CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT00563069Updated Jul 7, 2010

Premedication With Oral Midazolam in Patients Undergoing Rigid Cystoscopy: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial

An interventional study of Midazolam in Cystoscopy, sponsored by Hospital Authority, Hong Kong. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-07-07.

Sponsored by Hospital Authority, Hong Kong · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2010), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To investigate the efficacy of oral midazolam for patients undergoing rigid cystoscopy in:

  1. relieving patient's anxiety and improving satisfaction
  2. reducing procedure-related pain
  3. facilitating the diagnostic and therapeutic interventions during rigid cystoscopy
02

Conditions studied

  • Cystoscopy

Keywords

  • diagnostic and therapeutic rigid cystoscopy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Hospital Authority, Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 73 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All

Inclusion criteria

  • Elective rigid cystoscopy
  • Either diagnostic or therapeutic
  • Age between 18 to 80

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with allergy to midazolam or other benzodiazepine groups
  • Pregnancy
  • Emergency rigid cystoscopy
  • ASA class 3 or above
  • Patients on psychiatric medications
  • Alcoholics
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Double
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Interventions

  • DrugMidazolam
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain score during the procedure as assessed by visual analog scale

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient's satisfaction

  2. Patient's willingness to repeat the procedure

  3. Patient's cooperativeness during the procedure as assessed by surgeons

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital
    Hong Kong, China
    • Wilfred LM Mui, Dr · Sub investigator
    • Chi Fai Ng, Dr · Sub investigator
    • Michael CW Cheng, Dr · Sub investigator
    • Shu Yin Chan, Dr · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00563069
Lead sponsor
Hospital Authority, Hong Kong
Collaborators
Chinese University of Hong Kong
First posted
Nov 26, 2007
Start date
Sep 2005
Completion
Dec 2006 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 7, 2010

Study contacts

Shirley YW Liu, Dr
Contact
liu_yws@yahoo.com.hk
(852) 2632 2625
Shirley YW Liu, Dr
principal investigator · Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital/ The Chinese Univerisity of Hong Kong
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion