CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00501085Updated Jan 19, 2015Results posted

LAP-BAND AP Early Experience Trial (APEX)

An observational study in Obesity, Morbid, sponsored by Apollo Endosurgery, Inc.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-01-19.

Sponsored by Apollo Endosurgery, Inc. · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
521
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the LAP-BAND AP System in severely obese patients.

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of this study was to collect additional information about the safety and effectiveness of the LAP-BAND AP System in a real-life clinical setting. Effectiveness was assessed through the collection of weight loss data, as well as other secondary effectiveness measurements. Safety was assessed by the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) related to treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity, Morbid

Browse trials for

03

In context

Obesity, Morbid

922 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity, Morbid; 172 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 521 is above the median of 78 across 306 observational studies indexed under Obesity, Morbid.

Browse Obesity, Morbid studies →

Lead sponsor

Apollo Endosurgery, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Community sample

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient is scheduled to receive the LAP-BAND AP System
  • Willingness to follow protocol requirements, including: the Informed Consent Form (ICF), Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) forms, follow-up schedule, completion of patient questionnaires.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Per the LAP-BAND AP System Directions For Use (DFU)
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
521 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • LAP-BAND

    Patients who receive the LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System.

    Device: LAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System

Interventions

  • DeviceLAP-BAND AP Adjustable Gastric Banding System

    Reduction of food intake due to creation of smaller stomach pouch.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Percent Excess Weight

    Subjects' Percent Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) from baseline over the 5 year period post LAP-BAND implantation was measured. Excess Weight = Baseline weight - Ideal weight, where ideal weight is based on a BMI of 25 kg/m2.

    Time frame: Baseline to 5 Years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Subject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND Implantation

    Subjects' Body Mass Index (BMI) was recorded at each follow-up visit for the 5 years after LAP-BAND implantation.

    Time frame: Baseline to 5 years

  2. Subject Reported Satiety

    Subjects rated their level of hunger, satiety after meals, and desire to eat at all follow-up visits. Level of hunger was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = not hungry at all to 5 = as hungry as I have ever felt. Satiety after meals was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = not at all full to 5 = as full as I have ever felt. Desire to eat was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = no desire at all to 5 = extremely strong desire.

    Time frame: Baseline to 5 Years

  3. Subject Reported Quality of Life

    Quality of Life was assessed using the Obesity and Weight-Loss Quality of Life Questionnaire (OWL-QOL-17). The OWL-QOL-17 is a survey of 17 questions, that rates quality of life on a scale of 0 (better) to 102 (lower).

    Time frame: Baseline to 5 Years

  4. Subject Reported Sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale)

    The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a questionnaire used to determine a subject's level of daytime sleepiness. Subjects rate his or her chances of dozing off in different situations, which are combined into a total ESS score that can vary between zero (low level of daytime sleepiness) and 24 (high level of daytime sleepiness).

    Time frame: Baseline to 5 years

07

Results

Posted Jan 19, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLAP-BAND
Started515
Completed83
Not completed432
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up195
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject34
Withdrew: Subject decision1
Withdrew: Revision surgery7
Withdrew: Explantation surgery26
Withdrew: Adverse event4
Withdrew: Non-compliance24
Withdrew: Study closed by sponsor109
Withdrew: Other loss to follow-up32

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Percent Excess Weight

Subjects' Percent Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) from baseline over the 5 year period post LAP-BAND implantation was measured. Excess Weight = Baseline weight - Ideal weight, where ideal weight is based on a BMI of 25 kg/m2.

Time frame:
Baseline to 5 Years
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of excess weight lost
Change in Percent Excess Weight
percentage of excess weight lostLAP-BAND
%EWL from baseline 48 Weeks Post-Surgery (n=402)-45.7 ± 21.26
%EWL from baseline 24 Months Post-Surgery (n=304)-50.8 ± 26.70
%EWL from baseline 36 Months Post-Surgery (n=226)-47.7 ± 30.21
%EWL from baseline 48 Months Post-Surgery (n=156)-46.5 ± 27.23
%EWL from baseline 60 Months Post-Surgery (n=84)-45.9 ± 26.80
SecondarySubject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND Implantation

Subjects' Body Mass Index (BMI) was recorded at each follow-up visit for the 5 years after LAP-BAND implantation.

Time frame:
Baseline to 5 years
Reported as:
Mean · kg/m2
Subject BMI From Baseline to 5 Years Post LAP-BAND Implantation
kg/m2LAP-BAND
BMI at 48 Weeks Post-Surgery (n=402)35.9 ± 6.39
BMI at 24 Months Post-Surgery (n=304)34.8 ± 6.49
BMI at 36 Months Post-Surgery (n=226)35.2 ± 6.98
BMI at 48 Months Post-Surgery (n=156)35.1 ± 6.20
BMI at 60 Months Post-Surgery (n=84)35.2 ± 6.49
SecondarySubject Reported Satiety

Subjects rated their level of hunger, satiety after meals, and desire to eat at all follow-up visits. Level of hunger was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = not hungry at all to 5 = as hungry as I have ever felt. Satiety after meals was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = not at all full to 5 = as full as I have ever felt. Desire to eat was rated using a 6-point scale: 0 = no desire at all to 5 = extremely strong desire.

Time frame:
Baseline to 5 Years
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Subject Reported Satiety
units on a scaleLAP-BAND
Level of Hunger at Baseline (n=487)2.1 ± 1.21
Level of Hunger at Month 60 (n=81)2.3 ± 1.18
Level of Fullness at Baseline (n=488)3.5 ± 1.19
Level of Fullness at Month 60 (n=81)3.3 ± 1.29
Level of Desire to Eat at Baseline (n=488)2.4 ± 1.19
Level of Desire to Eat at Month 60 (n=81)2.7 ± 1.19
SecondarySubject Reported Quality of Life

Quality of Life was assessed using the Obesity and Weight-Loss Quality of Life Questionnaire (OWL-QOL-17). The OWL-QOL-17 is a survey of 17 questions, that rates quality of life on a scale of 0 (better) to 102 (lower).

Time frame:
Baseline to 5 Years
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Subject Reported Quality of Life
units on a scaleLAP-BAND
OWL-QOL-17 Score at Baseline (n=496)69.8 ± 19.98
OWL-QOL-17 Score at Month 60 (n=74)34.5 ± 24.50
SecondarySubject Reported Sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale)

The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a questionnaire used to determine a subject's level of daytime sleepiness. Subjects rate his or her chances of dozing off in different situations, which are combined into a total ESS score that can vary between zero (low level of daytime sleepiness) and 24 (high level of daytime sleepiness).

Time frame:
Baseline to 5 years
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Subject Reported Sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale)
units on a scaleLAP-BAND
Reported Sleepiness at Baseline (n=498)8.0 ± 4.23
Reported Sleepiness at Month 60 (n=79)5.0 ± 3.21

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse Event information was collected from the time of LAP-BAND implantation to 5 years (end of study).. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
LAP-BAND—38/515 (7.4%)158/515 (30.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 22
Most frequent serious events
EventLAP-BAND
Band SlipSurgical and medical procedures15/515
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders5/515
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders4/515
Band erosionSurgical and medical procedures3/515
Band removalSurgical and medical procedures3/515
Fibrous Band ObstructionGeneral disorders2/515
DeathGeneral disorders1/515
Device MalfunctionGeneral disorders1/515
DysphagiaGastrointestinal disorders1/515
Gastric ErosionGastrointestinal disorders1/515
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 19
Most frequent other events
EventLAP-BAND
Vomiting/NauseaGastrointestinal disorders42/515
DysphagiaGastrointestinal disorders37/515
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)Gastrointestinal disorders13/515
Dilated Gastric PouchGastrointestinal disorders12/515
HeartburnGastrointestinal disorders11/515
Band too tightGeneral disorders9/515
Acid RefluxGastrointestinal disorders8/515
Increased RestrictionGastrointestinal disorders7/515
Pain at port siteGeneral disorders7/515
Flipped PortGeneral disorders6/515

Baseline characteristics

The analysis population is defined as the number of subjects who underwent treatment with the LAP-BAND System.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)LAP-BAND
Mean42.7 ± 10.89
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(years)LAP-BAND
Median Age42.7 (18.5 to 70.6)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)LAP-BAND
Female422
Male93
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)LAP-BAND
Asian0
Black52
Hispanic16
Caucasian443
Other (Native American or unspecified)3
Missing1
Baseline Weight
Baseline Weight(pounds (lbs))LAP-BAND
Mean273.9 ± 51.37
Body Mass Index (BMI) at Baseline
Body Mass Index (BMI) at Baseline(kg/m2)LAP-BAND
Mean44.0 ± 6.25
Baseline Excess Weight
Baseline Excess Weight(pounds (lbs))LAP-BAND
Mean118.7 ± 42.46
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Apollo Endosurgery
    Austin, Texas 78746, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ponce J, Taheri S, Lusco V, Cornell C, Ng-Mak DS, Shi R, Okerson T. Efficacy and safety of the adjustable gastric band - pooled interim analysis of the APEX and HERO studies at 48 weeks. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 May;30(5):841-8. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.874992. Epub 2014 Jan 16. PubMed 24328415 ↗
  • Fusco M, James S, Cornell C, Okerson T. Weight loss through adjustable gastric banding and improvement in daytime sleepiness: 2 year interim results of APEX study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 May;30(5):849-55. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.874991. Epub 2014 Jan 17. PubMed 24328387 ↗
  • Shayani V, Voellinger D, Liu C, Cornell C, Okerson T. Safety and efficacy of the LAP-BAND AP(R) adjustable gastric band in the treatment of obesity: results at 2 years. Postgrad Med. 2012 Jul;124(4):181-8. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2012.07.2561. PubMed 22913906 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 19, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00501085
Lead sponsor
Apollo Endosurgery, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 13, 2007
Start date
Jun 2007
Primary completion
Aug 2013
Completion
Nov 2013
Results posted
Jan 19, 2015
Last update
Jan 19, 2015

Study contacts

Apollo Endosurgery
study director · Apollo Endosurgery, Inc.
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion