CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00542256Updated Mar 21, 2017

tDCS and Physical Therapy in Stroke

An interventional study of Active transcranial Direct Current Stimulation / Constraint Induced Movement Therapy and Sham transcranial Direct Current Stimulation / Constraint Induced Movement Therapy in Cerebrovascular Accident, sponsored by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-03-21.

Sponsored by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
85
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a painless and noninvasive procedure called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with a method of physical therapy called constraint-induced movement therapy improves motor function in patients with chronic stroke. Research in healthy subjects has shown that when tDCS is combined with motor learning tasks, there is an increase in learning as compared to motor learning tasks only. The tDCS procedure sessions will be compared to sham (fake) procedure sessions, which is also called placebo stimulation. This study is double blind, which means neither the subjects nor researchers analyzing motor function will know if participants are receiving real tDCS stimulation or placebo. Only the person performing the procedure will know which one participants are receiving. Only by comparing the tDCS procedure to a sham (placebo) procedure can we understand if the tDCS actually improves motor function.

We hypothesize that tDCS will enhance the effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on motor recovery in chronic stroke patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebrovascular Accident

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Apoplexy
  • Cerebral Stroke
  • Cerebrovascular Accident, Acute
  • Cerebrovascular Apoplexy
  • Cerebrovascular Stroke
  • CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident)
  • Stroke
  • Stroke, Acute
  • Vascular Accident, Brain
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 85 is above the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 560 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Of its 75 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 61 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • First time clinical ischemic or hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accident (radiologically confirmed)
  • Demonstrates adequate balance while wearing a hand restraint on the unaffected arm
  • Ability to stand from a sitting position and ability to stand with or without upper extremity support
  • Stroke onset at least 6 months prior to study enrollment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant pre-stroke disability
  • Any substantial decrease in alertness, language reception, or attention that might interfere with understanding instructions for motor testing
  • Excessive pain in any joint of the paretic extremity
  • A terminal medical diagnosis consistent with survival of less than 1 year
  • Advanced liver, kidney, cardiac, or pulmonary disease
  • Coexistent major neurological or psychiatric disease (including epilepsy)
  • A history of significant alcohol or drug abuse in the prior 3 years
  • Use of neuropsychotropic drugs - such as antidepressants
  • Patients may not be actively enrolled in a separate intervention study targeting stroke recovery
  • Patients may not have already received constraint-induced movement therapy and/or tDCS treatment for stroke
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
85 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1

    Each subject will receive 14 days (2 week period: 10 weekdays and 2 weekends) of constraint induced movement therapy. In addition, on the 10 weekdays during the treatment period, the subjects will come into the laboratory and receive up to 6 hours per day of training of the affected arm in a variety of tasks. At the beginning of each of the 10 weekday training sessions, participants will receive 40 minutes of active tDCS over the primary motor cortex.

    Device: Active transcranial Direct Current Stimulation / Constraint Induced Movement Therapy

  • Sham comparator
    2

    Each subject will receive 14 days (2 week period: 10 weekdays and 2 weekends) of constraint induced movement therapy. In addition, on the 10 weekdays during the treatment period, the subjects will come into the laboratory and receive up to 6 hours per day of training of the affected arm in a variety of tasks. At the beginning of each training day tDCS will be applied for 40 minutes with the current active for only 30 seconds over the primary motor cortex.

    Device: Sham transcranial Direct Current Stimulation / Constraint Induced Movement Therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceActive transcranial Direct Current Stimulation / Constraint Induced Movement Therapy

    14 days of constraint induced movement therapy with 10 weekdays of up to 6 hours of training of the affected arm combined with application of tDCS over the primary motor cortex for 40 minutes.

  • DeviceSham transcranial Direct Current Stimulation / Constraint Induced Movement Therapy

    14 days of constraint induced movement therapy with 10 days of up to 6 hours of training in the affected arm and sham tDCS applied over the primary motor cortex for 40 minutes with active current applied for 30 seconds.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test

    Time frame: Baseline, Treatment days 1,5,10, Follow Up

  2. Motor Activity Log Rating Scale

    Time frame: Baseline, Treatment Days 1,5,10 and Follow Up

  3. Beck Depression Inventory

    Time frame: Baseline, Treatment days 1,5,10 and Follow up

  4. Visual Analogue Scale for Anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline, Treatment days 1,5,10 and Follow Up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fugl Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery

    Time frame: Baseline Assessment

  2. Barthel Index Score

    Time frame: Baseline Assessment

  3. Modified Ashworth Scale

    Time frame: Baseline Assessment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Elsner B, Kugler J, Pohl M, Mehrholz J. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 11;11(11):CD009645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009645.pub4. PubMed 33175411 ↗

Related links

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 21, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00542256
Lead sponsor
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Responsible party
Felipe Fregni (Study Principal Investigator, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 11, 2007
Start date
Sep 2007
Primary completion
Nov 10, 2014
Completion
Nov 10, 2014
Last update
Mar 21, 2017

Study contacts

Felipe Fregni, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion