CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00689260Updated May 15, 2015Results posted

Easypod United States User Trial

A Phase 4 interventional study of easypod and easypod in Growth Hormone Deficiency, sponsored by EMD Serono. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 10 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-05-15.

Sponsored by EMD Serono · Phase 4 and Interventional

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
10 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will help to determine whether an injection log on a recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) delivery device improves subjects' adherence with injection schedules. Adherence will be compared between a group of subjects who are aware of the injection log on the easypod™ rhGH delivery device and a group of subjects who are not aware of the easypod™ injection log. It is the study hypothesis that subject non-adherence rate is different for those who are aware of the injection log capability versus those who are unaware of the injection log capability. Subject perception will also be evaluated by comparing the ease and convenience of use and subject preference for the easypod™ compared to two other rhGH pen injection devices.

02

Conditions studied

  • Growth Hormone Deficiency
03

In context

Lead sponsor

EMD Serono is the lead sponsor of 88 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Be male or female from 10 to 18 years of age, inclusive, with open epiphyses
  • Have GH deficiency diagnosed by treating pediatric endocrinologist for at least 6 months
  • Be undergoing rhGH treatment via self-injection using the Lilly Humatrope® or Pfizer Genotropin® pen injection device for at least 6 months
  • Be willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the trial
  • Have access to the Internet
  • Be able to read, speak and understand English
  • If female of childbearing potential, have a negative urine pregnancy test at Screening and use an acceptable form of birth control during the trial, including abstinence, a hormonal contraceptive, intrauterine device, diaphragm with spermicide, or condom with spermicide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to rhGH or prescribed diluent (0.3% metacresol for click.easy® cartridge)
  • Severe illness during the previous 6 months
  • Active malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin malignancies)
  • Diabetes mellitus (type I or II)
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Any medical condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would jeopardize the subject's safety following exposure to the investigational device
  • Participation in any other investigational study during the duration of participation in this trial
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
42 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1 - Log Aware

    Dose Log Aware (patient is aware that the device records their injection information) Half the subjects in the log aware arm will complete a diary. The other half in the log aware arm will not complete the diary.

    Device: easypod

  • Active comparator
    2 - Log Unaware

    Dose Log Unaware (patient is not aware that the device records their injection information) Half the subjects in the log unaware arm will complete a diary. The other half in the log unaware arm will not complete the diary.

    Device: easypod

Interventions

  • Deviceeasypod

    Subjects is aware that the device records injection information that can be viewed by user

  • Deviceeasypod

    Subjects is not aware that the device records injection information that can be viewed by user

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent rhGH Injections Missed During the Treatment Period (Based on the Easypod™ Injection Log)

    Time frame: 90 Days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Subjects Perception of Easypod Ease of Use Compared to Two Other rhGH Pen Injection Devices

    Time frame: 90 Days

  2. Subject Perceptions of Easypod: Storage Convenience Compared to Two Other rhGH Pen Injection Devices.

    Time frame: 90 Days

  3. Subject Perceptions of Easypod: Preference to Use Easypod Over Two Other rhGH Pen Injection Devices.

    Time frame: 90 Days

07

Results

Posted Jul 20, 2010
Limitations and caveats
Enrollment ended early due to slow enrollment. Only 44 enrolled of the 100 subjects needed. Of the 44 enrolled, only 35 subjects had valid device data for analysis.

Participant flow

43 Subjects were randomized from 14 Clinics in the US from March 2008 through January 2009. One subject withdrew consent prior to first dose. Recruitment was ended early due to slow enrollment.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLog AwareLog Unaware
Started2121
Completed1921
Not completed20

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercent rhGH Injections Missed During the Treatment Period (Based on the Easypod™ Injection Log)
Time frame:
90 Days
Reported as:
Median · Percent of injections missed
Percent rhGH Injections Missed During the Treatment Period (Based on the Easypod™ Injection Log)
Percent of injections missedLog AwareLog UnawareTotal
Percent rhGH Injections Missed During the Treatment Period (Based on the Easypod™ Injection Log)20 (0 to 71.7)19.46 (1.1 to 90.9)20 (0 to 90.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Log Aware vs Log Unaware · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.908
SecondarySubjects Perception of Easypod Ease of Use Compared to Two Other rhGH Pen Injection Devices
Time frame:
90 Days
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Subjects Perception of Easypod Ease of Use Compared to Two Other rhGH Pen Injection Devices
ParticipantsHumatropeGenotropinTotal
Strongly Agree5510
Agree134
Neutral044
Disagree314
Strongly Disagree235
Missing538
SecondarySubject Perceptions of Easypod: Storage Convenience Compared to Two Other rhGH Pen Injection Devices.
Time frame:
90 Days
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Subject Perceptions of Easypod: Storage Convenience Compared to Two Other rhGH Pen Injection Devices.
ParticipantsHumatropeGenotropinTotal
Very Convenient3710
Convenient358
Neutral538
Not Very Convenient000
Not at all Convenient011
Missing538
SecondarySubject Perceptions of Easypod: Preference to Use Easypod Over Two Other rhGH Pen Injection Devices.
Time frame:
90 Days
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Subject Perceptions of Easypod: Preference to Use Easypod Over Two Other rhGH Pen Injection Devices.
ParticipantsHumatropeGenotropinTotal
Strongly Agree268
Agree224
Neutral213
Disagree235
Strongly Disagree347
Missing538

Adverse events

Collected over Day 1, Week 12 and Four Week Follow-up. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Log Aware—1/21 (4.8%)2/21 (9.5%)
Log Unaware—1/21 (4.8%)5/21 (23.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventLog AwareLog Unaware
Brainstem TumorNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/210/21
Syncopal episodesNervous system disorders0/211/21
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventLog AwareLog Unaware
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders0/211/21
Injection site haematomaGeneral disorders1/210/21
Injection site haemorrhageGeneral disorders0/211/21
Gastroenteritis viralInfections and infestations0/211/21
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations1/210/21
Back InjuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/211/21
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/210/21
LaryngospasmRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/211/21

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Log AwareLog UnawareTotal
<=18 years212142
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Log AwareLog UnawareTotal
Mean12.4 ± 1.5013.0 ± 2.5612.7 ± 2.10
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Log AwareLog UnawareTotal
Female235
Male191837
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Log AwareLog UnawareTotal
United States212142
08

Study locations

1 site
  • US Medical Information
    Rockland, Massachusetts 02370, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 15, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00689260
Lead sponsor
EMD Serono
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 3, 2008
Start date
Mar 2008
Primary completion
May 2009
Completion
Oct 2009
Results posted
Jul 20, 2010
Last update
May 15, 2015

Study contacts

Medical Responsible, MD
study director · EMD Serono, Inc., an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion