CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00645567Updated Apr 7, 2017Results posted

Biomechanics of Wheelchair Transfers

An observational study in Spinal Cord Injury, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-07.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-crossover
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
10
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a laboratory-based study to evaluate the risk of shoulder injury associated with transfers between wheelchair and vehicle in persons with spinal cord injury. Four new devices will be compared against an unassisted transfer.

Read the detailed description

Specific Aims:

The purpose of this 3 year laboratory-based randomized crossover study is to evaluate the ergonomic effectiveness of four wheelchair/vehicle transfer assistive devices, including (1) standard transfer board, (2) Glide n' Go, ( 3) Easy Reach Lift, and (4) Ryno Lift, and to compare them to an unassisted manual transfer. We have targeted persons with paraplegia (level of injury T2-L5) to standardize physical capabilities. Our research questions are:

  1. Evaluate the impact of vehicle/wheelchair transfers on objective measures of shoulder kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity, for each of the participants.
  2. Evaluate the impact of vehicle/wheelchair transfers on subjective measures of shoulder pain, spasticity, perceived comfort, ease, efficiency, and safety.
  3. Examine the effects of covariates (patient characteristics, SCI characteristics and pain) on both objective and subjective outcome measures.

Background:

Upper limb pain and injury are highly prevalent in persons with a spinal cord injury (SCI) who use a manual wheelchair for mobility. Historically, persons with paraplegia did not long survive the trauma of their injury, but with advances in medicine and emergency services, persons with SCI now have a life expectancy approaching that of the general population. For persons with paraplegia, paralysis of the lower limbs necessitates an over reliance on the upper limbs for performing wheelchair propulsion, transfers in/out of the wheelchair, and other mobility-related tasks. Many years of overuse of the upper extremities leads to an increased incidence of pain and cumulative trauma to the shoulders, elbows and wrists. Over 50% of persons with SCI have upper extremity pain; rotator cuff tears have been reported in 59-73%; and 40% have clinical evidence of carpal tunnel syndrome. Upper extremity deterioration following years of compensating for the lack of functional lower limbs in addition to their usual loading reduces quality of life, function, independence, and even life expectancy following SCI. The two most stressful mobility tasks performed by persons with paraplegia are wheelchair propulsion and wheelchair transfers. Several investigators have examined upper extremity kinematics (joint motions) kinetics (joint forces and torques), and muscle activity as determined by electromyography (EMG) among individuals with SCI during wheelchair propulsion. Comparatively few studies have addressed wheelchair transfers none of which offer an integrated kinematic, kinetic and EMG approach to simultaneously examine joint angles, moments and muscle activity.

Methods:

Using Vicon motion analysis technology, we propose a laboratory-based randomized evaluation of five vehicle transfer approaches: unassisted manual transfer, standard transfer board, Glide n'Go, Easy Reach lift, and Ryno lift. The selected commercially-available products represent the range of assistive technologies presently available for this task.

A sample of 58 veterans with paraplegia, who use a manual wheelchair for mobility, will be recruited to participate in this study. Subjects will be recruited from the Tampa VA Hospital by means of poster advertisement. Participants will complete data collection activities during one four-hour session, for which they will be compensated. Subjects will be asked to perform a series of five randomized wheelchair-to-vehicle transfer tasks. Vicon markers placed on the participant's body will capture positional data. Dynamic external loads exerted during the transfer tasks will be measured using AMTI MC3A tri-axial load cells strategically mounted in a vehicle mock-up. EMG will be recorded bilaterally for major muscle groups. Participants will complete subjective rating scales upon completion of each of the transfers.

The results of this study will be used to develop a clinical algorithm to assist clinicians with the selection of the most appropriate assistive technology for persons with disabilities who use a manual wheelchair for mobility. This algorithm will facilitate the individualized selection of assistive technologies that minimize risk for injury and maximize patient compliance, comfort, and satisfaction. The ultimate goal of this program of research is to (1) promote successful adaptation to aging with a disability, (2) reduce morbidity and mortality associated with wheelchair use, (3) enhance health-related quality of life, patient freedom, function, independence, and confidence, and (4) reduce healthcare utilization and associated costs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Cord Injury

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Ergonomics
  • Spinal Cord Injury
  • Pain
  • Shoulder
03

In context

Spinal Cord Injuries

1,948 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 505 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 60 across 323 observational studies indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries.

Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

A sample of 58 veterans with paraplegia who use a rigid manual wheelchair will be recruited to participate in this study.

Inclusion criteria

  • level of SCI will be limited to ASIA A classification at T2 through L5 level to standardize physical capabilities,
  • SCI for at least 2 years (neurologically stable,
  • use rigid manual wheelchair as a primary means of mobility,
  • able to self-propel wheelchair,
  • able to independently transfer between wheelchair and vehicle,
  • between the ages of 18-65,
  • living in the community within 100 miles of the Tampa VA hospital,
  • able to follow simple instructions,
  • free from acute upper extremity injury for at least six months (determined by chart review) to minimize risk of injury during task performance,
  • comparable bilateral functional range of motion and strength of the shoulders, elbows and wrists (determined by physical evaluation) to minimize risk of injury during task performance.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Candidates who present:

  • progressive disease (e.g. spinal tumor),
  • extended bedrest for more than 30 days,
  • ventilator-dependent,
  • any cardiac or respiratory condition that would limit subject's physical performance,
  • unstable medical conditions,
  • use of power wheelchair or scooter as primary means of mobility,
  • pregnancy,
  • clinical evidence of severe musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity will be precluded from participating in this study.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-crossover
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Unassisted manual transfer

    this group will use no additional aid in transfer.

    Device: Unassisted Manual Transfer

  • Standard sliding board transfer

    The standard transfer board is a flat surface board designed to bridge the gap that exists with transfers from wheelchair to vehicle and/or other horizontally displaced seating surfaces.

    Device: Standard Transfer Board

  • Glide n' Go Lift

    The Glide n' Go lift is a flip down power list seat that enables the person to enter and exit the vehicle by lifting them from their wheelchair up tot eh vehicle seat that they can make an easy transfer into the vehicle. Trunk stability may be required to successfully use the device.

    Device: Glide n' Go

  • Easy Reach lift

    The Easy Reach lift seat allows the vehicles original seat to swivel out of the vehicle and lower to wheelchair height. the chair extends far from the vehicle to provide access for a safe, easy transfer.

    Device: Easy Reach lift

  • Ryno lift

    The Ryno lift is an under-vehicle list (UVL) system. Using this lift, the wheelchair user is raised into the vehicle cab using independent controls and can then maneuver into a convenient position in the cab. The wheelchair is locked down and the lift stored beneath the vehicle chassis. This technology eliminated the need to store and retrieve a wheelchair during transit.

    Device: Ryno lift

Interventions

  • DeviceUnassisted Manual Transfer

    No device assistance

  • DeviceStandard Transfer Board

    Flat surface board

  • DeviceGlide n' Go

    Flip down power lift chair

  • DeviceEasy Reach lift

    Original chair is converted to a chair that swivels out of the vehicle and lowers to wheelchair height

  • DeviceRyno lift

    Lift for the wheelchair

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Shoulder Force

    measurement of applied shoulder force during wheelchair transfers

    Time frame: None reported - verifiable data is not available for any of the participants

07

Results

Posted Apr 7, 2017
Limitations and caveats
PI has left facility. This study did not yield usable results due to staffing, contracting issues. Although 10 individuals signed ICs, 4 actually actively participated in the study and verifiable data is not available for any of the participants.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneWheelchair Transfer Interventions
Started5
Completed4
Not completed1
Withdrew: Adverse event1

Outcome measures

PrimaryShoulder Force

measurement of applied shoulder force during wheelchair transfers

Time frame:
None reported - verifiable data is not available for any of the participants

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Group 1—0/5 (0%)1/5 (20%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventGroup 1
Hand injuryMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/5

Baseline characteristics

One individual was enrolled in the study but withdrew due to an adverse event (hand injury UNRELATED to the study).

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Wheelchair Transfer Interventions
Mean47.8 ± 11.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Wheelchair Transfer Interventions
Female0
Male5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Wheelchair Transfer Interventions
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino0
Unknown or Not Reported5
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Wheelchair Transfer Interventions
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White0
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported5
08

Study locations

1 site
  • James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital
    Tampa, Florida 33612-4745, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 7, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00645567
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 27, 2008
Start date
Jan 2010
Primary completion
Mar 2011
Completion
Dec 2012
Results posted
Apr 7, 2017
Last update
Apr 7, 2017

Study contacts

John D Lloyd, PhD BS
principal investigator · James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion