CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00667693Updated Jul 24, 2018Results posted

Pentax Airway Scope (AWS) Intubation

An interventional study of Macintosh laryngoscope and Pentax AWS in Obesity, sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-07-24.

Sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
101
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will compare the Macintosh laryngoscope with the Pentax. The Pentax AWS is a novel airway management device that is designed to facilitate laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.

Read the detailed description

100 obese patients (BMI 30 to 50) requiring orotracheal intubation for elective surgery will be randomly allocated to intubation with either a conventional Macintosh laryngoscope or with the Pentax AWS. Our study hypothesis is that use of Pentax AWS will make tracheal intubation easier to perform in the obese surgical patient (BMI 30 to 50), as evidenced by the time to complete the intubation process as well as an "Ease of Use" visual analog score (VAS) measure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity

Keywords

  • intubation
  • obese
03

In context

Lead sponsor

The Cleveland Clinic is the lead sponsor of 818 studies on the registry; 118 are open to participants now.

Of its 89 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 72 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • subject is at least 18 years old
  • BMI between 30 and 50
  • scheduled for elective surgery requiring orotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a known difficult airway
  • loose teeth
  • subject pregnancy
  • rapid sequence induction required
  • subject is unable to give consent
  • anesthesiologist considered use of the Pentax AWS to be contraindicated
  • special endotracheal tube (ETT) is needed for the case.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
101 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Macintosh laryngoscope

    Intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope

    Device: Macintosh laryngoscope

  • Active comparator
    Pentax AWS

    Intubation with a Pentax AWS

    Device: Pentax AWS

Interventions

  • DeviceMacintosh laryngoscope

    Intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope

  • DevicePentax AWS

    Intubation with Pentax AWS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Intubation

    time between sufficient muscle relaxant and placement of intubation tube

    Time frame: time between sufficient muscle relaxant and placement of intubation tube, up to 100 seconds

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ease of Intubation

    Ease of intubation was recorded by the operator immediately after intubation on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). The score ranges from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates more difficulty in intubation

    Time frame: From the start of intubation until 24 hours after surgery

  2. Successful Intubation on the First Attempt

    The count number of successful intubation on the first attempt

    Time frame: From the start of intubation until 24 hours after surgery

  3. The Number of Patients With Different Number of Intubation Attempts

    We summarized the number of patients with one, two or three intubation attempts.

    Time frame: From the start of intubation until 24 hours after surgery

  4. The Number of Patients With Bleeding

    Time frame: From the start of intubation until 24 hours after surgery

07

Results

Posted Oct 31, 2016
Limitations and caveats
It focused on obese patients; did not include patients with a history of difficult intubation; protocol did not include use of adjunctive devices; was impossible to blind the operator to the device being used; only the Mallampati score was recorded

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMacintoshPentax
Started4952
Completed4950
Not completed02

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime to Intubation

time between sufficient muscle relaxant and placement of intubation tube

Time frame:
time between sufficient muscle relaxant and placement of intubation tube, up to 100 seconds
Reported as:
Median · seconds
Time to Intubation
secondsMacintoshPentax
Time to Intubation26 (22 to 29)38 (31 to 50)
Statistical analysis
  • Macintosh vs Pentax · Regression, Cox · p = <0.001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.35 · 95% CI 0.23 to 0.55
SecondaryEase of Intubation

Ease of intubation was recorded by the operator immediately after intubation on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). The score ranges from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates more difficulty in intubation

Time frame:
From the start of intubation until 24 hours after surgery
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Ease of Intubation
units on a scaleMacintoshPentax
Ease of Intubation40 ± 2852 ± 31
SecondarySuccessful Intubation on the First Attempt

The count number of successful intubation on the first attempt

Time frame:
From the start of intubation until 24 hours after surgery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Successful Intubation on the First Attempt
ParticipantsMacintoshPentax
Successful Intubation on the First Attempt4543
SecondaryThe Number of Patients With Different Number of Intubation Attempts

We summarized the number of patients with one, two or three intubation attempts.

Time frame:
From the start of intubation until 24 hours after surgery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Number of Patients With Different Number of Intubation Attempts
ParticipantsMacintoshPentax
one attempt4544
two attempts43
three attempts03
SecondaryThe Number of Patients With Bleeding
Time frame:
From the start of intubation until 24 hours after surgery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Number of Patients With Bleeding
ParticipantsMacintoshPentax
The Number of Patients With Bleeding02

Adverse events

Collected over From the start of intubation until 24 hours after surgery. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Macintosh—0/49 (0%)0/49 (0%)
Pentax—0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)MacintoshPentaxTotal
Mean49 ± 1450 ± 1249 ± 13
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)MacintoshPentaxTotal
Female393978
Male101121
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)MacintoshPentaxTotal
United States495099
ASA status
ASA status(participants)MacintoshPentaxTotal
II: mild systemic disease71522
III: severe systemic disease403272
IV: severe systemic disease that threats to life235
Mallampati score
Mallampati score(participants)MacintoshPentaxTotal
1: Soft palate, uvula, fauces, pillars visible142135
2: Soft palate, uvula, fauces visible211839
3: Soft palate, base of uvula visible13720
4: Only hard palate visible044
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Cleveland Clinic
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00667693
Lead sponsor
The Cleveland Clinic
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 28, 2008
Start date
Feb 2008
Primary completion
Mar 2009
Completion
Mar 2009
Results posted
Oct 31, 2016
Last update
Jul 24, 2018

Study contacts

Daniel I Sessler, MD
study chair · The Cleveland Clinic
John Doyle, MD, PhD
principal investigator · The Cleveland Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion