CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00502242Updated Aug 27, 2014Results posted

Study Evaluating The Effect Of Ramipril On Urinary Protein Excretion In Renal Transplant Patients Converted To Sirolimus

A Phase 4 interventional study of ramipril and ramipril in Kidney Transplant, sponsored by Pfizer. Completed at 50 sites in 12 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-08-27.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
229
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of the study is to determine the efficacy of ramipril in preventing a urinary protein to creatinine ratio (U p/c) greater than 0.5 following conversion to sirolimus from a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) in maintenance kidney transplant patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Kidney Transplant
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,244 studies on the registry; 139 are open to participants now.

Of its 582 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 381 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Receiving cyclosporine (CsA) or tacrolimus (TAC) since the first month post-transplant.
  • In addition to a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), subjects must be treated with either corticosteroids at a dosage range of 2.5 to 15 mg/day for prednisone or prednisolone (2 to 12mg/day for methylprednisolone or the alternate day equivalent) or a steroid-free regimen for a minimum of 12 weeks before randomization or either MMF (>/=500mg/day), mycophenolate sodium (MPS) (>/=360 mg/day) or AZA (>/=50mg/day). Subjects must be taking a minimum of 2 immunosuppressive drugs if on a steroid-free regimen.
  • Subject is 3 to 60 months after renal transplantation.
  • Subject is greater than 12 weeks after treatment for any acute rejection.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who are currently receiving, or have received within 4 weeks before enrollment, RAAS blockade.
  • Subjects with a calculated GFR \< 40mL/min (per the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD-7] or abbreviated MDRD formula).
  • Subjects with a urine protein to creatinine ratio (U p/c) of >0.3.
  • Subjects with a history of uncontrolled systolic blood pressure (SBP >140 mm Hg).
  • Subjects with severe hepatic impairment (Grade C Child-Pugh score). Additional Inclusion / Exclusion Criteria apply.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
229 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    A

    Capsule - initial treatment is 5 mg (active)- oral - once per day

    Drug: ramipril

  • Placebo comparator
    B

    Capsule - initial treatment is 5 mg (placebo) - oral - once per day

    Drug: ramipril

Interventions

  • Drugramipril

    Capsule - initial treatment is 5 mg (active)- oral - once per day

  • Drugramipril

    Capsule - initial treatment is 5 mg (placebo) - oral - once per day

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Had Initiated Losartan Therapy at 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL

    The event for each participant was defined as the initiation of losartan while on SRL and ramipril/placebo combination therapy. Participants who started losartan prior to SRL administration were not counted as events. Percentage was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method for time to event data.

    Time frame: From Day 1 of SRL conversion to 52 weeks after conversion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Had a Dose Escalation in Randomized Test Article (Ramipril or Placebo) by 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL

    Defined as the time from the first dose of SRL administration to the first dose escalation of randomized test article (ramipril or placebo; in weeks), or censored on the day that a participant stopped the combination of SRL and randomized test article (ramipril or placebo) if the participants did not experience any ramipril/placebo dose escalation following conversion to SRL. Dose-escalation was defined as an increase in total daily dose of ramipril/placebo compared to Day 1 post conversion. Percentage was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method for time to event data.

    Time frame: From Day 1 of SRL conversion to 52 weeks after conversion

  2. Percentage of Participants With U p/c <0.5 at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to Sirolimus

    Spot urine sample of protein and creatinine concentrations were obtained during the pre-SRL conversion period and after conversion.

    Time frame: 24 weeks and 52 weeks after conversion

  3. Percentage of Participants With Urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio (U Alb/c) <0.5 at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL

    Spot urine sample of albumin and creatinine concentrations were obtained during the pre-SRL conversion period and after conversion.

    Time frame: 24 weeks and 52 weeks after conversion

  4. Percentage of Participants With Both U Alb/c <0.5 and U p/c <0.5 at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL

    The U alb/c and U p/c must have been collected on the same day to be counted as the numerator.

    Time frame: 24 weeks and 52 weeks after conversion

  5. U p/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL

    U p/c was measured in milligrams per milligram (mg/mg). The baseline U p/c values were the last values of the pre-SRL conversion period.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 weeks after conversion

  6. U Alb/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL

    U alb/c was measured in mg/mg. Baseline U alb/c values were the last values of the pre-SRL conversion period.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 weeks after conversion

  7. Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued SRL Therapy at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL

    Defined as the percentage of participants who stop SRL (as test article) between the first day of SRL and either Week 24 or Week 52 following conversion to SRL. If a participant had a \>14 day gap in SRL use, the stop date of SRL was the date of the last SRL use before it was re-initiated. Participants who early terminate SRL at Week 24 were defined as having SRL stop day less than or equal to (≤) Day 190 (selected as the midpoint between Weeks 24 and 30). Participants who early terminate SRL at Week 52 were defined as having SRL stop day ≤Day 337 (selected as the midpoint between Weeks 44 and 52).

    Time frame: 24 weeks and 52 weeks after conversion

  8. Abbreviated Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Weeks 12, 24, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL

    Calculated in millimeters per minute per 1.73 square meters (mL/min/1.73m\^2). Age and corresponding creatinine at each visit (Weeks 12, 24, and 52) were used to calculate GFR.

    Time frame: 12, 24, and 52 weeks following conversion

  9. Fraction of Albumin (Milligrams Per Deciliter [mg/dL]) to Protein (mg/dL) in Urine at 24 and 52 Weeks After Conversion to SRL

    Baseline fraction was the last value of the pre-SRL conversion period. Only the last value of U p/c or U alb/c was used for analysis if multiple measurements occurred in the same data anlysis interval. Fraction of albumin and protein was calculated only when urine protein was 6.2 mg/dL or higher. For urine albumin, if the value was reported as '\<xx.x', the numerical portion of the value was used in the calculation of fraction of albumin and protein.

    Time frame: 24 weeks and 52 weeks after conversion

  10. Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Blood Pressure (BP) Values by Diastolic and Systolic BP Category

    BP values of potential clinical importance were recorded and categorized as follows: diastolic BP (DBP) ≤50 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) or ≥110 mmHg and systolic BP (SBP) ≤90 mmHg and ≥180 mmHg. Data were summarized for the on-therapy period and the off-therapy period and for the pre-SRL period.

    Time frame: Baseline, Pre-SRL (from first dose of ramipril/placebo up to SRL conversion), On-Therapy (up to 52 weeks after SRL conversion), and Off-Therapy Period (up to 56 weeks after SRL conversion)

  11. SRL Time-Normalized Trough Concentration (Cmin,TN) by Time Interval

    Cmin,TN was determined for SRL using the area method for the intervals: 0-2 weeks, \>2-4 weeks, \>4-12 weeks, \>12-24 weeks, \>24-36 weeks and \>36-52 weeks using the equation:Cmin,TN = AUCi-j/timej-timeiwhere AUC is the area under the concentration-time curve, i is the beginning of the interval and j is the end of the interval. Cmin,TN was calculated for participants who did not dropout of studies, but were missing concentrations at the interval endpoints by carrying the last observed concentration forward to the interval endpoint.

    Time frame: From Day 1 of SRL conversion to 52 weeks after conversion

  12. Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Levels ≤100 Grams Per Liter (g/L)

    Time frame: Baseline, Pre-SRL (from first dose of ramipril/placebo up to SRL conversion), On-Therapy (up to 52 weeks after SRL conversion), and Off-Therapy Period (up to 56 weeks after SRL conversion)

  13. Percentage of Participants Using Red Blood Cell Production Stimulants (Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents [ESAs])

    Time frame: Baseline, Pre-SRL (from first dose of ramipril/placebo up to SRL conversion), On-Therapy (up to 52 weeks after SRL conversion), and Off-Therapy Period (up to 56 weeks after SRL conversion)

  14. Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Parameters (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at 4, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL

    Parameters assessed included (all fasting) total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-densitylipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C).

    Time frame: 4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks after conversion

  15. Biopsy-Confirmed Acute Rejection (BCAR) - Number of Participants With an Event

    BCAR was defined according to updated Banff criteria (1997)for renal allograft rejection. The time to the first BCAR was defined as the date of first BCAR to the date of the first dose of SRL (in weeks). Participants without BCAR were censored at the time of withdrawal from the study.

    Time frame: From Day 1 of SRL conversion to 52 weeks after conversion

  16. Percentage of Participants With First BCAR at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL

    BCAR was defined according to updated Banff criteria (1997)for renal allograft rejection. Participants without BCAR were censored at the time of withdrawal from the study. Defined as the first BCAR occurring on therapy following conversion to SRL based on the mITT population. Time to first BCAR was defined as the date of first BCAR to date of the first dose of SRL (in weeks). Percentages were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for time to event data.

    Time frame: 24 weeks and 52 weeks after conversion

  17. Number of Participants With BCAR by Severity of First BCAR

    Severity was summarized by type (antibody versus T-cell) and by phase: post-SRL (where both on-therapy and off-therapy events are included) and post-SRL (on-therapy). BCAR was categorized using Banff criteria as antibody-mediated (AM) or T-cell. AM BCAR severity was graded as Grade I (mild), Grade II (moderate \[mod\]), and Grade III (severe). T-cell BCAR severity was graded as 'Grade Ia, Ib (mild), Grade IIa, IIb (mod), and Grade III (severe). If a participant had both T-cell BCAR and antibody-mediated BCAR on the first rejection, the participant was counted in each category. For participants with T-cell BCAR (post-SRL and post-SRL On -Therapy) the p-value could not be calculated and all events were mild in severity.

    Time frame: From Day 1 of SRL conversion to 52 weeks after conversion

  18. Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL

    Graft loss was defined as physical loss (nephrectomy orretransplantation), functional loss (requiring dialysis for ≥56days with no return of graft function), or death.

    Time frame: 24 weeks and 52 weeks after conversion

  19. Percentage of Participants Using Statins

    Time frame: Baseline, Pre-SRL (from first dose of ramipril/placebo up to SRL conversion), On-Therapy (up to 52 weeks after SRL conversion), and Off-Therapy Period (up to 56 weeks after SRL conversion)

  20. Percentage of Participants With an Infection

    Includes treatment-emergent adverse events based on categorization by the investigator as 'infection', regardless of the event preferred term in Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA.)

    Time frame: From Day 1 of Ramipril/Placebo to 52 weeks after SRL conversion

  21. Percentage of Participants With Angioedema

    Includes treatment-emergent adverse events based on categorization by the investigator as angioedema, regardless of the event preferred term in MedDRA.

    Time frame: From Day 1 of Ramipril/Placebo to 52 weeks after SRL conversion

  22. Percentage of Participants With Malignancy

    Includes treatment-emergent adverse events based on categorization by the investigator as 'malignancy', regardless of the event preferredterm in MedDRA.

    Time frame: From Day 1 of Ramipril/Placebo to 52 weeks after SRL conversion

  23. Percentage of Participants With Hyperkalemia

    Hyperkalemia defined as serum potassium \>5.6 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)

    Time frame: Baseline, Pre-SRL (from first dose of ramipril/placebo up to SRL conversion), On-Therapy (up to 52 weeks after SRL conversion), and Off-Therapy Period (up to 56 weeks after SRL conversion)

07

Results

Posted Aug 27, 2014

Participant flow

A Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double-Blind Comparative Study Evaluating the Effect of Ramipril on Urinary Protein Excretion in Maintenance Renal Transplant Patients Converted to Sirolimus.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRamiprilPlacebo
Started155140
Completed10484
Not completed5156
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy111
Withdrew: Adverse event3120
Withdrew: Physician decision23
Withdrew: Other - unspecified814
Withdrew: Protocol violation31
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject67

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Had Initiated Losartan Therapy at 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL

The event for each participant was defined as the initiation of losartan while on SRL and ramipril/placebo combination therapy. Participants who started losartan prior to SRL administration were not counted as events. Percentage was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method for time to event data.

Time frame:
From Day 1 of SRL conversion to 52 weeks after conversion
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Had Initiated Losartan Therapy at 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
percentage of participantsRamiprilPlacebo
Percentage of Participants Who Had Initiated Losartan Therapy at 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL6.2 (2.7 to 11.6)23.2 (15.7 to 31.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.0002 (2-sided p-value; alpha equals (=) 0.05) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.228 · 95% CI 0.099 to 0.528Stratified Cox proportional hazard model with region and race strata
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Had a Dose Escalation in Randomized Test Article (Ramipril or Placebo) by 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL

Defined as the time from the first dose of SRL administration to the first dose escalation of randomized test article (ramipril or placebo; in weeks), or censored on the day that a participant stopped the combination of SRL and randomized test article (ramipril or placebo) if the participants did not experience any ramipril/placebo dose escalation following conversion to SRL. Dose-escalation was defined as an increase in total daily dose of ramipril/placebo compared to Day 1 post conversion. Percentage was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method for time to event data.

Time frame:
From Day 1 of SRL conversion to 52 weeks after conversion
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Dose Escalation in Randomized Test Article (Ramipril or Placebo) by 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
percentage of participantsRamiprilPlacebo
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Dose Escalation in Randomized Test Article (Ramipril or Placebo) by 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL14.4 (8.7 to 21.3)29.2 (21.2 to 37.6)
Statistical analysis
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.0031 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.425 · 95% CI 0.237 to 0.763Stratified Cox proportional hazard model with region and race strata
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With U p/c <0.5 at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to Sirolimus

Spot urine sample of protein and creatinine concentrations were obtained during the pre-SRL conversion period and after conversion.

Time frame:
24 weeks and 52 weeks after conversion
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With U p/c <0.5 at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to Sirolimus
percentage of participantsRamiprilPlacebo
Up to 24 weeks post-conversion92.077.8
Up to 52 weeks post-conversion82.673.0
Statistical analysis
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.002 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.074 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio (U Alb/c) <0.5 at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL

Spot urine sample of albumin and creatinine concentrations were obtained during the pre-SRL conversion period and after conversion.

Time frame:
24 weeks and 52 weeks after conversion
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio (U Alb/c) <0.5 at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
percentage of participantsRamiprilPlacebo
Up to 24 weeks post-conversion95.789.7
Up to 52 weeks post-conversion88.482.5
Statistical analysis
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.093 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.219 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Both U Alb/c <0.5 and U p/c <0.5 at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL

The U alb/c and U p/c must have been collected on the same day to be counted as the numerator.

Time frame:
24 weeks and 52 weeks after conversion
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Both U Alb/c <0.5 and U p/c <0.5 at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
percentage of participantsRamiprilPlacebo
Up to 24 weeks post-conversion91.377.0
Up to 52 weeks post-conversion79.070.6
Statistical analysis
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.002 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.121 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
SecondaryU p/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL

U p/c was measured in milligrams per milligram (mg/mg). The baseline U p/c values were the last values of the pre-SRL conversion period.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 weeks after conversion
Reported as:
Mean · mg/mg
U p/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
mg/mgRamiprilPlacebo
Baseline (n=138,126)0.17 ± 0.370.15 ± 0.07
Week 3 (n=130,117)0.18 ± 0.110.23 ± 0.19
Week 4 (n=136,124)0.18 ± 0.090.28 ± 0.27
Week 8 (n=130,119)0.23 ± 0.390.31 ± 0.37
Week 12 (n=124,121)0.23 ± 0.300.38 ± 1.18
Week 24 (n=121,122)0.26 ± 0.400.31 ± 0.39
Week 30 (n=111,108)0.23 ± 0.230.32 ± 0.37
Week 36 (n=109,92)0.22 ± 0.130.29 ± 0.30
Week 52 (n=126,111)0.27 ± 0.310.35 ± 0.43
Statistical analysis
  • Ramipril · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 1.16Adjusted for baseline
  • Placebo · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 1.36Adjusted for baseline
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0098 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Treatment ratio: 0.85 · 95% CI 0.76 to 0.96Treatment ratio (Ramipril/Placebo) in the geometric mean fold-change.
  • Ramipril · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 1.18Adjusted for baseline
  • Placebo · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 1.52Adjusted for baseline
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0003 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Treatment ratio: 0.78 · 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89Treatment ratio (Ramipril/Placebo) in the geometric mean fold-change.
  • Ramipril · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 1.27Adjusted for baseline
  • Placebo · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 1.61Adjusted for baseline
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0016 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Treatment ratio: 0.79 · 95% CI 0.68 to 0.91Treatment ratio (Ramipril/Placebo) in the geometric mean fold-change.
  • Ramipril · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 1.34Adjusted for baseline
  • Placebo · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 1.63Adjusted for baseline
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0165 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Treatment ratio: 0.82 · 95% CI 0.70 to 0.96Treatment ratio (Ramipril/Placebo) in the geometric mean fold-change.
  • Ramipril · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 1.48Adjusted for baseline
  • Placebo · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 1.78Adjusted for baseline
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0264 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Treatment ratio: 0.83 · 95% CI 0.70 to 0.98Treatment ratio (Ramipril/Placebo) in the geometric mean fold-change.
  • Ramipril · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 1.43Adjusted for baseline
  • Placebo · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 1.82Adjusted for baseline
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0062 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Treatment ratio: 0.79 · 95% CI 0.66 to 0.93Treatment ratio (Ramipril/Placebo) in the geometric mean fold-change.
  • Ramipril · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 1.40Adjusted for baseline
  • Placebo · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 1.67Adjusted for baseline
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0341 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Treatment ratio: 0.84 · 95% CI 0.72 to 0.99Treatment ratio (Ramipril/Placebo) in the geometric mean fold-change.
  • Ramipril · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 1.56Adjusted for baseline
  • Placebo · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 1.86Adjusted for baseline
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0600 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Treatment ratio: 0.84 · 95% CI 0.70 to 1.01Treatment ratio (Ramipril/Placebo) in the geometric mean fold-change.
SecondaryU Alb/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL

U alb/c was measured in mg/mg. Baseline U alb/c values were the last values of the pre-SRL conversion period.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 weeks after conversion
Reported as:
Mean · mg/mg
U Alb/c at Baseline and Weeks 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 30, 36, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
mg/mgRamiprilPlacebo
Baseline (n=138,126)0.04 ± 0.260.02 ± 0.02
Week 3 (n=129,117)0.03 ± 0.050.06 ± 0.11
Week 4 (n=136,124)0.03 ± 0.040.09 ± 0.16
Week 8 (n=129,119)0.06 ± 0.310.11 ± 0.24
Week 12 (n=124,121)0.05 ± 0.090.17 ± 0.84
Week 24 (n=121,122)0.08 ± 0.240.11 ± 0.28
Week 30 (n=111,108)0.06 ± 0.130.11 ± 0.21
Week 36 (n=109,92)0.05 ± 0.080.10 ± 0.21
Week 52 (n=126,111)0.09 ± 0.210.15 ± 0.31
Statistical analysis
  • Ramipril · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 1.46Adjusted for baseline
  • Placebo · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 2.05Adjusted for baseline
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0034 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Treatment ratio: 0.71 · 95% CI 0.57 to 0.89Treatment ratio (Ramipril/Placebo) in the geometric mean fold-change.
  • Ramipril · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 1.43Adjusted for baseline
  • Placebo · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 2.37Adjusted for baseline
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Treatment ratio: 0.60 · 95% CI 0.47 to 0.76Treatment ratio (Ramipril/Placebo) in the geometric mean fold-change.
  • Ramipril · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 1.67Adjusted for baseline
  • Placebo · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 2.74Adjusted for baseline
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0002 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Treatment ratio: 0.61 · 95% CI 0.47 to 0.79Treatment ratio (Ramipril/Placebo) in the geometric mean fold-change.
  • Ramipril · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 1.91Adjusted for baseline
  • Placebo · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 2.92Adjusted for baseline
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0032 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Treatment ratio: 0.65 · 95% CI 0.49 to 0.87Treatment ratio (Ramipril/Placebo) in the geometric mean fold-change.
  • Ramipril · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 2.33Adjusted for baseline
  • Placebo · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 3.39Adjusted for baseline
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0130 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Treatment ratio: 0.69 · 95% CI 0.51 to 0.92Treatment ratio (Ramipril/Placebo) in the geometric mean fold-change.
  • Ramipril · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 2.50Adjusted for baseline
  • Placebo · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 3.39Adjusted for baseline
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0577 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Treatment ratio: 0.74 · 95% CI 0.54 to 1.01Treatment ratio (Ramipril/Placebo) in the geometric mean fold-change.
  • Ramipril · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 2.52Adjusted for baseline
  • Placebo · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 3.27Adjusted for baseline
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.1146 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Treatment ratio: 0.77 · 95% CI 0.56 to 1.07Treatment ratio (Ramipril/Placebo) in the geometric mean fold-change.
  • Ramipril · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 2.92Adjusted for baseline
  • Placebo · Adjusted geometric mean fold change: 3.45Adjusted for baseline
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.3496 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Treatment ratio: 0.85 · 95% CI 0.60 to 1.20Treatment ratio (Ramipril/Placebo) in the geometric mean fold-change.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Discontinued SRL Therapy at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL

Defined as the percentage of participants who stop SRL (as test article) between the first day of SRL and either Week 24 or Week 52 following conversion to SRL. If a participant had a \>14 day gap in SRL use, the stop date of SRL was the date of the last SRL use before it was re-initiated. Participants who early terminate SRL at Week 24 were defined as having SRL stop day less than or equal to (≤) Day 190 (selected as the midpoint between Weeks 24 and 30). Participants who early terminate SRL at Week 52 were defined as having SRL stop day ≤Day 337 (selected as the midpoint between Weeks 44 and 52).

Time frame:
24 weeks and 52 weeks after conversion
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued SRL Therapy at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
percentage of participantsRamiprilPlacebo
Up to 24 weeks post-conversion15.215.9
Up to 52 weeks post-conversion19.628.6
Statistical analysis
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 1.0000 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.1115 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
SecondaryAbbreviated Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Weeks 12, 24, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL

Calculated in millimeters per minute per 1.73 square meters (mL/min/1.73m\^2). Age and corresponding creatinine at each visit (Weeks 12, 24, and 52) were used to calculate GFR.

Time frame:
12, 24, and 52 weeks following conversion
Reported as:
Mean · mL/min/1.73 m^2
Abbreviated Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Weeks 12, 24, and 52 Following Conversion to SRL
mL/min/1.73 m^2RamiprilPlacebo
Baseline (n=138,126)62.06 ± 14.0863.30 ± 15.64
Week 12 (n=125,122)64.91 ± 16.5466.58 ± 15.26
Week 24 (n=123,122)65.18 ± 17.9963.85 ± 16.49
Week 52 (n=128,115)64.17 ± 16.7963.41 ± 15.54
Statistical analysis
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.4933 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Adjusted ls mean difference: -0.86 · 95% CI -3.33 to 1.61Adjusted for baseline
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0888 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Adjusted ls mean difference: 2.48 · 95% CI -0.38 to 5.33Adjusted for baseline
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.1475 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Adjusted ls mean difference: 2.12 · 95% CI -0.75 to 4.99Adjusted for baseline
SecondaryFraction of Albumin (Milligrams Per Deciliter [mg/dL]) to Protein (mg/dL) in Urine at 24 and 52 Weeks After Conversion to SRL

Baseline fraction was the last value of the pre-SRL conversion period. Only the last value of U p/c or U alb/c was used for analysis if multiple measurements occurred in the same data anlysis interval. Fraction of albumin and protein was calculated only when urine protein was 6.2 mg/dL or higher. For urine albumin, if the value was reported as '\<xx.x', the numerical portion of the value was used in the calculation of fraction of albumin and protein.

Time frame:
24 weeks and 52 weeks after conversion
Reported as:
Mean · (mg/dL)/(mg/dL)
Fraction of Albumin (Milligrams Per Deciliter [mg/dL]) to Protein (mg/dL) in Urine at 24 and 52 Weeks After Conversion to SRL
(mg/dL)/(mg/dL)RamiprilPlacebo
Week 24 (n=104,110)0.19 ± 0.170.25 ± 0.19
Week 52 (n=111,105)0.22 ± 0.180.25 ± 0.20
Statistical analysis
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.1167 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Treatment ratio: 0.84 · 95% CI 0.68 to 1.04Treatment ratio (Ramipril/Placebo) in the geometric mean.
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.7519 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Treatment ratio: 1.04 · 95% CI 0.82 to 1.31Treatment ratio (Ramipril/Placebo) in the geometric mean.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Blood Pressure (BP) Values by Diastolic and Systolic BP Category

BP values of potential clinical importance were recorded and categorized as follows: diastolic BP (DBP) ≤50 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) or ≥110 mmHg and systolic BP (SBP) ≤90 mmHg and ≥180 mmHg. Data were summarized for the on-therapy period and the off-therapy period and for the pre-SRL period.

Time frame:
Baseline, Pre-SRL (from first dose of ramipril/placebo up to SRL conversion), On-Therapy (up to 52 weeks after SRL conversion), and Off-Therapy Period (up to 56 weeks after SRL conversion)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Important Blood Pressure (BP) Values by Diastolic and Systolic BP Category
percentage of participantsRamiprilPlacebo
Baseline, Low DBP ≤50 mmHg (n=155,140)0.00.7
Baseline, Low SBP: ≤90 mmHg (n=155,140)0.00.7
Pre-SRL, Low DBP: ≤50 mmHg (n=152,135)0.00.7
Pre-SRL, High DBP: ≥110 mmHg (n=152,135)0.01.5
Pre-SRL, Low SBP: ≤90 mmHg (n=152,135)0.00.7
Pre-SRL, High SBP: ≥180 mmHg (n=152,135)0.70.7
On Therapy, Low DBP: ≤50 mmHg (n=138,126)3.62.4
On Therapy, High DBP: ≥110 mmHg (n=138,126)0.01.6
On Therapy, Low SBP: ≤90 mmHg (n=138,126)3.64.0
On Therapy, High SBP: ≥180 mmHg (n=138,126)0.74.0
Off Therapy, High DBP ≥110 mmHg (n=35,69)2.91.4
Off Therapy, Low SBP: ≤90 mmHg (n=35,69)2.91.4
Statistical analysis
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.470 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.220 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.470 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 1.000 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.725 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.227 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 1.000 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.106 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 1.000 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 1.000 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.475 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.475 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
SecondarySRL Time-Normalized Trough Concentration (Cmin,TN) by Time Interval

Cmin,TN was determined for SRL using the area method for the intervals: 0-2 weeks, \>2-4 weeks, \>4-12 weeks, \>12-24 weeks, \>24-36 weeks and \>36-52 weeks using the equation:Cmin,TN = AUCi-j/timej-timeiwhere AUC is the area under the concentration-time curve, i is the beginning of the interval and j is the end of the interval. Cmin,TN was calculated for participants who did not dropout of studies, but were missing concentrations at the interval endpoints by carrying the last observed concentration forward to the interval endpoint.

Time frame:
From Day 1 of SRL conversion to 52 weeks after conversion
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
SRL Time-Normalized Trough Concentration (Cmin,TN) by Time Interval
ng/mLRamipril
0-2 weeks (n=258)9.853 ± 6.0250
>2-4 weeks (n=257)9.872 ± 4.1408
>4-12 weeks (n=256)9.273 ± 3.1763
>12-24 weeks (n=244)9.274 ± 2.8944
>24-36 weeks (n=226)9.316 ± 3.1535
>36-52 weeks (n=193)8.961 ± 2.9031
0-52 weeks (n=264)9.300 ± 2.2678
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Levels ≤100 Grams Per Liter (g/L)
Time frame:
Baseline, Pre-SRL (from first dose of ramipril/placebo up to SRL conversion), On-Therapy (up to 52 weeks after SRL conversion), and Off-Therapy Period (up to 56 weeks after SRL conversion)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Levels ≤100 Grams Per Liter (g/L)
percentage of participantsRamiprilPlacebo
Baseline (n=155,140)1.31.4
Pre-SRL (n=148,129)2.00.8
On-Therapy (n=138,124)17.412.1
Off-Therapy (n=33,34)9.12.9
Statistical analysis
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 1.000 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.626 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.297 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.356 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Using Red Blood Cell Production Stimulants (Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents [ESAs])
Time frame:
Baseline, Pre-SRL (from first dose of ramipril/placebo up to SRL conversion), On-Therapy (up to 52 weeks after SRL conversion), and Off-Therapy Period (up to 56 weeks after SRL conversion)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Using Red Blood Cell Production Stimulants (Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents [ESAs])
percentage of participantsRamiprilPlacebo
Baseline (n=155,140)5.81.4
Pre-SRL (n=155,140)4.50.7
On-Therapy (n=138,126)4.33.2
Off-Therapy (n=136,122)1.54.1
Statistical analysis
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.064 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.069 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.752 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.261 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Parameters (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at 4, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL

Parameters assessed included (all fasting) total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-densitylipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C).

Time frame:
4, 12, 24, and 52 weeks after conversion
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Parameters (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L]) at 4, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
mmol/LRamiprilPlacebo
TC, Week 4 (n=128,109)0.83 ± 0.060.91 ± 0.09
TC, Week 12 (n=115,108)0.94 ± 0.090.92 ± 0.10
TC, Week 24 (n=105,102)0.91 ± 0.120.87 ± 0.09
TC, Week 52 (n=94,79)0.84 ± 0.110.69 ± 0.12
HDL-C, Week 4 (n=125,107)0.06 ± 0.020.09 ± 0.03
HDL-C, Week 12 (n=114,104)0.03 ± 0.020.03 ± 0.02
HDL-C, Week 24 (n=102,100)0.07 ± 0.030.04 ± 0.03
HDL-C, Week 52 (n=92,78)0.12 ± 0.030.06 ± 0.04
LDL-C, Week 4 (n=123,100)0.59 ± 0.060.56 ± 0.07
LDL-C, Week 12 (n=109,96)0.66 ± 0.080.53 ± 0.08
LDL-C, Week 24 (n=96,95)0.66 ± 0.100.56 ± 0.08
LDL-C, Week 52 (n=90,73)0.56 ± 0.100.27 ± 0.09
Triglycerides, Week 4 (n=127,108)0.41 ± 0.070.65 ± 0.10
Triglycerides, Week 12 (n=114,107)0.59 ± 0.100.79 ± 0.11
Triglycerides, Week 24 (n=104,102)0.54 ± 0.110.72 ± 0.13
Triglycerides, Week 52 (n=93,77)0.44 ± 0.100.58 ± 0.14
Statistical analysis
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.381 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Difference in adjusted means: -0.09ANCOVA with treatment as a factor and baseline as a covariate
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.956 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Difference in adjusted means: 0.01ANCOVA with treatment as a factor and baseline as a covariate
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.903 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Difference in adjusted means: 0.02ANCOVA with treatment as a factor and baseline as a covariate
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.503 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Difference in adjusted means: 0.10ANCOVA with treatment as a factor and baseline as a covariate
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.451 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Difference in adjusted means: -0.03ANCOVA with treatment as a factor and baseline as a covariate
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.919 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Difference in adjusted means: -0.00ANCOVA with treatment as a factor and baseline as a covariate
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.637 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Difference in adjusted means: 0.02ANCOVA with treatment as a factor and baseline as a covariate
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.229 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Difference in adjusted means: 0.05ANCOVA with treatment as a factor and baseline as a covariate
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.766 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Difference in adjusted means: 0.03ANCOVA with treatment as a factor and baseline as a covariate
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.217 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Difference in adjusted means: 0.14ANCOVA with treatment as a factor and baseline as a covariate
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.457 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Difference in adjusted means: 0.10ANCOVA with treatment as a factor and baseline as a covariate
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.041 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Difference in adjusted means: 0.26ANCOVA with treatment as a factor and baseline as a covariate
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.044 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Difference in adjusted means: -0.25ANCOVA with treatment as a factor and baseline as a covariate
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.180 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Difference in adjusted means: -0.20ANCOVA with treatment as a factor and baseline as a covariate
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.264 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Difference in adjusted means: -0.19ANCOVA with treatment as a factor and baseline as a covariate
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.408 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Difference in adjusted means: -0.14ANCOVA with treatment as a factor and baseline as a covariate
SecondaryBiopsy-Confirmed Acute Rejection (BCAR) - Number of Participants With an Event

BCAR was defined according to updated Banff criteria (1997)for renal allograft rejection. The time to the first BCAR was defined as the date of first BCAR to the date of the first dose of SRL (in weeks). Participants without BCAR were censored at the time of withdrawal from the study.

Time frame:
From Day 1 of SRL conversion to 52 weeks after conversion
Reported as:
Number · participants
Biopsy-Confirmed Acute Rejection (BCAR) - Number of Participants With an Event
participantsRamiprilPlacebo
Biopsy-Confirmed Acute Rejection (BCAR) - Number of Participants With an Event135
Statistical analysis
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.0732 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity)) · Hazard ratio (hr): 2.487 · 95% CI 0.887 to 6.978Hazard ratio was based on the Cox proportional hazards model.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With First BCAR at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL

BCAR was defined according to updated Banff criteria (1997)for renal allograft rejection. Participants without BCAR were censored at the time of withdrawal from the study. Defined as the first BCAR occurring on therapy following conversion to SRL based on the mITT population. Time to first BCAR was defined as the date of first BCAR to date of the first dose of SRL (in weeks). Percentages were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for time to event data.

Time frame:
24 weeks and 52 weeks after conversion
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With First BCAR at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
percentage of participantsRamiprilPlacebo
24 weeks post-conversion8.0 (4.2 to 13.3)0.8 (0.1 to 4.0)
52 weeks post-conversion9.5 (5.3 to 15.1)3.2 (1.1 to 7.5)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With BCAR by Severity of First BCAR

Severity was summarized by type (antibody versus T-cell) and by phase: post-SRL (where both on-therapy and off-therapy events are included) and post-SRL (on-therapy). BCAR was categorized using Banff criteria as antibody-mediated (AM) or T-cell. AM BCAR severity was graded as Grade I (mild), Grade II (moderate \[mod\]), and Grade III (severe). T-cell BCAR severity was graded as 'Grade Ia, Ib (mild), Grade IIa, IIb (mod), and Grade III (severe). If a participant had both T-cell BCAR and antibody-mediated BCAR on the first rejection, the participant was counted in each category. For participants with T-cell BCAR (post-SRL and post-SRL On -Therapy) the p-value could not be calculated and all events were mild in severity.

Time frame:
From Day 1 of SRL conversion to 52 weeks after conversion
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With BCAR by Severity of First BCAR
participantsRamiprilPlacebo
Post-SRL, AM BCAR, Grade I (mild)12
Post-SRL, AM BCAR, Grade II (mod)01
Post-SRL, AM BCAR, Grade III (severe)01
Post-SRL, T-Cell BCAR, Grade I (mild)124
Post-SRL (On-Therapy), AM BCAR, Grade I (mild)11
Post-SRL (On-Therapy), AM BCAR, Grade II (mod)01
Post-SRL (On-Therapy), T-Cell BCAR, Grade I (mild)103
Statistical analysis
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.7165 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel row mean test
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.4795 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel row mean test
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Graft Loss at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL

Graft loss was defined as physical loss (nephrectomy orretransplantation), functional loss (requiring dialysis for ≥56days with no return of graft function), or death.

Time frame:
24 weeks and 52 weeks after conversion
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss at 24 and 52 Weeks Following Conversion to SRL
percentage of participantsRamiprilPlacebo
Week 240.00.0
Week 520.00.8
Statistical analysis
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.4773 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Using Statins
Time frame:
Baseline, Pre-SRL (from first dose of ramipril/placebo up to SRL conversion), On-Therapy (up to 52 weeks after SRL conversion), and Off-Therapy Period (up to 56 weeks after SRL conversion)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Using Statins
percentage of participantsRamiprilPlacebo
Baseline (n=155,140)45.836.4
Pre-SRL (n=155,140)45.240.0
On-Therapy (n=138,126)67.472.2
Off-Therapy (n=136,122)62.568.9
Statistical analysis
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.124 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.410 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.423 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.297 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With an Infection

Includes treatment-emergent adverse events based on categorization by the investigator as 'infection', regardless of the event preferred term in Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA.)

Time frame:
From Day 1 of Ramipril/Placebo to 52 weeks after SRL conversion
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With an Infection
percentage of participantsRamiprilPlacebo
Percentage of Participants With an Infection54.256.4
Statistical analysis
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.726 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Angioedema

Includes treatment-emergent adverse events based on categorization by the investigator as angioedema, regardless of the event preferred term in MedDRA.

Time frame:
From Day 1 of Ramipril/Placebo to 52 weeks after SRL conversion
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Angioedema
percentage of participantsRamiprilPlacebo
Percentage of Participants With Angioedema1.31.4
Statistical analysis
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 1.000 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Malignancy

Includes treatment-emergent adverse events based on categorization by the investigator as 'malignancy', regardless of the event preferredterm in MedDRA.

Time frame:
From Day 1 of Ramipril/Placebo to 52 weeks after SRL conversion
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Malignancy
percentage of participantsRamiprilPlacebo
Percentage of Participants With Malignancy3.92.9
Statistical analysis
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.753 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Hyperkalemia

Hyperkalemia defined as serum potassium \>5.6 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)

Time frame:
Baseline, Pre-SRL (from first dose of ramipril/placebo up to SRL conversion), On-Therapy (up to 52 weeks after SRL conversion), and Off-Therapy Period (up to 56 weeks after SRL conversion)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Hyperkalemia
percentage of participantsRamiprilPlacebo
Baseline (n=155,140)0.01.4
Pre-SRL (n=151,135)4.61.5
On-Therapy (n=138,124)0.71.6
Off-Therapy (n=34,36)2.90.0
Statistical analysis
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.224 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.179 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.604 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))
  • Ramipril vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.486 (2-sided p-value; alpha=0.05 (unadjusted for multiplicity))

Adverse events

Collected over Randomization through Week 52 following conversion to SRL. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Ramipril—50/155 (32.3%)134/155 (86.5%)
Placebo—39/140 (27.9%)123/140 (87.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 88
Most frequent serious events
EventRamiprilPlacebo
Transplant rejectionImmune system disorders11/1551/140
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders4/1552/140
PyrexiaGeneral disorders4/1550/140
CellulitisInfections and infestations4/1551/140
Kidney transplant rejectionImmune system disorders3/1553/140
Basal cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)3/1552/140
Squamous cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)3/1551/140
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders3/1550/140
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations3/1551/140
HeadacheNervous system disorders3/1550/140
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 36
Most frequent other events
EventRamiprilPlacebo
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders40/15537/140
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders27/15530/140
AcneSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders18/15525/140
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations27/15516/140
Blood creatinine increasedInvestigations24/15511/140
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders24/15514/140
DyslipidaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders14/15519/140
LeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders19/1556/140
HeadacheNervous system disorders19/15516/140
Mouth ulcerationGastrointestinal disorders12/15517/140

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)RamiprilPlaceboTotal
Mean46.8 ± 12.747.5 ± 12.947.1 ± 12.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)RamiprilPlaceboTotal
Female485098
Male10790197
08

Study locations

50 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Los Angeles, California 90033-4612, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    San Francisco, California 94115, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Denver, Colorado 80218, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Gainesville, Florida 32610, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Lexington, Kentucky 40536-0293, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Portland, Maine 04102, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Springfield, Massachusetts 01107, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Springfield, Massachusetts 01199, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Gosse Pointe, Michigan 48236, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Buffalo, New York 14215, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Valhalla, New York 10595, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17104, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102-1192, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Providence, Rhode Island 02903, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425-6290, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Capital Federal, Buenos Aires 1425, Argentina
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    San Martin, Buenos Aires 1650 CP, Argentina
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Buenos Aires, 1181, Argentina
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Cordoba, 5016, Argentina
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Córdoba, 5016, Argentina
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Brisbane, Queensland 4029, Australia
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    North Terrace, 5000, Australia
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Woodville South, SA 5011, Australia
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Linz, 4020, Austria
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21041-030, Brazil
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Porto Alegre, RS 90020-090, Brazil
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Porto Alegre, RS 90035-074, Brazil
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Sao Paulo, SP 01323-001, Brazil
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Sao Paulo, SP 01323-030, Brazil
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Sao Paulo, SP 04038-002, Brazil
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Sao Paulo, SP 04039-033, Brazil
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Montreal, Quebec H2L 4M1, Canada
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Erlangen, 91054, Germany
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Szeged, 6720, Hungary
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Petach Tikva, 49100, Israel
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Mexico City, 14000, Mexico
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Veracruz, 91700, Mexico
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Szczecin, 70-111, Poland
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Johannesburg, Gauteng 2193, South Africa
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Cape Town, Western Cape 7925, South Africa
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Cape Town, Western Cape 8001, South Africa
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Mandelbrot DA, Alberu J, Barama A, Marder BA, Silva HT Jr, Flechner SM, Flynn A, Healy C, Li H, Tortorici MA, Schulman SL. Effect of Ramipril on Urinary Protein Excretion in Maintenance Renal Transplant Patients Converted to Sirolimus. Am J Transplant. 2015 Dec;15(12):3174-84. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13384. Epub 2015 Jul 14. PubMed 26176342 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 27, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00502242
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 17, 2007
Start date
Dec 2007
Primary completion
Sep 2013
Completion
Sep 2013
Results posted
Aug 27, 2014
Last update
Aug 27, 2014

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion