CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00675922SoaksUpdated Jun 22, 2023Results posted

Study of the Treatment of Burn Wounds With Antimicrobial Topical Soaks

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Sulfamylon 5% and Silver Nitrate Soaks in Burn, sponsored by The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 1 Day to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-22.

Sponsored by The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Data inconclusive.
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
98
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
1 Day to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Determine effectiveness of various antimicrobial solutions on burn wounds (infections, wound healing, length of hospital stay).

Read the detailed description

Patients were treated with both Sulfamylon soaks and Silver nitrate soaks on different burn areas. These two areas were then compared for incidence (percentage) of infections.

02

Conditions studied

  • Burn

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Burn
  • Wounds
  • Wound infection
  • Topical antimicrobials
  • Cerium
  • Dakins
  • Sulfamylon Soaks
  • Silver Nitrate
03

In context

Burns

719 studies on the registry are indexed under Burns; 145 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 98 is above the median of 40 across 524 interventional studies indexed under Burns.

Browse Burns studies →

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston is the lead sponsor of 251 studies on the registry; 38 are open to participants now.

Of its 30 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 25 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Day to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Burn Injury requiring excisional therapy
  • Hospitalization required until wounds are closed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known hypersensitivity to products
  • Outpatient treatment for burn injury
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
98 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sulfamylon 5% and Silver Nitrate Soaks

    Application of Sulfamylon 5% Solution and Silver Nitrate soaked dressings to two different burned area. Sites were then monitored for infections during hospitalization.

    Drug: Sulfamylon 5% and Silver Nitrate Soaks

Interventions

  • DrugSulfamylon 5% and Silver Nitrate Soaks

    Application of Sulfamylon and Silver Nitrate Solution to burn wound daily

    Also known as: Sulfamylon, Silver Nitrate

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Infection Rate

    Percent of infections following antimicrobial topical treatment with Sulfamylon vs Silver Nitrate Soaks.

    Time frame: Acute hospitalization following burn injury: admission to discharge (1-20 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of Hospital Stay With Various Antimicrobial Solutions for Burn Patients

    At the request of the study site, this study has been closed. Access to study-related data is unavailable, and the PI is no longer at the institution. Hence, we are unable to submit the results data for this outcome. Although peer-reviewed articles have been located that reference NCT00675922 it is not clear and verifiable (without access to the actual study-related data) what the results for this outcome.

    Time frame: Admission to burn unit to discharge

07

Results

Posted Jan 18, 2013

Participant flow

Patients admitted to Burn ICU with acute burn injury were eligible for recruitment

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSulfamylon Solution 5% and Silver Nitrate Soaks
Started98
Completed98
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryInfection Rate

Percent of infections following antimicrobial topical treatment with Sulfamylon vs Silver Nitrate Soaks.

Time frame:
Acute hospitalization following burn injury: admission to discharge (1-20 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Infection Rate
percentage of participantsPercent Infections:Sulfamylon SitePercent Infections: Silver Nitrate Site
Infection Rate72 ± .0574
SecondaryLength of Hospital Stay With Various Antimicrobial Solutions for Burn Patients

At the request of the study site, this study has been closed. Access to study-related data is unavailable, and the PI is no longer at the institution. Hence, we are unable to submit the results data for this outcome. Although peer-reviewed articles have been located that reference NCT00675922 it is not clear and verifiable (without access to the actual study-related data) what the results for this outcome.

Time frame:
Admission to burn unit to discharge

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over 1995-2008. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sulfamylon Soaks, Silver Nitrate Soaks—9/98 (9.2%)2/98 (2%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventSulfamylon Soaks, Silver Nitrate Soaks
hypoglycemiaEndocrine disorders2/98
Invasive infection, MOF, deathInfections and infestations1/98
ischemia of legVascular disorders1/98
renal failure, deathRenal and urinary disorders1/98
Patient aspiration and deathRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/98
pneumothoraxRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/98
Sepsis, multi organ failure and deathInfections and infestations1/98
chest tube fell outRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/98
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSulfamylon Soaks, Silver Nitrate Soaks
skin, opened woundSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/98
open woundSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/98

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Sulfamylon vs Silver Nitrate Solution
<=18 years86
Between 18 and 65 years12
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Sulfamylon vs Silver Nitrate Solution
Female32
Male66
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Texas Medical Branch
    Galveston, Texas 77555, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 22, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00675922
Lead sponsor
The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 12, 2008
Start date
Jul 1995
Primary completion
May 2008
Completion
May 2008
Results posted
Jan 18, 2013
Last update
Jun 22, 2023

Study contacts

David N Herndon, MD
principal investigator · University of Texas

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion