CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00616655Updated Apr 8, 2016Results posted

Generalized Anxiety Disorder Proof of Concept Efficacy and Safety Study of SEP-225441 (Eszopiclone) In GAD Subjects

A Phase 2 interventional study of eszopiclone and eszopiclone in Generalized Anxiety Disorder, sponsored by Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.. Completed at 57 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-04-08.

Sponsored by Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
456
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To determine the safety and efficacy of SEP-225441 (eszopiclone) in subjects with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD).

Read the detailed description

This is a multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study of the safety and efficacy of SEP-225441 (eszopiclone) in male and female adult subjects with a diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). The study consists of a screening period of 7-10 days, 8 weeks of treatment, and a 7 day follow-up period. This study was previously posted by Sepracor Inc. In October 2009, Sepracor Inc. was acquired by Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma., and in October 2010, Sepracor Inc's name was changed to Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.

02

Conditions studied

  • Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Anxiety
03

In context

Anxiety Disorders

4,868 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,390 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 456 is above the median of 80 across 4,174 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.

Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 176 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 20 (63%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female subjects must be between 18 and 50 years of age
  • Subjects must have GAD
  • Subjects must be in otherwise good general health

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has a documented history of HIV, hepatitis B or hepatitis C.
  • Subject has a recent history (within 6 months of study entry) or current diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder, panic disorder (or 3 or more panic attacks in the past month). Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, body dysmorphic disorder, eating disorder, or other disorder.
  • Subject has a history or presence of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), any psychotic, bipolar or schizophrenic disorder.
  • Subject has presence or history of antisocial personality or other severe disorder
  • Subject has refractory GAD (previously unresponsive to 2 or more adequate courses of SSRI, SNRI, benzodiazepine or non-benzodiazepine treatment for GAD).
  • Subject has history of seizures, including febrile seizures.
  • Subject has initiated psychotherapeutic intervention with 30 days; however, continued psychotherapy is allowed if stable and not specifically directed at GAD.
  • Subject is undergoing or has undergone electroconvulsive therapy.
  • Subject is a current smoker or has smoked within the last 12 months.
  • Subject has donated blood within the past 30 days or plans to donate during and within 30 days after study participation.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
456 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1

    SEP-225441 (eszopiclone) total daily dose of 1.5 mg

    Drug: eszopiclone

  • Active comparator
    2

    SEP-225441 (eszopiclone) total daily dose of 0.9 mg

    Drug: eszopiclone

  • Placebo comparator
    3

    Placebo total daily dose 0.9 mg

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Drugeszopiclone

    SEP-225441 (eszopiclone) total daily dose of 1.5 mg

    Also known as: SEP-225441

  • Drugeszopiclone

    SEP-225441 (eszopiclone) total daily dose of 0.9 mg

    Also known as: SEP-225441

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo total daily dose 0.9 mg

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Total Score on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), as Assessed by the Site-trained Rater

    THe HAM-M was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-M rating scale. These items included: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). The Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score (Except for Week 8)

    The HAM-A was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items included: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. all items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6 based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)

  2. Change in Individual Item Scores on HAM-A

    The HAM-A was administered by a site trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items include: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a t5-point scale (0-4). Each HAM-A individual item score can range from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety questions.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8

  3. Change From Baseline in Clinician Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)

    The CGI-Swas completed by a board certified psychiatrist and represents the clinician's subjective assessment of severity of the subject's anxiety symptoms as assessed by a 7-scale score for a single question, "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how anxious is the subject at this time?" The score was based on the following scale: 1=normal, not at all anxious; 2=borderline anxious; 3=mildly anxious; 4=moderately anxious; 5=markedly anxious; 6=severly anxious; 7=among the most extremely anxious subjects. CGI-S score can range from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating higher severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)

  4. Clinical Global Impression- Improvement (CGI-I)

    CGI-I was completed by a board certified psychiatrist and represented the clinician's subjective assessment of improvement of the subject's anxiety symptoms based on the following question, "Compared to his/her condition at Visit 2, how much has he/she changed?" The score was based on the following scale: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. CGI-I score can range from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating less improvement.

    Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 9, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)

  5. Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) 50% Anxiolytic Response

    The HAM-A was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items include: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). A 50% anxiolytic response was defined as a 50% or greater reduction from baseline in the HAM-A total score. The Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 2, 4, 6, 8

  6. Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Remission

    The HAM-A was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items include: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). Remission was defined as a HAM-A total score of 7 or less. The Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 2, 4, 6, 8 based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)

  7. Change From Baseline on Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Short Form

    The Q-LES-Q was completed by the subject and assessed quaility of life based on 16 items, each evaluated on a 5-point scale of overall level of enjoyment/satisfaction: 1=very poor; 2=poor; 3=fair; 4=good; 5=very good. The overall percentage score was computed as a sum of items 1 to 14 as expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score: Overall Percentage Score = Sum \[item 1... item 14\]-14)/(70-14 ) \*100%. Q-LES-Q overall percentage score can range from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating higher quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)

  8. Change From Baseline Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) Total Score

    The ISI was completed by the subject and is an assessment of the severity of insomnia. The administered extended ISI questionnaire consists of 5 items (containing 7 questions, as item 1 contains 3 questions) comprising the original ISI questionnaire, plus 6 quality of life related items (sleep quality, restedness/refreshness upon arising, daytime fatigue, attention/concentration, relationships and mood disturbances), and 2 items assessing duration and frequency of sleep problems. All items, except for the insomnia duration and frequency questions, are measured on a Likert-type 5-point scale (0-4). ISI total score can range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating more severe insomnia.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on lst observation carried forward (LOCF)

  9. Change From Baseline Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)

    The SDS was completed by the subject and captured the subject's level of disability. The subject rated the extent to which his or her work, social life or leisure activities, and home life or family responsibilities were impaired by his or her symptoms on a 10-point visual analog scale. SDS total score can range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating higher functional impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)

  10. Change From Baseline Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)

    ESS was completed by the subject and assessed daytime sedation based on 8 items, each presenting a situation for which the subject needed to evaluate how likely he/she is to doze off or fall asleep in contrast to feeling just tired. Each item was evaluated on the following scale: 0 = would never doze; 1 = slight chance of dozing; 2 = moderate chance of dozing; 3 = high chance of dozing. ESS total score can range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating higher levels of daytime sleepiness.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)

07

Results

Posted Aug 21, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlacebo ArmEszopiclone Low Dose ArmEszopiclone High Dose Arm
Started152153151
Completed117112103
Not completed354148
Withdrew: Adverse event10712
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy555
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up31210
Withdrew: Protocol violation243
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject9711
Withdrew: Does not meet in/ex criteria002
Withdrew: Other665

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Total Score on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), as Assessed by the Site-trained Rater

THe HAM-M was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-M rating scale. These items included: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). The Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Total Score on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), as Assessed by the Site-trained Rater
Units on a scalePlacebo ArmEszopiclone Low Dose ArmEszopiclone High Dose Arm
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Total Score on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), as Assessed by the Site-trained Rater-10.0 ± 7.0-9.3 ± 7.4-9.5 ± 8.1
SecondaryChange From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score (Except for Week 8)

The HAM-A was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items included: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. all items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6 based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)
Reported as:
Mean · unit on a scale
Change From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score (Except for Week 8)
unit on a scalePlacebo ArmEszopiclone Low Dose ArmEszopiclone High Dose Arm
Baseline24.2 ± 3.424.0 ± 3.424.0 ± 3.7
Week 2 - Change from baseline-5.7 ± 5.7-4.8 ± 5.0-6.0 ± 6.1
Week 4-Change from baseline-8.1 ± 6.0-7.6 ± 6.3-8.0 ± 6.8
Week 6- Change from baseline-8.9 ± 6.3-8.7 ± 7.2-8.5 ± 7.4
SecondaryChange in Individual Item Scores on HAM-A

The HAM-A was administered by a site trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items include: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a t5-point scale (0-4). Each HAM-A individual item score can range from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety questions.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Individual Item Scores on HAM-A
units on a scalePlacebo ArmEszopiclone Low Dose ArmEszopiclone High Dose Arm
Anxious Mood-Baseline2.8 ± 0.52.8 ± 0.52.8 ± 0.5
Anxious Mood-Week 2 -Change from baseline-0.6 ± 0.8-0.5 ± 0.7-0.6 ± 0.9
Anxious Mood-Week 4 - Change from baseline-0.8 ± 0.9-0.8 ± 0.8-0.9 ± 1.0
Anxious Mood-Week 6 - Change from baseline-1.0 ± 0.9-0.8 ± 0.8-1.0 ± 1.0
Anxious Mood-Week 8- Change from baseline-1.0 ± 1.0-0.9 ± 0.9-1.1 ± 1.1
Tension - Baseline2.7 ± 0.52.6 ± 0.52.7 ± 0.5
Tension - Week 2 -Change from baseline-0.5 ± 0.9-0.4 ± 0.7-0.6 ± 0.9
Tension - Week 4 - Change from baseline-0.8 ± 1.0-0.6 ± 0.9-0.8 ± 0.9
Tension - Week 6- Change from baseline-0.9 ± 1.0-0.8 ± 1.0-1.0 ± 1.0
Tension - Week 8- Change from baseline-0.9 ± 1.0-0.9 ± 1.0-1.0 ± 1.0
Fears- Baseline1.1 ± 1.11.2 ± 1.01.0 ± 0.9
Fears- Week 2- Change from baseline-0.3 ± 0.9-0.4 ± 0.8-0.2 ± 0.8
Fears- Week 4- Change from baseline-0.4 ± 0.9-0.5 ± 0.9-0.3 ± 0.8
Fears- Week 6- Change from baseline-0.4 ± 1.0-0.5 ± 0.9-0.4 ± 0.9
Fears- Week 8- Change from baseline-0.5 ± 0.9-0.7 ± 1.0-0.4 ± 0.9
Insomnia- Baseline2.5 ± 0.72.5 ± 0.72.6 ± 0.8
Insomnia- Week 2- Change from baseline-0.5 ± 0.9-0.5 ± 1.0-0.8 ± 1.0
Insomnia- Week 4- Change from baseline-0.8 ± 1.1-0.8 ± 1.0-0.9 ± 1.0
Insomnia- Week 6- Change from baseline-0.8 ± 1.0-0.8 ± 1.0-0.9 ± 1.1
insomnia- Week 8- Change from baseline-0.9 ± 1.1-0.8 ± 1.0-1.0 ± 1.2
Intellectual- Baseline2.1 ± 0.82.1 ± 0.82.2 ± 0.8
Intellectual- Week 2- Change from baseline-0.4 ± 0.9-0.4 ± 0.9-0.5 ± 0.9
Intellectual- Week 4- Change from baseline-0.8 ± 1.0-0.6 ± 0.9-0.7 ± 0.9
Intellectual- Week 6- Change from baseline-0.7 ± 1.1-0.7 ± 1.0-0.8 ± 1.1
Intellectual- Week 8- Change from baseline-0.9 ± 1.1-0.8 ± 1.1-0.9 ± 1.1
Depressed Mood- Baseline1.1 ± 0.81.2 ± 0.71.0 ± 0.7
Depressed Mood- Week 2- Change from baseline-0.3 ± 0.8-0.2 ± 0.8-0.2 ± 0.8
Depressed Mood- Week 4- Change in baseline-0.4 ± 0.9-0.3 ± 0.9-0.3 ± 0.8
Depressed Mood- Week 6- Change from baseline-0.3 ± 0.9-0.3 ± 0.9-0.3 ± 0.8
Depressed Mood- Week 8- Change from baseline-0.4 ± 0.9-0.4 ± 0.9-0.3 ± 0.9
Somatic Complaints-Muscular-Baseline2.0 ± 0.81.9 ± 0.81.8 ± 0.8
Somatic Complaints-Muscular-Wk 2-Chg from baseline-0.5 ± 1.0-0.3 ± 0.8-0.5 ± 0.8
Somatic Complaints-Muscular-Wk 4-Chg from baseline-0.7 ± 0.9-0.5 ± 1.0-0.6 ± 0.9
Somatic Complaints-Muscular-Wk 6-Chg from baseline-0.8 ± 1.1-0.7 ± 1.1-0.6 ± 1.0
Somatic Complaints-Muscular-Wk 8-Chg from baseline-0.9 ± 1.1-0.7 ± 1.1-0.7 ± 1.1
Somatic Complaints-Sensory-Baseline1.0 ± 0.91.0 ± 0.91.2 ± 0.9
Somatic Complaints-Sensory-Wk 2-Chg from baseline-0.3 ± 0.9-0.2 ± 0.8-0.5 ± 1.0
Somatic Complaints-Sensory-Wk 4-Chg from baseline-0.4 ± 0.9-0.3 ± 1.01.0 ± 0.9
Somatic Complaints-Sensory-Wk 6-Chg from baseline-0.4 ± 0.9-0.4 ± 0.9-0.5 ± 1.0
Somatic Complaints-Sensory-Wk 8-Chg from baseline-0.5 ± 1.0-0.4 ± 1.0-0.5 ± 1.0
Cardiovascular symptoms-baseline1.1 ± 1.01.2 ± 1.01.3 ± 1.0
Cardiovascular symptoms-Wk 2-Chg. from baseline-0.4 ± 1.0-0.4 ± 0.9-0.5 ± 1.0
Cardiovascular symptoms-Wk 4-Chg. from baseline-0.5 ± 1.0-0.7 ± 1.0-0.6 ± 1.0
Cardiovascular symptoms-Wk 6-Chg. from baseline-0.6 ± 1.0-0.6 ± 1.0-0.6 ± 1.0
Cardiovascular symptoms-Wk 8-Chg. from baseline-0.7 ± 1.0-0.8 ± 1.0-0.7 ± 1.1
Respiratory Symptoms-Baseline1.2 ± 0.91.2 ± 0.91.3 ± 0.9
Respiratory Symptoms-Wk 2 Change from baseline-0.4 ± 0.9-0.3 ± 0.8-0.4 ± 0.9
Respiratory Symptoms-Wk 4 Change from baseline-0.5 ± 0.9-0.5 ± 0.9-0.5 ± 1.0
Respiratory Symptoms-Wk 6 Change from baseline-0.6 ± 0.9-0.5 ± 1.0-0.5 ± 1.1
Respiratory Symptoms-Wk 8 Change from baseline-0.6 ± 0.9-0.6 ± 0.9-0.7 ± 1.0
Gastrointestinal Symptoms- Baseline1.4 ± 1.01.4 ± 1.01.3 ± 0.9
Gastrointestinal Symptoms-Wk2-Change from baseline-0.3 ± 1.1-0.4 ± 1.0-0.3 ± 1.1
Gastrointestinal Symptoms-Wk4-Change from baseline-0.5 ± 1.0-0.5 ± 1.0-0.4 ± 1.1
Gastrointestinal Symptoms-Wk6-Change from baseline-0.6 ± 1.0-0.6 ± 1.0-0.5 ± 1.1
Gastrointestinal Symptoms-Wk8-Change from baseline-0.6 ± 1.0-0.6 ± 1.0-0.5 ± 1.1
Genitourinary Symptoms-Baseline1.5 ± 1.01.4 ± 1.01.4 ± 1.1
Genitourinary Symptoms-Wk 2-Change from baseline-0.4 ± 1.0-0.2 ± 1.0-0.3 ± 1.0
Genitourinary Symptoms-Wk 4-Change from baseline-0.4 ± 1.1-0.4 ± 1.1-0.4 ± 1.1
Genitourinary Symptoms-Wk 6-Change from baseline-0.5 ± 1.1-0.4 ± 1.1-0.3 ± 1.0
Genitourinary Symptoms-Wk 8-Change from baseline-0.6 ± 1.1-0.5 ± 1.1-0.4 ± 1.1
Autonomic Symptoms-Baseline1.8 ± 0.91.8 ± 0.81.8 ± 0.8
Autonomic Symptoms-Wk 2-Change from baseline-0.4 ± 0.9-0.3 ± 0.9-0.4 ± 1.0
Autonomic Symptoms-Wk 4-Change from baseline-0.5 ± 1.0-0.5 ± 1.2-0.5 ± 0.9
Autonomic Symptoms-Wk 6-Change from baseline-0.6 ± 1.0-0.6 ± 1.1-0.6 ± 1.0
Autonomic Symptoms-Wk 8-Change from baseline-0.8 ± 1.1-0.7 ± 1.2-0.6 ± 1.0
Behavior at Interview-Baseline1.8 ± 0.71.8 ± 0.61.8 ± 0.6
Behavior at Interview-Wk 2- Change from baseline-0.4 ± 0.8-0.3 ± 0.7-0.4 ± 0.8
Behavior at Interview-Wk 4- Change from baseline-0.6 ± 0.7-0.6 ± 0.8-0.5 ± 0.7
Behavior at Interview-Wk 6- Change from baseline-0.7 ± 0.8-0.7 ± 0.8-0.7 ± 0.8
Behavior at Interview-Wk 8- Change from baseline-0.8 ± 0.8-0.6 ± 0.9-0.7 ± 0.9
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinician Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)

The CGI-Swas completed by a board certified psychiatrist and represents the clinician's subjective assessment of severity of the subject's anxiety symptoms as assessed by a 7-scale score for a single question, "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how anxious is the subject at this time?" The score was based on the following scale: 1=normal, not at all anxious; 2=borderline anxious; 3=mildly anxious; 4=moderately anxious; 5=markedly anxious; 6=severly anxious; 7=among the most extremely anxious subjects. CGI-S score can range from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating higher severity.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Clinician Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)
units on a scalePlacebo ArmEszopiclone Low Dose ArmEszopiclone High Dose Arm
Baseline4.4 ± 0.54.3 ± 0.54.4 ± 0.6
Week 2 - Change from baseline-0.6 ± 0.9-0.4 ± 0.6-0.7 ± 0.9
Week 4- Change from baseline-0.9 ± 0.9-0.8 ± 0.8-1.0 ± 1.1
Week 6- Change from baseline-1.1 ± 1.0-1.0 ± 1.0-1.2 ± 1.2
Week 8- Change from baseline-1.3 ± 1.1-1.2 ± 1.1-1.3 ± 1.3
SecondaryClinical Global Impression- Improvement (CGI-I)

CGI-I was completed by a board certified psychiatrist and represented the clinician's subjective assessment of improvement of the subject's anxiety symptoms based on the following question, "Compared to his/her condition at Visit 2, how much has he/she changed?" The score was based on the following scale: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. CGI-I score can range from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating less improvement.

Time frame:
Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 9, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression- Improvement (CGI-I)
units on a scalePlacebo ArmEszopiclone Low Dose ArmEszopiclone High Dose Arm
Week 23.2 ± 1.03.2 ± 0.93.1 ± 1.0
Week 42.9 ± 1.02.9 ± 0.92.7 ± 1.2
Week 62.7 ± 1.02.6 ± 1.12.7 ± 1.2
Week 82.6 ± 1.12.6 ± 1.12.6 ± 1.2
Week 92.4 ± 1.12.5 ± 1.12.4 ± 1.2
SecondaryHamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) 50% Anxiolytic Response

The HAM-A was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items include: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). A 50% anxiolytic response was defined as a 50% or greater reduction from baseline in the HAM-A total score. The Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms.

Time frame:
Week 2, 4, 6, 8
Reported as:
Number · participants
Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) 50% Anxiolytic Response
participantsPlacebo ArmEszopiclone Low Dose ArmEszopiclone High Dose Arm
Week 2211627
Week 4394149
Week 6515253
Week 8635766
SecondaryHamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Remission

The HAM-A was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items include: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). Remission was defined as a HAM-A total score of 7 or less. The Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms.

Time frame:
Week 2, 4, 6, 8 based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Remission
participantsPlacebo ArmEszopiclone Low Dose ArmEszopiclone High Dose Arm
Week 2729
Week 4111024
Week 6221923
Week 8312934
SecondaryChange From Baseline on Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Short Form

The Q-LES-Q was completed by the subject and assessed quaility of life based on 16 items, each evaluated on a 5-point scale of overall level of enjoyment/satisfaction: 1=very poor; 2=poor; 3=fair; 4=good; 5=very good. The overall percentage score was computed as a sum of items 1 to 14 as expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score: Overall Percentage Score = Sum \[item 1... item 14\]-14)/(70-14 ) \*100%. Q-LES-Q overall percentage score can range from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating higher quality of life.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline on Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Short Form
units on a scalePlacebo ArmEszopiclone Low Dose ArmEszopiclone High Dose Arm
Baseline52.4 ± 14.952.2 ± 13.552.0 ± 14.8
Week 2- Change from baseline3.1 ± 10.62.1 ± 13.21.5 ± 12.1
Week 4- Change from baseline4.7 ± 12.45.4 ± 12.74.6 ± 12.8
Week 6- Change from baseline5.8 ± 13.76.7 ± 13.45.0 ± 13.6
Week 8- Change from baseline7.0 ± 14.86.8 ± 13.25.8 ± 14.6
SecondaryChange From Baseline Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) Total Score

The ISI was completed by the subject and is an assessment of the severity of insomnia. The administered extended ISI questionnaire consists of 5 items (containing 7 questions, as item 1 contains 3 questions) comprising the original ISI questionnaire, plus 6 quality of life related items (sleep quality, restedness/refreshness upon arising, daytime fatigue, attention/concentration, relationships and mood disturbances), and 2 items assessing duration and frequency of sleep problems. All items, except for the insomnia duration and frequency questions, are measured on a Likert-type 5-point scale (0-4). ISI total score can range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating more severe insomnia.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on lst observation carried forward (LOCF)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) Total Score
units on a scalePlacebo ArmEszopiclone Low Dose ArmEszopiclone High Dose Arm
Baseline14.6 ± 5.314.3 ± 5.314.1 ± 6.0
Week 2- Change from baseline-2.4 ± 4.4-1.5 ± 5.0-2.7 ± 5.3
Week 4- Change from baseline-3.6 ± 4.8-3.1 ± 5.4-3.4 ± 5.3
Week 6- Change from baseline-4.0 ± 5.6-3.6 ± 5.5-3.6 ± 5.6
Week 8- Change from baseline-4.3 ± 5.6-3.5 ± 6.2-4.1 ± 5.8
SecondaryChange From Baseline Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)

The SDS was completed by the subject and captured the subject's level of disability. The subject rated the extent to which his or her work, social life or leisure activities, and home life or family responsibilities were impaired by his or her symptoms on a 10-point visual analog scale. SDS total score can range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating higher functional impairment.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)
units on a scalePlacebo ArmEszopiclone Low Dose ArmEszopiclone High Dose Arm
Baseline15.3 ± 6.714.0 ± 6.414.8 ± 6.4
Week 2- Change from baseline-2.5 ± 5.5-0.9 ± 6.3-2.7 ± 5.3
Week 4- Change from baseline-3.6 ± 6.1-2.5 ± 6.3-3.5 ± 6.1
Week 6- Change from baseline-4.2 ± 6.5-3.4 ± 6.3-4.1 ± 6.2
Week 8- Change from baseline-5.1 ± 6.6-4.1 ± 6.5-4.4 ± 6.2
SecondaryChange From Baseline Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)

ESS was completed by the subject and assessed daytime sedation based on 8 items, each presenting a situation for which the subject needed to evaluate how likely he/she is to doze off or fall asleep in contrast to feeling just tired. Each item was evaluated on the following scale: 0 = would never doze; 1 = slight chance of dozing; 2 = moderate chance of dozing; 3 = high chance of dozing. ESS total score can range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating higher levels of daytime sleepiness.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)
units on a scalePlacebo ArmEszopiclone Low Dose ArmEszopiclone High Dose Arm
Baseline7.4 ± 4.58.4 ± 4.58.5 ± 4.8
Week 2- Change from baseline-0.1 ± 4.0-0.5 ± 3.8-0.4 ± 3.6
Week 4- Change from baseline-0.2 ± 4.6-1.0 ± 4.1-0.7 ± 4.5
Week 6- Change from baseline-0.6 ± 4.0-1.3 ± 4.0-0.9 ± 4.5
Week 8- Change from baseline-0.8 ± 4.0-1.4 ± 4.2-1.3 ± 4.5

Adverse events

Collected over 10 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo Arm—0/149 (0%)104/149 (69.8%)
Eszopiclone Low Dose Arm—3/146 (2.1%)111/146 (76%)
Eszopiclone High Dose Arm—0/145 (0%)116/145 (80%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPlacebo ArmEszopiclone Low Dose ArmEszopiclone High Dose Arm
Amniotic Cavity InfectionInfections and infestations0/1491/1460/145
Colon CancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/1491/1460/145
Traumatic Brain InjuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1491/1460/145
Self Injurious BehaviorPsychiatric disorders0/1491/1460/145
Abortion SpontaneousPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions0/1491/1460/145
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 13
Most frequent other events
EventPlacebo ArmEszopiclone Low Dose ArmEszopiclone High Dose Arm
DysgeusiaNervous system disorders3/14910/14635/145
HeadacheNervous system disorders27/14926/14624/145
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders14/1497/14618/145
DizzinessNervous system disorders6/14911/14616/145
Abdominal Pain UpperGastrointestinal disorders10/1499/14614/145
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders11/1495/14613/145
Dry MouthGastrointestinal disorders6/1498/14612/145
FatigueGeneral disorders12/14912/1464/145
Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestations6/14912/1464/145
SomnolenceNervous system disorders7/1498/14610/145

Baseline characteristics

ITT Population

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Placebo ArmEszopiclone Low Dose ArmEszopiclone High Dose ArmTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years149146145440
>=65 years0000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Placebo ArmEszopiclone Low Dose ArmEszopiclone High Dose ArmTotal
Female111108102321
Male383843119
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Placebo ArmEszopiclone Low Dose ArmEszopiclone High Dose ArmTotal
United States149146145440
08

Study locations

57 sites
  • Birmingham Psychiatry Pharaceutical Studies, Inc.
    Birmingham, Alabama 35226, United States
  • Arcadia, California 91007, United States
  • Southwestern Research, Inc.
    Beverly Hills, California 90210, United States
  • Southwestern Research, Inc.
    Burbank, California 91506, United States
  • California Clinical Trials Medical Group
    Glendale, California 91202, United States
  • California clinical Trials Medical Group
    Glendale, California 91206, United States
  • Newport Beach, California 92660, United States
  • Excell Research
    Oceanside, California 92056, United States
  • California Clinical Trials Medical Group
    Paramount, California 90723, United States
  • Southwestern Research, Inc.
    Pasadena, California 91107, United States
  • California clinical Trials Medical Group
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Stanford Universtiy Medical center
    Stanford, California 94302, United States
  • University of CT Health Center
    Farmington, Connecticut 06032, United States
  • Comprehensive Psychiatric Care, PC
    Norwich, Connecticut 06360, United States
  • Florida Clinical Research Center LLC
    Bradenton, Florida 34208, United States
  • Sarkis Clinical Trials
    Gainsville, Florida 32607, United States
  • Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc.
    Jacksonville, Florida 32216, United States
  • Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc.
    Orlando, Florida 32806, United States
  • Comprehensive NeuroScience, Inc.
    St. Petersburg, Florida 33702, United States
  • Stedman Clinical Trials, LLC
    Tampa, Florida 33613, United States
  • Janus Center for Psychiatric Research
    West Palm Beach, Florida 33407, United States
  • Comprehensive NeuroScience, Inc.
    Atlanta, Georgia 30328, United States
  • Carmen Research
    Smyrna, Georgia 30080, United States
  • Alexian Brothers Center for Psychiatric Research
    Hoffman Estates, Illinois 60194, United States
  • Comprehensive NeuroScience, Inc.
    Park Ridge, Illinois 60068, United States
  • Vince and Associats Clinical Research
    Overland Park, Kansas 66212, United States
  • Clinical Trials Technology, Inc.
    Prairie Village, Kansas 66206, United States
  • Pedia Research, LLC
    Owensboro, Kentucky 42301, United States
  • Pharasite Research, Inc.
    Baltimore, Maryland 21208, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Coastal Research Associates, Inc.
    Braintree, Massachusetts 02184, United States
  • Center for Emotional Fitness
    Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08002, United States
  • CRI Worldwide, LLC
    Clementon, New Jersey 08021, United States
  • Social Psychiatry Research Institute
    Brooklyn, New York 11235, United States
  • Neurobehavioral Research, Inc.
    Cedarhurst, New York 11516, United States
  • Comprehensive NeuroScience, Inc.
    Fresh Meadows, New York 11366, United States
  • Fieve Clinica Services, Inc.
    New York, New York 10021, United States
  • Medical & Behavioral Health Research, PC
    New York, New York 10021, United States
  • Medical & Behavioral Health Research, P.C.
    New York, New York 10023, United States
  • Richmond Behavioral Associates
    Staten Island, New York 10312, United States
  • Glenwood Psychiatric Associates, P.L.L.C.
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27609, United States
  • Horizon Medical Services
    Bismarck, North Dakota 58501, United States
  • North Coast Clinical Trials
    Beachwood, Ohio 44122, United States
  • Patient Priority Clinical Sties, LLC
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45242, United States
  • Midwest Clinical Research Center
    Dayton, Ohio 45408, United States
  • North Star Mdical Research, LLC
    Middleburg Heights, Ohio 44130, United States
  • IPS Research Company
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73103, United States
  • Oregon Center for Clinical Investigations, Inc.
    Eugene, Oregon 97401, United States
  • Oregon Center for Clinical Investigations, Inc.
    Salem, Oregon 97301, United States
  • CRI Worldwide, LLC
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19139, United States
  • rhode Island Mood & Memory Research Institute
    East Providence, Rhode Island 02915, United States
  • Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc.
    Memphis, Tennessee 38119, United States
  • Future Search Trials
    Austin, Texas 78756, United States
  • Carolos Guerra, Jr., M.D.
    Houston, Texas 77042, United States
  • San Antonio Psychiatric Research Center
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Grayline Clinical Drug Trials
    Wichita Falls, Texas 76309, United States
  • University of Virginia, Center for Psychiatric Clinical Research
    Charlottesville, Virginia 22903, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Williams JB, Kobak KA, Giller E, Reasner DS, Curry L, Detke MJ. Comparison of Site-Based Versus Central Ratings in a Study of Generalized Anxiety Disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Dec;35(6):654-60. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000422. PubMed 26488677 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 8, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00616655
Lead sponsor
Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 15, 2008
Start date
Jan 2008
Primary completion
Dec 2008
Completion
Dec 2008
Results posted
Aug 21, 2015
Last update
Apr 8, 2016

Study contacts

CNS Medical Director
study director · Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion