CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00587405Updated Jan 7, 2016

Cyrotherapy vs. APC in GAVE

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of cryotherapy and Argon Plasma Coagulation in Watermelon Stomach, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-01-07.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To see if either method of treatment for Watermelon Stomach shows better results

Read the detailed description

Watermelon stomach (WS) is endoscopically recognized by characteristic stripes of angioectasias involving primarily the antrum, and causes transfusion-dependent anemia in the majority of patients. Current endoscopic treatment options, including argon plasma coagulation (APC) Endoscopic cryotherapy is a novel technique that has the potential to safely and more effectively treat WS by virtue of its mechanism of injury and mode of application.

02

Conditions studied

  • Watermelon Stomach

Keywords

  • Watermelon Stomach
  • Cryotherapy
  • Argon Plasma Coagulation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,218 studies on the registry; 670 are open to participants now.

Of its 445 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 313 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Confirmed WS at endoscopy that is associated with significant anemia (Hb \< 10 g/dl) and/or overt bleeding (melena, hematochezia or hematemesis) and/or blood transfusions within the past 6 months
  2. Able to give informed consent
  3. Age > 18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Endoscopic or histological findings inconsistent with WS
  2. Known coagulopathy (INR > 2), severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count \< 50,000), or bleeding diathesis
  3. Endoscopic treatment of WS within the past month
  4. Unable or unwilling to give informed consent.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1

    Cryotherapy

    Procedure: cryotherapy

  • Active comparator
    2

    Argon Plasma Coagulation

    Procedure: Argon Plasma Coagulation

Interventions

  • Procedurecryotherapy

    The Polar Wand device (GI Supply, Wayne, PA) is FDA 510(k) approved for endoscopic tissue ablation in the GI tract. It consists of a portable cryogen-containing unit and a single-use flexible cryogen spray catheter, designed for use with CO2 that is supplied in standard 20-lb cylinders. Controlled delivery of the cryogen is achieved by a foot pedal, and the tip of the catheter is maintained at about 1 cm from the mucosa. A cryogenic spray is applied to all vascular lesions until a whitened appearance of the mucosa is achieved within 3-5 seconds. Affected areas will be 'painted' by the spray catheter starting at the pylorus and sweeping proximally. A proton pump inhibitor, at double dose, will be prescribed for 1 month after each APC or cryotherapy session to promote mucosal healing post therapy.

  • ProcedureArgon Plasma Coagulation

    As per current clinical standard, the APC 300 device (ERBE Inc., Marietta, GA) will be used in this study. Targeted ablation of all vascular ectasias as best possible will be performed in standard fashion using an end-firing probe at a setting of 60 W and 2 L/min argon flow rate.A proton pump inhibitor, at double dose, will be prescribed for 1 month after each APC or cryotherapy session to promote mucosal healing post therapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. the proportion of clinical responders (no overt and hematological evidence of ongoing bleeding) and non-responders

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Endoscopic response will constitute the secondary outcome

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mayo CLinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 7, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00587405
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Responsible party
Louis-Michel Wong Kee Song (Principal Investigator, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 7, 2008
Start date
Dec 2007
Primary completion
Mar 2010
Completion
Apr 2010
Last update
Jan 7, 2016

Study contacts

Louis M Wongkeesong, MD
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion