CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00585195PROFILE 1001Updated Feb 8, 2023Results posted

A Study Of Oral PF-02341066, A C-Met/Hepatocyte Growth Factor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, In Patients With Advanced Cancer

A Phase 1 interventional study of PF-02341066 and Rifampin in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer ALK-positive, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer c-Met Dependent and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer ROS Marker Positive, sponsored by Pfizer. Completed at 29 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-08.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2006, registered Dec 2007).
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
596
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

PF-02341066 may work in cancer by blocking the cell growth, migration and invasion of tumor cells. PF-02341066 is a new class of drugs called c-Met/Hepatocyte growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. This compound is also an inhibitor of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (called ALK) tyrosine kinase and ROS receptor tyrosine kinases. This research study is the first time PF-02341066 will be given to people. PF-02341066 is taken by mouth daily.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer ALK-positive
  • Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer c-Met Dependent
  • Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer ROS Marker Positive
  • Systemic Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma
  • Advanced Malignancies Except Leukemia

Keywords

  • Crizotinib
  • dose-finding
  • drug-drug interaction
  • ALK rearrangements
  • c-Met mutations or amplifications
  • c-Met dependent tumors
  • ROS1 rearrangements
  • c-Met exon 14 deletion
  • c-Met exon 14 skipping
  • c-Met exon 14 alterations
03

In context

Lung Neoplasms

7,243 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,557 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 596 is above the median of 60 across 5,295 interventional studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.

Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,244 studies on the registry; 139 are open to participants now.

Of its 582 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 381 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Advanced malignancies (except leukemias), histologically proven at diagnosis; Histologically confirmed advanced malignancies that are known to be sensitive to PF-03241066 inhibition, e.g. ALK, c-MET and ROS
  • Solid tumors must have measurable disease (Recommended Phase 2 Dose Cohort patients with non-measurable disease may enter on a case-by-case basis); not required for DDI sub-studies.
  • Adequate blood cell counts, kidney function, liver function and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0 or 1 (for the Recommended Phase 2 Cohort, a ECOG score of 2 may be allowed on a case-by-case basis)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major surgery, radiation therapy or anti-cancer therapy within 2 to 4 weeks of starting study treatment, depending on the patient cohort
  • Prior stem cell transplant except of patients with neuroblastoma, lymphoma or myeloma
  • Active or unstable cardiac disease or heart attack within 3 months of starting study treatment
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
596 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    Drug: PF-02341066 · Drug: Rifampin · Drug: Itraconazole

Interventions

  • DrugPF-02341066

    Escalating doses of PF-02341066 will be administered orally on a continuous dosing schedule. Doses to be evaluated will range from 50 mg to 2000 mg/day administered either once or twice a day. A treatment cycle is considered to be 28 days (or 21 days depending on the cohort).

  • DrugRifampin

    600 mg QD administered from Cycle 1, Day 16 to Cycle 2, Day 1 (14 days of dosing) in combination with PF-02341066.

  • DrugItraconazole

    Multiple Dose Design: 200 mg QD administered from Cycle 1, Day 1 to Cycle 1, Day 16 (16 days) in combination with PF-02341066.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dose-Escalation Cohort: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Crizotinib

    MTD: Dose level at which at most 1 of 6 participants experienced DLT within and including 28 days of treatment (during Cycle 1 \[1 cycle=28 days\]) with next higher dose having at least 2/3 or 2/6 participants experiencing a DLT. DLT was defined as any of following: Hematologic toxicities- 1) prolonged grade 4 neutropenia for \>7 days. 2) Febrile neutropenia: grade 4 neutropenia with fever greater than (\>) 38.5 degree Celsius, both sustained over a 24 hour period (3) neutropenic infection: greater than or equal to (\>=) Grade 3 neutropenia with Grade \>=3 infection. (4) Grade \>=3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding/grade 4 lasting \>=7 days. Other non-hematologic toxicity included: Grade 3/4 toxicities (except for alopecia, Grade 3/4 hypophosphatemia, grade 3 hypertension with controlled blood pressure \[less than (\<) 140/90 millimeter of mercury, and Grade 3/4 hyperuricemia without signs and symptoms of gout). Nausea, vomiting/diarrhea must persist at grade 3/4 despite maximal medical therapy.

    Time frame: Cycle 1 (28 days)

  2. Dose-Escalation Cohort: Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of Crizotinib

    RP2D was defined as a dose below or equal to MTD, at which crizotinib was unlikely to cause a significant inhibition of CYP3A4 activity.

    Time frame: Cycle 1 (28 days)

  3. Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Crizotinib on Day -7

    AUCinf = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) extrapolated to infinite time (0-inf).

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48 and any two time points (72, 96, 120 and 144 hours) post-dose on Day -7

  4. Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib on Day -7

    Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to end of dosing interval (AUCtau), where dosing interval is 12 hours for BID dose and 24 hours for QD dose.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48 and any two time points (72, 96, 120 and 144 hours) post-dose on Day -7

  5. Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 1

    Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to end of dosing interval (AUCtau), where dosing interval is 12 hours for BID dose and 24 hours for QD dose.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 2, 4 and 6 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 1

  6. Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 15

    Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to end of dosing interval (AUCtau), where dosing interval is 12 hours for BID dose and 24 hours for QD dose.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 15

  7. Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib on Cycle 2 Day 1

    Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to end of dosing interval (AUCtau), where dosing interval is 12 hours for BID dose and 24 hours for QD dose.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 2 Day 1

  8. Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Crizotinib Cycle 1 Day 15

    Ctrough refers to plasma concentration of Crizotinib observed just before treatment administration.

    Time frame: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15

  9. Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Crizotinib on Cycle 2 Day 1

    Ctrough refers to plasma concentration of Crizotinib observed just before treatment administration.

    Time frame: Pre-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1

  10. Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib on Day -7

    Cmax is defined as the observed maximum plasma concentration post drug administration.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48 and any two time points (72, 96, 120 and 144 hours) post-dose on Day -7

  11. Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 1

    Cmax is defined as the observed maximum plasma concentration post drug administration.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 2, 4 and 6 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 1

  12. Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 15

    Cmax is defined as the observed maximum plasma concentration post drug administration.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 15

  13. Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 2 Day 1

    Cmax is defined as the observed maximum plasma concentration post drug administration.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 2 Day 1

  14. Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Crizotinib on Day -7

    Tmax was defined as the time to reach the observed maximum plasma concentration (Cmax).

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48 and any two time points (72, 96, 120 and 144 hours) post-dose on Day -7

  15. Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 1

    Tmax was defined as the time to reach the observed maximum plasma concentration (Cmax).

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 2, 4 and 6 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 1

  16. Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 15

    Tmax was defined as the time to reach the observed maximum plasma concentration (Cmax).

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 15

  17. Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Crizotinib Cycle 2 Day 1

    Tmax was defined as the time to reach the observed maximum plasma concentration (Cmax).

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 2 Day 1

  18. Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of Crizotinib on Day -7

    Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration of Crizotinib to decrease by one half.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48 and any two time points (72, 96, 120 and 144 hours) post-dose on Day -7

  19. Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAES) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; medically important events. AEs included both serious and all non-serious adverse events. TEAEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity on or after the first dose of investigational product administration.

    Time frame: up to 189 Months

  20. Dose-Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLT)

    Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any of the following: Hematologic- prolonged grade 4 neutropenia for \>7 days. Febrile neutropenia, defined as grade 4 neutropenia with fever greater than (\>)38.5 degree Celsius, both sustained over a 24 hour period, neutropenic infection: greater than or equal to (\>=)Grade 3 neutropenia with Grade \>=3 infection. Grade \>=3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding or grade 4 lasting \>=7 days Lymphopenia was not considered a DLT unless accompanied by infection. Other non-hematologic toxicity: Grade 3 or 4 toxicities (except for alopecia, Grade 3/4 hypophosphatemia, grade 3 hypertension with controlled blood pressure \[less than (\<) 140/90\], and Grade 3/4 hyperuricemia without signs and symptoms of gout). Nausea, vomiting or diarrhea must persist at grade 3 or 4 despite maximal medical therapy.

    Time frame: Cycle 1 (28 days)

  21. Midazolam Interaction Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Midazolam When Taken Alone or Taken With Crizotinib

    Cmax is defined as the observed maximum plasma concentration post drug administration.

    Time frame: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours post dose on Day -7 (midazolam alone arm), pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (midazolam with crizotinib arm)

  22. Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Midazolam When Taken Alone or Taken With Crizotinib

    AUCinf = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-inf).

    Time frame: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours post dose on Day -7 (midazolam alone arm), pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (midazolam with crizotinib arm)

  23. RP2D Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC (0-24)] of Crizotinib When Taken With Food

    AUC0-24 of Crizotinib was defined as the area under the free plasma concentration time curve from time 0 to 24 hours post-dose.

    Time frame: pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours post-dose on Day -7

  24. RP2D Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib When Taken With Food

    Cmax is defined as the observed maximum plasma concentration post drug administration.

    Time frame: pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours post-dose on Day -7

  25. Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib Alone and When Taken With Rifampin

    Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to end of dosing interval (AUCtau).

    Time frame: pre-dose, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 hours on Cycle 1 Day 15 (Crizotinib alone arm) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (Crizotinib with Rifampin arm)

  26. Rifampin Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib Alone and When Taken With Rifampin

    Time frame: pre-dose, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 hours on Cycle 1 Day 15 (Crizotinib alone) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (Crizotinib with Rifampin)

  27. Rifampin Cohort: Ctrough of Crizotinib Alone and When Taken With Rifampin

    Ctrough refers to plasma concentration of Crizotinib observed just before treatment administration.

    Time frame: pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (Crizotinib alone arm) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (Crizotinib with Rifampin arm)

  28. Itraconazole Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib When Taken Alone and When Taken With Itraconazole

    Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to end of dosing interval (AUCtau), where dosing interval is 24 hours.

    Time frame: pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (Crizotinib with itraconazole) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (itraconazole alone)

  29. Itraconazole Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib When Taken Alone and When Taken With Itraconazole

    Time frame: pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (Crizotinib with itraconazole) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (itraconazole alone)

  30. Itraconazole Cohort: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Crizotinib When Taken Alone and When Taken With Itraconazole

    Ctrough refers to plasma concentration of Crizotinib observed just before treatment administration.

    Time frame: pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (crizotinib with itraconazole) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (itraconazole alone)

  31. Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)

    ORR was defined as participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by the total number of evaluable participants per RECIST version 1.0 (RECIST1.1 for ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 1 and ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 2). CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, normalization of tumor marker levels, and no appearance of new lesions indicated complete response. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum), without progression of non-target lesions and no appearance of new lesions indicated partial response.

    Time frame: Baseline up to 172 months

  32. Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Duration of Response (DOR)

    Duration of response (DoR) was the time from first documentation of PR or CR to date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum), without progression of non-target lesions and no appearance of new lesions indicated partial response. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, normalization of tumor marker levels, and no appearance of new lesions indicated complete response. PD: \>=20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.

    Time frame: From first documentation of response to date of PD or death due to any cause (up to 172 months)

  33. Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Response (TTR)

    TTR: time between first dose until first documented response of PR or CR. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum), without progression of non-target lesions and no appearance of new lesions indicated partial response. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, normalization of tumor marker levels, and no appearance of new lesions indicated complete response.

    Time frame: From first dose until first documented response of PR or CR (up to 172 months)

  34. Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Disease Control at Week 8

    Disease control was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) per RECIST version 1.0 (RECIST1.1 for ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 1 and ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 2). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum), without progression of non-target lesions and no appearance of new lesions indicated partial response. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, normalization of tumor marker levels, and no appearance of new lesions indicated complete response. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.

    Time frame: Week 8

  35. Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Disease Control at Week 16

    Disease control was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) per RECIST version 1.0 (RECIST1.1 for ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 1 and ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 2). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum), without progression of non-target lesions and no appearance of new lesions indicated partial response. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, normalization of tumor marker levels, and no appearance of new lesions indicated complete response. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.

    Time frame: Week 16

  36. Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Progression free survival (PFS) was the time from randomization date to date of first documentation of PD or death due to any cause RECIST version 1.0 (RECIST1.1 for ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 1 and ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 2). PD: \>=20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.

    Time frame: From randomization until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to 172 months)

  37. Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Probability of Being Event Free at Month 6

    Probability of being event free (event defined as PD or death due to any cause) at 6 months after the first dose of crizotinib was reported. PD: \>=20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.

    Time frame: From randomization to 6 months

  38. Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Overall Survival (OS)

    OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause.

    Time frame: From randomization date to the date of death (up to 172 Months)

  39. Probability of Participant Survival at Month 6

    Probability of survival was defined as the probability of being alive at Month 6.

    Time frame: Month 6

  40. Probability of Participant Survival at Month 12

    Probability of survival was defined as the probability of being alive at Month 12.

    Time frame: Month 12

  41. Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 1 Day 15

    Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle1Day15/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts.

    Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 15

  42. Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 2 Day 1

    Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 2 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts.

    Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1

  43. Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 4 Day 1

    Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 4 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts.

    Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1

  44. Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 6 Day 1

    Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 6 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts.

    Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 6 Day 1

  45. Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 9 Day 1

    Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 9 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

    Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 9 Day 1

  46. Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 12 Day 1

    Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 12 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

    Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 12 Day 1

  47. Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 15 Day 1

    Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 15 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

    Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 15 Day 1

  48. Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 18 Day 1

    Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 18 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

    Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 18 Day 1

  49. Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 21 Day 1

    Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 21 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

    Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 21 Day 1

  50. Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 24 Day 1

    Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 24 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

    Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 24 Day 1

  51. Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 27 Day 1

    Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 27 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

    Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 27 Day 1

  52. Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 30 Day 1

    Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 30 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

    Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 30 Day 1

  53. Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at End of Treatment

    Geometric mean of ratio (End of treatment/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

    Time frame: Baseline, End of Treatment (28 days post last dose)

07

Results

Posted Oct 14, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 400 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 500 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 650 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 800 mg QDRP2D Cohort: ROS1-Positive NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Exon 14 Alterations NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Amplification NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Negative Cohort 1, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Negative Cohort 2, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Positive Cohort, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: Enriched Other: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: Itraconazole Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg +ItraconazoleRP2D Cohort: Rifampin Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg +RifampinRP2D Cohort: Midazolam Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg +Midazolam
Started349796753611538541481915467211814
Treated34878665369538541481815466181812
Completed000000000000000000000
Not completed349796753611538541481915467211814
Withdrew: Adverse event0000210100308641149231
Withdrew: Progressive disease2254646305225292621129442498
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1122000100381503071220
Withdrew: Other011101002101924711328121042
Withdrew: Randomized not treated001010100020000101302
Withdrew: Death0000000010117282110001
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up000000000000100002000
Withdrew: Site terminated by sponsor000000000000100000000
Withdrew: Withdrawn due to pregnancy000000000000001000000

Outcome measures

PrimaryDose-Escalation Cohort: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Crizotinib

MTD: Dose level at which at most 1 of 6 participants experienced DLT within and including 28 days of treatment (during Cycle 1 \[1 cycle=28 days\]) with next higher dose having at least 2/3 or 2/6 participants experiencing a DLT. DLT was defined as any of following: Hematologic toxicities- 1) prolonged grade 4 neutropenia for \>7 days. 2) Febrile neutropenia: grade 4 neutropenia with fever greater than (\>) 38.5 degree Celsius, both sustained over a 24 hour period (3) neutropenic infection: greater than or equal to (\>=) Grade 3 neutropenia with Grade \>=3 infection. (4) Grade \>=3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding/grade 4 lasting \>=7 days. Other non-hematologic toxicity included: Grade 3/4 toxicities (except for alopecia, Grade 3/4 hypophosphatemia, grade 3 hypertension with controlled blood pressure \[less than (\<) 140/90 millimeter of mercury, and Grade 3/4 hyperuricemia without signs and symptoms of gout). Nausea, vomiting/diarrhea must persist at grade 3/4 despite maximal medical therapy.

Time frame:
Cycle 1 (28 days)
Reported as:
Number · milligram
Dose-Escalation Cohort: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Crizotinib
milligramLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 400 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 500 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 650 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 800 mg QD
Dose-Escalation Cohort: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Crizotinib250250250250250250250250250250250
PrimaryDose-Escalation Cohort: Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of Crizotinib

RP2D was defined as a dose below or equal to MTD, at which crizotinib was unlikely to cause a significant inhibition of CYP3A4 activity.

Time frame:
Cycle 1 (28 days)
Reported as:
Number · milligram
Dose-Escalation Cohort: Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of Crizotinib
milligramLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 400 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 500 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 650 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 800 mg QD
Dose-Escalation Cohort: Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of Crizotinib250250250250250250250250250250250
PrimaryDose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Crizotinib on Day -7

AUCinf = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) extrapolated to infinite time (0-inf).

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48 and any two time points (72, 96, 120 and 144 hours) post-dose on Day -7
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanogram*hour per milliliter
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Crizotinib on Day -7
nanogram*hour per milliliterLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 400 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 500 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 650 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 800 mg QDRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Crizotinib on Day -7274.43 ± 221378.05 ± 144946.93 ± 381817.35 ± 342320.003457 ± 423078 ± 1192107 ± 533979 ± 397547 ± 762489.39 ± 53
PrimaryDose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib on Day -7

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to end of dosing interval (AUCtau), where dosing interval is 12 hours for BID dose and 24 hours for QD dose.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48 and any two time points (72, 96, 120 and 144 hours) post-dose on Day -7
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanogram*hour per milliliter
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib on Day -7
nanogram*hour per milliliterLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 400 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 500 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 650 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 800 mg QDRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib on Day -7137.40 ± 8658.64 ± 136338.39 ± 50558.01 ± 33863.001731 ± 511377 ± 1141300 ± 611906 ± 393423 ± 57741.50 ± 45
PrimaryDose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 1

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to end of dosing interval (AUCtau), where dosing interval is 12 hours for BID dose and 24 hours for QD dose.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 2, 4 and 6 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanogram*hour per milliliter
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 1
nanogram*hour per milliliterLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 1457.55 ± 32383.98 ± 10763.71 ± 57663.39 ± 56
PrimaryDose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 15

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to end of dosing interval (AUCtau), where dosing interval is 12 hours for BID dose and 24 hours for QD dose.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanogram*hour per milliliter
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 15
nanogram*hour per milliliterLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 400 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 500 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 650 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 800 mg QDRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 15206.13 ± 761086.99 ± 342047.13 ± 451780.21 ± 693083.93 ± 314066.67 ± 534375 ± 343385 ± 246655 ± 46362 ± 3710480 ± 763879.56 ± 45
PrimaryDose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib on Cycle 2 Day 1

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to end of dosing interval (AUCtau), where dosing interval is 12 hours for BID dose and 24 hours for QD dose.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 2 Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanogram*hour per milliliter
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib on Cycle 2 Day 1
nanogram*hour per milliliterLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 400 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 500 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 650 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 800 mg QDRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib on Cycle 2 Day 1425.90 ± 491595.58 ± 301719.30 ± 682255.70 ± 143054.45 ± 293644.72 ± 174815 ± 233839 ± 656330 ± 647273 ± 488733 ± 634163.77 ± 40
PrimaryDose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Crizotinib Cycle 1 Day 15

Ctrough refers to plasma concentration of Crizotinib observed just before treatment administration.

Time frame:
Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanogram per milliliter
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Crizotinib Cycle 1 Day 15
nanogram per milliliterLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Crizotinib Cycle 1 Day 157.29 ± 4232.61 ± 3648.18 ± 58126.76 ± 97232.59 ± 33307.83 ± 59280.43 ± 75
PrimaryDose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Crizotinib on Cycle 2 Day 1

Ctrough refers to plasma concentration of Crizotinib observed just before treatment administration.

Time frame:
Pre-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanogram per milliliter
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Crizotinib on Cycle 2 Day 1
nanogram per milliliterLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Crizotinib on Cycle 2 Day 112.68 ± 9431.91 ± 3454.04 ± 85157.24 ± 17232.45 ± 32329.50 ± 40312.99 ± 55
PrimaryDose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib on Day -7

Cmax is defined as the observed maximum plasma concentration post drug administration.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48 and any two time points (72, 96, 120 and 144 hours) post-dose on Day -7
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanogram per milliliter
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib on Day -7
nanogram per milliliterLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 400 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 500 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 650 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 800 mg QDRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib on Day -724.19 ± 3667.64 ± 10655.73 ± 4587.02 ± 34130.00184.7 ± 65115.9 ± 85146.6 ± 31154.3 ± 30270.9 ± 47108.40 ± 42
PrimaryDose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 1

Cmax is defined as the observed maximum plasma concentration post drug administration.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 2, 4 and 6 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanogram per milliliter
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 1
nanogram per milliliterLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 154.89 ± 5364.14 ± 2114.09 ± 4898.86 ± 55
PrimaryDose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 15

Cmax is defined as the observed maximum plasma concentration post drug administration.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanogram per milliliter
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 15
nanogram per milliliterLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 400 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 500 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 650 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 800 mg QDRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 1524.44 ± 6885.66 ± 66149.06 ± 29188.84 ± 56326.51 ± 24420.15 ± 46315.2 ± 50215.5 ± 26395.3 ± 16379.2 ± 28671.3 ± 76411.11 ± 51
PrimaryDose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 2 Day 1

Cmax is defined as the observed maximum plasma concentration post drug administration.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 2 Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanogram per milliliter
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 2 Day 1
nanogram per milliliterLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 400 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 500 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 650 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 800 mg QDRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 2 Day 147.99 ± 23133.69 ± 48146.26 ± 38238.84 ± 12327.94 ± 25474.68 ± 43275.0 ± 28248.2 ± 60327.9 ± 47419.8 ± 36700.0 ± 37477.85 ± 44
PrimaryDose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Crizotinib on Day -7

Tmax was defined as the time to reach the observed maximum plasma concentration (Cmax).

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48 and any two time points (72, 96, 120 and 144 hours) post-dose on Day -7
Reported as:
Median · hour
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Crizotinib on Day -7
hourLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 400 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 500 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 650 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 800 mg QDRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Crizotinib on Day -72.00 (1.75 to 4.08)4.09 (1.08 to 6.00)4.00 (4.00 to 4.08)4.00 (1.00 to 8.95)2.02 (2.02 to 2.02)4.00 (2.00 to 6.00)2.15 (1.00 to 6.00)4.00 (2.00 to 8.00)4.00 (1.98 to 6.00)4.99 (2.15 to 6.13)4.00 (2.00 to 9.33)
PrimaryDose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 1

Tmax was defined as the time to reach the observed maximum plasma concentration (Cmax).

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 2, 4 and 6 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 1
Reported as:
Median · hour
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 1
hourLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 12.52 (1.00 to 4.02)4.00 (4.00 to 4.00)4.00 (2.05 to 8.02)4.05 (1.00 to 9.08)
PrimaryDose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 15

Tmax was defined as the time to reach the observed maximum plasma concentration (Cmax).

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Reported as:
Median · hour
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 15
hourLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 400 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 500 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 650 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 800 mg QDRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 152.00 (1.00 to 4.00)2.51 (0.00 to 6.08)4.07 (1.00 to 6.00)5.01 (2.08 to 8.03)4.00 (0.97 to 6.07)4.99 (3.98 to 6.22)5.13 (1.93 to 7.88)5.17 (0.933 to 6.00)4.00 (4.00 to 9.00)5.98 (4.00 to 6.00)5.03 (4.00 to 6.03)4.00 (0.00 to 9.03)
PrimaryDose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Crizotinib Cycle 2 Day 1

Tmax was defined as the time to reach the observed maximum plasma concentration (Cmax).

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 2 Day 1
Reported as:
Median · hour
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Crizotinib Cycle 2 Day 1
hourLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 400 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 500 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 650 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 800 mg QDRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Crizotinib Cycle 2 Day 11.02 (1.00 to 4.00)3.98 (2.00 to 4.02)4.00 (2.00 to 4.17)4.00 (3.95 to 4.00)4.00 (4.00 to 6.00)4.05 (3.98 to 9.00)3.00 (1.00 to 5.95)4.00 (2.08 to 6.00)7.59 (6.18 to 9.00)4.30 (4.00 to 9.00)5.00 (4.00 to 6.00)4.00 (0.00 to 9.02)
PrimaryDose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of Crizotinib on Day -7

Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration of Crizotinib to decrease by one half.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48 and any two time points (72, 96, 120 and 144 hours) post-dose on Day -7
Reported as:
Median · hour
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of Crizotinib on Day -7
hourLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 400 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 500 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 650 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 800 mg QDRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of Crizotinib on Day -748.20 (45.50 to 56.80)46.70 (30.40 to 67.20)52.60 (51.70 to 53.50)47.35 (36.80 to 57.70)45.70 (45.70 to 45.70)43.33 (35.4 to 52.3)49.06 (33.2 to 79.3)46.36 (43.0 to 49.8)42.17 (28.3 to 53.8)38.78 (30.9 to 55.3)43.20 (27.10 to 63.40)
PrimaryDose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAES) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; medically important events. AEs included both serious and all non-serious adverse events. TEAEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity on or after the first dose of investigational product administration.

Time frame:
up to 189 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAES) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
ParticipantsLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 400 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 500 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 650 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 800 mg QDRP2D Cohort: ROS1-Positive NSCLC: Crizotinib 250RP2D Cohort: MET Exon 14 Alterations NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Amplification NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Negative Cohort 1, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Negative Cohort 2, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Positive Cohort, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: Enriched Other: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: Itraconazole Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg +ItraconazoleRP2D Cohort: Rifampin Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg +RifampinRP2D Cohort: Midazolam Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg +Midazolam
AEs34878664369538541471815466181812
SAEs001242221242454252297529766
PrimaryDose-Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLT)

Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any of the following: Hematologic- prolonged grade 4 neutropenia for \>7 days. Febrile neutropenia, defined as grade 4 neutropenia with fever greater than (\>)38.5 degree Celsius, both sustained over a 24 hour period, neutropenic infection: greater than or equal to (\>=)Grade 3 neutropenia with Grade \>=3 infection. Grade \>=3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding or grade 4 lasting \>=7 days Lymphopenia was not considered a DLT unless accompanied by infection. Other non-hematologic toxicity: Grade 3 or 4 toxicities (except for alopecia, Grade 3/4 hypophosphatemia, grade 3 hypertension with controlled blood pressure \[less than (\<) 140/90\], and Grade 3/4 hyperuricemia without signs and symptoms of gout). Nausea, vomiting or diarrhea must persist at grade 3 or 4 despite maximal medical therapy.

Time frame:
Cycle 1 (28 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Dose-Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLT)
ParticipantsLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 400 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 500 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 650 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 800 mg QD
Dose-Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLT)00100200000
PrimaryMidazolam Interaction Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Midazolam When Taken Alone or Taken With Crizotinib

Cmax is defined as the observed maximum plasma concentration post drug administration.

Time frame:
pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours post dose on Day -7 (midazolam alone arm), pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (midazolam with crizotinib arm)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanogram per milliliter
Midazolam Interaction Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Midazolam When Taken Alone or Taken With Crizotinib
nanogram per milliliterLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QD (Midazolam Alone)Low Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QD + MidazolamLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BID (Midazolam Alone)Low Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BID + MidazolamRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg (Midazolam Alone)RP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg + Midazolam
Midazolam Interaction Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Midazolam When Taken Alone or Taken With Crizotinib14.98 ± 1919.26 ± 3813.65 ± 1032.62 ± 4012.78 ± 4125.37 ± 67
Statistical analysis
  • Low Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QD (Midazolam Alone) vs Low Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QD + Midazolam · Ratio of adjusted geometric means: 131.72 · 90% CI 96.59 to 179.63
  • Low Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BID (Midazolam Alone) vs Low Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BID + Midazolam · Ratio of adjusted geometric means: 239.03 · 90% CI 172.14 to 331.93
  • RP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg (Midazolam Alone) vs RP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg + Midazolam · Ratio of adjusted geometric means: 201.56 · 90% CI 139.33 to 291.58
PrimaryArea Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Midazolam When Taken Alone or Taken With Crizotinib

AUCinf = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-inf).

Time frame:
pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours post dose on Day -7 (midazolam alone arm), pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (midazolam with crizotinib arm)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanogram*hour per milliliter
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Midazolam When Taken Alone or Taken With Crizotinib
nanogram*hour per milliliterLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QD (Midazolam Alone)Low Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QD + MidazolamLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BID (Midazolam Alone)Low Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BID + MidazolamRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg (Midazolam Alone)RP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg +Midazolam
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Midazolam When Taken Alone or Taken With Crizotinib41.77 ± 2790.78 ± 3337.71 ± 38151.45 ± 3132.10 ± 36112.78 ± 87
Statistical analysis
  • Low Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QD (Midazolam Alone) vs Low Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QD + Midazolam · Ratio of adjusted geometric means: 216.19 · 90% CI 161.41 to 289.56
  • Low Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BID (Midazolam Alone) vs Low Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BID + Midazolam · Ratio of adjusted geometric means: 350.00 · 90% CI 141.09 to 868.23
  • RP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg (Midazolam Alone) vs RP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg +Midazolam · Ratio of adjusted geometric means: 365.43 · 90% CI 263.22 to 507.31
PrimaryRP2D Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC (0-24)] of Crizotinib When Taken With Food

AUC0-24 of Crizotinib was defined as the area under the free plasma concentration time curve from time 0 to 24 hours post-dose.

Time frame:
pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours post-dose on Day -7
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanogram*hour per milliliter
RP2D Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC (0-24)] of Crizotinib When Taken With Food
nanogram*hour per milliliterRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg With Food
RP2D Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC (0-24)] of Crizotinib When Taken With Food1212.86 ± 46
PrimaryRP2D Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib When Taken With Food

Cmax is defined as the observed maximum plasma concentration post drug administration.

Time frame:
pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours post-dose on Day -7
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanogram per milliliter
RP2D Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib When Taken With Food
nanogram per milliliterRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg With Food
RP2D Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib When Taken With Food106.24 ± 51
PrimaryArea Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib Alone and When Taken With Rifampin

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to end of dosing interval (AUCtau).

Time frame:
pre-dose, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 hours on Cycle 1 Day 15 (Crizotinib alone arm) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (Crizotinib with Rifampin arm)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanogram*hour per milliliter
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib Alone and When Taken With Rifampin
nanogram*hour per milliliterRP2D Cohort: Rifampin Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg AloneRP2D Cohort: Rifampin Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg With Rifampin
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib Alone and When Taken With Rifampin3110 ± 49509.6 ± 35
Statistical analysis
  • RP2D Cohort: Rifampin Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg Alone vs RP2D Cohort: Rifampin Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg With Rifampin · Ratio of adjusted geometric mean: 15.57 · 90% CI 10.89 to 22.26
PrimaryRifampin Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib Alone and When Taken With Rifampin
Time frame:
pre-dose, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 hours on Cycle 1 Day 15 (Crizotinib alone) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (Crizotinib with Rifampin)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanogram per milliliter
Rifampin Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib Alone and When Taken With Rifampin
nanogram per milliliterRP2D Cohort: Rifampin Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg AloneRP2D Cohort: Rifampin Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg With Rifampin
Rifampin Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib Alone and When Taken With Rifampin326.4 ± 4871.53 ± 49
Statistical analysis
  • RP2D Cohort: Rifampin Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg Alone vs RP2D Cohort: Rifampin Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg With Rifampin · Ratio of adjusted geometric mean: 20.64 · 90% CI 14.59 to 29.18
PrimaryRifampin Cohort: Ctrough of Crizotinib Alone and When Taken With Rifampin

Ctrough refers to plasma concentration of Crizotinib observed just before treatment administration.

Time frame:
pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (Crizotinib alone arm) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (Crizotinib with Rifampin arm)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanogram per milliliter
Rifampin Cohort: Ctrough of Crizotinib Alone and When Taken With Rifampin
nanogram per milliliterRP2D Cohort: Rifampin Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg AloneRP2D Cohort: Rifampin Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg With Rifampin
Rifampin Cohort: Ctrough of Crizotinib Alone and When Taken With Rifampin251.7 ± 4626.67 ± 50
PrimaryItraconazole Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib When Taken Alone and When Taken With Itraconazole

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to end of dosing interval (AUCtau), where dosing interval is 24 hours.

Time frame:
pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (Crizotinib with itraconazole) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (itraconazole alone)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanogram*hour per milliliter
Itraconazole Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib When Taken Alone and When Taken With Itraconazole
nanogram*hour per milliliterRP2D Cohort: Itraconazole Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg AloneItraconazole Interaction Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg + Itraconazole
Itraconazole Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib When Taken Alone and When Taken With Itraconazole4102 ± 316665 ± 16
Statistical analysis
  • RP2D Cohort: Itraconazole Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg Alone vs Itraconazole Interaction Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg + Itraconazole · Ratio of adjusted geometric means: 157.40 · 90% CI 136.89 to 180.97
PrimaryItraconazole Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib When Taken Alone and When Taken With Itraconazole
Time frame:
pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (Crizotinib with itraconazole) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (itraconazole alone)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanogram per milliliter
Itraconazole Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib When Taken Alone and When Taken With Itraconazole
nanogram per milliliterRP2D Cohort: Itraconazole Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg AloneRP2D Cohort: Itraconazole Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg With Itraconazole
Itraconazole Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib When Taken Alone and When Taken With Itraconazole259.9 ± 23353.2 ± 14
Statistical analysis
  • RP2D Cohort: Itraconazole Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg Alone vs RP2D Cohort: Itraconazole Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg With Itraconazole · Ratio of adjusted geometric means: 132.81 · 90% CI 119.10 to 148.10
PrimaryItraconazole Cohort: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Crizotinib When Taken Alone and When Taken With Itraconazole

Ctrough refers to plasma concentration of Crizotinib observed just before treatment administration.

Time frame:
pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (crizotinib with itraconazole) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (itraconazole alone)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanogram per milliliter
Itraconazole Cohort: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Crizotinib When Taken Alone and When Taken With Itraconazole
nanogram per milliliterRP2D Cohort: Itraconazole Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg AloneRP2D Cohort: Itraconazole Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg With Itraconazole
Itraconazole Cohort: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Crizotinib When Taken Alone and When Taken With Itraconazole136.0 ± 36214.0 ± 30
PrimaryRecommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)

ORR was defined as participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by the total number of evaluable participants per RECIST version 1.0 (RECIST1.1 for ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 1 and ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 2). CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, normalization of tumor marker levels, and no appearance of new lesions indicated complete response. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum), without progression of non-target lesions and no appearance of new lesions indicated partial response.

Time frame:
Baseline up to 172 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)
percentage of participantsRP2D Cohort: ROS1-Positive NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Exon 14 Alterations NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Amplification NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Negative Cohort 2, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Positive Cohort, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: Enriched Other: Crizotinib 250 mg
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)71.7 (57.7 to 83.2)32.3 (21.2 to 45.1)31.6 (17.5 to 48.7)19.0 (5.4 to 41.9)61.2 (51.7 to 70.1)8.3 (0.2 to 38.5)
PrimaryRecommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Duration of Response (DOR)

Duration of response (DoR) was the time from first documentation of PR or CR to date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum), without progression of non-target lesions and no appearance of new lesions indicated partial response. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, normalization of tumor marker levels, and no appearance of new lesions indicated complete response. PD: \>=20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.

Time frame:
From first documentation of response to date of PD or death due to any cause (up to 172 months)
Reported as:
Median · Weeks
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Duration of Response (DOR)
WeeksRP2D Cohort: ROS1-Positive NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Exon 14 Alterations NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Amplification NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Positive Cohort, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mg
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Duration of Response (DOR)14.5 (2.8 to 45.4)6.8 (2.8 to 13.4)5.2 (3.8 to 12.2)26.2 (8.1 to 72.9)
PrimaryRecommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Response (TTR)

TTR: time between first dose until first documented response of PR or CR. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum), without progression of non-target lesions and no appearance of new lesions indicated partial response. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, normalization of tumor marker levels, and no appearance of new lesions indicated complete response.

Time frame:
From first dose until first documented response of PR or CR (up to 172 months)
Reported as:
Median · Weeks
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Response (TTR)
WeeksRP2D Cohort: ROS1-Positive NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Exon 14 Alterations NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Amplification NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Positive Cohort, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mg
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Response (TTR)7.9 (4.3 to 103.6)7.6 (3.7 to 47.3)8.0 (7.1 to 23.6)7.7 (4.3 to 39.6)
PrimaryRecommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Disease Control at Week 8

Disease control was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) per RECIST version 1.0 (RECIST1.1 for ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 1 and ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 2). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum), without progression of non-target lesions and no appearance of new lesions indicated partial response. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, normalization of tumor marker levels, and no appearance of new lesions indicated complete response. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Disease Control at Week 8
percentage of participantsRP2D Cohort: ROS1-Positive NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Exon 14 Alterations NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Positive Cohort, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Negative Cohort 2, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mg
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Disease Control at Week 886.8 (74.7 to 94.5)71.8 (61.0 to 81.0)79.3 (70.8 to 86.3)47.6 (25.7 to 70.2)
PrimaryRecommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Disease Control at Week 16

Disease control was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) per RECIST version 1.0 (RECIST1.1 for ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 1 and ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 2). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum), without progression of non-target lesions and no appearance of new lesions indicated partial response. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, normalization of tumor marker levels, and no appearance of new lesions indicated complete response. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Disease Control at Week 16
percentage of participantsRP2D Cohort: ROS1-Positive NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Exon 14 Alterations NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Positive Cohort, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Negative Cohort 2, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mg
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Disease Control at Week 1679.2 (65.9 to 89.2)51.8 (40.7 to 62.7)67.2 (57.9 to 75.7)42.9 (21.8 to 66.0)
PrimaryRecommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression free survival (PFS) was the time from randomization date to date of first documentation of PD or death due to any cause RECIST version 1.0 (RECIST1.1 for ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 1 and ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 2). PD: \>=20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.

Time frame:
From randomization until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to 172 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Progression Free Survival (PFS)
MonthsRP2D Cohort: ROS1-Positive NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Exon 14 Alterations NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Amplification NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Positive Cohort, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mg
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Progression Free Survival (PFS)19.3 (15.2 to 39.1)7.6 (5.6 to 9.1)4.0 (1.9 to 6.9)10.0 (8.2 to 14.7)
PrimaryRecommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Probability of Being Event Free at Month 6

Probability of being event free (event defined as PD or death due to any cause) at 6 months after the first dose of crizotinib was reported. PD: \>=20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.

Time frame:
From randomization to 6 months
Reported as:
Number · Probability of being event-free
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Probability of Being Event Free at Month 6
Probability of being event-freeRP2D Cohort: ROS1-Positive NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Exon 14 Alterations NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Amplification NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Positive Cohort, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mg
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Probability of Being Event Free at Month 676.9 (62.8 to 86.1)57.5 (45.3 to 68.0)39.0 (22.8 to 54.9)71.9 (61.8 to 79.7)
PrimaryRecommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause.

Time frame:
From randomization date to the date of death (up to 172 Months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Overall Survival (OS)
MonthsRP2D Cohort: ROS1-Positive NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Exon 14 Alterations NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Amplification NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Positive Cohort, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mg
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Overall Survival (OS)51.4 (29.3 to NA)20.0 (13.2 to 25.7)10.1 (7.1 to 12.9)NA (NA to NA)
PrimaryProbability of Participant Survival at Month 6

Probability of survival was defined as the probability of being alive at Month 6.

Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Number · Probability of participants survival
Probability of Participant Survival at Month 6
Probability of participants survivalRP2D Cohort: ROS1-Positive NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Exon 14 Alterations NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Amplification NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Positive Cohort, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mg
Probability of Participant Survival at Month 690.5 (78.7 to 95.9)86.7 (77.3 to 92.4)67.8 (51.1 to 79.9)90.0 (82.7 to 94.4)
PrimaryProbability of Participant Survival at Month 12

Probability of survival was defined as the probability of being alive at Month 12.

Time frame:
Month 12
Reported as:
Number · probability of participants survival
Probability of Participant Survival at Month 12
probability of participants survivalRP2D Cohort: ROS1-Positive NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Exon 14 Alterations NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Amplification NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Positive Cohort, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mg
Probability of Participant Survival at Month 1278.8 (65.0 to 87.7)66.0 (54.0 to 75.5)37.1 (22.4 to 51.8)80.5 (70.9 to 87.2)
PrimaryGeometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 1 Day 15

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle1Day15/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts.

Time frame:
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 15
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio
Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 1 Day 15
RatioRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Testosterone0.46 (0.34 to 0.62)
Estradiol0.53 (0.42 to 0.66)
Prolactin1.19 (0.91 to 1.55)
Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Serum0.58 (0.47 to 0.73)
Follicle Stimulating Hormone0.77 (0.66 to 0.91)
Free Testosterone0.96 (0.66 to 1.40)
Sex Hormone Binding Globulin0.36 (0.32 to 0.41)
Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate0.97 (0.85 to 1.11)
PrimaryGeometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 2 Day 1

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 2 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts.

Time frame:
Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio
Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 2 Day 1
RatioRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Testosterone0.47 (0.38 to 0.58)
Estradiol0.72 (0.56 to 0.93)
Prolactin0.89 (0.71 to 1.12)
LH Serum0.42 (0.26 to 0.70)
Follicle Stimulating Hormone0.69 (0.48 to 1.00)
Free Testosterone1.31 (0.97 to 1.77)
Sex Hormone Binding Globulin0.24 (0.18 to 0.31)
Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate0.85 (0.75 to 0.96)
PrimaryGeometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 4 Day 1

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 4 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts.

Time frame:
Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio
Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 4 Day 1
RatioRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Testosterone0.48 (0.27 to 0.84)
Estradiol0.66 (0.49 to 0.89)
Prolactin0.84 (0.55 to 1.28)
LH Serum0.75 (0.57 to 1.00)
Follicle Stimulating Hormone0.88 (0.68 to 1.15)
Free Testosterone1.63 (0.88 to 3.01)
Sex Hormone Binding Globulin0.22 (0.18 to 0.28)
Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate0.81 (0.69 to 0.97)
PrimaryGeometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 6 Day 1

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 6 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts.

Time frame:
Baseline, Cycle 6 Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio
Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 6 Day 1
RatioRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Testosterone0.49 (0.24 to 1.01)
Estradiol0.75 (0.58 to 0.97)
Prolactin0.69 (0.48 to 1.00)
LH Serum0.78 (0.60 to 1.02)
Follicle Stimulating Hormone1.07 (0.78 to 1.46)
Free Testosterone1.71 (1.01 to 2.90)
Sex Hormone Binding Globulin0.25 (0.15 to 0.43)
Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate0.87 (0.68 to 1.12)
PrimaryGeometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 9 Day 1

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 9 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

Time frame:
Baseline, Cycle 9 Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio
Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 9 Day 1
RatioRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Testosterone0.38 (0.26 to 0.57)
Estradiol0.56 (0.49 to 0.65)
Prolactin1.19 (0.65 to 2.18)
LH Serum0.72 (0.56 to 0.93)
Follicle Stimulating Hormone0.83 (0.67 to 1.03)
Free Testosterone1.23 (1.08 to 1.40)
Sex Hormone Binding Globulin0.19 (0.09 to 0.39)
Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate0.72 (0.51 to 1.00)
PrimaryGeometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 12 Day 1

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 12 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

Time frame:
Baseline, Cycle 12 Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio
Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 12 Day 1
RatioRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Testosterone0.38 (0.14 to 1.04)
Estradiol0.66 (0.32 to 1.37)
Prolactin1.06 (0.72 to 1.57)
LH Serum0.88 (0.59 to 1.32)
Follicle Stimulating Hormone1.02 (0.63 to 1.65)
Free Testosterone1.39 (0.68 to 2.86)
Sex Hormone Binding Globulin0.23 (0.11 to 0.46)
Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate0.75 (0.42 to 1.34)
PrimaryGeometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 15 Day 1

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 15 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

Time frame:
Baseline, Cycle 15 Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio
Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 15 Day 1
RatioRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Testosterone0.49 (0.21 to 1.14)
Estradiol1.03 (0.47 to 2.25)
Prolactin1.32 (0.86 to 2.03)
LH Serum0.90 (0.56 to 1.45)
Follicle Stimulating Hormone0.81 (0.53 to 1.22)
Free Testosterone1.71 (0.57 to 5.13)
Sex Hormone Binding Globulin0.24 (0.12 to 0.49)
Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate0.76 (0.57 to 0.99)
PrimaryGeometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 18 Day 1

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 18 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

Time frame:
Baseline, Cycle 18 Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio
Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 18 Day 1
RatioRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Testosterone0.32 (0.22 to 0.48)
Estradiol0.55 (0.03 to 8.69)
Prolactin1.64 (1.12 to 2.39)
LH Serum0.69 (0.58 to 0.82)
Follicle Stimulating Hormone0.89 (0.53 to 1.47)
Free Testosterone1.10 (0.42 to 2.91)
Sex Hormone Binding Globulin0.18 (0.07 to 0.45)
Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate0.69 (0.20 to 2.35)
PrimaryGeometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 21 Day 1

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 21 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

Time frame:
Baseline, Cycle 21 Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio
Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 21 Day 1
RatioRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Testosterone0.23 (0.09 to 0.60)
Estradiol0.48
Prolactin1.46 (0.62 to 3.41)
LH Serum0.53 (0.12 to 2.42)
Follicle Stimulating Hormone0.77 (0.44 to 1.33)
Free Testosterone1.23 (0.00 to 797.68)
Sex Hormone Binding Globulin0.15 (0.00 to 20.43)
Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate0.72 (0.09 to 5.76)
PrimaryGeometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 24 Day 1

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 24 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

Time frame:
Baseline, Cycle 24 Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio
Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 24 Day 1
RatioRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Testosterone0.39 (0.00 to 70772.27)
Estradiol0.70 (0.00 to 11581.59)
Prolactin1.13 (0.10 to 12.55)
LH Serum0.69 (0.09 to 5.23)
Follicle Stimulating Hormone0.53 (0.07 to 3.81)
Free Testosterone2.35
Sex Hormone Binding Globulin0.20 (0.00 to 33217.86)
Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate0.90 (0.48 to 1.66)
PrimaryGeometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 27 Day 1

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 27 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

Time frame:
Baseline, Cycle 27 Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio
Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 27 Day 1
RatioRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Testosterone0.46 (0.00 to 61000.31)
Estradiol0.97 (0.00 to 9022.66)
Prolactin1.48 (0.11 to 20.69)
LH Serum0.70 (0.11 to 4.50)
Follicle Stimulating Hormone0.66 (0.06 to 7.53)
Free Testosterone1.86 (0.02 to 147.95)
Sex Hormone Binding Globulin0.24 (0.00 to 22059.61)
Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate0.95 (0.24 to 3.78)
PrimaryGeometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 30 Day 1

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 30 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

Time frame:
Baseline, Cycle 30 Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio
Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 30 Day 1
RatioRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Testosterone0.16
Estradiol0.38
Prolactin1.14
LH Serum0.85
Follicle Stimulating Hormone0.80
Free Testosterone1.25
Sex Hormone Binding Globulin0.09
Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate0.71
PrimaryGeometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at End of Treatment

Geometric mean of ratio (End of treatment/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

Time frame:
Baseline, End of Treatment (28 days post last dose)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio
Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at End of Treatment
RatioRP2D Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg
Testosterone0.40 (0.08 to 2.08)
Estradiol0.66 (0.39 to 1.13)
Prolactin1.48 (0.49 to 4.50)
LH Serum0.52 (0.14 to 1.98)
Follicle Stimulating Hormone0.85 (0.26 to 2.72)
Free Testosterone0.62 (0.20 to 1.93)
Sex Hormone Binding Globulin0.64 (0.24 to 1.71)
Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate0.41 (0.21 to 0.78)

Adverse events

Collected over Up to maximum of 189 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Low Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QD0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)3/3 (100%)
Low Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QD0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)4/4 (100%)
Low Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QD0/8 (0%)1/8 (12.5%)8/8 (100%)
Low Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BID0/7 (0%)2/7 (28.6%)7/7 (100%)
Low Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BID0/8 (0%)4/8 (50%)8/8 (100%)
Low Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BID0/6 (0%)2/6 (33.3%)6/6 (100%)
High Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg QD1/6 (16.7%)2/6 (33.3%)6/6 (100%)
High Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 400 mg QD0/5 (0%)2/5 (40%)4/5 (80%)
High Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 500 mg QD1/3 (33.3%)1/3 (33.3%)3/3 (100%)
High Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 650 mg QD1/6 (16.7%)2/6 (33.3%)6/6 (100%)
High Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 800 mg QD1/9 (11.1%)4/9 (44.4%)9/9 (100%)
RP2D Cohort: ROS1-Positive NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mg10/53 (18.9%)24/53 (45.3%)53/53 (100%)
RP2D Cohort: MET Exon 14 Alterations NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mg15/85 (17.6%)54/85 (63.5%)85/85 (100%)
RP2D Cohort: MET Amplification NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mg8/41 (19.5%)25/41 (61%)41/41 (100%)
RP2D Cohort: ALK-Negative Cohort 1, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mg13/48 (27.1%)22/48 (45.8%)46/48 (95.8%)
RP2D Cohort: ALK-Negative Cohort 2, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mg9/18 (50%)9/18 (50%)18/18 (100%)
RP2D Cohort: ALK-Positive Cohort, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mg25/154 (16.2%)75/154 (48.7%)154/154 (100%)
RP2D Cohort: Enriched Other: Crizotinib 250 mg15/66 (22.7%)29/66 (43.9%)66/66 (100%)
Itraconazole Interaction Sub-study: Crizotinib 250 mg0/18 (0%)7/18 (38.9%)18/18 (100%)
RP2D Cohort: Rifampin Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg +Rifampin1/18 (5.6%)6/18 (33.3%)18/18 (100%)
Midazolam Interaction Cohort: Crizotinib 2504/12 (33.3%)6/12 (50%)12/12 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 199
Most frequent serious events
EventLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 400 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 500 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 650 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 800 mg QDRP2D Cohort: ROS1-Positive NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Exon 14 Alterations NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Amplification NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Negative Cohort 1, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Negative Cohort 2, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Positive Cohort, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: Enriched Other: Crizotinib 250 mgItraconazole Interaction Sub-study: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: Rifampin Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg +RifampinMidazolam Interaction Cohort: Crizotinib 250
Disease progressionGeneral disorders0/30/40/80/72/81/61/60/50/31/61/910/538/856/418/481/1819/15412/660/180/184/12
Cardiac arrestCardiac disorders0/30/40/80/70/80/60/60/51/30/60/90/531/850/410/480/180/1540/660/180/180/12
Gastrointestinal necrosisGastrointestinal disorders0/30/40/80/70/80/60/60/51/30/60/90/530/850/410/480/180/1540/660/180/180/12
Intestinal obstructionGastrointestinal disorders0/30/40/80/70/80/60/60/51/30/60/90/530/850/410/480/180/1540/660/181/180/12
MegacolonGastrointestinal disorders0/30/40/80/70/80/60/60/51/30/60/90/530/850/410/480/180/1540/660/180/180/12
Hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathyNervous system disorders0/30/40/80/70/80/60/60/51/30/60/90/530/850/410/480/180/1540/660/180/180/12
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders0/30/40/80/70/80/60/61/50/30/60/90/531/851/410/480/183/1540/660/180/180/12
Cerebral haematomaNervous system disorders0/30/40/80/70/80/60/61/50/30/60/90/530/850/410/480/181/1540/660/180/180/12
Small intestinal obstructionGastrointestinal disorders0/30/41/80/70/80/60/60/50/31/60/90/530/850/410/480/180/1541/660/180/180/12
PyrexiaGeneral disorders0/30/40/80/70/80/61/60/50/30/60/90/534/851/410/480/182/1541/660/180/181/12
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 351
Most frequent other events
EventLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 400 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 500 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 650 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 800 mg QDRP2D Cohort: ROS1-Positive NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Exon 14 Alterations NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Amplification NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Negative Cohort 1, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Negative Cohort 2, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Positive Cohort, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: Enriched Other: Crizotinib 250 mgItraconazole Interaction Sub-study: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: Rifampin Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg +RifampinMidazolam Interaction Cohort: Crizotinib 250
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/33/46/83/73/83/62/61/53/33/65/933/5349/8514/4120/4810/1897/15441/6610/1812/187/12
Visual impairmentEye disorders0/30/40/81/70/80/61/62/50/34/63/943/5311/856/4126/489/1892/15422/663/1810/181/12
PyrexiaGeneral disorders1/33/41/80/70/80/60/60/50/32/62/915/5312/852/416/482/1834/1543/663/183/181/12
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders0/30/41/82/73/82/63/63/52/34/64/924/5345/8510/4121/4811/1868/15415/6611/187/181/12
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders2/30/42/81/71/81/61/61/50/33/62/925/5350/8517/4117/485/1893/15432/667/187/184/12
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders2/32/45/84/74/81/63/62/51/32/65/928/5335/8515/4126/489/1881/15434/668/1810/188/12
FatigueGeneral disorders2/32/43/83/74/83/63/61/52/32/63/920/5335/8511/4123/488/1859/15426/668/186/185/12
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/32/44/82/72/84/61/61/52/31/63/916/5324/857/419/483/1850/15420/665/186/183/12
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/30/40/82/70/83/62/60/50/30/61/912/5327/8510/4111/484/1834/15414/668/181/181/12
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders0/30/40/82/71/80/62/61/50/32/60/927/5349/8514/4115/484/1869/15418/663/185/181/12

Baseline characteristics

Safety analysis (SA) set included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 1.

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Low Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 400 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 500 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 650 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 800 mg QDRP2D Cohort: ROS1-Positive NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Exon 14 Alterations NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Amplification NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Negative Cohort 1, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Negative Cohort 2, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Positive Cohort, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: Enriched Other: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: Itraconazole Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg +ItraconazoleRP2D Cohort: Rifampin Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg +RifampinRP2D Cohort: Midazolam Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg +MidazolamTotal
less than 65 years345586353652318203012131519129368
greater than or equals to 65 years003200300043067211862315963210
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Low Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 400 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 500 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 650 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 800 mg QDRP2D Cohort: ROS1-Positive NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Exon 14 Alterations NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Amplification NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Negative Cohort 1, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Negative Cohort 2, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Positive Cohort, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: Enriched Other: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: Itraconazole Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg +ItraconazoleRP2D Cohort: Rifampin Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg +RifampinRP2D Cohort: Midazolam Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg +MidazolamTotal
Female3123423501330481924880251198289
Male0364443035623372224107441794289
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Low Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 50 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 100 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg QDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 200 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 250 mg BIDLow Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg BIDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 300 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 400 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 500 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 650 mg QDHigh Dose Escalation Cohort: Crizotinib 800 mg QDRP2D Cohort: ROS1-Positive NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Exon 14 Alterations NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: MET Amplification NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Negative Cohort 1, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Negative Cohort 2, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: ALK-Positive Cohort, NSCLC: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: Enriched Other: Crizotinib 250 mgRP2D Cohort: Itraconazole Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg +ItraconazoleRP2D Cohort: Rifampin Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg +RifampinRP2D Cohort: Midazolam Interaction: Crizotinib 250 mg +MidazolamTotal
White2376866425830603835119849131611418
Black10000001100222135432027
Asian001000000012115192439000102
Other01010000010080328420131
08

Study locations

29 sites
  • University of California, Irvine Medical Center
    Orange, California 92868-3201, United States
  • University of Colorado Hospital/ Anschutz Cancer Pavilion
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • University of Colorado Hospital
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • University of Colorado
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • University of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston Inc.
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Dana Farber Cancer Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Joslin Beetham Eye Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Karmanos Cancer Institute
    Detroit, Michigan 48201, United States
  • Kresge Eye Institute
    Detroit, Michigan 48201, United States
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
    New York, New York 10022, United States
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: Breast and Imaging Center
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • UNC Hospitals
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7600, United States
  • The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
  • Ohio State Eye and Ear Institute
    Columbus, Ohio 43212, United States
  • The Ohio State University Martha Morehouse Medical Plaza
    Columbus, Ohio 43221, United States
  • UPMC Hillman Cancer Center
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15232, United States
  • Henry-Joyce Cancer Clinic
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
  • Vanderbilt Eye Institute
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
  • The University of Vermont Medical Center
    Burlington, Vermont 05401, United States
  • The University of Vermont Cancer Center
    Burlington, Vermont 05405, United States
  • Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
    Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
  • Aichi cancer center central hospital
    Nagoya, Aichi 464-8681, Japan
  • Hyogo Cancer Center
    Akashi, Hyogo 673-8558, Japan
  • Kindai University Hospital
    Osakasayama, Osaka 589-8511, Japan
  • Seoul National University Hospital
    Seoul, 03080, Korea, Republic of
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ng TL, Tsui DCC, Wang S, Usari T, Patil T, Wilner K, Camidge DR. Association of anticoagulant use with clinical outcomes from crizotinib in ALK- and ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancers: A retrospective analysis of PROFILE 1001. Cancer Med. 2022 Dec;11(23):4422-4429. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4789. Epub 2022 May 5. PubMed 35510711 ↗
  • Camidge DR, Otterson GA, Clark JW, Ignatius Ou SH, Weiss J, Ades S, Shapiro GI, Socinski MA, Murphy DA, Conte U, Tang Y, Wang SC, Wilner KD, Villaruz LC. Crizotinib in Patients With MET-Amplified NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2021 Jun;16(6):1017-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Mar 4. PubMed 33676017 ↗
  • Solomon BJ, Kim EE, Winter M, Monti K, Tang Y, Wilner KD, Wang S, Ou SI. Ophthalmological assessment of crizotinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2020 Jul;145:167-172. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 Apr 28. PubMed 32460197 ↗
  • Clark JW, Camidge DR, Kwak EL, Maki RG, Shapiro GI, Chen I, Tan W, Randolph S, Christensen JG, Ozeck M, Tang Y, Wilner KD, Salgia R. Dose-escalation trial of the ALK, MET & ROS1 inhibitor, crizotinib, in patients with advanced cancer. Future Oncol. 2020 Jan;16(1):4289-4301. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0653. Epub 2019 Nov 28. PubMed 31778074 ↗
  • Shaw AT, Riely GJ, Bang YJ, Kim DW, Camidge DR, Solomon BJ, Varella-Garcia M, Iafrate AJ, Shapiro GI, Usari T, Wang SC, Wilner KD, Clark JW, Ou SI. Crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): updated results, including overall survival, from PROFILE 1001. Ann Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;30(7):1121-1126. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz131. PubMed 30980071 ↗
  • Camidge DR, Kim EE, Usari T, Polli A, Lewis I, Wilner KD. Renal Effects of Crizotinib in Patients With ALK-Positive Advanced NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2019 Jun;14(6):1077-1085. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.02.015. Epub 2019 Feb 26. PubMed 30822515 ↗
  • Yoneda KY, Scranton JR, Cadogan MA, Tassell V, Nadanaciva S, Wilner KD, Stollenwerk NS. Interstitial Lung Disease Associated With Crizotinib in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Independent Review of Four PROFILE Trials. Clin Lung Cancer. 2017 Sep;18(5):472-479. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 14. PubMed 28373069 ↗
  • Shaw AT, Ou SH, Bang YJ, Camidge DR, Solomon BJ, Salgia R, Riely GJ, Varella-Garcia M, Shapiro GI, Costa DB, Doebele RC, Le LP, Zheng Z, Tan W, Stephenson P, Shreeve SM, Tye LM, Christensen JG, Wilner KD, Clark JW, Iafrate AJ. Crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 20;371(21):1963-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406766. Epub 2014 Sep 27. PubMed 25264305 ↗
  • Go H, Kim DW, Kim D, Keam B, Kim TM, Lee SH, Heo DS, Bang YJ, Chung DH. Clinicopathologic analysis of ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer and proposal of a diagnostic algorithm. J Thorac Oncol. 2013 Nov;8(11):1445-50. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182a4dd6e. PubMed 24128715 ↗
  • Awad MM, Katayama R, McTigue M, Liu W, Deng YL, Brooun A, Friboulet L, Huang D, Falk MD, Timofeevski S, Wilner KD, Lockerman EL, Khan TM, Mahmood S, Gainor JF, Digumarthy SR, Stone JR, Mino-Kenudson M, Christensen JG, Iafrate AJ, Engelman JA, Shaw AT. Acquired resistance to crizotinib from a mutation in CD74-ROS1. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 20;368(25):2395-401. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1215530. Epub 2013 Jun 1. PubMed 23724914 ↗
  • Camidge DR, Bang YJ, Kwak EL, Iafrate AJ, Varella-Garcia M, Fox SB, Riely GJ, Solomon B, Ou SH, Kim DW, Salgia R, Fidias P, Engelman JA, Gandhi L, Janne PA, Costa DB, Shapiro GI, Lorusso P, Ruffner K, Stephenson P, Tang Y, Wilner K, Clark JW, Shaw AT. Activity and safety of crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated results from a phase 1 study. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Oct;13(10):1011-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70344-3. Epub 2012 Sep 4. PubMed 22954507 ↗
  • Ou SH, Azada M, Dy J, Stiber JA. Asymptomatic profound sinus bradycardia (heart rate </=45) in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with crizotinib. J Thorac Oncol. 2011 Dec;6(12):2135-7. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182307e06. PubMed 22088989 ↗
  • Shaw AT, Yeap BY, Solomon BJ, Riely GJ, Gainor J, Engelman JA, Shapiro GI, Costa DB, Ou SH, Butaney M, Salgia R, Maki RG, Varella-Garcia M, Doebele RC, Bang YJ, Kulig K, Selaru P, Tang Y, Wilner KD, Kwak EL, Clark JW, Iafrate AJ, Camidge DR. Effect of crizotinib on overall survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring ALK gene rearrangement: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Oct;12(11):1004-12. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70232-7. Epub 2011 Sep 18. PubMed 21933749 ↗
  • Kijima T, Takeuchi K, Tetsumoto S, Shimada K, Takahashi R, Hirata H, Nagatomo I, Hoshino S, Takeda Y, Kida H, Goya S, Tachibana I, Kawase I. Favorable response to crizotinib in three patients with echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion-type oncogene-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Sci. 2011 Aug;102(8):1602-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.01970.x. PubMed 21767331 ↗
  • Ou SH, Kwak EL, Siwak-Tapp C, Dy J, Bergethon K, Clark JW, Camidge DR, Solomon BJ, Maki RG, Bang YJ, Kim DW, Christensen J, Tan W, Wilner KD, Salgia R, Iafrate AJ. Activity of crizotinib (PF02341066), a dual mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, in a non-small cell lung cancer patient with de novo MET amplification. J Thorac Oncol. 2011 May;6(5):942-6. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31821528d3. PubMed 21623265 ↗
  • Costa DB, Kobayashi S, Pandya SS, Yeo WL, Shen Z, Tan W, Wilner KD. CSF concentration of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor crizotinib. J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 20;29(15):e443-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.34.1313. Epub 2011 Mar 21. No abstract available. PubMed 21422405 ↗
  • Butrynski JE, D'Adamo DR, Hornick JL, Dal Cin P, Antonescu CR, Jhanwar SC, Ladanyi M, Capelletti M, Rodig SJ, Ramaiya N, Kwak EL, Clark JW, Wilner KD, Christensen JG, Janne PA, Maki RG, Demetri GD, Shapiro GI. Crizotinib in ALK-rearranged inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 28;363(18):1727-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1007056. PubMed 20979472 ↗
  • Kwak EL, Bang YJ, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, Solomon B, Maki RG, Ou SH, Dezube BJ, Janne PA, Costa DB, Varella-Garcia M, Kim WH, Lynch TJ, Fidias P, Stubbs H, Engelman JA, Sequist LV, Tan W, Gandhi L, Mino-Kenudson M, Wei GC, Shreeve SM, Ratain MJ, Settleman J, Christensen JG, Haber DA, Wilner K, Salgia R, Shapiro GI, Clark JW, Iafrate AJ. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 28;363(18):1693-703. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1006448. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 10;364(6):588. PubMed 20979469 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · May 11, 2021
  • Statistical analysis plan · Aug 22, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 8, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00585195
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 3, 2008
Start date
Apr 19, 2006
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2020
Completion
Jan 19, 2022
Results posted
Oct 14, 2021
Last update
Feb 8, 2023

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion