CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00526188Updated May 1, 2015Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of Primovist in Chinese Patients

A Phase 3 interventional study of Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Primovist, BAY86-4873) in Known or Suspected Focal Liver Lesions, sponsored by Bayer. Completed at 6 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-05-01.

Sponsored by Bayer · Phase 3, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
234
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Participants who had been diagnosed or suspected by doctors to have focal liver lesions that need further evaluation in order to make an accurate diagnosis. Participants would need to have an enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan so that doctors could have further information about the number and characteristics of the focal liver lesions.

Participants were invited to take part in this clinical study. The purpose of this study was to evaluate Primovist, which is a liver-specific MRI contrast medium, on the efficacy of lesion detection and characterization, and tolerability in Chinese patients with known or suspected focal liver lesions.

Primovist, the investigational drug in this study, is a liver-specific MRI contrast medium developed by Bayer Schering Pharma AG. Its active substance is Gd-EOB-DTPA. Primovist was first approved in 2004 in Sweden followed by an approval in the European community, in Switzerland and Australia in the same year.

Procedures:

Before entry into the study and after entry of the study a physical examination was conducted, blood pressure and heart rate were measured, blood and urine samples were taken. Current medications and medical conditions (including suspected pregnancy) and medical and surgical history were elicited by doctors.

After entry into the study, participants were scheduled to have an MRI examination, which lasted about 25-35 minutes.

During the MRI examination, an initial MRI scan without contrast was acquired which followed by another MRI series after the intravenous administration of Primovist.

The following day participants were asked to return to the hospital for a follow-up safety evaluation.

Possible Benefit Participants were scheduled to receive an enhanced magnetic resonance imaging scan. Clinical studies indicated that Primovist increased the efficacy of detection and characterization of focal liver lesions by providing better contrast between the focal liver lesions and surrounding normal tissue. Primovist were shown to provide additional information regarding existence, number and characterization (lesion or non-lesion, malignant or benign) of these abnormalities.

Based on the experience with patients given Primovist, some adverse reactions were observed.

Most of undesirable effects were transient and of mild to moderate intensity. The most commonly noted adverse events (AEs) in subjects receiving Primovist for MRI were nausea and headache with an incidence of 1.1%. Other AEs that occurred in 0.5% of the subject population were feeling hot (0.8%), back pain (0.6%) and dizziness (0.5%).

All other AEs occurred in less than 0.5% of the patients, e.g. anxiety; coughing; eye disorder; fever; flatulence; generalized spasm; hypertension; injection site symptoms including edema, inflammation, and reaction; lightheadedness; parosmia; postural hypotension; taste perversion, motoric unrest; acute respiratory distress; fatigue; malaise; vomiting; palpitations, erythema, chest pain and back pain.

Coldness, warmth or pain at the injection site, injection site reaction, and injection site accumulation of fluid were rare. In very rare cases strong allergy-like reactions ranging to shock may occur.

Post-marketing tachycardia and restlessness have been reported. As in the case of other investigational drugs, there may also be unforeseen side effects.

Additional information concerning all Gadolinium- based contrast agents Primovist contains the rare earth metal gadolinium as active ingredient. There have been reports of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) associated with use of some gadolinium-containing contrast agents (especially Omniscan) in patients with severe renal impairment. NSF is a systemic disease characterised by formation of connective tissue in the skin, which becomes thickened and hard, sometimes leading to contractures and joint immobility. The clinical course is usually progressive and currently no treatment is available. To date NSF has only been reported in association with some Gd-containing contrast agents, but the role of these contrast agents in the overall pathogenesis of the disease is still not completely understood.

No reports of patients with NSF after administration of Primovist® are known. The risk to trigger NSF in risk patients with severe renal impairment is considered to be low for Primovist® due to the low dose given and the additional excretion via feces. Furthermore the participation of patients with severe renal impairment are excluded from this study.

In case the participants were suffering from renal insufficiency, they were told to tell their doctors prior to application of the contrast agent. In case the participants experienced any new alterations of the skin following the administration of the contrast agent, they were told to contact their doctors as soon as possible after they had recognized these symptoms.

Read the detailed description

Adult Chinese patients with known focal or suspected liver lesions, referred for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for further diagnostic work-up, who have undergone or are scheduled to undergo a defined SOR procedure, within one month before or after the study MRI.

The data for the Secondary Outcome Measure "Lesion size and location" has been documented but not analyzed. The data for the Secondary Outcome Measure "Safety" are reflected in the Adverse Event section.

02

Conditions studied

  • Known or Suspected Focal Liver Lesions

Keywords

  • Primovist
  • Chinese patients
  • Liver MRI
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Bayer is the lead sponsor of 1,643 studies on the registry; 57 are open to participants now.

Of its 209 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 129 (62%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients between 18 and 75 years of age inclusive.
  • Patients (men or women) with at least one focal liver lesion, either identified or suspected by ultrasound (US), Computed Tomography (CT)/spiral-CT, conventional angiography, CT-angiography (CTA), CT-arterioportography (CTAP) or unenhanced / contrast-enhanced MRI* within 2 months before entering the study

For reference, the following pathologies will meet the definition of 'focal liver lesions':

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Cholangiole carcinoma
  • Metastasis
  • Focal lymphoma
  • Adenoma
  • Focal nodular hyperplasia
  • Hemangioma
  • Abscess
  • Focal liver fibrosis
  • Regenerative nodules
  • Focal fatty infiltration
  • Hydatid cyst
  • Liver cyst
  • Focal sparing in fatty liver
  • Others
  • Patients willing to undergo study procedures including safety follow-up
  • Patients who have undergone or who are scheduled to undergo the defined procedure for SOR within one month before or after the study MRI
  • Women of child-bearing potential with negative urine pregnancy test result within 24 hours before contrast medium (CM) injection
  • Patients who are fully informed about the study and have signed the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have previously entered this study
  • Patients who have received any contrast material within 24 hours before injection with study drug, or who are scheduled to receive any contrast material within 24 hours after injection
  • Patients who are, or suspected to be, nursing
  • Patients who require emergency treatment
  • Patients with severely impaired hepatic or renal functions (e.g. serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) twice the upper limit of reference range, acute renal failure)
  • Patients who are clinically unstable and whose clinical course during the observation period is unpredictable (e.g. due to previous surgery, acute myocardial infarction)
  • Patients with any physical or mental status that interferes with the signing of informed consent
  • Patients with known anaphylactoid or anaphylactic reaction to any contrast media or hypersensitivity to any allergen including drugs
  • Patients with a contraindication for MRI
  • Patients who are scheduled for liver biopsy/surgery or other surgeries within 24 hours after injection with contrast media, or who would have a biopsy within 24 hours before planned injection with contrast media
  • Patients who are likely to have any therapy or change in therapy between the study MRI and the procedures for the SOR
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
234 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Primovist, BAY86-4873)

    Bolus injection of 0.025 mmol/kg body weight (0.1 ml/kg BW) of Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Primovist, BAY86-4873). Single i.v. injection during MRI procedure, with one contrast-enhanced MRI procedure per patient

    Drug: Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Primovist, BAY86-4873)

Interventions

  • DrugGadoxetic Acid Disodium (Primovist, BAY86-4873)

    Bolus injection of 0.025 mmol/kg body weight (0.1 ml/kg BW) of Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Primovist, BAY86-4873). Single i.v. injection during MRI procedure, with one contrast-enhanced MRI procedure per patient

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in Sensitivity of Lesion Detection in MRI Images (Post-contrast MRI Minus Pre-contrast MRI) Measured as Percentage Points

    Three Blinded Readers performed lesion detection in pre- and post-contrast MRI image sets. Per Blinded Reader/image set combination, sensitivity of lesion detection was calculated, as: (number of lesions detected in the reader/image set combination)/(number of lesions in Standard of Reference)\*100%. Then, difference in sensitivity of lesion detection for post- minus pre-contrast MRI images (in percentage points) was calculated for each Blinded Reader.

    Time frame: Post administration assessment of study images (i.e. on the same day of treatment by the investigators and at the end of patient enrollment of the study from 29 September to 18 November 2008 by the Blinded Readers).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in Sensitivity of Lesion Detection in MRI Images (Post-contrast MRI Minus Pre-contrast MRI) Assessed by Investigators Measured in Percentage Points

    The on-site investigators performed lesion detection in pre- and post-contrast MRI image sets. Per image set, sensitivity of lesion detection was calculated, as: (number of lesions detected in image set)/(number of lesions in Standard of Reference)\*100%. Then, difference in sensitivity of lesion detection for post- minus pre-contrast MRI (in percentage points) was calculated.

    Time frame: Post administration assessment of study images (i.e. on the same day of treatment by the investigators and at the end of patient enrollment of the study from 29 September to 18 November 2008 by the Blinded Readers).

  2. Difference in Precision of Lesion Characterization (Combined Pre- and Post-contrast Minus Pre-contrast MRI) Measured in Percentage Points

    Three Blinded Reader performed lesion characterization in pre- and combined pre-/post-contrast MRI image set. Per Blinded Reader/image set combination, precision of lesion characterization was calculated: (number of unique Standard of Reference-matched characterizations detected for the Reader/image set combination)/(number of unique lesion characterizations in Standard of Reference)\*100%. Then, difference in precision of lesion characterization for post- minus combined pre-/post-contrast MRI (in percentage points) was calculated for each Blinded Reader.

    Time frame: Post administration assessment of study images (i.e. on the same day of treatment by the investigators and at the end of patient enrollment of the study from 29 September to 18 November 2008 by the Blinded Readers).

07

Results

Posted Dec 30, 2009

Participant flow

The recruitment period was 20 Aug 2007 to 30 Aug 2008.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGadoxetic Acid Disodium (Primovist, BAY86-4873)
Started234
Completed234
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryDifference in Sensitivity of Lesion Detection in MRI Images (Post-contrast MRI Minus Pre-contrast MRI) Measured as Percentage Points

Three Blinded Readers performed lesion detection in pre- and post-contrast MRI image sets. Per Blinded Reader/image set combination, sensitivity of lesion detection was calculated, as: (number of lesions detected in the reader/image set combination)/(number of lesions in Standard of Reference)\*100%. Then, difference in sensitivity of lesion detection for post- minus pre-contrast MRI images (in percentage points) was calculated for each Blinded Reader.

Time frame:
Post administration assessment of study images (i.e. on the same day of treatment by the investigators and at the end of patient enrollment of the study from 29 September to 18 November 2008 by the Blinded Readers).
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage points
Difference in Sensitivity of Lesion Detection in MRI Images (Post-contrast MRI Minus Pre-contrast MRI) Measured as Percentage Points
Percentage pointsGadoxetic Acid Disodium (Primovist, BAY86-4873)
BR 1: Dif. in sens. post- minus pre-contrast MRI8.65 (4.82 to 12.47)
BR 2: Dif. in sens. post- minus pre-contrast MRI12.23 (7.60 to 16.87)
BR 3: Dif. in sens. post- minus pre-contrast MRI7.50 (2.84 to 12.17)
Statistical analysis
  • Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Primovist, BAY86-4873) · Test performed based on the 95% CI · Mean difference (final values): 9.46 · 95% CI 6.00 to 12.93Comparison was post-contrast MRI minus pre-contrast MRI
SecondaryDifference in Sensitivity of Lesion Detection in MRI Images (Post-contrast MRI Minus Pre-contrast MRI) Assessed by Investigators Measured in Percentage Points

The on-site investigators performed lesion detection in pre- and post-contrast MRI image sets. Per image set, sensitivity of lesion detection was calculated, as: (number of lesions detected in image set)/(number of lesions in Standard of Reference)\*100%. Then, difference in sensitivity of lesion detection for post- minus pre-contrast MRI (in percentage points) was calculated.

Time frame:
Post administration assessment of study images (i.e. on the same day of treatment by the investigators and at the end of patient enrollment of the study from 29 September to 18 November 2008 by the Blinded Readers).
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage points
Difference in Sensitivity of Lesion Detection in MRI Images (Post-contrast MRI Minus Pre-contrast MRI) Assessed by Investigators Measured in Percentage Points
Percentage pointsGadoxetic Acid Disodium (Primovist, BAY86-4873)
Difference in Sensitivity of Lesion Detection in MRI Images (Post-contrast MRI Minus Pre-contrast MRI) Assessed by Investigators Measured in Percentage Points4.81 (1.84 to 7.78)
Statistical analysis
  • Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Primovist, BAY86-4873) · Test performed based on the 95% CI · Mean difference (final values): 4.81 · 95% CI 1.84 to 7.78Comparison was post-contrast MRI minus pre-contrast MRI (for investigator's result)
SecondaryDifference in Precision of Lesion Characterization (Combined Pre- and Post-contrast Minus Pre-contrast MRI) Measured in Percentage Points

Three Blinded Reader performed lesion characterization in pre- and combined pre-/post-contrast MRI image set. Per Blinded Reader/image set combination, precision of lesion characterization was calculated: (number of unique Standard of Reference-matched characterizations detected for the Reader/image set combination)/(number of unique lesion characterizations in Standard of Reference)\*100%. Then, difference in precision of lesion characterization for post- minus combined pre-/post-contrast MRI (in percentage points) was calculated for each Blinded Reader.

Time frame:
Post administration assessment of study images (i.e. on the same day of treatment by the investigators and at the end of patient enrollment of the study from 29 September to 18 November 2008 by the Blinded Readers).
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage points
Difference in Precision of Lesion Characterization (Combined Pre- and Post-contrast Minus Pre-contrast MRI) Measured in Percentage Points
Percentage pointsGadoxetic Acid Disodium (Primovist, BAY86-4873)
BR1: Dif. in prec. pre-/post- minus pre-contrast13.64 (7.80 to 19.47)
BR2: Dif. in prec. pre-/post- minus pre-contrast9.55 (3.13 to 15.96)
BR3: Dif. in prec. pre-/post- minus pre-contrast10.91 (5.32 to 16.50)
Statistical analysis
  • Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Primovist, BAY86-4873) · Test performed based on the 95% CI · Mean difference (final values): 11.36 · 95% CI 7.45 to 15.28Comparison was combined pre- and post-contrast MRI minus pre-contrast MRI

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Primovist, BAY86-4873)—0/234 (0%)20/234 (8.5%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 13
Most frequent other events
EventGadoxetic Acid Disodium (Primovist, BAY86-4873)
HypertensionVascular disorders4/234
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increasedInvestigations3/234
Blood bilirubin increasedInvestigations3/234
HypotensionVascular disorders2/234
Blood glucose increasedInvestigations2/234
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders2/234
White blood cell count decreasedInvestigations2/234
Blood pressure systolic increasedInvestigations1/234
Blood pressure diastolic increasedInvestigations1/234
Injection site painGeneral disorders1/234

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Primovist, BAY86-4873)
Mean50.2 ± 11.78
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Primovist, BAY86-4873)
Female79
Male155
Characterization of first liver lesion type of referral diagnosis
Characterization of first liver lesion type of referral diagnosis(participants)Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Primovist, BAY86-4873)
Hepatocellular carcinoma47
Cholangiocarcinoma1
Metastasis58
Focal nodular hyperplasia14
Hemangioma42
Abscess2
Focal fatty infiltration1
Liver cyst13
Inflammation1
Harmatoma1
Infection1
Inflammatory pseudotumor2
Not assessable51
Characterization of second liver lesion type of referral diagnosis
Characterization of second liver lesion type of referral diagnosis(participants)Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Primovist, BAY86-4873)
No second liver lesion type191
Hepatocellular carcinoma3
Metastasis5
Hemangioma7
Hydatid cyst1
Liver cyst23
Calcification1
Inflammatory pseudotumor1
Not assessable2
Characterization of third liver lesion type of referral diagnosis
Characterization of third liver lesion type of referral diagnosis(participants)Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Primovist, BAY86-4873)
No third liver lesion type231
Hemangioma1
Liver cyst1
Calcification1
08

Study locations

6 sites
  • Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China
  • Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, China
  • Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China
  • Beijing, 100853, China
  • Shanghai, 200032, China
  • Shanghai, 200433, China
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Zeng MS, Ye HY, Guo L, Peng WJ, Lu JP, Teng GJ, Huan Y, Li P, Xu JR, Liang CH, Breuer J. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for focal liver lesions in Chinese patients: a multicenter, open-label, phase III study. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2013 Dec;12(6):607-16. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(13)60096-x. PubMed 24322746 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 1, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00526188
Lead sponsor
Bayer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 10, 2007
Start date
Aug 2007
Primary completion
Aug 2008
Completion
Aug 2008
Results posted
Dec 30, 2009
Last update
May 1, 2015

Study contacts

Bayer Study Director
study director · Bayer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion