CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00572832Updated Aug 17, 2010Results posted

Randomized Trial of Alternative Quadrivalent Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Vaccination Schedules in a University Setting

An interventional study of Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine on-time administration and Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine delayed administration in Human Papillomavirus Infection, sponsored by University of Pittsburgh. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 23 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-08-17.

Sponsored by University of Pittsburgh · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 23 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This is a randomized, open label trial of HPV (human papilloma virus) vaccine, comparing an on-time administration of the third dose with delayed administration of the third dose. All participants would receive the first and second doses according to schedule. They would be randomized to either vaccine at 6 months or vaccine at 12 months.

Blood will be drawn for titers twice from all participants: pre-dose 1 and one month post third dose. We hypothesize that the GMTs in the test group (T) are non-inferior to the usual timing control group (C):

H0: δ ≤ -δ0 versus H1: δ > -δ0 where δ = log (GMTT )- log (GMTC) and δ0 is the pre-specified non-inferiority margin.

Read the detailed description

The recommendations for HPV vaccine include catch-up of women 18 to 26 years old. Given that a large percentage of women in this age group are attending college, a good place to access them would be through the student health services on college campuses. However, the HPV vaccine schedule of 0, 2, and 6 months is likely to be difficult to implement in a college calendar year and the immunogenicity of alternative schedules is unknown. If the immunogenicity of an altered schedule is good, then higher vaccination rates may be achievable.

Aims:

  1. Determine if delay in the third dose is immunologically non-inferior to the standard administration schedule (1 month post-dose 3).
  2. Determine the side effect profile of a delayed third dose, in comparison to the standard schedule
02

Conditions studied

  • Human Papillomavirus Infection

Keywords

  • Human Papillomavirus Vaccine
03

In context

Papillomavirus Infections

495 studies on the registry are indexed under Papillomavirus Infections; 125 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 200 is close to the median of 202 across 332 interventional studies indexed under Papillomavirus Infections.

Browse Papillomavirus Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pittsburgh is the lead sponsor of 1,385 studies on the registry; 167 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 23 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • 18-23 year old college females who are planning to return to the university for the next fall semester.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or planned pregnancy.
  • Prior receipt of HPV vaccine.
  • Greater than four lifetime sexual partners.
  • Immunosuppression.
  • Anti-coagulant therapy.
  • Breastfeeding.
  • History of abnormal pap smear.
  • Allergy to vaccine components.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
200 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    6 mon. 3rd dose of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine

    Receipt of three doses of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine according to the regular schedule of 0,2, and 6 months.

    Biological: Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine on-time administration

  • Active comparator
    12 mon. 3rd dose of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine

    Receipt of three doses of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine on a delayed schedule of 0,2, and 12 months.

    Biological: Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine delayed administration

Interventions

  • BiologicalQuadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine on-time administration

    The vaccine is given in three doses: Dose 1; dose 2 given 60 days later; dose 3 given six months after dose 1.

    Also known as: Gardasil

  • BiologicalQuadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine delayed administration

    The vaccine is given in three doses: Dose 1; dose 2 given 60 days later; dose 3 given 12 months after dose 1.

    Also known as: Gardasil

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Geometric Mean Antibody Titers Following the Third Dose of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Vaccine by Virus Type and by Administration Schedule

    Geomtric mean antibody titers were assessed 1 month following the third dose of human papilloma virus vaccine. Persons with baseline antibody titers that were positive to a particular type were deleted from the analysis for that particular type so that the outcome is excludes those with baseline positives (thus, sample size varies by type). Responses were compared between the two groups after dose 3 by type.

    Time frame: 1 month post-dose 3 (i.e., 7 months for standard schedule and 13 months for alternative schedule)

07

Results

Posted Feb 25, 2010
Limitations and caveats
One participant in the Standard group did not respond to any of the vaccine HPV types. Eleven participants in the Alternate group either did not receive Dose 3 or were out of window, compared with only one participant in the Standard group.

Participant flow

Two hundred young women from the university community who met the eligibility criteria were recruited at the Student Health Service.

Participant flow — Overall Study
Milestone6 Month Standard Schedule12 Month Alternative Group
Started100100
Completed10088
Not completed012
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up011
Withdrew: Pregnancy01

Outcome measures

PrimaryGeometric Mean Antibody Titers Following the Third Dose of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Vaccine by Virus Type and by Administration Schedule

Geomtric mean antibody titers were assessed 1 month following the third dose of human papilloma virus vaccine. Persons with baseline antibody titers that were positive to a particular type were deleted from the analysis for that particular type so that the outcome is excludes those with baseline positives (thus, sample size varies by type). Responses were compared between the two groups after dose 3 by type.

Time frame:
1 month post-dose 3 (i.e., 7 months for standard schedule and 13 months for alternative schedule)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · milliMerck units per mL
Geometric Mean Antibody Titers Following the Third Dose of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Vaccine by Virus Type and by Administration Schedule
milliMerck units per mL6 Month Standard Schedule12 Month Alternative Group
Type 61894 (1564 to 2194)4221 (2930 to 5416)
Type 111773 (1261 to 2252)5623 (3939 to 7208)
Type 165534 (3875 to 7093)11832 (8165 to 15223)
Type 181225 (1038 to 1396)2052 (1138 to 2959)
Statistical analysis
  • 6 Month Standard Schedule vs 12 Month Alternative Group · ANOVA · p = .025 (Non-inferiority was tested against a one-sided null hypothesis (alpha=.025) that the post Dose 3 GMT ratio of the Alternate to Standard schedule was ≤ 0.5 for each HPV type. Results: GMT ratios were 2.23, 3,17, 2.14, and 1.68 for types 6,11,16,\& 18.)Log transformed the data and calculated GMTs. Tested if post Dose 3 GMT ratio of the Alternate to Standard schedule was ≤ 0.5 for each HPV type

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
6 Month Standard Schedule—0/100 (0%)57/100 (57%)
12 Month Alternative Group—0/100 (0%)55/100 (55%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
Event6 Month Standard Schedule12 Month Alternative Group
Soreness at the injection siteSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders57/10055/100
syncopeGeneral disorders1/1000/100

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)6 Month Standard Schedule12 Month Alternative GroupTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years100100200
>=65 years000
Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)6 Month Standard Schedule12 Month Alternative GroupTotal
Mean20.3 ± 1.320.1 ± 1.420.2 ± 1.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)6 Month Standard Schedule12 Month Alternative GroupTotal
Female100100200
Male000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)6 Month Standard Schedule12 Month Alternative GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian527
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American8816
White8389172
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported415
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)6 Month Standard Schedule12 Month Alternative GroupTotal
United States100100200
Body Mass Index
Body Mass Index(kg/m^2)6 Month Standard Schedule12 Month Alternative GroupTotal
Mean24.2 ± 4.724.5 ± 5.124.3 ± 4.9
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Pittsburgh
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Zimmerman RK, Nowalk MP, Lin CJ, Fox DE, Ko FS, Wettick E, Cost G, Hand L, Hayes J, Michaels M. Randomized trial of an alternate human papillomavirus vaccine administration schedule in college-aged women. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Aug;19(8):1441-7. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1753. PubMed 20629576 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 17, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00572832
Lead sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Collaborators
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
First posted
Dec 13, 2007
Start date
Sep 2007
Primary completion
Apr 2009
Completion
Aug 2009
Results posted
Feb 25, 2010
Last update
Aug 17, 2010

Study contacts

Richard K. Zimmerman, MD
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion