, compromise nutrition and quality of life and may necessitate interruptions in radiation therapy, thus adversely affecting cancer therapy outcomes. This study examined the use of an anti-inflammatory medicine to reduce pain and severity of oral mucositis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Oral Mucositis

Keywords

  • Mucositis
  • Head and Neck Cancer
  • Head and Neck Neoplasms
  • Stomatitis
03

In context

Mucositis

488 studies on the registry are indexed under Mucositis; 70 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 43 is below the median of 50 across 394 interventional studies indexed under Mucositis.

Browse Mucositis studies →

Lead sponsor

UConn Health is the lead sponsor of 182 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who will be receiving at least 5000 centigray (cGy) radiation therapy to at least 2 of 14 pre-defined areas in the oral cavity.
  • Women of childbearing potential must agree to use a medically accepted form of contraception during the course of the study. Women of childbearing potential must have a documented negative pregnancy test within fourteen days of enrollment in the study.
  • Patient's willing and able to provide written informed consent for the study.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with known hypersensitivity to celecoxib or other COX-2 inhibitors.
  • Patients who have experienced asthma, urticaria, or allergic-type reactions after taking salicylates (e.g. aspirin) or Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
  • Patients who have demonstrated allergic-type reactions to sulfonamides.
  • Patients with a history of gastric, esophageal, pyloric channel or duodenal ulcer disease or gastrointestinal bleeding.
  • Patients with a history of inflammatory bowel disease (e.g. Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis) or pancreatic disease.
  • Patients with severe hepatic impairment.
  • Patients with advanced renal disease.
  • Patients with a significant bleeding disorder.
  • Patients under the age of 18 or over the age of 75.
  • Women who are pregnant or nursing.
  • Patients with a history of thromboembolic events including myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, transient ischemic attack and ischemic cerebrovascular accident (stroke).
  • Patients who have had coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass surgery or another cardiac revascularization procedure.
  • Patients with a history of a cardiac arrhythmia requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy, angina pectoris or congestive heart failure.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
43 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    I- Celecoxib

    Drug: celecoxib

  • Placebo comparator
    II

    Drug: placebo

Interventions

  • Drugcelecoxib

    Subject was asked to take celecoxib each day that radiation therapy was given.

    Also known as: Celebrex

  • Drugplacebo

    Subject was asked to take placebo each day that radiation therapy was given.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Oral Mucosal Injury Score at Cumulative Radiation Dose of 5000 cGy

    Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS) was used to assess oral mucosal injury during the period of radiation therapy. This validated scale scores ulceration and erythema independently at nine specified sites in the oral cavity. Ulceration is scored from 0-3 based on size of lesion and erythema is scored from 0-2 based on severity of erythema. The sum of scores is then divided by 9. The mean OMAS score at a cumulative radiation dose of 5000 cGy (approximately 5 weeks of treatment) was compared between groups.

    Time frame: 5 weeks from start of radiation therapy (5000 cGy)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of Pain Severity at 5000 cGy Radiation

    Mean worst pain at 5000 cGy on 0-10 scale, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable

    Time frame: 5 weeks from start of radiation therapy (cumulative dose of 5000 cGy)

07

Results

Posted Jun 5, 2014

Participant flow

Recruitment period University of Connecticut Health Center: December 2003 through December 2004 and from March 2006 through June 2011. Recruitment period Hartford Hospital: March 2010 thorough June 2011.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneI- CelecoxibII- Placebo
Started2020
Completed1920
Not completed10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10

Outcome measures

PrimaryClinical Oral Mucosal Injury Score at Cumulative Radiation Dose of 5000 cGy

Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS) was used to assess oral mucosal injury during the period of radiation therapy. This validated scale scores ulceration and erythema independently at nine specified sites in the oral cavity. Ulceration is scored from 0-3 based on size of lesion and erythema is scored from 0-2 based on severity of erythema. The sum of scores is then divided by 9. The mean OMAS score at a cumulative radiation dose of 5000 cGy (approximately 5 weeks of treatment) was compared between groups.

Time frame:
5 weeks from start of radiation therapy (5000 cGy)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Clinical Oral Mucosal Injury Score at Cumulative Radiation Dose of 5000 cGy
units on a scaleI- CelecoxibII- Placebo
Clinical Oral Mucosal Injury Score at Cumulative Radiation Dose of 5000 cGy1.42 ± .671.36 ± .88
SecondaryEvaluation of Pain Severity at 5000 cGy Radiation

Mean worst pain at 5000 cGy on 0-10 scale, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable

Time frame:
5 weeks from start of radiation therapy (cumulative dose of 5000 cGy)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Evaluation of Pain Severity at 5000 cGy Radiation
units on a scaleI- CelecoxibII- Placebo
Evaluation of Pain Severity at 5000 cGy Radiation4.47 ± 2.823.70 ± 3.20

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data was collected from the date of Informed Consent through 30 days after the last study intervention.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
I- Celecoxib—6/20 (30%)1/20 (5%)
II- Placebo—5/20 (25%)0/20 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventI- CelecoxibII- Placebo
FeverGeneral disorders3/203/20
Nausea/vomitingGastrointestinal disorders3/202/20
Electrolyte abnormalityBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/201/20
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/201/20
Myocardial infarctionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/200/20
Pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/200/20
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventI- CelecoxibII- Placebo
pruritusImmune system disorders1/200/20

Baseline characteristics

Intent-to-treat analysis performed for 40 participants. Per-protocol analysis performed for the period in which individual participants were taking study medication (celecoxib or placebo).

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)I- CelecoxibII- PlaceboTotal
Mean53.15 (34 to 71)56.00 (36 to 69)54.58 (34 to 71)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)I- CelecoxibII- PlaceboTotal
Female358
Male171532
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)I- CelecoxibII- PlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American011
White201939
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)I- CelecoxibII- PlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino022
Not Hispanic or Latino201838
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of Connecticut Health Center
    Farmington, Connecticut 06030-1605, United States
  • Hartford Hospital
    Hartford, Connecticut 06102, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Lalla RV, Choquette LE, Curley KF, Dowsett RJ, Feinn RS, Hegde UP, Pilbeam CC, Salner AL, Sonis ST, Peterson DE. Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of celecoxib for oral mucositis in patients receiving radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 2014 Nov;50(11):1098-103. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 21. PubMed 25151488 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 5, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00698204
Lead sponsor
UConn Health
Collaborators
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), Pfizer
Responsible party
Rajesh Lalla (Associate Professor, Oral Medicine, UConn Health) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 17, 2008
Start date
Jul 2003
Primary completion
Sep 2012
Completion
Dec 2013
Results posted
Jun 5, 2014
Last update
Jun 5, 2014

Study contacts

Rajesh V Lalla, DDS, Ph.D, CCRP
principal investigator · UConn Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion