CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00599053Updated May 17, 2017Results posted

Early Versus Expectant Treatment of Ureaplasma Infection in Very Low Birth Weight Neonates

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Azithromycin in Bacteria Infection and Respiratory Tract Infections, sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 1 Day to 3 Days. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-17.

Sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was terminated
Enrollment was terminated early due to a change in practice on the obstetrical side that included administering azithromycin to women with preterm labor.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
7
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Day to 3 Days
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Our hypothesis is that treatment of known Ureaplasma spp. infection of the airways in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants with azithromycin will eradicate the organisms and lessen the proinflammatory state caused by infection that puts them at risk for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD). We propose to conduct a randomized trial of early (less than 3 days of age) treatment with intravenous azithromycin versus expectant management for VLBW infants with Ureaplasma spp. respiratory tract infection with the following specific aims: (1) Determine microbiological efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety of azithromycin treatment for eradication of Ureaplasma spp. in preterm infants, (2) Determine the respiratory outcomes of infants in the two treatment groups and those without respiratory tract Ureaplasma spp. infection

02

Conditions studied

  • Bacteria Infection
  • Respiratory Tract Infections

Keywords

  • Ureaplasma
  • Bronchopulmonary dysplasia
  • very low birthweight
03

In context

Infections

6,687 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 7 is below the median of 120 across 4,201 interventional studies indexed under Infections.

Browse Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Alabama at Birmingham is the lead sponsor of 1,396 studies on the registry; 284 are open to participants now.

Of its 156 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 124 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Day to 3 Days
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Infants weighing \<1250 grams at birth with respiratory distress syndrome who have respiratory infection with Ureaplasma sp organisms.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe respiratory distress syndrome with survival unlikely >7 days, Congenital malformations
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
7 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    Early treatment with azithromycin

    Drug: Azithromycin

  • No intervention
    2

    Expectant (usual) management

Interventions

  • DrugAzithromycin

    10 mg/kg IV per dose given for 10 days

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Microbiological Efficacy of Azithromycin Treatment for Eradication of Ureaplasma Spp. in Preterm Infants

    Number of subjects without ureaplasma spp at 100 days after study entry or at hospital discharge in subjects receiving therapy

    Time frame: 100 days or discharge from hospital

  2. Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Azithromycin Treatment for Eradication of Ureaplasma Spp. in Preterm Infants

    Pharmacokinetic measures (AUC12) of subjects receiving azithromycin who had eradication of ureaplasma spp.at either day 100 or discharge day which ever comes first.

    Time frame: 100 days or discharge from hospital

  3. Safety of Azithromycin Treatment for Eradication of Ureaplasma Spp. in Preterm Infants

    Number of serious of adverse event experienced by subjects treated with azithromycin

    Time frame: from day 1 of study drug through 100 days or discharge from hospital, which ever comes first

Secondary outcomes

  1. Respiratory Outcomes as Determined by Subjects Without Respiratory Tract Ureaplasma Spp Infection in Subjects in the Two Treatment Groups

    Absence of Ureaplasma spp infection is determined by the total number of days with positive pressure ventilation, (conventional ventilation or nasal continuous positive pressure) and oxygen therapy. The mean number of days was used to compare the two treatment groups.

    Time frame: from baseline to 100 days or discharge from Hospital, which ever comes first

07

Results

Posted Dec 31, 2012
Limitations and caveats
Early termination due to small number enrolled.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEarly Treatment With AzithromycinExpectant (Usual) Management
Started52
Completed52
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryMicrobiological Efficacy of Azithromycin Treatment for Eradication of Ureaplasma Spp. in Preterm Infants

Number of subjects without ureaplasma spp at 100 days after study entry or at hospital discharge in subjects receiving therapy

Time frame:
100 days or discharge from hospital

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryRespiratory Outcomes as Determined by Subjects Without Respiratory Tract Ureaplasma Spp Infection in Subjects in the Two Treatment Groups

Absence of Ureaplasma spp infection is determined by the total number of days with positive pressure ventilation, (conventional ventilation or nasal continuous positive pressure) and oxygen therapy. The mean number of days was used to compare the two treatment groups.

Time frame:
from baseline to 100 days or discharge from Hospital, which ever comes first
Reported as:
Mean · days
Respiratory Outcomes as Determined by Subjects Without Respiratory Tract Ureaplasma Spp Infection in Subjects in the Two Treatment Groups
daysEarly Treatment With AzithromycinExpectant (Usual) Management
Respiratory Outcomes as Determined by Subjects Without Respiratory Tract Ureaplasma Spp Infection in Subjects in the Two Treatment Groups09.4 (0 to 23)2.5 (0 to 5)
PrimaryPharmacokinetics (PK) of Azithromycin Treatment for Eradication of Ureaplasma Spp. in Preterm Infants

Pharmacokinetic measures (AUC12) of subjects receiving azithromycin who had eradication of ureaplasma spp.at either day 100 or discharge day which ever comes first.

Time frame:
100 days or discharge from hospital

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimarySafety of Azithromycin Treatment for Eradication of Ureaplasma Spp. in Preterm Infants

Number of serious of adverse event experienced by subjects treated with azithromycin

Time frame:
from day 1 of study drug through 100 days or discharge from hospital, which ever comes first
Reported as:
Mean · number of events
Safety of Azithromycin Treatment for Eradication of Ureaplasma Spp. in Preterm Infants
number of eventsEarly Treatment With AzithromycinExpectant (Usual) Management
Safety of Azithromycin Treatment for Eradication of Ureaplasma Spp. in Preterm Infants0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)

Adverse events

Collected over enrollment through 100 days or discharge which ever is first. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Early Treatment With Azithromycin—0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)
Expectant (Usual) Management—0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Early Treatment With AzithromycinExpectant (Usual) ManagementTotal
<=18 years527
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Early Treatment With AzithromycinExpectant (Usual) ManagementTotal
Female325
Male202
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Early Treatment With AzithromycinExpectant (Usual) ManagementTotal
United States527
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 17, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00599053
Lead sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Responsible party
Robert Schelonka (Principal Investigator, University of Alabama at Birmingham) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 23, 2008
Start date
May 2007
Primary completion
Jul 2009
Completion
Aug 2009
Results posted
Dec 31, 2012
Last update
May 17, 2017

Study contacts

Robert L Schelonka, MD
principal investigator · University of Alabama at Birminham

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion