CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00565383VersionUpdated Jun 13, 2013

The Effect of Combined Spinal-Epidural Analgesia on the Success of External Cephalic Version (ECV) for Breech Position

An interventional study of Combined spinal-epidural analgesia and Intravenous fentanyl (50mcg) in Pregnancy and Breech Presentation, sponsored by Northwestern University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-06-13.

Sponsored by Northwestern University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
101
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

We aim to answer the clinical question: Does combined spinal-epidural analgesia improve the success rate of external cephalic version? We hypothesize that neuraxial analgesia (spinal or epidural analgesia) during version for breech presentation increases successful fetal rotation and decreases the incidence of Cesarean delivery for malpresentation.

Read the detailed description

At term 2 to 3% of singleton pregnancies are in breech presentation. Many of these deliveries are managed by cesarean delivery due to higher neonatal morbidity associated with vaginal breech delivery. Cesarean delivery, the safer option for the baby, however, is associated with a higher incidence of maternal complications for both the current and subsequent pregnancies. External cephalic version is a procedure commonly used to attempt to manually rotate the fetus into vertex position. This facilitates vaginal delivery and thus avoids higher maternal and/or neonatal complications.

Obstetricians perform versions after 36 weeks gestational age with a reportable success rate of 30-80%. The most common technique involves external manipulation of the fetal position preceded by pharmacologic uterine relaxation. Pain relief is most commonly provided in the form of intravenous opioids such as fentanyl. A more efficacious form of analgesia is the use of neuraxial opioids and local anesthetics (neuraxial analgesia), a technique commonly used for labor and delivery analgesia.

Although the use of neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia techniques improve maternal pain and satisfaction, there is conflicting evidence if they improve the success rate of version procedures. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has stated, "Currently there is not enough evidence to make a recommendation favoring or opposing anesthesia during ECV (external cephalic version) attempts."

We propose to conduct a prospective, single blinded, randomized clinical trial to assess the impact of combined spinal-epidural analgesia on the success rate of external version for breech fetal position and the subsequent incidence of vaginal vs. Cesarean delivery as a secondary outcome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pregnancy
  • Breech Presentation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pregnancy
  • 37 Weeks Gestation
  • Breech Presentation
  • Version Procedure
  • Pain Control
  • Neuraxial analgesia
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 18-55 years of age
  • Female
  • Pregnant
  • Breech Presentation
  • Greater than 36 Weeks gestation
  • Version Procedure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under 18 or over 55 years of age
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
101 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Intravenous fentanyl analgesia

    Intravenous fentanyl (50 mcg) analgesia

    Procedure: Intravenous fentanyl (50mcg)

  • Experimental
    Combined spinal-epidural analgesia

    Combined spinal-epidural analgesia (intrathecal fentanyl 2.5 mg plus bupivacaine 2.5 mg) single administration

    Procedure: Combined spinal-epidural analgesia

Interventions

  • ProcedureCombined spinal-epidural analgesia

    Combined spinal-epidural

  • ProcedureIntravenous fentanyl (50mcg)

    Intravenous fentanyl

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Does combined spinal-epidural analgesia improve the success rate of external cephalic version?

    Time frame: Time between analgesia intervention for the version procedure and delivery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mode of delivery

    Time frame: At delivery

  2. Maternal satisfaction

    Time frame: Between analgesic intervention and the completion of the version procedure

  3. Maternal Pain

    Time frame: Between analgesic intervention and termination of the version procedure

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Prentice Women's Hospital
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Fortunato SJ, Mercer LJ, Guzick DS. External cephalic version with tocolysis: factors associated with success. Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Jul;72(1):59-62. PubMed 3288930 ↗
  • Zhang J, Bowes WA Jr, Fortney JA. Efficacy of external cephalic version: a review. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Aug;82(2):306-12. PubMed 8336883 ↗
  • Carlan SJ, Dent JM, Huckaby T, Whittington EC, Shaefer D. The effect of epidural anesthesia on safety and success of external cephalic version at term. Anesth Analg. 1994 Sep;79(3):525-8. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199409000-00021. PubMed 8067558 ↗
  • Birnbach DJ, Matut J, Stein DJ, Campagnuolo J, Drimbarean C, Grunebaum A, Kuroda MM, Thys DM. The effect of intrathecal analgesia on the success of external cephalic version. Anesth Analg. 2001 Aug;93(2):410-3, 4th contents page. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200108000-00035. PubMed 11473871 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00565383
Lead sponsor
Northwestern University
Responsible party
John Sullivan (John T. Sullivan M.D., Northwestern University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 30, 2007
Start date
Aug 2002
Primary completion
Jun 2006
Completion
Jun 2006
Last update
Jun 13, 2013

Study contacts

John T Sullivan, M.D.
principal investigator · Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion