CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00600665Updated Aug 4, 2026Results posted

Effectiveness of a Computerized Tool (PAINRelieveIt) to Help Manage Pain Related to Sickle Cell Disease

An interventional study of PAINReportIt (Phase 1 + 2) and PAINUCope (Phase 1) in Anemia, Sickle Cell and Hemoglobin SC Disease, sponsored by University of Illinois at Chicago. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-04.

Sponsored by University of Illinois at Chicago · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
279
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a blood disorder that is characterized by intense, painful episodes known as sickle cell crises. This study will evaluate the effectiveness of PAINRelieveIt, a three-part computer-based pain management tool, in treating adults with SCD.

Read the detailed description

SCD is an inherited blood disorder that mainly affects people of African, Mediterranean, or Latin descent. Symptoms include anemia, infections, organ damage, and painful sickle cell crises. Adults with SCD who experience frequent painful crises are more likely to die sooner than are adults with SCD who have fewer painful crises. Experts suggest that SCD pain be treated in the same way that cancer pain is treated because both types of pain are sustained and severe. However, unlike the research directed towards cancer pain, research focused on the characteristics of SCD pain has been limited. Although medications are available to treat SCD pain, the SCD pain management process is complex and often requires more time than what is available during the typical medical appointment. Recent advances in computer technologies may provide an opportunity to improve the effectiveness of SCD pain management by combining online patient education with decision-making support tools for doctors. This study will evaluate three touch screen computerized tools that are known collectively as PAINRelieveIt. The three tools include the following:

  1. PAINReportIt-a pain assessment data collection tool
  2. PAINUCope-a multimedia patient education program tailored to the participant's SCD pain management misconceptions
  3. PAINConsultN-a decision support tool for doctors that will provide algorithm-based pain medication therapies tailored to each participant's pain level

This two-part study will evaluate the effectiveness of PAINReportIt and PAINUCope, alone and in combination with PAINConsultN, at improving participants' SCD pain by educating participants about their role in pain management and by providing decision-making support to doctors.

This study will enroll patients who are receiving care at the University of Illinois at Chicago Sickle Cell Clinic. The patients will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group or the control group. It comprises two phases. In Phase 1, the patients in the experimental group will have access to PAINReportIt and PAINUCope, which the control will have access to PAINReportIt and a selection of games. At baseline and Month 3, participants will complete questionnaires on misconceptions about pain, medication adherence, and pain intensity. The same participants from Phase 1 of the study will be enrolled into Phase 2 of the study with the same group assignment, which will last 2 years. In Phase 2, the experimental group participants will be assigned to receive care from doctors who have access to PAINConsultN while the control group will be assigned to usual care. All participants will have access to PAINReportIt and PAINUCope in Phase 2. At baseline and Year 2, participants will complete questionnaires on pain episodes. Information will also be collected from doctors, including pain documentation, appropriateness of prescribed pain medications, and the number of emergency department visits by and hospitalizations of participants experiencing painful SCD crises.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anemia, Sickle Cell
  • Hemoglobin SC Disease

Keywords

  • Sickle Cell Anemia
  • Sickle Cell Disease
03

In context

Anemia, Sickle Cell

1,103 studies on the registry are indexed under Anemia, Sickle Cell; 235 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 279 is above the median of 40 across 750 interventional studies indexed under Anemia, Sickle Cell.

Browse Anemia, Sickle Cell studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Illinois at Chicago is the lead sponsor of 515 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 31 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 18 (58%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with SCD
  • Scheduled for continuing care at the University of Illinois at Chicago Sickle Cell Clinic
  • Experienced a moderate to severe level of pain (at least 3 on 0 to 10 scale) related to the SCD within the 12 months prior to study entry
  • Had a emergency department visit or hospitalization within the 2 years prior to study entry
  • Speaks and reads English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Legally blind
  • Physically unable to complete study questionnaire
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
279 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control

    In Phase 1 of the study, participants will access PAINReportIt and computer games. PAINReportIt helps the patient describe the pain experienced. In Phase 2 of the study, participants will continue to access PAINReportIt when they are seen in the clinic, emergency department (ED), acute care center (ACCA), and hospital. They will gain access to the PAINUCope computer-based programs, which provides multimedia education tailored to the patient's misconceptions about pain management. They will receive medial usual care at the outpatient clinic, ED, ACC, and hospital.

    Behavioral: PAINReportIt (Phase 1 + 2) · Behavioral: PAINUCope (Phase 2)

  • Experimental
    Experimental

    In Phase 1 of the study, participants will access PAINReportIt and PAINUCope computer-based programs. PAINReportIt helps the patients describe the pain experiences and PAINUCope provides multimedia education tailored to the patient's misconceptions about pain management. In Phase 2 of the study, participants will continue to access PAINReportIt and PAINUCope programs when they are seen in the clinic, emergency department (ED), acute care center (ACC), and hospital. Their doctors will have access to PAINConsultN when seen at the ED, ACC, and hospital. PAINConsultN is just-in-time decision support for the physicians with the pain data summarized and suggestions for analgesics that may be useful to help manage the patient's pain.

    Behavioral: PAINReportIt (Phase 1 + 2) · Behavioral: PAINUCope (Phase 1) · Behavioral: PAINConsultN (Phase 2) · Behavioral: PAINUCope (Phase 2)

Interventions

  • BehavioralPAINReportIt (Phase 1 + 2)

    A pain assessment data collection tool

  • BehavioralPAINUCope (Phase 1)

    A multimedia patient education program tailored to the participant's SCD pain management misconceptions

  • BehavioralPAINConsultN (Phase 2)

    A decision support tool for doctors that will provide algorithm-based pain medication therapies tailored to each participant's pain level

  • BehavioralPAINUCope (Phase 2)

    A multimedia patient education program tailored to the participant's SCD pain management misconceptions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Misperception About Pain (BQ-13)

    Range 0-5. Higher score indicates more perceived barriers (greater concern about pain management beliefs and/or analgesic side effects)

    Time frame: Measured at Month 3

  2. Composite Pain Index (CPI)

    Range 0-100. Higher score indicates worse pain.

    Time frame: Measured at Month 3

  3. Analgesic Adherence

    Range 0-1. Higher is better.

    Time frame: Measured at Month 3

  4. Time in Pain Crisis

    Percentage of days in pain crisis during Phase 2. Range 0-100. Lower is better.

    Time frame: Measured over the course of Phase 2, a 2-year period.

  5. Pain Documentation

    Completeness of pain documentation during Phase 2. Range 0-100. Higher is better.

    Time frame: Measured over the course of Phase 2, a two-year period.

  6. Appropriateness of Analgesic Prescription

    Percentage of appropriate analgesic prescriptions during Phase 2. Range 0-100. Higher is better.

    Time frame: Average over the course of Phase 2, a two-year period.

07

Results

Posted Aug 4, 2026

Participant flow

Phase 1, 3 months
Participant flow — Phase 1, 3 months
MilestoneControlExperimental
Started124116
Completed baseline118110
Completed9787
Not completed2729
Phase 2, 2 years
Participant flow — Phase 2, 2 years
MilestoneControlExperimental
Started9285
Completed9285
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryMisperception About Pain (BQ-13)

Range 0-5. Higher score indicates more perceived barriers (greater concern about pain management beliefs and/or analgesic side effects)

Time frame:
Measured at Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Misperception About Pain (BQ-13)
units on a scaleUsual CarePAINUCope/PAINConsultN
Misperception About Pain (BQ-13)2.26 ± 0.862.05 ± 0.80
Statistical analysis
  • Usual Care vs PAINUCope/PAINConsultN · Regression, Linear · p = 0.35 · Mean difference (net): -0.097
PrimaryComposite Pain Index (CPI)

Range 0-100. Higher score indicates worse pain.

Time frame:
Measured at Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Composite Pain Index (CPI)
units on a scaleUsual CarePAINUCope/PAINConsultN
Composite Pain Index (CPI)41.2 ± 13.743.0 ± 13.6
Statistical analysis
  • Usual Care vs PAINUCope/PAINConsultN · Regression, Linear · p = 0.36 · Mean difference (net): 1.763
PrimaryAnalgesic Adherence

Range 0-1. Higher is better.

Time frame:
Measured at Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of pills taken
Analgesic Adherence
percentage of pills takenUsual CarePAINUCope/PAINConsultN
Analgesic Adherence52 ± 6845 ± 48
Statistical analysis
  • Usual Care vs PAINUCope/PAINConsultN · Regression, Linear · p = 0.68 · Mean difference (net): -3.8
PrimaryTime in Pain Crisis

Percentage of days in pain crisis during Phase 2. Range 0-100. Lower is better.

Time frame:
Measured over the course of Phase 2, a 2-year period.
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of days
Time in Pain Crisis
percentage of daysUsual CarePAINUCope/PAINConsultN
Time in Pain Crisis7.6 ± 11.26.2 ± 11.3
Statistical analysis
  • Usual Care vs PAINUCope/PAINConsultN · Regression, Linear · p = 0.41 · Mean difference (net): -0.014
PrimaryPain Documentation

Completeness of pain documentation during Phase 2. Range 0-100. Higher is better.

Time frame:
Measured over the course of Phase 2, a two-year period.
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of pain doc completed
Pain Documentation
percentage of pain doc completedUsual CarePAINUCope/PAINConsultN
Pain Documentation55.0 ± 11.354.3 ± 15.5
Statistical analysis
  • Usual Care vs PAINUCope/PAINConsultN · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.54 · Mean difference (net): -0.8Adjusted for setting (ED, ACC, clinic, hospital)
PrimaryAppropriateness of Analgesic Prescription

Percentage of appropriate analgesic prescriptions during Phase 2. Range 0-100. Higher is better.

Time frame:
Average over the course of Phase 2, a two-year period.
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of appropriate prescription
Appropriateness of Analgesic Prescription
percentage of appropriate prescriptionUsual CarePAINUCope/PAINConsultN
Appropriateness of Analgesic Prescription72.5 ± 34.069.3 ± 36.0
Statistical analysis
  • Usual Care vs PAINUCope/PAINConsultN · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.66 · Odds ratio, log: -0.15Adjusting for setting (ED, ACC).

Adverse events

Collected over For subjects that participated in Phase 1 but not Phase 2, through the end of Phase 1, an average of 3 months. For subjects that participated in both Phase 1 and Phase 2, through study completion, an average of 2 years and 3 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Usual Care—0/124 (0%)0/124 (0%)
PAINUCope/PAINConsultN—0/116 (0%)0/116 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ControlExperimentalTotal
Phase 132.7 ± 11.133.8 ± 11.233.2 ± 11.1
Phase 234.0 ± 11.534.7 ± 11.534.4 ± 11.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ControlExperimentalTotal
Phase 1 — Female7765142
Phase 1 — Male414586
Phase 2 — Female6151112
Phase 2 — Male313465
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ControlExperimentalTotal
Phase 1 — Hispanic or Latino347
Phase 1 — Not Hispanic or Latino115106221
Phase 1 — Unknown or Not Reported000
Phase 2 — Hispanic or Latino415
Phase 2 — Not Hispanic or Latino8884172
Phase 2 — Unknown or Not Reported000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)ControlExperimentalTotal
Phase 1 — Black116107223
Phase 1 — Other235
Phase 2 — Black8985174
Phase 2 — Other303
BQ-13
BQ-13(units on a scale)ControlExperimentalTotal
Mean2.39 ± 0.922.15 ± 0.872.27 ± 0.90
CPI
CPI(units on a scale)ControlExperimentalTotal
Mean41.8 ± 14.641.9 ± 13.741.9 ± 14.1
Analgesic adherence
Analgesic adherence(percentage of pills taken)ControlExperimentalTotal
Mean45 ± 4432 ± 3839 ± 42
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Illinois at Chicago Sickle Cell Center and Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Wilkie DJ, Molokie R, Boyd-Seal D, Suarez ML, Kim YO, Zong S, Wittert H, Zhao Z, Saunthararajah Y, Wang ZJ. Patient-reported outcomes: descriptors of nociceptive and neuropathic pain and barriers to effective pain management in adult outpatients with sickle cell disease. J Natl Med Assoc. 2010 Jan;102(1):18-27. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30471-5. PubMed 20158132 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00600665
Lead sponsor
University of Illinois at Chicago
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Responsible party
Diana J. Wilkie (Professor, University of Illinois at Chicago) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 25, 2008
Start date
Feb 2007
Primary completion
Jun 2013
Completion
Jun 2014
Results posted
Aug 4, 2026
Last update
Aug 4, 2026

Study contacts

Diana J. Wilkie, PhD
principal investigator · University of Illinois at Chicago

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion