CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00641498Updated Mar 30, 2015

Effectiveness of Standard Emergency Department Psychiatric Treatment Associated With Treatment Delivery by a Suicide Prevention Center

An interventional study of Psychotherapy in Suicide Attempted, sponsored by University Hospital, Toulouse. Completed at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-03-30.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Toulouse · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
607
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Very few studies have proved the effectiveness of treatment for suicide attempt patients. Our objective is to evaluate the addition of the resources of an suicide prevention centre to standard psychiatric treatment in the Emergency Department. Consecutive suicide attempt patients in 2 Emergency departments (multicenter study) were included after standard psychiatric treatment and referral. After Written informed consent, psychological assessment (depression, suicide intention) was carried out After randomisation, control patients were given an information card describing the Suicide Prevention Center (SPC); experimental patients had a first meeting with a psychologist of the SPC.

To verify the hypothesis of a decrease in suicidal behaviors in the experimental group, an evaluation of these behaviors was carried out every month during a two year follow-up.

Read the detailed description

Very few studies have proved the effectiveness of treatment for suicide attempt patients. Our objective is to evaluate the addition of the resources of an existent suicide prevention centre to standard psychiatric treatment in the Emergency Department. Consecutive suicide attempt (self poisoning) patients in 2 Emergency departments (multicenter study) were included after standard psychiatric treatment and referral. After Written informed consent, psychological assessment (depression, suicide intent scale/SIS Beck Depression Inventory, Toronto Ale, Beck Hopelessness Sc, Audit, mini, PDQ 4) was carried out After randomisation, control patients were given an information card describing the Suicide Prevention Center (SPC); experimental patients had a first meeting with a psychologist of the SPC. The number of subjects included should be 405 per group. To verify the hypothesis of a decrease in suicidal behaviors in the experimental group, an evaluation of these behaviors was carried out every month during a two year follow-up The frequency of subsequent suicidal behavior will be monitored by the scrutiny of the Emergency Dept records. Death by suicide will be identified by the examination of information obtained from the national death statistics office (INSERM).

02

Conditions studied

  • Suicide Attempted

Keywords

  • suicide
  • parasuicide
  • prevention
  • individual supportive psychotherapy
03

In context

Emergencies

1,692 studies on the registry are indexed under Emergencies; 333 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 607 is above the median of 145 across 931 interventional studies indexed under Emergencies.

Browse Emergencies studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Toulouse is the lead sponsor of 794 studies on the registry; 214 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • parasuicide by self-poisoning
  • Glasgow score=15
  • Standard psychiatric treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No speaking french
  • committed inpatient
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
607 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    Usual therapy

  • Experimental
    Active group

    Individual supportive psychotherapy initiated in the Emergency department

    Behavioral: Psychotherapy

Interventions

  • BehavioralPsychotherapy

    Individual supportive

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Suicide behavior defined by self poisoning or other suicidal attempts in the emergency departments of the region. Death by suicide will be identified by the examination of information obtained from the national death statistics office (INSERM).

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Level of depression, suicide ideation, level of despair, level of alexithymia

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Service d'Accueil des Urgences
    Brive-la Gaillarde, 19100, France
  • Laboratoire de Stress Post-Traumatique
    Toulouse, 31059, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Witt KG, Hetrick SE, Rajaram G, Hazell P, Taylor Salisbury TL, Townsend E, Hawton K. Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 22;4(4):CD013668. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013668.pub2. PubMed 33884617 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 30, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00641498
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Toulouse
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 24, 2008
Start date
Mar 2007
Primary completion
Dec 2009
Completion
Oct 2011
Last update
Mar 30, 2015

Study contacts

Philippe BIRMES, PhD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Toulouse

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion