CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00688376Updated Jan 5, 2022Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of Donepezil Hydrochloride in Preadolescent and Adolescent Children With Attention Impairment Following Cancer Treatment

A Phase 3 interventional study of Donepezil hydrochloride and Placebo in Attention Impairment, sponsored by Eisai Inc.. Completed at 31 sites in 10 countries. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-05.

Sponsored by Eisai Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of donepezil in children with persistent attention impairment that is present at least 12 months after the completion of cancer treatment.

Read the detailed description

This is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study in pediatric subjects who have persistent attention impairment following treatment for cancer. This trial has three phases: (1) pre-randomization to establish eligibility, (2) a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase with dose escalation based on body weight, (3) a 12-week, blinded extension phase during which all subjects will receive active drug.

02

Conditions studied

  • Attention Impairment

Keywords

  • Attention
  • cancer
  • chemotherapy
  • donepezil
  • acetylcholinesterase
  • inhibitor
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Eisai Inc. is the lead sponsor of 361 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Of its 81 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 54 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

  1. The subject must have received at least one cycle of chemotherapy and/or cranial radiation, and must have completed this treatment at least one year before screening takes place for entry into this study.
  2. Subjects may be male or female; age range: 6 - 17.5 years; weight ≥ 20 kg. They must be physically healthy and able to move about, with or without aids, must be living in the community, and must have adequate motor skills as shown by tests that will be given at the time of screening. The subject's eyesight and hearing must be good enough to allow cooperation with tests and physical examinations. Additionally, they must be able to swallow tablets.
  3. There must be subjective complaints by subject and/or parent of difficulties in school or other daily activities, possibly related to impairments in attention. These difficulties must have emerged after treatment for cancer and must still be present 12 months after cessation of treatment. There must also be objective evidence for this impairment, as shown by a test that will be given to the subject at the time of screening.
  4. The IQ must be >70 according to tests that will be given at the time of screening.
  5. The first language in which the subject learned to read and write must be one that uses Roman lettering (a, b, c, etc.) and Arabic numerals (1, 2, 3, etc.).
  6. The subject must not have previously taken any drugs in the class known as cholinesterase inhibitors.
  7. A parent or legal guardian must be available who is willing and able to complete all of the outcome measures, to administer medications, and to accompany the subject to the required clinic visits.
  8. Subjects with diabetes or thyroid disease may still be eligible if certain medical requirements are satisfied.
  9. Female subjects who could become pregnant must undergo pregnancy testing and must agree to use contraception.

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:

  1. Inability to perform the required tests (for example, because of aphasia, motor deficits affecting the dominant hand, or mental retardation).
  2. Motor coordination not sufficient, according to tests to be conducted at the time of screening.
  3. Recurrence of cancer. If this happens, the subject will have to withdraw from the study.
  4. Mental retardation/developmental disability.
  5. Certain medications, such as methylphenidate, are not allowed during the study.
  6. Major depression.
  7. Problems with the digestive tract that could affect the subject's ability to absorb the study drug.
  8. Hypersensitivity to a chemical class known as piperidine derivatives.
  9. Certain other medical conditions as determined by clinical staff.
  10. Alcoholism, drug abuse, or organic brain disease other than that caused by the cancer or its treatment.
  11. Pregnancy, nursing, or unwillingness to undergo pregnancy testing if requested by clinical staff.
  12. Pregnancy, lactation or plans to become pregnant, or unwilling to take a screening Beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ßhCG) test if a female >10 years of age.
  13. If sexually active, unwillingness to use birth control (males and females).
  14. Plans for certain types of elective surgery that would occur while the study is in progress.
  15. Plans for travel or other events that would interfere with the study schedule.
  16. Active treatment with another investigational drug within 3 months of the screening visit.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
72 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    Drug: Donepezil hydrochloride

  • Placebo comparator
    2

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugDonepezil hydrochloride

    During the 12-week Double-Blind Phase, subjects will receive oral donepezil hydrochloride tablets starting at a dose of 3 mg once daily. Doses will be increased incrementally at successive 3-week intervals on the basis of weight and tolerability. The final daily dose will be 3, 5, or 10 mg depending on body weight. During the Blinded Extension Phase, all subjects will receive active treatment (donepezil).

    Also known as: Aricept

  • DrugPlacebo

    During the 12-week Double-Blind Phase, subjects will receive matching placebo tablets (3, 5, of 10 mg) once daily. During the 12-week Blinded Extension Phase, all subjects will receive active treatment (donepezil).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in the Test of Variables in Attention-Continuous Performance Test (TOVA-CPT) "D-prime" Standard Score (SS) at Week 12

    TOVA-CPT test has a standardized computer game-like format that tests attention and simple impulse control. It precisely measures a person's reaction time to clicking on correct targets versus incorrect targets. Scores are based on the number of "Hits" (correct responses), omission errors (failure to respond), commission errors/"False Alarms" (incorrect responses), response time, and sensitivity ("d-prime"). "D-prime" a dimensionless statistics is a measure of distractibility and reflects how well a person reacts correctly versus incorrectly. A higher value of "d-prime" is reached by having more "Hits" (correct response) and fewer "False Alarms" (incorrect response). Analysis was based on three factors: the "d-prime" standard score, reaction time variability standard score, and response time standard score. Standard scores less than or equal to 80 were significant for an attention deficit disorder. Standard scores greater than 80 were not significant for an attention deficit disorder.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in the TOVA-CPT "D-prime" Standard Score (SS) at Week 6

    TOVA-CPT test has a standardized computer game-like format that tests attention and simple impulse control. It precisely measures a person's reaction time to clicking on correct targets versus incorrect targets. Scores are based on the number of "Hits" (correct responses), omission errors (failure to respond), commission errors/"False Alarms" (incorrect responses), response time, and sensitivity ("d-prime"). "D-prime" a dimensionless statistics is a measure of distractibility and reflects how well a person reacts correctly versus incorrectly. A higher value of "d-prime" is reached by having more "Hits" (correct response) and fewer "False Alarms" (incorrect response). Analysis was based on three factors: the "d-prime" standard score, reaction time variability standard score, and response time standard score. Standard scores less than or equal to 80 were significant for an attention deficit disorder. Standard scores greater than 80 were not significant for an attention deficit disorder.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

  2. Change From Baseline in the Reaction Time Variability Standard Score (RTVSS) and Response Time Standard Score (RTSS) at Weeks 6 and 12

    The Reaction Time Variability is defined as the time measurement of how consistently the switch is pressed. The Response Time is the measurement of how fast or slow information is processed and responded to by the participant. The testing process was as described in a previous outcome measure. Standard scores less than or equal to 80 were significant for an attention deficit disorder. Standard scores greater than 80 were not significant for an attention deficit disorder.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 6 and 12

  3. Change From Baseline in the Global Executive Composite Score, Behavioral Regulation Index, Metacognition Index, and Working Memory Subscale

    Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning test evaluates impairment of executive function(planning and organization),memory,and sustained attention in children aged 5-18 years with wide range of developmental and acquired neurological conditions.Survey assess parent/guardian's perception of their child's executive functioning in home and school environments,which relate to daily function(as judged by parent).Each survey contains 86 items scored as;1(behavior is never a problem),2(behavior is sometimes a problem),or 3(behavior is often a problem).Data was presented as t-scores(raw scale scores are used to generate t-scores)for Global Executive Composite Score(t-score range 72-216),Behavioral Regulation Index(t-score range 28-84;inhibit,shift,and emotional control),Metacognition Inde (t-score range 44-132;initiate,working memory,plan/organize,organization of materials, and monitor),and Working Memory Subscale(t-score range 35-90).Higher scores indicate decline in performance.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

07

Results

Posted Mar 27, 2020
Limitations and caveats
Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data.

Participant flow

This study was conducted at 22 centers in the United States, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, the UK, Argentina, Chile, and Australia during the period of 02 July 2008 to 26 May 2009.

Double-Blind Phase
Participant flow — Double-Blind Phase
MilestoneDonepezilPlacebo
Started4032
Safety population4031
Completed3425
Not completed67
Withdrew: Adverse event44
Withdrew: Protocol violation12
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10
Withdrew: Not treated01
Blinded Extension Phase
Participant flow — Blinded Extension Phase
MilestoneDonepezilPlacebo
Started3425
Completed2920
Not completed55
Withdrew: Adverse event34
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01
Withdrew: Physician decision10
Withdrew: Other10

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in the Test of Variables in Attention-Continuous Performance Test (TOVA-CPT) "D-prime" Standard Score (SS) at Week 12

TOVA-CPT test has a standardized computer game-like format that tests attention and simple impulse control. It precisely measures a person's reaction time to clicking on correct targets versus incorrect targets. Scores are based on the number of "Hits" (correct responses), omission errors (failure to respond), commission errors/"False Alarms" (incorrect responses), response time, and sensitivity ("d-prime"). "D-prime" a dimensionless statistics is a measure of distractibility and reflects how well a person reacts correctly versus incorrectly. A higher value of "d-prime" is reached by having more "Hits" (correct response) and fewer "False Alarms" (incorrect response). Analysis was based on three factors: the "d-prime" standard score, reaction time variability standard score, and response time standard score. Standard scores less than or equal to 80 were significant for an attention deficit disorder. Standard scores greater than 80 were not significant for an attention deficit disorder.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · d-prime
Change From Baseline in the Test of Variables in Attention-Continuous Performance Test (TOVA-CPT) "D-prime" Standard Score (SS) at Week 12
d-primeDonepezilPlacebo
Change From Baseline in the Test of Variables in Attention-Continuous Performance Test (TOVA-CPT) "D-prime" Standard Score (SS) at Week 125.2 ± 8.774.5 ± 7.39
Statistical analysis
  • Donepezil vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.694 · Ls mean difference: 0.8 · 95% CI -3.22 to 4.8
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the TOVA-CPT "D-prime" Standard Score (SS) at Week 6

TOVA-CPT test has a standardized computer game-like format that tests attention and simple impulse control. It precisely measures a person's reaction time to clicking on correct targets versus incorrect targets. Scores are based on the number of "Hits" (correct responses), omission errors (failure to respond), commission errors/"False Alarms" (incorrect responses), response time, and sensitivity ("d-prime"). "D-prime" a dimensionless statistics is a measure of distractibility and reflects how well a person reacts correctly versus incorrectly. A higher value of "d-prime" is reached by having more "Hits" (correct response) and fewer "False Alarms" (incorrect response). Analysis was based on three factors: the "d-prime" standard score, reaction time variability standard score, and response time standard score. Standard scores less than or equal to 80 were significant for an attention deficit disorder. Standard scores greater than 80 were not significant for an attention deficit disorder.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · d-prime
Change From Baseline in the TOVA-CPT "D-prime" Standard Score (SS) at Week 6
d-primeDonepezilPlacebo
Change From Baseline in the TOVA-CPT "D-prime" Standard Score (SS) at Week 65.7 ± 8.416.2 ± 9.49
Statistical analysis
  • Donepezil vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9458 · Ls mean difference: -0.1 · 95% CI -4.38 to 4.09
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Reaction Time Variability Standard Score (RTVSS) and Response Time Standard Score (RTSS) at Weeks 6 and 12

The Reaction Time Variability is defined as the time measurement of how consistently the switch is pressed. The Response Time is the measurement of how fast or slow information is processed and responded to by the participant. The testing process was as described in a previous outcome measure. Standard scores less than or equal to 80 were significant for an attention deficit disorder. Standard scores greater than 80 were not significant for an attention deficit disorder.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 6 and 12
Reported as:
Mean · milliseconds
Change From Baseline in the Reaction Time Variability Standard Score (RTVSS) and Response Time Standard Score (RTSS) at Weeks 6 and 12
millisecondsDonepezilPlacebo
RTVSS (Week 6)-3.4 ± 18.44-3.2 ± 15.75
RTVSS (Week 12)-3.9 ± 15.21-5.0 ± 17.00
RTSS (Week 6)-6.9 ± 13.17-9.6 ± 13.25
RTSS (Week 12)-9.0 ± 13.15-9.1 ± 12.79
Statistical analysis
  • Donepezil vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.743 · Ls mean difference: -1.4 · 95% CI -9.56 to 6.85
  • Donepezil vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9561 · Ls mean difference: 0.2 · 95% CI -7.42 to 7.84
  • Donepezil vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.4385 · Ls mean difference: 2.5 · 95% CI -3.97 to 9.04
  • Donepezil vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9088 · Ls mean difference: -0.4 · 95% CI -6.74 to 6
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Global Executive Composite Score, Behavioral Regulation Index, Metacognition Index, and Working Memory Subscale

Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning test evaluates impairment of executive function(planning and organization),memory,and sustained attention in children aged 5-18 years with wide range of developmental and acquired neurological conditions.Survey assess parent/guardian's perception of their child's executive functioning in home and school environments,which relate to daily function(as judged by parent).Each survey contains 86 items scored as;1(behavior is never a problem),2(behavior is sometimes a problem),or 3(behavior is often a problem).Data was presented as t-scores(raw scale scores are used to generate t-scores)for Global Executive Composite Score(t-score range 72-216),Behavioral Regulation Index(t-score range 28-84;inhibit,shift,and emotional control),Metacognition Inde (t-score range 44-132;initiate,working memory,plan/organize,organization of materials, and monitor),and Working Memory Subscale(t-score range 35-90).Higher scores indicate decline in performance.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · t-scores
Change From Baseline in the Global Executive Composite Score, Behavioral Regulation Index, Metacognition Index, and Working Memory Subscale
t-scoresDonepezilPlacebo
Global Executive Composite Score-1.3 ± 6.73-3.8 ± 6.78
Behavioral Regulation Index0.8 ± 7.54-1.9 ± 6.91
Metacognition Index-2.3 ± 7.29-4.9 ± 6.99
Working Memory Scale-3.6 ± 7.45-3.3 ± 6.59
Statistical analysis
  • Donepezil vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.2886 · Ls mean difference: 1.7 · 95% CI -1.5 to 4.96
  • Donepezil vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.2555 · Ls mean difference: 2.1 · 95% CI -1.54 to 5.69
  • Donepezil vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.3155 · Ls mean difference: 1.7 · 95% CI -1.63 to 4.99
  • Donepezil vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9075 · Ls mean difference: -0.2 · 95% CI -3.55 to 3.16

Adverse events

Collected over For each participant, adverse events were collected from the time the participant signed the informed consent form up to 30 days after discontinuation, or approximately 203 days.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Donepezil Double-Blind Phase0/40 (0%)1/40 (2.5%)30/40 (75%)
Placebo Double-Blind Phase0/31 (0%)1/31 (3.2%)20/31 (64.5%)
Donepezil Blinded Extension Phase0/34 (0%)0/34 (0%)21/34 (61.8%)
Placebo Blinded Extension Phase0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)15/25 (60%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventDonepezil Double-Blind PhasePlacebo Double-Blind PhaseDonepezil Blinded Extension PhasePlacebo Blinded Extension Phase
RhabdomyosarcomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/401/310/340/25
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/400/310/340/25
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 110
Most frequent other events
EventDonepezil Double-Blind PhasePlacebo Double-Blind PhaseDonepezil Blinded Extension PhasePlacebo Blinded Extension Phase
HeadacheNervous system disorders10/407/312/346/25
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders7/402/311/343/25
DizzinessNervous system disorders1/400/310/344/25
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders2/401/312/343/25
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations4/403/312/340/25
Muscle spasmsMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/401/310/342/25
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/401/310/340/25
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders3/403/311/342/25
FatigueGeneral disorders2/403/312/340/25
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations1/401/312/342/25

Baseline characteristics

Safety population (SP) included randomized participants who took at least one dose of study medication and who had at least one post-Baseline safety assessment. One participant from the placebo group was not evaluable for safety resulting in one less total participants (71) in the SP as compared to the randomized population (72).

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)DonepezilPlaceboTotal
Mean12.1 ± 3.0611.6 ± 2.8311.9 ± 2.95
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)DonepezilPlaceboTotal
Female152136
Male251035
08

Study locations

31 sites
  • Stanford, California 94305-5826, United States
  • Miami, Florida 33155, United States
  • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404, United States
  • Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, United States
  • Brooklyn, New York 11209, United States
  • Great Neck, New York 10021, United States
  • New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514, United States
  • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States
  • Dallas, Texas 75235, United States
  • Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Road Runner Research Ltd.
    San Antonio, Texas 78258, United States
  • Cordoba Capital, Provincia De Cordoba 5000, Argentina
  • Buenos Aires, C1181ACH, Argentina
  • Buenos Aires, C1428AQK, Argentina
  • Sydney, New South Wales 2301, Australia
  • Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales 2045, Australia
  • Calgary, Alberta T2T5C7, Canada
  • Antonio Varas, Providencia Santiago 360, Chile
  • Santa Maria, Providencia Santiago 0410, Chile
  • Vandoeurvre Les Nancy, 54511, France
  • Villejuif, 94805, France
  • Koeln, 50924, Germany
  • Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Netherlands
  • Groningen, 9713 GZ, Netherlands
  • Rotterdam, 3015 GJ, Netherlands
  • Utrecht, 3584 EA, Netherlands
  • Palma de Mallorca, 07198, Spain
  • Valencia, 46009, Spain
  • Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 5, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00688376
Lead sponsor
Eisai Inc.
Collaborators
Eisai Limited
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 2, 2008
Start date
Jul 2, 2008
Primary completion
May 26, 2009
Completion
May 26, 2009
Results posted
Mar 27, 2020
Last update
Jan 5, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion