A Phase 3 interventional study of FluBlok Influenza Vaccination and TIV (Fluzone) Influenza Vaccination in Influenza, sponsored by Protein Sciences Corporation. Completed at 5 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 64 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-07-27.
Sponsored by Protein Sciences Corporation · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the safety, reactogenicity, immunogenicity, relative efficacy and effectiveness of FluBlok to a licensed trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV)in healthy adults age 50-64 years.
Annual influenza epidemics are associated with serious excess morbidity and mortality, particularly among the elderly. Licensed trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines (TIVs) have been shown to reduce hospitalization and death following influenza in this vulnerable population, but their efficacy is lower than that observed in younger, healthy populations. In addition, recent studies have questioned the level of effectiveness of TIV in the elderly, suggesting that cohort studies have overestimated the benefits of immunization with current TIV formulations in this age group. In view of these considerations, it is widely accepted that improved and alternative vaccines are needed for control of seasonal and pandemic influenza.
Currently available TIVs are prepared from viruses that are grown in embryonated hens' eggs. Alternative substrates for vaccine production are desirable in order to reduce the vulnerability of and to expand influenza vaccine supply. Recombinant DNA techniques allow for expression of the influenza hemagglutinin (rHA) by baculovirus vectors in insect cell cultures. Advantages of this technique include speed of production, absence of egg protein, and a highly purified product. Previous studies among healthy younger and older adults have confirmed that rHA vaccines are safe, well tolerated and immunogenic at dosages up to nine times higher than those contained in TIV. Dose-related increases in serum antibody levels after immunization also were observed.
2,214 studies on the registry are indexed under Influenza, Human; 164 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 602 is above the median of 238 across 1,853 interventional studies indexed under Influenza, Human.
Browse Influenza, Human studies →Protein Sciences Corporation is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Recombinant Trivalent Hemagglutinin Influenza Vaccine: 2007-2008 formulation containing 45μg of each hemagglutinin derived from A/Solomon Islands/03/2006 (H1N1), A/Wisconsin/67/2005 (H3N2), and B/Malaysia/2506/2004 135μg total
Biological: FluBlok Influenza Vaccination
Licensed Trivalent Influenza Vaccine (TIV): 2007-2008 formulation containing 15μg of each hemagglutinin derived from A/Solomon Islands/03/2006 (H1N1), A/Wisconsin/67/2005 (H3N2), and B/Malaysia/2506/2004 45μg total (Fluzone, sanofi pasteur)
Biological: TIV (Fluzone) Influenza Vaccination
0.5mL dose for intramuscular injection
Also known as: FluBlok, rHA, rHA0, recombinant hemagglutinin
0.5mL dose for intramuscular injection
Also known as: Fluzone, TIV
Number of Participants With Reactogenicity (Solicited) Adverse Events (AEs)
Solicited reactogenicity events included injection site pain, bruising, erythema and swelling. Solicited systemic AEs included fatigue, chills, arthralgias, myalgias, headache and nausea.
Time frame: Reactogenicity days 0-7 following immunization; other AEs days 0-28 following immunization
Evaluation and Comparison of Immunogenicity of FluBlok and TIV in Healthy Adults 50-64 Years of Age.
Immunogenicity was assessed by measuring the difference in values in Hemagglutination-Inhibition Assay (HAI) titers in participants from Day 0 to Day 28, using Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs). The GMTs from the FluBlok and TIV groups were then compared.
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 28
Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion
Percentage of participants with greater than or equal to a 4-fold rise in Hemagglutination-Inhibition Assay (HAI) titer over Day 0 at Day 28 following immunization
Time frame: Day 28 following immunization at Day 0
Percentage of Participants With Seroprotection
Percentage of participants with (HAI titer greater than or equal to 40) at Day 28
Time frame: Day 28 following immunization at Day 0
Subjects 50 - \<64 years of age were screened in participating outpatient clinics for eligibility within 30 days of randomization during the 2007 influenza season.
| Milestone | FluBlok | TIV (Fluzone) |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 300 | 302 |
| Completed | 299 | 300 |
| Not completed | 1 | 2 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 0 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 1 | 1 |
Immunogenicity was assessed by measuring the difference in values in Hemagglutination-Inhibition Assay (HAI) titers in participants from Day 0 to Day 28, using Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs). The GMTs from the FluBlok and TIV groups were then compared.
| HAI Titers | FluBlok | TIV (Fluzone) |
|---|---|---|
| A/Solomon Islands (H1N1) - Day 0 | 28.71 (25.59 to 32.21) | 27.77 (25.07 to 30.76) |
| A/Solomon Islands (H1N1) - Day 28 | 181.34 (159.61 to 206.02) | 139.74 (124.64 to 156.66) |
| A/Wisconsin (H3N2) - Day 0 | 18.57 (16.37 to 21.06) | 18.20 (16.07 to 20.62) |
| A/Wisconsin (H3N2) - Day 28 | 105.41 (91.01 to 122.09) | 60.88 (53.58 to 69.18) |
| B/Malaysia - Day 0 | 48.49 (43.38 to 54.19) | 49.18 (43.77 to 55.25) |
| B/Malaysia - Day 28 | 110.93 (100.07 to 122.97) | 116.03 (104.16 to 129.25) |
Solicited reactogenicity events included injection site pain, bruising, erythema and swelling. Solicited systemic AEs included fatigue, chills, arthralgias, myalgias, headache and nausea.
| participants | FluBlok | TIV (Fluzone) |
|---|---|---|
| Fatigue | 40 | 62 |
| Chills | 12 | 15 |
| Arthralgias | 15 | 19 |
| Myalgia | 40 | 63 |
| Headache | 59 | 63 |
| Nausea | 13 | 15 |
| Injection Site Pain | 154 | 165 |
| Injection Site Bruising | 16 | 14 |
| Injection Site Erythema | 24 | 25 |
| Injection Site Swelling | 25 | 30 |
Percentage of participants with greater than or equal to a 4-fold rise in Hemagglutination-Inhibition Assay (HAI) titer over Day 0 at Day 28 following immunization
| Percentage of participants | FluBlok | TIV (Fluzone) |
|---|---|---|
| A/Solomon Islands (H1N1) | 72 (66.8 to 77.2) | 66 (60.6 to 71.5) |
| A/Wisconsin (H3N2) | 61 (55.4 to 66.8) | 44 (38.0 to 69.2) |
| B/Malaysia | 41 (35.2 to 46.6) | 41 (35.5 to 46.8) |
Percentage of participants with (HAI titer greater than or equal to 40) at Day 28
| Percentage of participants | FluBlok | TIV (Fluzone) |
|---|---|---|
| Influenza A/Solomon Islands (H1N1) | 96 (93.5 to 98.1) | 96 (92.8 to 97.7) |
| Influenza A/Wisconsin (H3N2) | 85 (80.8 to 89.1) | 75 (69.9 to 79.9) |
| Influenza B/Malaysia | 93 (89.5 to 95.6) | 94 (91.1 to 96.7) |
Collected over All AEs - 28 days following immunization; SAEs for duration of influenza season.. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| FluBlok | — | 1/300 (0.3%) | 4/300 (1.3%) |
| TIV (Fluzone) | — | 0/302 (0%) | 9/302 (3%) |
| Event | FluBlok | TIV (Fluzone) |
|---|---|---|
| Vasovagal SyncopeCardiac disorders | 1/300 | 0/302 |
| Event | FluBlok | TIV (Fluzone) |
|---|---|---|
| Pharyngolaryngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 4/300 | 9/302 |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | FluBlok | TIV (Fluzone) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 300 | 302 | 602 |
| >=65 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Age Continuous(years) | FluBlok | TIV (Fluzone) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 55.9 ± 3.71 | 55.7 ± 3.64 | 55.8 ± 3.67 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | FluBlok | TIV (Fluzone) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 187 | 192 | 379 |
| Male | 113 | 110 | 223 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | FluBlok | TIV (Fluzone) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 300 | 302 | 602 |
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Protein Sciences Corporation