CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00663169Updated Jan 7, 2013Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of a Single Dose of Canakinumab (ACZ885) in Hospitalized Patients With Acute Gout

A Phase 2 interventional study of canakinumab and dexamethasone in Arthritis, Gouty, sponsored by Novartis. Completed at 4 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-01-07.

Sponsored by Novartis · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is an exploratory proof-of-concept study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of canakinumab (ACZ885) for inflammation and pain associated with acute gouty arthritis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Arthritis, Gouty

Keywords

  • Arthritis Gouty
  • ACZ885
  • IL1B protein
  • Pain
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 317 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 6 is below the median of 90 across 2,377 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Novartis is the lead sponsor of 703 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • score over 50 on the 0-100 VAS pain scale
  • acute, confirmed gout flare for no longer than 3 days

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with biological anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) within the past 3 months
  • Anti-inflammatory medication for the treatment of acute gout within the previous 24 hours
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Major surgery with high infection risk
  • History of severe allergy to food or drugs
  • History or risk of tuberculosis
  • Active infection

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
6 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Canakinumab

    Canakinumab 10 mg/kg intravenous infusion and placebo matching dexamethasone intravenous infusion on Day 1.

    Biological: canakinumab · Other: placebo matching dexamethasone

  • Active comparator
    Dexamethasone

    Dexamethasone 12 mg intravenous infusion and placebo matching canakinumab on Day 1.

    Drug: dexamethasone · Other: placebo matching canakinumab

Interventions

  • Biologicalcanakinumab

    10 mg/kg intravenous infusion 250 mL over 2 hours.

    Also known as: ACZ885, Ilaris®

  • Drugdexamethasone

    12 mg intravenous infusion 50 mL over 30 minutes.

  • Otherplacebo matching canakinumab

    5% glucose in water intravenous infusion.

  • Otherplacebo matching dexamethasone

    Placebo intravenous infusion.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Gout at 72 Hours Post-dose Using a Likert Scale

    72 hours following treatment, patients were asked the question: "How would you rate the improvement in your gout since receiving the study medication?" Patients rated their improvement on the Likert 5-point scale: 1=Excellent, 2=Good, 3=Acceptable,4=Slight and 5=Poor. Improvement was assessed by determining patients who scored a "good" or "excellent" response.

    Time frame: 72 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Non-inferiority of a Single Dose of Canakinumab Compared to Dexamethasone During Treatment Period

    Time frame: 72 hours

  2. Time to Recurrence of the Symptoms of Acute Gout (if Applicable) During Treatment Period

    Time to recurrence is defined as from the point of improvement (good to excellent on Likert scale) to recurrence.

    Time frame: 4 months

  3. Time to Walk Independently (if Applicable) During Treatment Period

    Time frame: 4 months

  4. Number of Participants With Discontinuation of Treatment Due to Adverse Events, Deaths or Serious Adverse Events During the Study

    Additional safety information can be found in the Adverse Event section.

    Time frame: 4 months

  5. Change in C-reactive Protein (CRP) From Baseline at Month 4

    Blood was collected at Baseline and Month 4 for CRP to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor response to treatment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 4

  6. Change in Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) From Baseline at Month 4

    Blood was collected at Baseline and Month 4 for SAA to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor response to treatment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 4

  7. ACZ885 (Canakinumab) Pharmacokinetics (PK) Serum Concentration During the Treatment Period

    Blood was collected for ACZ885 (canakinumab) levels at baseline and Days 0.25, 1, 3, 6, 20, 34, 55 and 119. Serum was analyzed by means of a competitive Enzyme linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA).

    Time frame: Baseline, Days 0.25, 1, 3, 6, 20, 34, 55 and 119

  8. Change From Baseline in Pain Using a Visual Analog Scale at Month 4

    Patients rated their pain on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 4

  9. Number of Patients Who Took Rescue Medication

    Patients who did not improve by 72 hours post-dose (i.e. patients who show a pain Visual Analog (VAS) decrease of less than 50 % from baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) would have been treated with rescue medication of methylprednisolone 80 mg intravenous or intramuscular once at the discretion of the clinical investigator.

    Time frame: 4 months

07

Results

Posted Jan 7, 2013

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCanakinumabDexamethasone
Started33
Completed33
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Improvement in Gout at 72 Hours Post-dose Using a Likert Scale

72 hours following treatment, patients were asked the question: "How would you rate the improvement in your gout since receiving the study medication?" Patients rated their improvement on the Likert 5-point scale: 1=Excellent, 2=Good, 3=Acceptable,4=Slight and 5=Poor. Improvement was assessed by determining patients who scored a "good" or "excellent" response.

Time frame:
72 hours
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Gout at 72 Hours Post-dose Using a Likert Scale
Percentage of participantsCanakinumabDexamethasone
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Gout at 72 Hours Post-dose Using a Likert Scale100100
SecondaryNon-inferiority of a Single Dose of Canakinumab Compared to Dexamethasone During Treatment Period
Time frame:
72 hours

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryTime to Recurrence of the Symptoms of Acute Gout (if Applicable) During Treatment Period

Time to recurrence is defined as from the point of improvement (good to excellent on Likert scale) to recurrence.

Time frame:
4 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryTime to Walk Independently (if Applicable) During Treatment Period
Time frame:
4 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Participants With Discontinuation of Treatment Due to Adverse Events, Deaths or Serious Adverse Events During the Study

Additional safety information can be found in the Adverse Event section.

Time frame:
4 months
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Discontinuation of Treatment Due to Adverse Events, Deaths or Serious Adverse Events During the Study
ParticipantsCanakinumabDexamethasone
Discontinuation from treatment00
Death00
Serious Adverse Event01
SecondaryChange in C-reactive Protein (CRP) From Baseline at Month 4

Blood was collected at Baseline and Month 4 for CRP to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor response to treatment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 4
Reported as:
Mean · mg/L
Change in C-reactive Protein (CRP) From Baseline at Month 4
mg/LCanakinumabDexamethasone
Change in C-reactive Protein (CRP) From Baseline at Month 4-22.23 ± 16.822-30.30 ± 51.963
SecondaryChange in Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) From Baseline at Month 4

Blood was collected at Baseline and Month 4 for SAA to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor response to treatment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 4
Reported as:
Mean · mg/L
Change in Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) From Baseline at Month 4
mg/LCanakinumabDexamethasone
Change in Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) From Baseline at Month 4-579.980 ± 563.7449-260.327 ± 463.8600
SecondaryACZ885 (Canakinumab) Pharmacokinetics (PK) Serum Concentration During the Treatment Period

Blood was collected for ACZ885 (canakinumab) levels at baseline and Days 0.25, 1, 3, 6, 20, 34, 55 and 119. Serum was analyzed by means of a competitive Enzyme linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA).

Time frame:
Baseline, Days 0.25, 1, 3, 6, 20, 34, 55 and 119
Reported as:
Mean · μg/mL
ACZ885 (Canakinumab) Pharmacokinetics (PK) Serum Concentration During the Treatment Period
μg/mLCanakinumab
Baseline0.0 ± 0.00
Day 0.25221.5 ± 143.58
Day 1 (n=2)276.5 ± 26.163
Day 3 (n=1)92.3 ± NA
Day 6136.6 ± 41,532
Day 2072.37 ± 11.154
Day 3452.87 ± 13.194
Day 5531.67 ± 8.4884
Day 1197.643 ± 4.6151
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Pain Using a Visual Analog Scale at Month 4

Patients rated their pain on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 4
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Pain Using a Visual Analog Scale at Month 4
Score on a scaleCanakinumabDexamethasone
Change From Baseline in Pain Using a Visual Analog Scale at Month 4-62.0 ± 3.61-65.7 ± 17.62
SecondaryNumber of Patients Who Took Rescue Medication

Patients who did not improve by 72 hours post-dose (i.e. patients who show a pain Visual Analog (VAS) decrease of less than 50 % from baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) would have been treated with rescue medication of methylprednisolone 80 mg intravenous or intramuscular once at the discretion of the clinical investigator.

Time frame:
4 months
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Patients Who Took Rescue Medication
ParticipantsCanakinumabDexamethasone
Number of Patients Who Took Rescue Medication00

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Canakinumab—0/3 (0%)2/3 (66.7%)
Dexamethasone—1/3 (33.3%)3/3 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventCanakinumabDexamethasone
GoutMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/31/3
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventCanakinumabDexamethasone
GoutMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/33/3
Ocular hyperaemiaEye disorders0/31/3
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders0/31/3
Joint injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/31/3
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations0/31/3
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations0/31/3
Blood urine presentInvestigations1/30/3
HyperuricaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/30/3
ArthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/31/3

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)CanakinumabDexamethasoneTotal
Mean46.7 ± 10.9746.0 ± 3.4646.3 ± 7.28
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)CanakinumabDexamethasoneTotal
Female011
Male325
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Novartis Investigator Site
    Birmingham, Alabama 35249, United States
  • Novartis Investigator Site
    New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, United States
  • Novartis Investigator Site
    Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Novartis Investigator Site
    Glasgow, United Kingdom
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 7, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00663169
Lead sponsor
Novartis
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 22, 2008
Start date
Apr 2008
Primary completion
Oct 2009
Completion
Oct 2009
Results posted
Jan 7, 2013
Last update
Jan 7, 2013

Study contacts

Novartis
principal investigator · Novartis investigator site

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion